INTERMEDIATE LOGIC Glossary of key terms

Similar documents
Digital Logic Lecture 5 Boolean Algebra and Logic Gates Part I

Logic Appendix: More detailed instruction in deductive logic

Artificial Intelligence: Valid Arguments and Proof Systems. Prof. Deepak Khemani. Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Semantic Entailment and Natural Deduction

Chapter 9- Sentential Proofs

What are Truth-Tables and What Are They For?

An Introduction to. Formal Logic. Second edition. Peter Smith, February 27, 2019

Study Guides. Chapter 1 - Basic Training

LOGIC ANTHONY KAPOLKA FYF 101-9/3/2010

KRISHNA KANTA HANDIQUI STATE OPEN UNIVERSITY Patgaon, Ranigate, Guwahati SEMESTER: 1 PHILOSOPHY PAPER : 1 LOGIC: 1 BLOCK: 2

Chapter 8 - Sentential Truth Tables and Argument Forms

9 Methods of Deduction

A. Problem set #3 it has been posted and is due Tuesday, 15 November

Logic & Proofs. Chapter 3 Content. Sentential Logic Semantics. Contents: Studying this chapter will enable you to:

PART III - Symbolic Logic Chapter 7 - Sentential Propositions

(Refer Slide Time 03:00)

UC Berkeley, Philosophy 142, Spring 2016

HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.)

Logic: A Brief Introduction

Chapter 3: Basic Propositional Logic. Based on Harry Gensler s book For CS2209A/B By Dr. Charles Ling;

Logicola Truth Evaluation Exercises

Natural Deduction for Sentence Logic

2.1 Review. 2.2 Inference and justifications

A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC FOR METAPHYSICIANS

PHIL 115: Philosophical Anthropology. I. Propositional Forms (in Stoic Logic) Lecture #4: Stoic Logic

2. Refutations can be stronger or weaker.

C. Exam #1 comments on difficult spots; if you have questions about this, please let me know. D. Discussion of extra credit opportunities

1.2. What is said: propositions

Day 3. Wednesday May 23, Learn the basic building blocks of proofs (specifically, direct proofs)

Logic Dictionary Keith Burgess-Jackson 12 August 2017

Artificial Intelligence Prof. P. Dasgupta Department of Computer Science & Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

Logic: A Brief Introduction. Ronald L. Hall, Stetson University

Critical Thinking 5.7 Validity in inductive, conductive, and abductive arguments

Part II: How to Evaluate Deductive Arguments

Today s Lecture 1/28/10

1 Clarion Logic Notes Chapter 4

HANDBOOK. IV. Argument Construction Determine the Ultimate Conclusion Construct the Chain of Reasoning Communicate the Argument 13

PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy

Deccan Education Society s FERGUSSON COLLEGE, PUNE (AUTONOMOUS) SYLLABUS UNDER AUTONOMY FIRST YEAR B.A. LOGIC SEMESTER I

Homework: read in the book pgs and do "You Try It" (to use Submit); Read for lecture. C. Anthony Anderson

Artificial Intelligence. Clause Form and The Resolution Rule. Prof. Deepak Khemani. Department of Computer Science and Engineering

HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.)

Illustrating Deduction. A Didactic Sequence for Secondary School

MISSOURI S FRAMEWORK FOR CURRICULAR DEVELOPMENT IN MATH TOPIC I: PROBLEM SOLVING

Module 5. Knowledge Representation and Logic (Propositional Logic) Version 2 CSE IIT, Kharagpur

Exposition of Symbolic Logic with Kalish-Montague derivations

Basic Concepts and Skills!

