Hamilton s and Jefferson s Methods

Similar documents
The Plurality-with-Elimination Method

The Addition Rule. Lecture 44 Section 9.3. Robb T. Koether. Hampden-Sydney College. Mon, Apr 14, 2014

The Plurality-with-Elimination Method

Tests of Homogeneity and Independence

Heap and Merge Sorts

The Pigeonhole Principle

Part II: Facing Reality. Reality. Reality. Dreaming God s Good Future. Stewardship begins with the Heart

KPFA Staff Delegate Election CANDIDATES: Lewis O. Sawyer. Josiah Luis A. Alderete. Steve Zeltzer. Kate Raphael. Lisa Dettmer.

LIVING ON MISSIONAL PURPOSE. Peter Meier Center for United States Missions

Torah Code Cluster Probabilities

Jewish College Students

Logicola Truth Evaluation Exercises

Computational Learning Theory: Agnostic Learning

Pulling Rabbits from Hats (Conditional Probability), Part I

NCLS Occasional Paper 8. Inflow and Outflow Between Denominations: 1991 to 2001

occasions (2) occasions (5.5) occasions (10) occasions (15.5) occasions (22) occasions (28)

Introduction to Inference

Math2UU3*TEST1. Duration of Test: 60 minutes McMaster University, 25 September Last name (PLEASE PRINT): First name (PLEASE PRINT): Student No.

Quiz2_Practice2 #2. Basic Math / FND M020 SP N30FFD05-NAP (Prof. Abdon)

Module 02 Lecture - 10 Inferential Statistics Single Sample Tests

ADAIR COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADE 03 REPORT CARD Page 1 of 5

Chapter 2 - Lecture 4 Conditional Probability

Executive Summary. Attitudes in the Catholic world towards damage to children and young people from LGBT stigma. On behalf of Equal Future 2018

MITOCW ocw f99-lec19_300k

SUMMARY COMPARISON of 6 th grade Math texts approved for 2007 local Texas adoption

End of the year test day 2 #3

Pastoral Research Online

Number, Part I of II

Oregon Media Mayoral Tracker Survey May 10-12, 2012; N=500 City of Portland likely voters 5 minutes; Margin of error +/-2.8% to 4.

Math 10 Lesson 1 4 Answers

American Meteorological Society Member Survey on Global Warming: Preliminary Findings. February 12 th, 2012

Final Exam (PRACTICE-2) #2

This pamphlet was produced by Leadership Ministries.

THE DEATH OF MAINSTREAM PROTESTANTISM: AN ANALYSIS OF SOME MODELS OF SPIRITUALITY DR. OLLI-PEKKA VAINIO, UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI

Diocese of Rockford. Mass Intention and Stipend Handling Guide

NCLS Occasional Paper Church Attendance Estimates

Grade 6 Math Connects Suggested Course Outline for Schooling at Home

The WHY of Church Multiplication

Ten Facts about Geographic Patterns of the Orthodox Church Life in the United States p.2

THE TITHE COMMUTATION ACT OF 1836: MEASURING THE EFFICIENCY GAINS OF AGRICULTURAL LAND TAX REFORMS IN ENGLAND

Excel Lesson 3 page 1 April 15

Survey Report New Hope Church: Attitudes and Opinions of the People in the Pews

Mathematics Manuscript. by Dr. Irene Galtung

Grade 6 correlated to Illinois Learning Standards for Mathematics

Reformed Denominations Team Report 21 August 2015

Evangelical Author & Secular Publisher: Prospects for Partnership

Colorado Christian University Commencement Address Saturday, May 10, 2014

MITOCW watch?v=4hrhg4euimo

Open Church Notices (December 16,2015)

3722 Transportation Analysis Zones (TAZs)

Toongabbie Anglican Church. Church Site Possible Redevelopment Discussion

MITOCW MITRES18_006F10_26_0703_300k-mp4

Philosophy 200: Introduction to Philosophy. Spring Dr. Bill E. Lawson. Tuesday and Thursday 10:20 11:40 am

The Center for US Missions

Chapter 20 Testing Hypotheses for Proportions

2008 Congregational Leadership Survey

Syllabus Becoming a Holy People

Lead Student Lesson Plan L11: 4 Nephi Mormon 9

UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU-NATAL SESSIONAL DATES APPLICABLE TO THE FACULTY OF EDUCATION 2008

It s great to be here at Lincoln High school in Lake City - the home of the Tigers!

