Atoms for Peace. Delivered 8 December 1953, United Nations General Assembly, New York

Similar documents
Address to the American Society of Newspaper Editors. delivered 16 April 1953, Statler Hotel, Washington, D.C.

The Board of Directors recommends this resolution be sent to a Committee of the General Synod.

Hubert Humphrey. Vice Presidential Nomination Acceptance Address. delivered 4 June 1964, DNC, Atlantic City, NJ

13. Address by Adolf Hitler 1 SEPTEMBER (Address by Adolf Hitler, Chancellor of the Reich, before the Reichstag, September 1, 1939)

February 04, 1977 Letter, Secretary Brezhnev to President Carter

HISTORY PAPER 1 (SAMPLE PAPER)

GOD is our refuge and strength, a

H. RES. ll IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

What was the significance of the WW2 conferences?

Q & A with author David Christian and publisher Karen. This Fleeting World: A Short History of Humanity by David Christian

Pray for Israel 20 November 2012

Konstantinos Karamanlis Oral History Interview 3/12/1965 Administrative Information

The Constitution of the Blue Planet Earth

Democratic National Convention Keynote Address. delivered 12 July 1976, New York, NY

International Chairman s Conference 2012

Resolved: The United States should adopt a no first strike policy for cyber warfare.

Sir Alec Douglas-Home Oral History Statement 3/17/1965 Administrative Information

Lassina Zerbo: «Israel and Iran could and should be next to ratify CTBT»

Iran Nuclear Deal Press Briefing. delivered 16 July 2015, Washington, D.C.

Richard Nixon Address to the Nation on Vietnam May 14, 1969 Washington, D.C.

Two Parallel Worlds An Interview with His Beatitude Sviatoslav

~ SSA Piro then asked Hussein if he wrote his own

オバマ広島演説 Remarks by President Obama at Hiroshima Peace Memorial May 27, 2016

THE SULTANATE OF OMAN

[For Israelis only] Q1 I: How confident are you that Israeli negotiators will get the best possible deal in the negotiations?

Faith in America. Delivered 6 December 2007, College Station, Texas

Eisenhower farewell address, January 17, My fellow Americans:

Joint Remarks to the Press Following Bilateral Meeting. Delivered 20 May 2011, Oval Office of the White House, Washington, D.C.

Press Briefing by Secretary of State Colin Powell

100 Sunrise Ranch Road Loveland, Colorado USA Phone:

The Holy See APOSTOLIC JOURNEY TO THE UNITED KINGDOM (SEPTEMBER 16-19, 2010)

CHAIRMAN S CLOSING REMARKS PROFESSOR A. HADDOW

Reading Speed Benchmark

McCarthyism and the Great Fear : DBQ Exercise. How Communism Works" Its Okay, We re Hunting Communists By Herbert Block, Oct 31, 1947 Washington Post

Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief

The Hiroshima-Nagasaki Peace Study Course. Basic Concepts and Content

NATO Press Conference After Defense Ministerial. delivered 15 February 2017, NATO Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium

November Guidelines for the demilitarization of Gaza and a long-term arrangement in the South. MK Omer Barlev

Discussion Guide for Small Groups* Good Shepherd Catholic Church Fall 2015

RCIA Christian Morality Part II Session 20

Adlai E. Stevenson High School Course Description

... J. Robert Oppenheimer

TRANSBOUNDARY COOPERATION

TALENTS AND LEVER SKILLS

February 02, Third African Department, Soviet Foreign Ministry, Information Report on Somali-Ethiopian Territorial. Disputes

International History Declassified

The U.S. Withdrawal and Limited Options

a. What is the rhetorical device Obama uses in the underlined portion? Anecdote b. How does the underlined portion demonstrate this rhetorical device?

A Christian s Place in the World Today. The Reverend Dr. Girard Lowe

Remarks by Soviet Foreign Minister Andrei Gromyko to the UN Special Committee on Palestine (14 May 1947)

Prashant Mavani, is an expert in current affairs analysis and holds a MSc in Management from University of Surrey (U.K.).

United Flight 93 National Memorial Dedication Address. delivered 10 September 2011, Shanksville, PA

ANDREW MARR SHOW VLADIMIR CHIZHOV

SSR. Continue reading from wherever you left off in Animal Farm. If you don t have a book, get a red one from the bookshelf on the side of the room.