Foreknowledge, evil, and compatibility arguments

Reductio ad Absurdum, Modulation, and Logical Forms. Miguel López-Astorga 1

Instructor s Manual 1

Semantic Foundations for Deductive Methods

Proof as a cluster concept in mathematical practice. Keith Weber Rutgers University

Exercise Sets. KS Philosophical Logic: Modality, Conditionals Vagueness. Dirk Kindermann University of Graz July 2014

THE FORM OF REDUCTIO AD ABSURDUM J. M. LEE. A recent discussion of this topic by Donald Scherer in [6], pp , begins thus:

In this section you will learn three basic aspects of logic. When you are done, you will understand the following:

What is the Nature of Logic? Judy Pelham Philosophy, York University, Canada July 16, 2013 Pan-Hellenic Logic Symposium Athens, Greece

prohibition, moral commitment and other normative matters. Although often described as a branch

Methods of Proof for Boolean Logic

Unit 4. Reason as a way of knowing. Tuesday, March 4, 14

Logic I, Fall 2009 Final Exam

Wittgenstein and Gödel: An Attempt to Make Wittgenstein s Objection Reasonable

Chapter 3: More Deductive Reasoning (Symbolic Logic)

GENERAL NOTES ON THIS CLASS

Also, in Argument #1 (Lecture 11, Slide 11), the inference from steps 2 and 3 to 4 is stated as:

MCQ IN TRADITIONAL LOGIC. 1. Logic is the science of A) Thought. B) Beauty. C) Mind. D) Goodness

Constructive Logic for All

PHI Introduction Lecture 4. An Overview of the Two Branches of Logic

CHAPTER ONE STATEMENTS, CONNECTIVES AND EQUIVALENCES

A Romp through the Foothills of Logic: Session 2

Scott Soames: Understanding Truth

On The Logical Status of Dialectic (*) -Historical Development of the Argument in Japan- Shigeo Nagai Naoki Takato

TWO VERSIONS OF HUME S LAW

ILLOCUTIONARY ORIGINS OF FAMILIAR LOGICAL OPERATORS

Part 2 Module 4: Categorical Syllogisms

Moore on External Relations

3.3. Negations as premises Overview

Can Gödel s Incompleteness Theorem be a Ground for Dialetheism? *

Announcements. CS243: Discrete Structures. First Order Logic, Rules of Inference. Review of Last Lecture. Translating English into First-Order Logic

Informalizing Formal Logic

Aquinas' Third Way Modalized

4.1 A problem with semantic demonstrations of validity

Woods, John (2001). Aristotle s Earlier Logic. Oxford: Hermes Science, xiv pp. ISBN

CHAPTER 1 A PROPOSITIONAL THEORY OF ASSERTIVE ILLOCUTIONARY ARGUMENTS OCTOBER 2017

Ling 98a: The Meaning of Negation (Week 1)

Selections from Aristotle s Prior Analytics 41a21 41b5

Truth-Functional Propositional Logic

How Gödelian Ontological Arguments Fail

Intersubstitutivity Principles and the Generalization Function of Truth. Anil Gupta University of Pittsburgh. Shawn Standefer University of Melbourne

A Liar Paradox. Richard G. Heck, Jr. Brown University

Courses providing assessment data PHL 202. Semester/Year

SAVING RELATIVISM FROM ITS SAVIOUR

Lecture 3 Arguments Jim Pryor What is an Argument? Jim Pryor Vocabulary Describing Arguments

SYLLOGISTIC LOGIC CATEGORICAL PROPOSITIONS

Introduction Symbolic Logic

Pitt State Pathway (Undergraduate Course Numbers through 699)

Introduction to Philosophy

Lecture Notes on Classical Logic

Rosen, Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications, 6th edition Extra Examples

Beyond Symbolic Logic

Is the law of excluded middle a law of logic?

Transcription:

1 GLOSSARY INTERMEDIATE LOGIC BY JAMES B. NANCE INTERMEDIATE LOGIC Glossary of key terms This glossary includes terms that are defined in the text in the lesson and on the page noted. It does not include the rules that are given in the appendices, but does include some key terms carried over from Introductory Logic. Algebraic identity Lesson 36, page 291 A rule of digital logic that can be used to simplify a proposition (see Appendix D). AND gate Lesson 32, page 266 A logic gate that performs the logical operation conjunction. Antecedent Lesson 4, page 27 In a conditional if p then q, the antecedent is the proposition represented by the p. Argument Introductory Logic, lesson 19, page 141 A set of statements, one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others. Biconditional Lesson 5, page 35 The logical operator if and only if symbolized by, that joins two propositions and is true when both propositions have the same truth value, and false when their truth values differ. Binary number system Lesson 30, page 254 A base-two number system, using only the numerals 0 and 1 to represent any number (cf. the standard decimal number system, which is base ten, using the numerals 0 through 9). Bit Lesson 29, page 249 The smallest amount of information that a computer stores, having a binary value of 1 or 0. Bubble pushing Lesson 38, page 303 A technique used to simplify logic circuits by visually applying De Morgan s theorem. Byte Lesson 29, page 249 A set of bits (usually eight) required to encode one character. Circuit (see logic circuit) Closed branch Lesson 22, page 179 A path of decomposed propositions on a truth tree which includes a contradiction.