6.041SC Probabilistic Systems Analysis and Applied Probability, Fall 2013 Transcript Lecture 21

Ch. 5 Lessons 1-6 Preview #1

Rational and Irrational Numbers 2

Looking Back Looking Ahead. February 19, 2016

Probability Foundations for Electrical Engineers Prof. Krishna Jagannathan Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Issues and Policies in American Government (GOV 312L) Religion and Politics in the United States The University of Texas at Austin Spring 2013

Friends and strangers

Instructions by Heydrich on Policy and Operations Concerning Jews in the Occupied Territories, September 21, 1939

LFS CAROLINAS HISTORY

SL 210 THEOLOGY 1: AUTHORITY, TRINITY, CREATION, ANTHROPOLOGY, CHRISTOLOGY AND SOTERIOLOGY

St. Paul Lutheran Church 721 Twelfth Ave. Huntington, WV The Rev. Jennifer Obermueller, Pastor October 2013

Divide By Jessa Russo

The contents of this document are made using Alan Nguyen s Brain Juices.

Background for Native American Myths and Origin Stories: Native American Oral Tradition

POLS 3000 INTRODUCTION TO POLITICAL THEORY

Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary Hamilton PR 926A/B: The Preacher and the Message Syllabus: Fall 2011 & Spring 2012

The Florida Digital Newspaper Library: Ethnic Newspapers Database An online presentation and tutorial by Rebecca Jefferson and April Hines

Probability Distributions TEACHER NOTES MATH NSPIRED

Why We Celebrate. Native American Ministries Sunday

1863: Shifting Tides. Cut out the following cards and hand one card to each of the pairs.

Decimals_Mid-term Exam Review #4

Kierkegaard s Authorship University of Copenhagen Department of Theology / DIS Spring Semester 2018

Module - 02 Lecturer - 09 Inferential Statistics - Motivation

Bar Mitzvah Drasha (translated from Hebrew)

The Holy Days and God s Plan

American Revolution Study Guide

Model: 2+2 Scenario 1: Cluster SMK, SKD, and SM; cluster CCBT and SJW

CSCI 215 Semester Project Debate some of the top technology topics of the day

Six Sigma Prof. Dr. T. P. Bagchi Department of Management Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur. Lecture No. # 18 Acceptance Sampling

Honors Philosophy Course Syllabus

Messiah College HIS 399: Topics: Religion and the American Founding Spring 2009 MWF 1:50-2:50 Boyer 422

The Covenant of Shared Ministry of the Silver Spring Cooperative Parish I. Our Spiritual Foundation II. Statement of Purpose:

Descendants of Squire James Ewing ( )

The numbers of single adults practising Christian worship

Office Hours: Monday: 1:00-2:30 p.m. Phone: (305)

Newsletter Date May Trestle Board. Staunton Lodge No. 13 AF & AM. Brethren or others sick or in Distress. Pray for their recovery.

Mission Action Plan Our 7 aims

HIST 4420/ : THE CRUSADES. Co-listed as Mid E 4542/ Fall 2016 MWF 10:45-11: BU C

Office Hours: Tuesday: 2:00-3:00 p.m. Phone: (305) By the end of this course, the successful student will be able to:

Go and make a survey of the land and write a description of it.

Transcription:

Hamilton s and Jefferson s Methods Lecture 15 Sections 4.2-4.3 Robb T. Koether Hampden-Sydney College Mon, Feb 23, 2015 Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) Hamilton s and Jefferson s Methods Mon, Feb 23, 2015 1 / 18

1 Definitions 2 Hamilton s Method 3 Jefferson s Method 4 Examples 5 Assignment Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) Hamilton s and Jefferson s Methods Mon, Feb 23, 2015 2 / 18

Outline 1 Definitions 2 Hamilton s Method 3 Jefferson s Method 4 Examples 5 Assignment Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) Hamilton s and Jefferson s Methods Mon, Feb 23, 2015 3 / 18

Apportionment Problems Definition (Apportionment Problem) The classic apportionment problem involves a representative body where each state is given a certain number of seats, according to the state s population. Let N be the number of states. Let M the number of seats. Let p 1, p 2, p 3,..., p N be the states populations. Let P = p 1 + p 2 + p 3 + + p N, the total population. Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) Hamilton s and Jefferson s Methods Mon, Feb 23, 2015 4 / 18

Definitions Definition (Standard Divisor) The standard divisor (SD) is P M. It represents the number of people that each seat represents. SD = P M. Definition (Standard Quota) The standard quota of a state is the exact fractional number of seats it should get for its fair share. It is computed as ( pi ) q i = M = p i P SD. Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) Hamilton s and Jefferson s Methods Mon, Feb 23, 2015 5 / 18