Our Drift Toward War (Delivered June 15, 1940)

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY - Investment Policy Guidelines

ESAM [Economic and Social Resource Center] 26 th Congress of International Union of Muslim Communities Global Crises, Islamic World and the West"

Re: Criminal Trial of Abdul Rahman for Converting to Christianity

Mr. President, 2. Several of the themes included on the agenda of this General Assembly may be

(This letter was issued by the Canadian Council of Churches of which the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops (CCCB) is a member.

Motives for Israel s Intensified Military Strikes against Syria

World Council of Churches 10th Assembly 30 October to 8 November 2013 Busan, Republic of Korea. Document No. PIC 02.3 ADOPTED

Russia s view. Sergei Lavrov

Jimmy Carter. Energy and the National Goals. Delivered 15 July, 1979

Using your knowledge AND the documents provided write a well-reasoned essay on the following prompt:

Nanjing Statement on Interfaith Dialogue

The Battle over Remembering Hiroshima rkoerselman June 6, 201http://blog.perspectivesjournal.org/2016/06/06/the-battle-overremembering-hiroshima/

Unofficial translation

Part III: Imperialism in Asia

THE GERMAN CONFERENCE ON ISLAM

AP WORLD HISTORY SUMMER READING GUIDE

George Washington Carver Engineering and Science High School 2018 Summer Enrichment

Series: The Wisdom, Wonder, and Witness of the Gospel The Preaching of the Cross # 3 1 Corinthians 2: 1-5

Tonight I want to speak to you of peace in Vietnam and Southeast Asia.

SENATOR HUBERT H. HUMPHREY WITH GUEST WILLIAX C. FOSTER. Bob Coar: This is Washington, and this is Senator Hubert H.

Mr Secretary of State, Excellencies, Distinguished Guests, Ladies and Gentlemen, Dear friends,

STATEMENT OF MR MICHAEL MOLLER, ACTING SECRETARY-GENERAL OF THE CONFERENCE ON DISARMAMENT

The 9th General Conference of Mayors for Peace. Closing Ceremony. August 10 (Thu), :15-12:45 Nakabe Hall, Nagasaki University Bunkyo Campus

Practical Wisdom and Politics

Address to the United Nations General Assembly Session on Terrorism. Delivered 1 October 2001, New York

1: adapt. 2: adult. 3: advocate. 4: aid. 5: channel. 6: chemical. 7: classic. Appears in List(s): 7a Level: AWL

NEW DEAL DBQ. Question: To what extent did the New Deal fundamentally change American s relationship with their federal government?

Memorial Day The. Suggested Speech

Carmelite NGO a non governmental organization in Special Consultative Status with the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) of the United Nations and

Anthony Eden. The University of Toledo Digital Repository. The University of Toledo

SPEECH. Over the past year I have travelled to 16 Member States. I have learned a lot, and seen at first-hand how much nature means to people.

SYSTEMATIC RESEARCH IN PHILOSOPHY. Contents

Americano, Outra Vez!

In the Name of God, Most Gracious, Most Merciful. ((Report on the External Operations))

THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON

Remarks by. H.E. Ambassador John W. Ashe President of the 68 th Session of the United Nations General Assembly. New York 2 October 2013

Please Pray for Sudan

Rafsanjani on Iran s Conduct of the War. June 21, 2008

Splendid Isolation Britain The Balance Of Power And The Origins Of The First World War

A study on commodification of religious rituals and social reproduction in contemporary Sri Lanka.

I m writing this public letter to you EU because I think at times people from the outside see issues in a clearer manner.

AM: Sounds like a panic measure.

Remarks by High Representative/Vice- President Federica Mogherini following her

First Speech to Staff as U.S. Secretary of State. delivered 2 February 2017, Washington, D.C.

THE reparations question has dominated the politics and

Transcription:

Dwight D. Eisenhower Atoms for Peace Delivered 8 December 1953, United Nations General Assembly, New York AUTHENTICITY CERTIFIED: Text version below transcribed directly from audio Madam President, Members of the General Assembly: When Secretary General Hammarskjold s invitation to address this General Assembly reached me in Bermuda, I was just beginning a series of conferences with the Prime Ministers and Foreign Ministers of Great Britain and of France. Our subject was some of the problems that beset our world. During the remainder of the Bermuda Conference, I had constantly in mind that ahead of me lay a great honor. That honor is mine today, as I stand here, privileged to address the General Assembly of the United Nations. At the same time that I appreciate the distinction of addressing you, I have a sense of exhilaration as I look upon this Assembly. Never before in history has so much hope for so many people been gathered together in a single organization. Your deliberations and decisions during these somber years have already realized part of those hopes. But the great tests and the great accomplishments still lie ahead. And in the confident expectation of those accomplishments, I would use the office which, for the time being, I hold, to assure you that the Government of the United States will remain steadfast in its support of this body. This we shall do in the conviction that you will provide a great share of the wisdom, of the courage, and the faith which can bring to this world lasting peace for all nations, and happiness and well being for all men. Transcription by Michael E. Eidenmuller. Property of AmericanRhetoric.com Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. Page 1