2 GLOSSARY INTERMEDIATE LOGIC BY JAMES B. NANCE Compound proposition Lesson 1, page 9 A proposition that has more than one component part, or is modified in some other way. Conditional Lesson 4, page 27 The logical operator if then symbolize by the horseshoe, that (in standard form) is false if and only if the proposition following the if (the antecedent) is true and the proposition following the then (the consequent) is false. Conditional Proof Lesson 18, page 137 A rule used in formal proofs which allows one to assume the antecedent of a conditional and, once the consequent is deduced, to conclude the entire conditional. Conjunction Lesson 2, page 16 The logical operator and symbolized by the dot, that joins two propositions and is true if and only if both propositions (conjuncts) are true (cf. AND gate). Consequent Lesson 4, page 27 In a conditional if p then q, the consequent is the proposition represented by the q. Consistent Lesson 10, page 65 A set of propositions is consistent if the propositions can be true at the same time. Contradictory Lesson 6, page 40 Two propositions are contradictory if and only if they have opposite truth values in a truth table (i.e. the biconditional of contradictory propositions is a self-contradiction). Decompose a proposition Lesson 22, page 177 To break down a compound proposition into its literals (see Appendix C). Defining truth table Lesson 2, page 15 A listing of the truth values produced by a logical operator modifying a minimum number of variables (see Appendix A). Digital display Lesson 29, page 249 A seven-segment display used to represent the numerals 0 through 9. Digital logic Lesson 29, page 249. A branch of formal logic that is applied to electronics. Dilemma Lesson 12, page 73

3 GLOSSARY INTERMEDIATE LOGIC BY JAMES B. NANCE A valid argument that presents a choice between two conditionals. A constructive dilemma follows the form (p q) (r s), p q, r s, while a destructive dilemma follows the form (p q) (r s), ~q ~s, ~p ~r. Disjunction Lesson 2, page 16 The logical operator or symbolized by the, that joins two propositions and is true if and only if one or both of the propositions (disjuncts) is true (cf. OR gate). Equivalent (see logically equivalent) Exclusive or Lesson 2, page 16 A disjunction that is true when either one or the other disjunct, but not both, is true (cf. XOR gate). Formal proof of validity Lesson 13, page 101 A step-by-step deduction of a conclusion from a set of premises, each step being justified by an appropriate basic rule. Gate (see logic gate) Going between the horns Lesson 12, page 74 A method of refuting a dilemma that denies the disjunctive premise and provides another alternative (cf. grasping the horns, rebutting the horns). Grasping the horns Lesson 12, page 75 A method of refuting a dilemma that rejects one of the conditionals in the conjunctive premise (cf. going between the horns, rebutting the horns). Inclusive or Lesson 2, page 16 A disjunction that is true when the one disjunct or the other is true, or both are true (cf. OR gate). The standard disjunction is the inclusive or. Inconsistent Lesson 10, page 66 A set of propositions is inconsistent if the propositions cannot be true at the same time. Invalid Lesson 7, page 43 In an invalid argument, it is possible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false. Karnaugh map Lesson 40, page 313