Definitions Definition (Lower and Upper Quotas) The lower quota and the upper quota for a state are the two whole numbers nearest the standard quota for that state. If the standard quota happens to be a whole number, then the lower and upper quotas are the same. Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) Hamilton s and Jefferson s Methods Mon, Feb 23, 2015 6 / 18

Example Example (Example) Suppose that three states A, B, and C, have populations 3 million, 6 million, and 7 million. The total population is P = 16 million. Suppose there are 50 seats to be apportioned. Find the standard divisor SD. Find each states standard quota, q 1, q 2, q 3. Find the lower and upper quotas for each state. Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) Hamilton s and Jefferson s Methods Mon, Feb 23, 2015 7 / 18

Outline 1 Definitions 2 Hamilton s Method 3 Jefferson s Method 4 Examples 5 Assignment Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) Hamilton s and Jefferson s Methods Mon, Feb 23, 2015 8 / 18

Hamilton s Method Definition (Hamilton s Method) 1 Calculate the standard divisor SD. 2 Calculate each state s standard quota q i. 3 Round each one down to the lower quota L i. 4 Initially, give each state that many seats. 5 Distribute the surplus to the states with the largest fractional parts. Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) Hamilton s and Jefferson s Methods Mon, Feb 23, 2015 9 / 18

Example Example (Example) Apply Hamilton s method to the three states A, B, and C, with populations 3 million, 6 million, and 7 million and 50 seats to be apportioned. We found SD = 320000. q 1 = 9.375, q 2 = 18.75, and q 3 = 21.875. The lower quotas are 9, 18, and 21. The lower quotas add up to 48. So the surplus is 50 48 = 2. Which states get the 2 extra seats? Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) Hamilton s and Jefferson s Methods Mon, Feb 23, 2015 10 / 18

Example VA, NC, MD, WV Example The populations of VA, NC, MD, and WV, in thousands, are 8001, 9535, 5774 and 1853 people, respectively. The total number of seats apportioned to those states is 35. Use Hamilton s method to determine how many seats each state should get. Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) Hamilton s and Jefferson s Methods Mon, Feb 23, 2015 11 / 18

Outline 1 Definitions 2 Hamilton s Method 3 Jefferson s Method 4 Examples 5 Assignment Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) Hamilton s and Jefferson s Methods Mon, Feb 23, 2015 12 / 18

Jefferson s Method Definition (Jefferson s Method) By Jefferson s method, instead of the standard divisor, we use a modified divisor and recalculate until the lower quotas add up to M. As long as the surplus is positive, we try a smaller modified divisor. As long as the surplus is negative, we try a larger modified divisor. Jefferson s method was used from 1791 until 1842, when it was replaced by Webster s method. Jefferson s method involves repeated guesses until we find a number that works. Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) Hamilton s and Jefferson s Methods Mon, Feb 23, 2015 13 / 18

Outline 1 Definitions 2 Hamilton s Method 3 Jefferson s Method 4 Examples 5 Assignment Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) Hamilton s and Jefferson s Methods Mon, Feb 23, 2015 14 / 18

Example Example (Example) Apply Jefferson s method to the three states A, B, and C, with populations 3 million, 6 million, and 7 million and 50 seats to be apportioned. We found SD = 320000 and q 1 = 9.375, q 2 = 18.75, and q 3 = 21.875. The lower quotas are 9, 18, and 21, which add up to 48. Should the modified divisor be larger or smaller than 320000? Find one that works. Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) Hamilton s and Jefferson s Methods Mon, Feb 23, 2015 15 / 18

Example VA, NC, MD, WV Example The populations of VA, NC, MD, and WV, in thousands, are 8001, 9535, 5774 and 1853 people, respectively. The total number of seats apportioned to those states is 35. Use Jefferson s method to determine how many seats each state should get. Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) Hamilton s and Jefferson s Methods Mon, Feb 23, 2015 16 / 18

Outline 1 Definitions 2 Hamilton s Method 3 Jefferson s Method 4 Examples 5 Assignment Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) Hamilton s and Jefferson s Methods Mon, Feb 23, 2015 17 / 18

Assignment Assignment Chapter 4: (Hamilton s method) Exercises 11, 12, 13, 14. Chapter 4: (Jefferson s method) Exercises 21, 23, 24, 26. Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) Hamilton s and Jefferson s Methods Mon, Feb 23, 2015 18 / 18