Clearly, it would not be fitting for me to take this occasion to present to you a unilateral American report on Bermuda. Nevertheless, I assure you that in our deliberations on that lovely island we sought to invoke those same great concepts of universal peace and human dignity which are so cleanly etched in your Charter. Neither would it be a measure of this great opportunity merely to recite, however hopefully, pious platitudes. I therefore decided that this occasion warranted my saying to you some of the things that have been on the minds and hearts of my legislative and executive associates, and on mine, for a great many months thoughts I had originally planned to say primarily to the American people. I know that the American people share my deep belief that if a danger exists in the world, it is a danger shared by all; and equally, that if hope exists in the mind of one nation, that hope should be shared by all. Finally, if there is to be advanced any proposal designed to ease even by the smallest measure the tensions of today s world, what more appropriate audience could there be than the members of the General Assembly of the United Nations. I feel impelled to speak today in a language that in a sense is new, one which I, who have spent so much of my life in the military profession, would have preferred never to use. That new language is the language of atomic warfare. The atomic age has moved forward at such a pace that every citizen of the world should have some comprehension, at least in comparative terms, of the extent of this development, of the utmost significance to everyone of us. Clearly, if the peoples of the world are to conduct an intelligent search for peace, they must be armed with the significant facts of today s existence. My recital of atomic danger and power is necessarily stated in United States terms, for these are the only incontrovertible facts that I know. I need hardly point out to this Assembly, however, that this subject is global, not merely national in character. On July 16, 1945, the United States set off the world s first atomic explosion. Since that date in 1945, the United States of America has conducted forty two test explosions. Atomic bombs today are more than twenty five times as powerful as the weapons with which the atomic age dawned, while hydrogen weapons are in the ranges of millions of tons of TNT equivalent. Today, the United States stockpile of atomic weapons, which, of course, increases daily, exceeds by many times the total [explosive] equivalent of the total of all bombs and all shells that came from every plane and every gun in every theatre of war in all the years of World War II. Transcription by Michael E. Eidenmuller. Property of AmericanRhetoric.com Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. Page 2

A single air group, whether afloat or land based, can now deliver to any reachable target a destructive cargo exceeding in power all the bombs that fell on Britain in all of World War II. In size and variety, the development of atomic weapons has been no less remarkable. The development has been such that atomic weapons have virtually achieved conventional status within our armed services. In the United States, the Army, the Navy, the Air Force, and the Marine Corps are all capable of putting this weapon to military use. But the dread secret and the fearful engines of atomic might are not ours alone. In the first place, the secret is possessed by our friends and allies, Great Britain and Canada, whose scientific genius made a tremendous contribution to our original discoveries and the designs of atomic bombs. The secret is also known by the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union has informed us that, over recent years, it has devoted extensive resources to atomic weapons. During this period the Soviet Union has exploded a series of atomic devices, including at least one involving thermo nuclear reactions. If at one time the Unites States possessed what might have been called a monopoly of atomic power, that monopoly ceased to exist several years ago. Therefore, although our earlier start has permitted us to accumulate what is today a great quantitative advantage, the atomic realities of today comprehend two facts of even greater significance. First, the knowledge now possessed by several nations will eventually be shared by others, possibly all others. Second, even a vast superiority in numbers of weapons, and a consequent capability of devastating retaliation, is no preventive, of itself, against the fearful material damage and toll of human lives that would be inflicted by surprise aggression. The free world, at least dimly aware of these facts, has naturally embarked on a large program of warning and defense systems. That program will be accelerated and expanded. But let no one think that the expenditure of vast sums for weapons and systems of defense can guarantee absolute safety for the cities and citizens of any nation. The awful arithmetic of the atomic bomb does not permit of any such easy solution. Even against the most powerful defense, an aggressor in possession of the effective minimum number of atomic bombs for a surprise attack could probably place a sufficient number of his bombs on the chosen targets to cause hideous damage. Transcription by Michael E. Eidenmuller. Property of AmericanRhetoric.com Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. Page 3

