Sentence Starters from They Say, I Say

Similar documents
Index of Templates from They Say, I Say by Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstein. Introducing What They Say. Introducing Standard Views

Templates for Research Paper

Templates for Writing about Ideas and Research

ACADEMIC SKILLS PROGRAM STUDENT SERVICES AND DEVELOPMENT

THEY SAY: Discussing what the sources are saying

Some Transition Words and Phrases

Templates for Introducing Standard Views (what everybody thinks) Templates for Making what they say something you Say

BASIC SENTENCE PATTERNS

Thesis Statements. (and their purposes)

AND YET. IF GOOD ACADEMIC writing involves putting yourself into dialogue with others, it DETERMINE WHO IS SAYING WHAT IN THE TEXTS YOU READ

Study Guide: Academic Writing

Three Ways to Respond

Language Supports for Argument Writing

Halliday and Hasan in Cohesion in English (1976) see text connectedness realized by:

Writing the Persuasive Essay

Does the Skeptic Win? A Defense of Moore. I. Moorean Methodology. In A Proof of the External World, Moore argues as follows:

The Critical Mind is A Questioning Mind

! Prep Writing Persuasive Essay

Relativism and Subjectivism. The Denial of Objective Ethical Standards

Ask Yourself: Which points have the best supporting information? For which points can I make the best case? In which points am I most interested?

Note: This is the penultimate draft of an article the final and definitive version of which is

40 Useful Words and Phrases for Top-Notch Essays

Overview: Application: What to Avoid:

Marcel Sarot Utrecht University Utrecht, The Netherlands NL-3508 TC. Introduction

Who or what is God?, asks John Hick (Hick 2009). A theist might answer: God is an infinite person, or at least an

a0rxh/ On Van Inwagen s Argument Against the Doctrine of Arbitrary Undetached Parts WESLEY H. BRONSON Princeton University

THE REFORMED ROAD AND THE SIGNIFICANCE SUPRALAPSARIANISM FOR CALVINISM

Human Nature & Human Diversity: Sex, Love & Parenting; Morality, Religion & Race. Course Description

Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me?

Reply to Kit Fine. Theodore Sider July 19, 2013

Questioning Contextualism Brian Weatherson, Cornell University references etc incomplete

Ayer and Quine on the a priori

Adapted from The Academic Essay: A Brief Anatomy, for the Writing Center at Harvard University by Gordon Harvey. Counter-Argument

Philosophy of Religion 21: (1987).,, 9 Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht - Printed in the Nethenanas

[JGRChJ 9 (2013) R28-R32] BOOK REVIEW

Commentary on Sample Test (May 2005)

What God Could Have Made

The Qualiafications (or Lack Thereof) of Epiphenomenal Qualia

What is the "Social" in "Social Coherence?" Commentary on Nelson Tebbe's Religious Freedom in an Egalitarian Age

Science and Religion: Exploring the Spectrum

Essay Discuss Both Sides and Give your Opinion

WHAT IS HUME S FORK? Certainty does not exist in science.

PART FOUR: CATHOLIC HERMENEUTICS

5 A Modal Version of the

Topics and Activities for Critical Response

From They Say/I Say: The Moves that Matter in Academic Writing Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstein Prediction:

1/9. Locke on Abstraction

The Non-Identity Problem from Reasons and Persons by Derek Parfit (1984)

[AJPS 5:2 (2002), pp ]

Responses to Respondents RESPONSE #1 Why I Reject Exegetical Conservatism

Goheen, Michael. A Light to the Nations: The Missional Church and the Biblical Story. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2011.

Theory of Knowledge. 5. That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. (Christopher Hitchens). Do you agree?

The Social Nature in John Stuart Mill s Utilitarianism. Helena Snopek. Vancouver Island University. Faculty Sponsor: Dr.

PHI 1700: Global Ethics

The Answer from Science

1/10. Space and Time in Leibniz and Newton (1)

Multi-Paragraph Essay

Epistemic Contextualism as a Theory of Primary Speaker Meaning

Why is life on Earth so incredibly diverse yet so strangely similar? Similarities among Diverse Forms. Diversity among Similar Forms

PLATO: PLATO CRITICIZES HIS OWN THEORY OF FORMS, AND THEN ARGUES FOR THE FORMS NONETHELESS (PARMENIDES)

what makes reasons sufficient?

Phenomenal Knowledge, Dualism, and Dreams Jesse Butler, University of Central Arkansas

introduction Entering the Conversation

HOW TO BE (AND HOW NOT TO BE) A NORMATIVE REALIST:

Newbigin, Lesslie. The Open Secret: An Introduction to the Theology of Mission. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, Kindle E-book.

3. Detail Example from Text this is directly is where you provide evidence for your opinion in the topic sentence.

Introduction. Framing the Debate. Dr. Brent Royuk is Professor of Physics Concordia University, Nebraska.

-- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text.

In his book Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong, J. L. Mackie agues against

Direct Realism and the Brain-in-a-Vat Argument by Michael Huemer (2000)

Naturalism and is Opponents

Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics. Critical Thinking Lecture 2. Background Material for the Exercise on Inference Indicators

10 CERTAINTY G.E. MOORE: SELECTED WRITINGS

Take Home Exam #2. PHI 1700: Global Ethics Prof. Lauren R. Alpert

Writing Module Three: Five Essential Parts of Argument Cain Project (2008)

Well-Being, Time, and Dementia. Jennifer Hawkins. University of Toronto

Anthony P. Andres. The Place of Conversion in Aristotelian Logic. Anthony P. Andres

AN OUTLINE OF CRITICAL THINKING

REPLY TO LUDLOW Thomas M. Crisp. Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 1 (2004): 37-46

Teacher-Minister Contract

Kihyun Lee (Department of Philosophy, Seoul National University)

Prentice Hall U.S. History Modern America 2013

KANT S EXPLANATION OF THE NECESSITY OF GEOMETRICAL TRUTHS. John Watling

Darwinist Arguments Against Intelligent Design Illogical and Misleading

PHILOSOPHY 5340 EPISTEMOLOGY

BOOK REVIEW: Gideon Yaffee, Manifest Activity: Thomas Reid s Theory of Action

2 FREE CHOICE The heretical thesis of Hobbes is the orthodox position today. So much is this the case that most of the contemporary literature

Selections from Aristotle s Prior Analytics 41a21 41b5

Against the Vagueness Argument TUOMAS E. TAHKO ABSTRACT

The Kripkenstein Paradox and the Private World. In his paper, Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Languages, Kripke expands upon a conclusion

PHENOMENAL LANGUAGE ACCORDINGTO DR. BERNARD RAMM

Aquinas' Third Way Modalized

World-Wide Ethics. Chapter Two. Cultural Relativism

Choosing Rationally and Choosing Correctly *

Review of Ontology and the Ambitions of Metaphysics by Thomas Hofweber Billy Dunaway University of Missouri St Louis

4/30/2010 cforum :: Moderator Control Panel

John Benjamins Publishing Company

Qualitative and quantitative inference to the best theory. reply to iikka Niiniluoto Kuipers, Theodorus

The Question of Metaphysics

part one MACROSTRUCTURE Cambridge University Press X - A Theory of Argument Mark Vorobej Excerpt More information

Transcription:

Sentence Starters from They Say, I Say Introducing What They Say A number of have recently suggested that. It has become common today to dismiss. In their recent work, Y and Z have offered harsh critiques of for. Introducing Standard Views Americans today tend to believe that. Conventional wisdom has it that. Common sense seems to dictate that. The standard way of thinking about topic X has it that. It is often said that. My whole life I have heard it said that. You would think that. Many people assume that. Making What They Say Something You Say I ve always believed that. When I was a child, I used to think that. Although I should know better by now, I cannot help thinking that. At the same time I believe, I also believe. Introducing Something Implied or Assumed Although none of them have ever said so directly, my teachers have often given me the impression that. One implication of X s treatment of is that. Although X does not say so directly, she apparently assumes that. While they rarely admit as much, often take for granted that. Introducing an Ongoing Debate In discussions of X, one controversial topic has been. On the one hand, argues. On the other hand, contends. Others even maintain. My own view is. When it comes to the topic of, most of us will readily agree that. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of. Whereas some are convinced that others maintain that. In conclusion, then, as I suggested earlier, defenders of can t have it both ways. Their assertion that is contradicted by their claim that. Capturing Authorial Action X acknowledges that. X agrees that. X argues that. X believes that. X denies/does not deny that. X claims that. X concedes that. X demonstrates that. X deplores the tendency to. X celebrates the fact that. X emphasizes that. X complains that. Agreeing With a Difference I agree that because my experience confirms it. X surely is right about because, as she may not be aware, recent studies have shown that.

