Rationalizing Denominators

Similar documents
Step 2: Multiply both the numerator and the denominator. Remember that you can multiply numbers

Math 10 Lesson 1 4 Answers

Grade 7 Math Connects Suggested Course Outline for Schooling at Home 132 lessons

Grade 6 Math Connects Suggested Course Outline for Schooling at Home

Content Area Variations of Academic Language

6.041SC Probabilistic Systems Analysis and Applied Probability, Fall 2013 Transcript Lecture 3

Math Matters: Why Do I Need To Know This? 1 Logic Understanding the English language

Curriculum Guide for Pre-Algebra

In Alexandria mathematicians first began to develop algebra independent from geometry.

The Birthday Problem

Shahriar Shahriari William Polk Russell Professor of Mathematics. Pomona College Convocation 2010 August 31, 2010

The Rationale For This Web Site (As Seen Through the Eyes of Herb Gross)

Georgia Quality Core Curriculum

Estimating Irrational Roots

COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. Many centuries ago, in ancient Alexandria, an old man had to bury his son. Diophantus

We know that numbers are important in the natural world and

Houghton Mifflin MATHEMATICS

Torah Code Cluster Probabilities

Rational and Irrational Numbers 2

(Refer Slide Time 03:00)

Identifying Rational And Irrational Numbers

MITOCW ocw f99-lec18_300k

Review for Test III #1

MITOCW ocw f08-rec10_300k

Math 11 Final Exam Review Part 3 #1

Saint Bartholomew School Third Grade Curriculum Guide. Language Arts. Writing

McDougal Littell High School Math Program. correlated to. Oregon Mathematics Grade-Level Standards

Macmillan/McGraw-Hill SCIENCE: A CLOSER LOOK 2011, Grade 4 Correlated with Common Core State Standards, Grade 4

Grade 6 correlated to Illinois Learning Standards for Mathematics

Module 02 Lecture - 10 Inferential Statistics Single Sample Tests

Number, Part I of II

MITOCW Lec 2 MIT 6.042J Mathematics for Computer Science, Fall 2010

About QF101 Overview Careers for Quants Pre-U Math Takeaways. Introduction. Christopher Ting.

Artificial Intelligence Prof. Deepak Khemani Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Introduction to Quantitative Finance

Why Did Jesus Catch 153 Fish?

2.1 Review. 2.2 Inference and justifications

Summary of Research about Denominational Structure in the North American Division of the Seventh-day Adventist Church

Artificial Intelligence Prof. P. Dasgupta Department of Computer Science & Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

What Makes Someone s Life Go Best from Reasons and Persons by Derek Parfit (1984)

Responses to Respondents RESPONSE #1 Why I Reject Exegetical Conservatism

Macmillan/McGraw-Hill SCIENCE: A CLOSER LOOK 2011, Grade 3 Correlated with Common Core State Standards, Grade 3

Ramsey s belief > action > truth theory.

The Decline of the Traditional Church Choir: The Impact on the Church and Society. Dr Arthur Saunders

1. Show that f is a bijective

Pastoral Research Online

A romp through the foothills of logic Session 3

Over these many years of pastoring, leading and planting churches, I have labored and prayed for wisdom seeking to discover the right combination of

as well as positive and integral number. He proved the laws of exponents, which led to defining x 0, x -1,

There are various different versions of Newcomb s problem; but an intuitive presentation of the problem is very easy to give.

A note about the notion of exp 10 (log 10 (modulo 1))(x)

Olivia Howie May 8th, 2017 Math 10X Teaching Project Script INTRODUCTION

The St. Petersburg paradox & the two envelope paradox

Justice and the fair innings argument. Dr Tom Walker Queen s University Belfast

Now consider a verb - like is pretty. Does this also stand for something?

Youth. I didn t get to do as much as I wanted to, because my mother kept putting me out all the time, to play.