Should such an atomic attack be launched against the United States, our reactions would be swift and resolute. But for me to say that the defense capabilities of the United States are such that they could inflict terrible losses upon an aggressor, for me to say that the retaliation capabilities of the Unites States are so great that such an aggressor s land would be laid waste, all this, while fact, is not the true expression of the purpose and the hope of the United States. To pause there would be to confirm the hopeless finality of a belief that two atomic colossi are doomed malevolently to eye each other indefinitely across a trembling world. To stop there would be to accept hope helplessly the probability of civilization destroyed, the annihilation of the irreplaceable heritage of mankind handed down to use generation from generation, and the condemnation of mankind to begin all over again the age old struggle upward from savagery toward decency, and right, and justice. Surely no sane member of the human race could discover victory in such desolation. Could anyone wish his name to be coupled by history with such human degradation and destruction? Occasional pages of history do record the faces of the great destroyers, but the whole book of history reveals mankind s never ending quest for peace and mankind s Godgiven capacity to build. It is with the book of history, and not with isolated pages, that the United States will ever wish to be identified. My country wants to be constructive, not destructive. It wants agreements, not wars, among nations. It wants itself to live in freedom and in the confidence that the people of every other nation enjoy equally the right of choosing their own way of life. So my country s purpose is to help us move out of the dark chamber of horrors into the light, to find a way by which the minds of men, the hopes of men, the souls of men everywhere, can move forward toward peace and happiness and well being. In this quest, I know that we must not lack patience. I know that in a world divided, such as ours today, salvation cannot be attained by one dramatic act. I know that many steps will have to be taken over many months before the world can look at itself one day and truly realize that a new climate of mutually peaceful confidence is abroad in the world. But I know, above all else, that we must start to take these steps now. The United States and its allies, Great Britain and France, have, over the past months, tried to take some of these steps. Let no one say that we shun the conference table. On the record has long stood the request of the United States, Great Britain, and France to negotiate with the Soviet Union the problems of a divided Germany. On that record has long stood the request of the same three nations to negotiate an Austrian peace treaty. On the same record still stands the request of the United Nations to negotiate the problems of Korea. Transcription by Michael E. Eidenmuller. Property of AmericanRhetoric.com Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. Page 4

Most recently we have received from the Soviet Union what is in effect an expression of willingness to hold a four Power meeting. Along with our allies, Great Britain and France, we were pleased to see that his note did not contain the unacceptable pre conditions previously put forward. As you already know from our joint Bermuda communiqué, the United States, Great Britain, and France have agreed promptly to meet with the Soviet Union. The Government of the United States approaches this conference with hopeful sincerity. We will bend every effort of our minds to the single purpose of emerging from that conference with tangible results towards peace, the only true way of lessening international tension. We never have, we never will, propose or suggest that the Soviet Union surrender what is rightfully theirs. We will never say that the people of Russia are an enemy with whom we have no desire ever to deal or mingle in friendly and fruitful relationship. On the contrary, we hope that this coming conference may initiate a relationship with the Soviet Union which will eventually bring about a free intermingling of the peoples of the East and of the West the one sure, human way of developing the understanding required for confident and peaceful relations. Instead of the discontent which is now settling upon Eastern Germany, occupied Austria, and the countries of Eastern Europe, we seek a harmonious family of free European nations, with none a threat to the other, and least of all a threat to the peoples of the Russia. Beyond the turmoil and strife and misery of Asia, we seek peaceful opportunity for these peoples to develop their natural resources and to elevate their lives. These are not idle words or shallow visions. Behind them lies a story of nations lately come to independence, not as a result of war, but through free grant or peaceful negotiation. There is a record already written of assistance gladly given by nations of the West to needy peoples and to those suffering the temporary effects of famine, drought, and natural disaster. These are deeds of peace. They speak more loudly than promises or protestations of peaceful intent. But I do not wish to rest either upon the reiteration of past proposals or the restatement of past deeds. The gravity of the time is such that every new avenue of peace, no matter how dimly discernible, should be explored. There is at least one new avenue of peace which has not yet been well explored an avenue now laid out by the General Assembly of the Unites Nations. In its resolution of November 18th, 1953 this General Assembly suggested and I quote that the Disarmament Commission study the desirability of establishing a sub committee consisting of representatives of the Powers principally involved, which should seek in private an acceptable solution and report such a solution to the General Assembly and to the Security Council not later than September 1, of 1954. Transcription by Michael E. Eidenmuller. Property of AmericanRhetoric.com Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. Page 5