X s theory of is extremely useful because it sheds insight on the difficult problem of. Those unfamiliar with this school of thought may be interested to know that it basically boils down to. I agree that, a point that needs emphasizing since so many people believe. If group X is right that, as I think they are, then we need to reassess the popular assumption that. Agreeing and Disagreeing Simultaneously Although I agree with X up to a point, I cannot accept his overall conclusion that. Although I disagree with much that X says, I fully endorse his final conclusion that. Though I concede that, I still insist that. Whereas X provides ample evidence that, Y and Z s research on and convince me that instead. X is right that, but she seems on more dubious ground when she claims that. While X is probably wrong when she claims that, she is right that. I m of two minds about X s claim that. On the one hand, I agree that. On the other hand, I m not sure if. My feelings on the issue are mixed. I do support X s position that, but I find Y s argument about and Z s research on to be equally persuasive. Signaling who is saying what X argues. According to both X and Y,. Politicians, X argues, should. Most athletes will tell you that. My own view, however, is that. I agree, as X may not realize, that. But are real and, arguably, the most significant factor in. But X is wrong that. However, it is simply not true that. Indeed, it is highly likely that. X s assertion that does not fit the facts. X is right that. X is wrong that. X is both right and wrong that. Yet a sober analysis of the matter reveals. Nevertheless, new research shows. Anyone familiar with should agree that. Embedding voice markers X overlooks what I consider an important point about. My own view is that what X insists is a is in fact a. I wholeheartedly endorse what X calls. These conclusions, which X discusses in, add weight to the argument that. Entertaining objections At this point I would like to raise some objections that have been inspired by the skeptic in me. She feels that I have been ignoring., she says to me,. Yet some readers may challenge the view that. Of course, many will probably disagree with this assertion that. Naming your naysayers Here many feminist would probably object that. But social Darwinists would certainly take issue with the argument that.

Biologists, of course, they want to question whether. Nevertheless, both followers and critics of Malcolm X will probably argue that. Although not all Christians think alike, some of them will probably dispute my claim that. Non-native English speakers are so diverse in their views that it s hard to generalize about them, but some are likely to object on the grounds that. Introducing objections informally But is my proposal realistic? What are the chances of its actually being adopted? Yet is it always true that? Is it always the case, as I ve been suggesting, that? However, does the evidence I ve cited prove conclusively that? Impossible, some will say. You must be reading the research selectively. Making concessions while still standing your ground Although I grant that, I still maintain that. Proponents of X are right to argue that. But they exaggerate when they claim that. While it is true that, it does not necessarily follow that. On the one hand, I agree with X that. But on the other hand, I still insist that. Indicating who cares used to think. The recently [or within the past few decades] suggest that. These findings challenge the work of earlier researchers, who tended to assume that. Recent studies like the shed new light on, which previous studies had not addressed. Researchers had long assumed that. For instance, one eminent scholar of cell biology,, assumed in, her seminal work on cell structures and functions, that fat cells. As herself put it, " " (2007). Another leading scientist,, argued that fat cells (2006). Ultimately, when it came to the nature of fat, the basic assumption was that. But a new body of research shows that fat cells are far more complex and that. If sports enthusiasts stop to think about it, many of them might simply assume that the most successful athletes. However, new research shows. These findings challenge neoliberals common assumptions that. At first glance, teenagers appeared to. But on closer inspection. Establishing why your claims matter X matters/is important because. Although X may seem trivial, it is in fact crucial in terms of today s concern over. Ultimately, what is at stake here is. These findings have important consequences for the broader domain of. My discussion of X is in fact addressing the larger matter of. These conclusions/this discovery will have significant applications in as well as in. Although X may seem of concern to only a small group of, it should in fact concern anyone who cares about. Adding meta-commentary In other words,. What really means by this is. Ultimately, my goal is to demonstrate that. My point is not, but. To put it another way,. In sum, then,. My conclusion, then, is that,. In short,.

What is more important,. Incidentally,. By the way,. Chapter 2 explores, while chapter 3 examines. Having just argued that, let us now turn our attention to. Although some readers may object that, I would answer that. Comparing two or more studies findings Our data support/confirm/verify the work of X by showing that. By demonstrating, X s work extends the findings of Y. The results of X contradict/refute Y s conclusion that. X s findings call into question the widely accepted theory that. Our data are consistent with X s hypothesis that. Explaining an experimental result One explanation for X s finding a is that. An alternative explanation is. The difference between and is probably due to. Introducing gaps in the existing research Studies of X have indicated. It is not clear, however, that this conclusion applies to. often take for granted that. You have investigated this assumption, however. X s work tells us a great deal about. Can this work be generalized to? Transitions Cause and Effect Accordingly, since, as a result, so, consequently, then, hence, therefore, thus and it follows, then Conclusion As a result, so, consequently, the upshot of all of this is that, hence, therefore, thus, to sum up, to summarize and in conclusion, then Comparison Along the same lines, likewise, in the same way and similarly Contrast Although, but, nevertheless, on the contrary, on the other hand, regardless, whereas, conversely, despite, even though, however, in contrast, white and yet Addition Also, and, besides, furthermore, in fact, indeed, moreover, so too and in addition Concession Admittedly, although it is true that, granted, of course, naturally, to be sure and I concede that Example After all, as an illustration, consider, for instance, specifically, for example and to take a case in point Elaboration

Actually, by extension, in short, that is, in other words, to put it another way, to put it bluntly, to put it succinctly and ultimately