DO YOU KNOW THAT THE DIGITS HAVE AN END? Mohamed Ababou. Translated by: Nafissa Atlagh

NPTEL NPTEL ONLINE COURSES REINFORCEMENT LEARNING. UCB1 Explanation (UCB1)

Based on the translation by E. M. Edghill, with minor emendations by Daniel Kolak.

part one MACROSTRUCTURE Cambridge University Press X - A Theory of Argument Mark Vorobej Excerpt More information

Contradictory Information Can Be Better than Nothing The Example of the Two Firemen

On Interpretation. Section 1. Aristotle Translated by E. M. Edghill. Part 1

The following content is provided under a Creative Commons license. Your support

DISCUSSION PRACTICAL POLITICS AND PHILOSOPHICAL INQUIRY: A NOTE

David Ethics Bites is a series of interviews on applied ethics, produced in association with The Open University.

[Slide 1] Empty Nesters Series Outline: Generational Lift vs. Generational Drift. Theme Scripture: 2 Peter 1: The Gray Zone.

I thought I should expand this population approach somewhat: P t = P0e is the equation which describes population growth.

BBC LEARNING ENGLISH 6 Minute English Why did Singapore ban gum?

Prompt: Explain van Inwagen s consequence argument. Describe what you think is the best response

The paradox we re discussing today is not a single argument, but a family of arguments. Here s an example of this sort of argument:!

The Paradox of the stone and two concepts of omnipotence

2.3. Failed proofs and counterexamples

Midterm Review. Intermediate Algebra / MAT135 S2014 test (Mr. Porter)

SEVENTH GRADE RELIGION

B. C. Johnson. General Problem

Pascal (print-only) Page 1 of 6 11/3/2014 Blaise Pascal Born: 19 June 1623 in Clermont

C. H. Howard To: Mrs. E. Gilmore

Marcel Sarot Utrecht University Utrecht, The Netherlands NL-3508 TC. Introduction

ORDINAL GENESIS 1:1/JOHN 1:1 TRIANGLE (Part 1)

John Napier: A Man of Invention. Marisela Guerrero. El Paso Community College

Friends and strangers

A Good Shepherd Sacred Story

Methods of Proof for Boolean Logic

MISSOURI S FRAMEWORK FOR CURRICULAR DEVELOPMENT IN MATH TOPIC I: PROBLEM SOLVING

III Knowledge is true belief based on argument. Plato, Theaetetus, 201 c-d Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Edmund Gettier

Vedic Mathematics By Bharati Krsna Tirthaji, V. S. Agrawala

A CONSEQUENTIALIST RESPONSE TO THE DEMANDINGNESS OBJECTION Nicholas R. Baker, Lee University THE DEMANDS OF ACT CONSEQUENTIALISM

A multi-generational church with a next-generation ministry.

Critical Thinking - Section 1

Let Your Church Grow. by Richard Varnell

Inference in Cyc. This is the final lesson in the Inference Tutorial. It will focus on microtheories and forward/backward inference.

Rationalism in Contemporary American Culture Julia Snyder Saint Vincent College

What are Truth-Tables and What Are They For?

SUMMARY COMPARISON of 6 th grade Math texts approved for 2007 local Texas adoption

Anselm s Equivocation. By David Johnson. In an interview for The Atheism Tapes, from the BBC, philosopher Colin McGinn briefly

The Debate Between Evolution and Intelligent Design Rick Garlikov

The following content is provided under a Creative Commons license. Your support

Module 5. Knowledge Representation and Logic (Propositional Logic) Version 2 CSE IIT, Kharagpur

Scientific Progress, Verisimilitude, and Evidence

The paradox we re discussing today is not a single argument, but a family of arguments. Here are some examples of this sort of argument:

Transcription:

Solver9 Rationalizing Denominators Get that pesky radical OUT of my denominator John Reece 7//00