The United States, heeding the suggestion of the General Assembly of the United Nations, is instantly prepared to meet privately with such other countries as may be principally involved, to seek an acceptable solution to the atomic armaments race which overshadows not only the peace, but the very life of the world. We shall carry into these private or diplomatic talks a new conception. The United States would seek more than the mere reduction or elimination of atomic materials for military purposes. It is not enough to take this weapon out of the hands of the soldiers. It must be put into the hands of those who will know how to strip its military casing and adapt it to the arts of peace. The United States knows that if the fearful trend of atomic military build up can be reversed, this greatest of destructive forces can be developed into a great boon, for the benefit of all mankind. The United States knows that peaceful power from atomic energy is no dream of the future. That capability, already proved, is here, now, today. Who can doubt, if the entire body of the world s scientists and engineers had adequate amounts of fissionable material with which to test and develop their ideas, that this capability would rapidly be transformed into universal, efficient, and economic usage? To hasten the day when fear of the atom will begin to disappear from the minds of people and the governments of the East and West, there are certain steps that can be taken now. I therefore make the following proposals: The governments principally involved, to the extent permitted by elementary prudence, to begin now and continue to make joint contributions from their stockpiles of normal uranium and fissionable materials to an International Atomic Energy Agency. We would expect that such an agency would be set up under the aegis of the United Nations. The ratios of contributions, the procedures, and other details would properly be within the scope of the private conversations I have referred to earlier. The United States is prepared to undertake these explorations in good faith. Any partner of the United States acting in the same good faith will find the United States a not unreasonable or ungenerous associate. Undoubtedly, initial and early contributions to this plan would be small in quantity. However, the proposal has the great virtue that it can be undertaken without the irritations and mutual suspicions incident to any attempt to set up a completely acceptable system of world wide inspection and control. The Atomic Energy Agency could be made responsible for the impounding, storage, and protection of the contributed fissionable and other materials. Transcription by Michael E. Eidenmuller. Property of AmericanRhetoric.com Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. Page 6

The ingenuity of our scientists will provide special, safe conditions under which such a bank of fissionable material can be made essentially immune to surprise seizure. The more important responsibility of this Atomic Energy Agency would be to devise methods whereby this fissionable material would be allocated to serve the peaceful pursuits of mankind. Experts would be mobilized to apply atomic energy to the needs of agriculture, medicine, and other peaceful activities. A special purpose would be to provide abundant electrical energy in the power starved areas of the world. Thus the contributing Powers would be dedicating some of their strength to serve the needs rather than the fears of mankind. The United States would be more than willing it would be proud to take up with others principally involved the development of plans whereby such peaceful use of atomic energy would be expedited. Of those principally involved the Soviet Union must, of course, be one. I would be prepared to submit to the Congress of the United States, and with every expectation of approval, any such plan that would, first, encourage world wide investigation into the most effective peacetime uses of fissionable material, and with the certainty that they [the investigators] had all the material needed for the conduct of all experiments that were appropriate; second, begin to diminish the potential destructive power of the world s atomic stockpiles; third, allow all peoples of all nations to see that, in this enlightened age, the great Powers of the earth, both of the East and of the West, are interested in human aspirations first rather than in building up the armaments of war; fourth, open up a new channel for peaceful discussion and initiate at least a new approach to the many difficult problems that must be solved in both private and public conversations, if the world is to shake off the inertia imposed by fear and is to make positive progress toward peace. Against the dark background of the atomic bomb, the United States does not wish merely to present strength, but also the desire and the hope for peace. The coming months will be fraught with fateful decisions. In this Assembly, in the capitals and military headquarters of the world, in the hearts of men everywhere, be they governed or governors, may they be the decisions which will lead this world out of fear and into peace. To the making of these fateful decisions, the United States pledges before you, and therefore before the world, its determination to help solve the fearful atomic dilemma to devote its entire heart and mind to find the way by which the miraculous inventiveness of man shall not be dedicated to his death, but consecrated to his life. I again thank the delegates for the great honor they have done me in inviting me to appear before them and in listening to me so courteously. Thank you. Transcription by Michael E. Eidenmuller. Property of AmericanRhetoric.com Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. Page 7