Fall Meeting 2006 Report from the Stephen J. Patterson, Chair, Steering Committee Did Christianity begin with the resurrection? No. Did Christianity begin with Pentecost? No. Did it begin with Paul, then? No. Did it begin with Jesus? No. As the first meeting of the unfolded it soon became apparent that the search for the beginnings of Christianity might turn out to be every bit as elusive as the quest for Jesus himself. In the first session of the new seminar, fellows began by testing the proposition, favored by many theologians Ballot One Did Christianity Begin with Resurrection? Daniel A. Smith/Joe Bessler-Northcutt Q1 Christianity began with the resurrection of Jesus. (Basic Proposition).08 Black 0 3 16 81.18 Black 4 5 30 60 Q2 It is impossible to imagine the emergence of Christian faith following Jesus death without positing the physical resurrection of Jesus. (Smith) Q3 Resurrection is the centeral claim of all forms of early Christian faith. (Smith) Q4 Claims about Jesus resurrection, translation, ascension, or other forms of divine vindication were expressions of faith in Jesus, but not the origin of that faith. (Smith/Bessler-Northcutt) Q5 Since Jesus words and deeds were not primarily self-referential, his personal demise at the hands of the Romans would not have constituted a crisis of faith for his friends and followers. (Bessler-Northcutt) Q6 In Christian theology, the resurrection has functioned to authorize Christian faith and practice by connecting it to the transcendent world, not as an account of how Christianity began. (Bessler-Northcutt) Q7 Christianity began as a movement within Judaism; it would not later, after the first generation of Jesus followers had passed from the scene. (General Issue) Q8 Resurrection is the central claim of some forms of early Christian faith. Q9 Resurrection is the central claim of many forms of early Christian faith..09 Black 3 0 16 81.21 Black 7 12 20 61.02 Black 0 0 6 94.09 Black 1 5 12 81.85 Red 58 39 3 0.79 Red 48 42 7 3.56 Pink 26 29 32 13.53 Pink 18 38 27 16.82 Red 52 42 6 0.76 Red 44 43 10 3.84 Red 67 27 0 7.85 Red 60 36 04 0.87 Red 71 18 11 0.84 Red 60 35 3 2.70 Pink 37 37 26 0.59 Pink 17 48 30 5 16
of the twentieth century, that Christianity began with the resurrection. More recently, scholars like N.T. Wright and James Dunn have argued that, apart the physical resurrection of Jesus, it is scarcely possible to imagine the continuation of the movement Jesus created. His death would have constituted a crisis of faith of insurmountable proportions. But the of the seminar roundly rejected these ideas. Responding positively to position papers by Daniel Smith of Western Ontario University and Joe Bessler-Nothcutt of Phillips Seminary in Tulsa, they agreed that resurrection claims were a way for early followers of Jesus to express their faith in him, but were not the origin of that faith. Moreover, they agreed that Jesus preaching was not focused primarily on himself say, his status as messiah or Son of God. He spoke, rather, of a new kingdom or empire of God, as a way of life to be pursued. His death, then, would have been understood not as the embarrassing defeat of a failed messiah, but as the noble death of a martyr who died in devotion to the cause he espoused, the kingdom of God. If this was so, then his death, far from creating a crisis of faith, might well have given the Jesus movement new energy, a phenomenon often associated with the death of a hero. The claim that Jesus was raised from the dead could well have originated among those who regarded Jesus as a martyr to the cause and purposes of God. In the next session, took up a central feature in the story of Christian beginnings, the miraculous event of Pentecost, as depicted in Acts 2, where dozens of followers of Jesus suddenly begin to speak in foreign languages, so that those gathered from distant lands can all hear the gospel in their own tongue. Following the lead of position papers offered by Shelly Matthews of Furman University and Todd Penner of Austin College, the endorsed the position of most critical scholars studying Acts today, that the story of Pentecost was created by Luke (the author of Acts) in an effort to write a story of Christian origins that would inspire his readers to emulate the great deeds of founder figures like Peter, Stephen, and Paul. agreed that charismatic gifts like glossalalia (speaking in tongues) were common among the first Christians. But they also recognized that Luke s account in Acts 2 is a highly stylized and circumscribed presentation of that phenomenon. For example, one may infer from Paul s references to glossalalia in First Corinthians