Argument vs Persuasion vs Propaganda. So many terms...what do they all mean??

Similar documents
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Collections 2015 Grade 8. Indiana Academic Standards English/Language Arts Grade 8

United States History and Geography: Modern Times

Common Core Standards for English Language Arts & Draft Publishers' Criteria for History/Social Studies

Discovering Our Past: A History of the United States, Early Years Correlated to Common Core State Standards, Grades 6 8

Prentice Hall U.S. History Modern America 2013

War Protests & Free Speech: Guide to Critical Analysis

College and Career Readiness Anchor Standards for Reading. Step Into the Time 36 Step Into the Place 92, 108, 174, 292, 430

Prentice Hall United States History Survey Edition 2013

Course Learning Outcomes for Unit V

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT (If submission is not text, cite appropriate resource(s))

Reading and Evaluating Arguments

Macmillan/McGraw-Hill SCIENCE: A CLOSER LOOK 2011, Grade 4 Correlated with Common Core State Standards, Grade 4

Strand 1: Reading Process

Appendix to Chapter 3. Survey Question Wording, Studies 1, 2, and 3. Study 1: National Pre-election Survey Experiment, October 2008

Macmillan/McGraw-Hill SCIENCE: A CLOSER LOOK 2011, Grade 1 Correlated with Common Core State Standards, Grade 1

World History and Geography Correlated to Common Core State Standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects

Argument Writing. Whooohoo!! Argument instruction is necessary * Argument comprehension is required in school assignments, standardized testing, job

EPL: Is that even English?

Teaching Argument. Blanqui Valledor. SURN April 20, 2018

Macmillan/McGraw-Hill SCIENCE: A CLOSER LOOK 2011, Grade 3 Correlated with Common Core State Standards, Grade 3

Critical Thinking. The Four Big Steps. First example. I. Recognizing Arguments. The Nature of Basics

How persuasive is this argument? 1 (not at all). 7 (very)

Comprehension Strategy. I think: Determining a Purpose for Reading. Why am I reading this? What do I need to remember?

Prentice Hall United States History 1850 to the Present Florida Edition, 2013

Discovering Our Past: A History of the World, Early Ages Correlated to Common Core State Standards, Grades 6 8

NAEP Reading Grade 8

PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy

Analyze how concessions and refutations can be used to refute an opposing argument. Apply strategies of refutation to a set of persuasive elements.

What is an Argument?

StoryTown Reading/Language Arts Grade 3

CCSS.ELA- Literacy.RH Distinguish among fact, opinion, and reasoned judgment in a text.

Annotated Works Consulted

9694 THINKING SKILLS

Learning About World Religions: Buddhism

(If submission is not a book, cite appropriate location(s)) INDICATORS The students:

The Art of Critical Thinking

Correlation. Mirrors and Windows, Connecting with Literature, Level II

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Silver Level 2002 Correlated to: West Virginia English Language Arts IGO s (Grade 8)

Logical Fallacies. Define the following logical fallacies and provide an example for each.

The SAT Essay: An Argument-Centered Strategy

Grade 8 English Language Arts

1. Read, view, listen to, and evaluate written, visual, and oral communications. (CA 2-3, 5)

Learning About World Religions: Buddhism

Grab an Everything s an Argument book off the shelf by the flags. INTRO TO RHETORIC

The EMC Masterpiece Series, Literature and the Language Arts

I. Claim: a concise summary, stated or implied, of an argument s main idea, or point. Many arguments will present multiple claims.

CRITICAL THINKING. Critical thinking is "reasonably and reflectively deciding what to believe or do." (Ennis (1985)

PHI 1700: Global Ethics

Critical Thinking - Section 1

CORRELATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS CORRELATION COURSE STANDARDS/BENCHMARKS

Pearson myworld Geography Western Hemisphere 2011

Some Templates for Beginners: Template Option 1 I am analyzing A in order to argue B. An important element of B is C. C is significant because.

A Short Course in Logic Example 3

How do Lakota origin stories & The Sculpture Project invite us to consider natural forces in new ways?

SAMPLE Prior Learning Proposal for USM Core: Ethical Inquiry requirement

1 Chapter 6 (Part 2): Assessing Truth Claims

New! Based on ACTFL s alignment of the National Standards for Learning Languages Correlation of Common Core State Standards Levels 1 & 2

2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 1

Stratford School Academy Schemes of Work

Of Mice and Men Mock Trial Expert Witness Packet

8 th Grade. Assessment 2. Assessment Guide... Pages 2-3. Assessment Rubric... Pages 4-9. Checkers. Pages 10-12

StoryTown Reading/Language Arts Grade 2

Grade 7. correlated to the. Kentucky Middle School Core Content for Assessment, Reading and Writing Seventh Grade

COACHING THE BASICS: WHAT IS AN ARGUMENT?

Strand 1: Reading Process

ELA CCSS Grade Five. Fifth Grade Reading Standards for Literature (RL)

APPROACHING PERSUASIVE WRITING

Writing Module Three: Five Essential Parts of Argument Cain Project (2008)

Social Studies 10-1: The Position Paper

AICE Thinking Skills Review. How to Master Paper 2

Critical Thinking Questions

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking

2014 Examination Report 2014 Extended Investigation GA 2: Critical Thinking Test GENERAL COMMENTS

Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley. Background

Everything s An Argument. Chapter 1: Everything Is an Argument

Correlates to Ohio State Standards

Argumentative Writing

HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.)