What does Rationalize the Denominator mean? It means to change a fraction, without changing its value, so that any irrational or complex numbers in the denominator of the fraction become rational numbers. For example, is a fraction with an irrational number in the denominator, whereas is an equivalent number, but with a rational number denominator. Before the invention of readily accessible calculators, when people did calculations by hand, sometimes supported by logarithm tables or by a slide rule, it was much easier to calculate the numerical approximation of a number such as than it would be to calculate the value of. mathematicians have decreed that numbers with rational denominators are simpler than numbers with irrational denominators. Hence, by convention, mathematicians have, in general, decreed that numbers with rational denominators are simpler than those with irrational denominators. Notice that the convention is qualified with the phrase in general. That is because there are situations, albeit infrequent, when you may not want to rationalize the denominator, or perhaps even rationalize a numerator at the expense of an irrational denominator. However, in the vast majority of cases, you will be either asked or required to perform the process of rationalizing denominators.

Rationalizing a monomial denominator. The simplest situation is that illustrated in the example given above where the denominator consists of a single radical term. The process of rationalizing the denominator makes use of the definition of the radical symbol and the concept of the multiplicative identity. Definition of the Radical Symbol: Multiplicative Inverse: y x y x a, a 0, such that a a a Multiplicative Identity: a, I such that a I a So how do we apply these ideas to a number that looks like: and alter it so that it retains its current value, yet has a rational number for a denominator? by The definition of the radical symbol tells us that if we multiply the denominator that we will end up with, a rational number, in our denominator. The idea of a multiplicative inverse tells us that if we multiply the value that we need to get rid of the radical in the denominator by we will have a multiplier of, and then the idea of the multiplicative identity guarantees that using this multiplier will not change the value of our original fraction. is the required multiplication simply proceed as in multiplying any other fractions, numerator times numerator and denominator times denominator:

And the task is complete. Rationalizing a binomial denominator. This is a bit trickier involving a fractional expression where the denominator consists of two terms at least one of which is a radical. Example: If we try the method of the previous section, that is to multiply by a factor of the denominator divided by itself, we won t get any closer to our goal of eliminating the radical in our original denominator. Here s why: 4 4 7 4 We still have a radical in the denominator! Obviously, we need a different strategy. The strategy to solve this type of problem involves the concept of a conjugate binomial. The conjugate of any binomial is simply the binomial with the sign between the two terms reversed. For example, a band a bare conjugates. The important property of conjugates is that when you multiply them, you get the difference of two squares. a b a b a b Ah ha! This looks promising. If we multiply our two-term denominator by its conjugate, we can get rid of the original radical without introducing a new one. 4 Much better. Of course, we need to consider the multiplicative identity and multiply our original fraction by, but this time in terms of the conjugate of the denominator divided by itself: Whoa! We got rid of the denominator altogether swwwwweet!

Rationalizing a monomial denominator with index >. Ok, we have handled monomial and binomial denominators with square roots, but what about higher order roots, i.e. cube roots or 4 th roots and such? 4 5 If we simply multiply by the denominator divided by the denominator, we are out of luck again. 4 4 4 5 5 5 means to take the 4 th root of something. and we still have a radical. Let s look at what it 4 4 y x y x and bye- 4 But notice that y y y, so that means if I multiply bye you nasty old radical. Which leads us to the solution: 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 And that s all I have to say about that. Rationalizing a complex denominator. A complex denominator is one that is of the form a biwhere a and b are real numbers and i is the imaginary number defined by i. Example: 5 i Again, we need to return to our concept of the conjugate. Complex conjugates are formed the same way any other binomial conjugates are formed; just change the sign on the imaginary part coefficient. For the example: 5 i 5 0i 5 0i i i 9 ( )(4) The only trick is to remember thati.

Conclusion: This tutorial reference deals with the sorts of situations that are typically encountered in Algebra I and II, Trigonometry, Pre-Calculus, and most, if not all, of Calculus, but is not intended to be an exhaustive treatment of the subject. If you have a situation not covered in this tutorial, by all means ask a question on the Q&A board. Solver9 reecejo on Google s mail service.