that this was phenomenon that involved both men and women, and perhaps even slaves. But Matthews called attention to the fact that, in Luke s story of Pentecost, women and slaves are not among the prophets. A vestige of the older tradition may still be seen in the prophecy from Joel preserved in the traditional speech of Peter in Acts 2:17-21. But in Luke s story all the lead characters are men. agreed with Matthews, that the resulting heroic narrative was designed to appeal to elite Roman men, and to create a Christian story in which they would feel at home and important. On the second day of the Seminar the focused on Paul. Did Paul create Christianity, as Nietzsche famously argued a view common among nineteenthcentury scholars as well? The assertion implies that Paul did not really understand or accept the simple views of Jesus and the Jesus movement, and so Jesus death, far from created the complex theology we have creating a crisis of faith, come to know as Christianity today. But it turns out that this old hypothesis no might well have given the longer commands the assent of scholars. To the propositions, Paul was the Jesus movement new energy. founder of Christianity and Paul was intent on constructing a new religion the agreed with the recommendation of Arthur Dewey of Xavier University, and voiced a resounding no. Instead, they generally embraced a growing consensus among contemporary scholars that places Paul closer to the views of Jesus and the early Jesus movement. While dividing over the controversial issue of Paul s view of women the texts involved are of questionable authenticity they tended to endorse the position that like Jesus, Paul was a dissident voice in his culture, and advocated a community life in which differences in social rank and ethnicity were to be overcome. In this session also considered the question of when Christianity would have been recognizable as a new and distinct religion in the ancient world. They agreed overwhelmingly with the proposition, Christianity began as a movement among Jews; it would not become 17
Ballot Two /Acts Seminar Did Christianity Begin with Pentecost? Shelly Matthews/Todd Penner Q1 Christianity began with the evenst of Pentecost described in Acts 2. (Basic proposition) Q7 Christianity began as a movement within Judaism; it would not later, after the first generation of Jesus followers had passed from the scene. (General Issue) Q3 Like other ancient writers, the author of Acts is concerned primarily with the establishment of the character or ethos of the group when he utilizes the motif of beginnings. (Penner) Q4 The motif of xenoglossy in Acts 2 functions rhetorically to display numinous power in this birthing moment without necessary connection to any actual early Christian charismatic experiences. (Penner) Q5 Charismata such as tongues and prophecy were significant aspects of early Christian experience. (Matthews) Q6 The authority of slaves and women to speak for God was bound up with the question of the legitimacy of spiritual gifts. (Matthews) Q7 Luke s efforts to write history suitable for Theophilus required that he erase the agency and contributions of slaves and women from his historical narrative. (Matthews) Q8 Elite male privilege is one of the essential building blocks of the Christianity Luke attempts to construct. (Matthews) Q9 A totalizing vision, modeled on the Roman quest for world domination, is one of the essential building blocks of the Christianity Luke attempts to construct. (Matthews) Q10 While he did not have precise language to describe the split he imagines, Luke asserted that his social group was distinct from the Jews. (Matthews) Q11 The fusion of the categories morally depraved and non-believing Jew is one of the essential building blocks of the Christianity Luke attempts to construct. (Matthews).02 Black 0 0 7 93.15 Black 4 7 21 68.84 Red 59 37 0 4.75 Red 44 40 14 2.76 Red 43 46 7 4.72 Pink 36 48 13 4.71 Pink 36 50 7 7.64 Pink 32 38 21 9.79 Red 54 32 11 4.61 Pink 29 32 32 7.77 Red 43 50 4 4.64 Pink 30 43 19 9.70 Pink 28 55 17 0.66 Pink 29 45 19 7.78 Red 52 34 10 3.67 Pink 43 28 17 12.78 Red 48 41 7 3.69 Pink 42 32 16 10.80 Red 45 52 3 0.74 Pink 38 51 6 6.72 Pink 34 52 10 3.65 Pink 33 37 20 9 18