4 GLOSSARY INTERMEDIATE LOGIC BY JAMES B. NANCE A rectangular grid with cells that can contain the output of a given truth table of two, three, or four variables, used to quickly determine the proposition corresponding to that output (also called a K-map). Literal Lesson 22, page 177 A simple proposition represented by a single letter, or the negation of the same. Logic Introduction, page 5 The science and art of correct reasoning. Logic circuit Lesson 32, page 267 A combination of logic gates, in which the outputs of some gates are joined to the input of other gates, used to perform complex operations. Logic gate Lesson 32, page 265 A logical operator represented by a symbol in digital logic, with one or two inputs and a single output, which can be joined together in logic circuits. Logical operator Lesson 1, page 10 Words (representable by symbols) that combine or modify simple propositions, making them compound (such as AND, OR, NOT) (see Appendix A). Logically equivalent Lesson 6, page 39 Two propositions are logically equivalent if and only if they have identical truth values in a truth table (i.e. the biconditional of logically equivalent propositions is a tautology) (cf. XNOR gate). Negation Lesson 2, page 15 The logical operator not symbolized by the tilde ~, that contradicts or denies a proposition. The negation of a proposition has the opposite truth value of that proposition (cf. NOT gate). NAND gate Lesson 35, page 283 A logic gate that performs the logical operation negated conjunction. NOR gate Lesson 35, page 283 A logic gate that performs the logical operation negated disjunction. NOT gate Lesson 32, page 265 A logic gate that performs the logical operation negation (also called an inverter). Open branch Lesson 22, page 178

5 GLOSSARY INTERMEDIATE LOGIC BY JAMES B. NANCE A path of decomposed propositions on a truth tree which includes no contradictions. OR gate Lesson 32, page 266 A logic gate that performs the logical operation disjunction (i.e. inclusive or) Proof (see formal proof of validity) Proposition Lesson 1, page 9 A statement, a sentence that is true or false. Propositional constant Lesson 1, page 10 An uppercase letter that represents a single, given proposition, usually the first letter of a key word in the proposition. Propositional logic Lesson 1, page 9 A branch of formal, deductive logic in which the basic unit of thought is the proposition (cf. categorical logic, in which the basic unit of thought is the category or term). Propositional variable Lesson 1, page 10 A lowercase letter that represents any proposition, usually p, q, r, etc. usually used when the form of a compound proposition or argument is being emphasized. Reason Introduction, page 5 To draw conclusions from premises. Rebutting the horns Lesson 12, page 75 Refuting a dilemma by means of a counter-dilemma (cf. going between the horns, grasping the horns). Recover truth values Lesson 22, page 178 We recover the truth values after creating a truth tree when we determine the truth values of the component simple propositions for which the propositions in the given set are consistent. Reductio ad absurdum Lesson 19, page 143 A rule used in formal proofs which allows one to assume the negation of a proposition and, once a self-contradiction is deduced, to conclude the original proposition. Rule of inference Lesson 13, page 103 A valid argument form which can be used to justify steps in a proof (see Appendix B).

6 GLOSSARY INTERMEDIATE LOGIC BY JAMES B. NANCE Rule of replacement Lesson 16, page 123 Form of equivalent propositions which can be used to justify steps in a proof (see Appendix B). In digital logic, rules of replacement can be used to simplify logic circuits (see Appendix D). Self-contradiction Lesson 6, page 39 A proposition that is false by logical structure (false for every row in a truth table). Simple proposition Lesson 1, page 9 A proposition that has only one component part. Tautology Lesson 6, page 39 A proposition that is true by logical structure (true for every row in a truth table). Truth-functional Lesson 1, page 9 A proposition is truth-functional when the truth value of the proposition depends upon the truth value of its component parts (cf. self-reports, tautologies, self-contradictions, which are not truth functional). Truth-functionally complete Lesson 21, page 154 A set of logical operators is truth-functionally complete if and only if all possible combinations of true and false are derivable using only those logical operators, i.e. any truth-functional proposition can be written using only those logical operators. In digital logic, a truth-functionally complete gate is a logic gate that by itself can be used to design any basic logic circuit. Truth table Lesson 2, page 15 A listing of the possible truth values for a set of one or more propositions. Truth tree Lesson 22, page 177 A diagram that shows a set of propositions being decomposed into their literals to determine their consistency. Valid Lesson 7, page 43 In a valid argument, the premises imply the conclusion (if the premises are true, the conclusion must be true). Validity is the key concept in formal logic. XNOR gate Lesson 39, page 308 A logic gate that performs the logical operation negated exclusive or (i.e. biconditional). XOR gate Lesson 39, page 307 A logic gate that performs the logical operation exclusive or (symbolized by ). www.logiccurriculum.com