ENGLISH 10. December 12 th

SCAMMED! Assignment: Identify main claim (conclusion) in three different scams and outline argument.

Corporate Team Training Session # 2 May 30 / June 1

Based on these sets of measures, this passage is recommended for assessment at grade 10 or 11.

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Silver Level '2002 Correlated to: Oregon Language Arts Content Standards (Grade 8)

Lecture 2.1 INTRO TO LOGIC/ ARGUMENTS. Recognize an argument when you see one (in media, articles, people s claims).

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Bronze Level '2002 Correlated to: Oregon Language Arts Content Standards (Grade 7)

Developing arguments for the persuasive speech. Developing arguments for the persuasive speech.zip

TASKS Readers (All). Read and Complete Mark The Text Chart (EXIT for 2 days)

The Critique (analyzing an essay s argument)

Norva Y S Lo Produced by Norva Y S Lo Edited by Andrew Brennan

The Critical Mind is A Questioning Mind

Learning Objective: Understand how to assess the value and limitations of a source with reference to its origin, purpose and content

South Carolina English Language Arts / Houghton Mifflin Reading 2005 Grade Three

The Influence of Islam on West Africa

A Correlation of. To the. Language Arts Florida Standards (LAFS) Grade 5

The Church. The road for the Church of Scientology has been hard, but not necessarily long. Founded

HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.)

#25 Objectives. I can identify and define the MAIN causes of WWI. I can describe how each of the MAIN causes led to a world war.

Corporate Team Training Session # 2 June 8 / 10

South Carolina English Language Arts / Houghton Mifflin English Grade Three

Louisiana English Language Arts Content Standards BENCHMARKS FOR 5 8

Transcription:

Argument vs Persuasion vs Propaganda So many terms...what do they all mean??

Learning Targets Argumentative Reading Unit LT 1: I can cite the textual evidence that most strongly supports what the text says explicitly. LT 2: I can cite the textual evidence that most strongly supports inferences made from text. LT 3: I can determine an author s point of view or purpose in a text. LT 4: I can analyze how the author acknowledges and responds to conflicting evidence of viewpoints. LT 5: I can identify the argument and specific claims in a text. LT 6: I can assess whether the reasoning is sound and evidence is relevant and sufficient. LT 7: I can identify when irrelevant evidence is introduced. LT 8: I can determine the purpose of information delivered in multiple formats (graphical, oral, visual, or multimodal). LT 9: I can evaluate the motives (social, commercial, or political) behind a presentation.

Essential Vocabulary Argumentative Reading Unit (copy these definitions on your paper) textual evidence--details from the text that that are used to support a statement author s point of view--the author s opinion or viewpoint (indicated by his/her word choice and connotations) author s purpose OR motive--the specific reason an author writes a text argument--the author s overall position or stance on an issue claims--the reasons or main ideas used to prove the argument counterargument--the way an author addresses the opposing position evidence (NOT textual evidence)--the specific details an author uses to support a claim (which is used to prove the writer s argument) irrelevant evidence--evidence that doesn t fit with the argument (offtopic or unrelated) sound evidence--evidence that is logical and factual; makes sense sufficient evidence--using ENOUGH evidence to clearly and strongly support an argument

What s the Difference? An argument focuses on proving or disproving a point for the reader Uses logical reasoning and factual evidence to prove a point; based on research; considers others perspectives on the issue Includes a counterargument to address the opposing position Persuasion focuses on influencing/ changing others beliefs and actions Uses a blend of facts and opinions to make others do or believe something; might consider others perspectives on the issue Only includes a counterargument if it helps the writer change someone s mind Red = writer s goal Purple = techniques used Green = counterargument Argument Persuasion Propaganda Propaganda focuses on making others accept the writer s beliefs without thinking Uses assumptions and biases to manipulate your emotions; uses little or no evidence or logic; only considers its own message Ignores all counterarguments; may even lie about them

Why You Should Know the Difference Most college writing is ARGUMENT writing--you need to support ideas LOGICALLY with EVIDENCE. If you do not analyze a writer s purpose, you may get suckered into believing something that isn t logical. If you do not recognize the manipulation of propaganda, you will fall prey to advertisements and political ads--then you will make a poor purchase OR cast a poor vote.

Analyzing Examples Argument-- Every Cigarette Is Doing You Damage PSA What is the ARGUMENT posed in this PSA? What facts are used as evidence to support this argument? Does this PSA give logical evidence, sufficient evidence, or BOTH? Explain. Persuasion--2012 Obama campaign ad What is the PURPOSE/MOTIVE of this campaign ad? What facts does Obama give? What opinions? Why does Obama talk about his opponent, Mitt Romney? To achieve his goal, does Obama give logical evidence, sufficient evidence, BOTH, or NEITHER? Explain. Propaganda--American WWII poster addressing the issue of dropping nuclear bombs on Japan What does this poster want American citizens to believe? What claim is given to make Americans believe this? Is this a logical claim? Explain. Does this poster give sufficient evidence to support its claim? Explain. Nazi Propaganda Poster: The caption: The Jew: The inciter of war, the prolonger of war. This poster was released in late 1943 or early 1944.

Click to return to previous slide