Ballot Four Did Christianity Begin with Paul? Arthur J. Dewey Q1 Paul argues for communal practice that recognizes and affirms difference. Q2 What was at stake for Paul was the re-envisioning of the basic categories of social life. Q3 This vision countered the gospel of the Empire. Q4 The perspective of the historical Paul was greatly lost or revised by later tradition. Q5 Paul was the founder of Christianity. Q6 The historical Paul was intent on constructing a new religion. Q7 Paul argues for communal practice that recognizes and affirms some difference. Q8 Christianity began as a movement among Jews. It would not later, after the first generation of Jews followers had passed from the scene..61 Pink 40 13 37 10.59 Pink 24 41 22 13.66 Pink 30 40 27 3.72 Pink 37 44 17 2.83 Red 67 20 10 3.87 Red 63 35 0 2.90 Red 73 23 3 0.82 Red 57 38 0 6.07 Black 0 3 13 83.19 Black 11 4 18 67.09 Black 0 3 20 77.29 Gray 9 15 28 47.86 Red 62 34 3 0.86 Red 69 20 10 0.88 Red 77 17 0 7.87 Red 76 16 2 6 recognizable as a distinct new religion until many years later.... Exactly how much later was left open for further investigation. Nevertheless, to speak of Christianity in the generation following Jesus death was quickly recognized as an anachronism, and struggled to arrive at language that would correctly characterize the situation. In the final session the considered the proposition: Christianity began with Jesus. Throughout the twentieth century it was a theological commonplace to regard Jesus and his ideas as the presupposition to Christian faith, but not central to that faith itself. Christian faith was not the faith of Jesus, but faith in Jesus. Testing this older idea produced one of the most lively and contentious discussions of the weekend. The rejected the simple proposition that Christianity began with Jesus, but also seemed to reject the older notion that Christian faith was necessarily faith in Jesus. They endorsed, by a very narrow margin, the thesis presented in a posthumous paper by Robert W. Funk, the founder and first chair of the Jesus Seminar, that Christianity began when Jesus used 19
Ballot Five Did Christianity Begin with Jesus? Robert W. Funk/Brandon Scott Philip E. Devinish Q1 Christianity began with Jesus. (Basic Proposition) Q2 Christian experience, or faith, began when some people encountered Jesus positively as ultimaately decisive for their lives. (Devenish) Q3 Christian witness began with the Jesus-kerygma (i.e., the re-presented words and deeds of Jesus), not the Christ-kerygma (i.e., confessional claims made about Jesus person). (Devenish/Funk) Q4 Christianity began when Jesus used imaginative language to call into question his received life world in favor of the life world that emerges in his parables and aphorisms. (Funk) Q5 Christianity began when the followers of Jesus adjusted the Jesus tradition to fit more comfortably within the received life world of his/their time and place. (Funk) Q6 Christianity began in Galilee. (Devenish) Q7 Jesus of Nazareth should be included in the discussion of Christian origins..28 Gray 14 17 7 62.34 Gray 19 11 23 47.47 Gray 31 7 34 28.67 Pink 45 26 13 15.59 Pink 38 24 14 24.62 Pink 31 37 21 12.55 Pink 34 21 21 24.57 Pink 28 32 21 19.47 Gray 14 41 17 28.55 Pink 26 30 26 17.70 Pink 55 21 3 21.67 Pink 43 28 17 13.86 Red 82 4 4 11.95 Red 90 6 4 0 imaginative language to call into question his received life world in favor of the life world that emerges in his parables and aphorisms. In other words, Christianity began with the preaching of Jesus. Philip Devenish s formulation: Christianity began with the Jesus-kerygma (that is, the repeated words and deeds of Jesus) not the Christ-kerygma (that is, preaching about Jesus), received a slightly stronger endorsement, with most objections having to do with the anachronistic use of the word Christianity. When polled on the proposition Jesus of Nazareth should be included in the discussion of Christian origins, more than 80% of the strongly agreed, signally a new approach to this old question. The origins of Christianity understood now as a movement among Jews, not a new religion lay not in the mystery of the resurrection or the miracle of Pentecost, or even in the creative imagination of Paul the Apostle, but in the ideas and practices of Jesus and his first followers. The of the seem to have shied away from the idea of a big bang account of Christian beginnings. Christianity emerged slowly, and in many places, as the convictions of Jesus and his followers took root and developed. In the coming years, the aims to investigate how those ideas and practices took shape in particular places and over time. Spring 2007 At its Spring 2007 meeting, the Jesus Seminar on Christians Origins will begin its work in earnest by asking what we can know about the character and claims of the earliest Jesus Movement in Galilee. On the docket will be early texts like Q, or traditions shared by Q and Thomas, or Mark and Q. What do these texts and traditions sound like when placed in the concrete cultural context of first century Galilee? 20