Great Philosophers Bertrand Russell Evening lecture series, Department of Philosophy. Dr. Keith Begley 28/11/2017

Similar documents
[3.] Bertrand Russell. 1

(1) a phrase may be denoting, and yet not denote anything e.g. the present King of France

15. Russell on definite descriptions

Philosophical Logic. LECTURE SEVEN MICHAELMAS 2017 Dr Maarten Steenhagen

Russell: On Denoting

Beyond Symbolic Logic

Todays programme. Background of the TLP. Some problems in TLP. Frege Russell. Saying and showing. Sense and nonsense Logic The limits of language

Class 33 - November 13 Philosophy Friday #6: Quine and Ontological Commitment Fisher 59-69; Quine, On What There Is

PHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEMS & THE ANALYSIS OF LANGUAGE

Russell's paradox. Contents. Informal presentation. Formal derivation

Russell on Denoting. G. J. Mattey. Fall, 2005 / Philosophy 156. The concept any finite number is not odd, nor is it even.

Philosophy of Mathematics Kant

Strawson On Referring. By: Jake McDougall and Siri Cosper

Definite Descriptions: From Symbolic Logic to Metaphysics. The previous president of the United States is left handed.

Wittgenstein s Logical Atomism. Seminar 8 PHIL2120 Topics in Analytic Philosophy 16 November 2012

Ockham s Razor in Russell s Philosophy John L. Taylor

PHI2391: Logical Empiricism I 8.0

Class #7 - Russell s Description Theory

Bertrand Russell Proper Names, Adjectives and Verbs 1

The Ontological Argument for the existence of God. Pedro M. Guimarães Ferreira S.J. PUC-Rio Boston College, July 13th. 2011

Hartley Slater BACK TO ARISTOTLE!

Mathematics in and behind Russell s logicism, and its

Soames on the Metaphysics and Epistemology of Moore and Russell

Russell on Descriptions

Class #14: October 13 Gödel s Platonism

G. H. von Wright Deontic Logic

russell s theory of propositions

Gödel's incompleteness theorems

Class 33: Quine and Ontological Commitment Fisher 59-69

Negative Facts. Negative Facts Kyle Spoor

Wittgenstein and Gödel: An Attempt to Make Wittgenstein s Objection Reasonable

Phil 435: Philosophy of Language. P. F. Strawson: On Referring

The Sea-Fight Tomorrow by Aristotle

Philosophy 240: Symbolic Logic

Collingwood and the Disaster of Cook Wilson, Moore and Russell for British Ethics and Politics. Ian Winchester, University of Calgary

Soames on the metaphysics and epistemology of Moore and Russell

Phil 435: Philosophy of Language. [Handout 7] W. V. Quine, Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes (1956)

Empty Names and Two-Valued Positive Free Logic

(1) A phrase may be denoting, and yet not denote anything; e.g., 'the present King of France'.

A Note on a Remark of Evans *

WRITERS AND CRITICS - BERTRAND RUSSELL. by John Watling.

CHAPTER 1 A PROPOSITIONAL THEORY OF ASSERTIVE ILLOCUTIONARY ARGUMENTS OCTOBER 2017

Ling 98a: The Meaning of Negation (Week 1)

Figure 1: Laika. Definite Descriptions Jean Mark Gawron San Diego State University. Definite Descriptions: Pick out an entity in the world (Figure 1)

BERTRAND RUSSELL READER P RINCIPLES, PROPOSITIONS & D ISCUSSIONS FOR L AND & FREEDOM

Broad on Theological Arguments. I. The Ontological Argument

BERTRAND RUSSELL ON NUCLEAR WAR, PEACE, AND LANGUAGE

Semantic Entailment and Natural Deduction

Logic and Existence. Steve Kuhn Department of Philosophy Georgetown University

Philosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy. Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2011

Spinoza and the Axiomatic Method. Ever since Euclid first laid out his geometry in the Elements, his axiomatic approach to

A Solution to the Gettier Problem Keota Fields. the three traditional conditions for knowledge, have been discussed extensively in the

(Refer Slide Time 03:00)

Facts and Free Logic. R. M. Sainsbury

Facts and Free Logic R. M. Sainsbury

Remarks on a Foundationalist Theory of Truth. Anil Gupta University of Pittsburgh

Frege and Russell on Names and Descriptions Naïve theories

Potentialism about set theory

RUSSELL, NEGATIVE FACTS, AND ONTOLOGY* L. NATHAN OAKLANDERt SILVANO MIRACCHI

Tools for Logical Analysis. Roger Bishop Jones

356 THE MONIST all Cretans were liars. It can be put more simply in the form: if a man makes the statement I am lying, is he lying or not? If he is, t

Definite Descriptions, Naming, and Problems for Identity. 1. Russel s Definite Descriptions: Here are three things we ve been assuming all along:

A Priori Knowledge: Analytic? Synthetic A Priori (again) Is All A Priori Knowledge Analytic?

REFERENCE AND MODALITY. An Introduction to Naming and Necessity

Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

HORWICH S MINIMALIST CONCEPTION OF TRUTH: Some Logical Difficulties

2.1 Review. 2.2 Inference and justifications

to Frege's Philosophy

QUESTIONING GÖDEL S ONTOLOGICAL PROOF: IS TRUTH POSITIVE?

TRUTH VIRTUAL ISSUE NO. 1. Facts and Propositions F. P. R A M S E Y

Theories of propositions

ON DENOTING BERTRAND RUSSELL ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED IN MIND 14.4 (1905): THIS COPY FROM PHILOSOPHY-INDEX.COM.

Molnar on Truthmakers for Negative Truths

F. P. Ramsey ( )

Is There a Plural Object? Byeong-Uk Yi

LENT 2018 THEORY OF MEANING DR MAARTEN STEENHAGEN

What is the Frege/Russell Analysis of Quantification? Scott Soames

First- or Second-Order Logic? Quine, Putnam and the Skolem-paradox *

Early Russell on Philosophical Grammar

The Metaphysics of Logical Atomism

Concerning the Laws of Contradiction and Excluded Middle by V. J. McGill, Philosophy of Science, Vol. 6, No. 2 (Apr., 1939), pp.

Chapter 3: More Deductive Reasoning (Symbolic Logic)

Introduction. I. Proof of the Minor Premise ( All reality is completely intelligible )

Logic I or Moving in on the Monkey & Bananas Problem

How Gödelian Ontological Arguments Fail

Based on the translation by E. M. Edghill, with minor emendations by Daniel Kolak.

Ryle on Systematically Misleading Expresssions

PHILOSOPHY OF LOGIC AND LANGUAGE OVERVIEW FREGE JONNY MCINTOSH 1. FREGE'S CONCEPTION OF LOGIC

On Interpretation. Section 1. Aristotle Translated by E. M. Edghill. Part 1

Brief Remarks on Putnam and Realism in Mathematics * Charles Parsons. Hilary Putnam has through much of his philosophical life meditated on

Aristotle on the Principle of Contradiction :

Foundations of Logic, Language, and Mathematics

Lecture 4. Before beginning the present lecture, I should give the solution to the homework problem

Artificial Intelligence Prof. P. Dasgupta Department of Computer Science & Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

Philosophy (PHILOS) Courses. Philosophy (PHILOS) 1

Justice and Ethics. Jimmy Rising. October 3, 2002

145 Philosophy of Science

2 in which a; is a constituent, where x, the variable, is. 1 I have discussed this subject in Principles of Mathematics, chapter

Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (abridged version) Ludwig Wittgenstein

Contemporary Theology I: Hegel to Death of God Theologies

Transcription:

Great Philosophers Bertrand Russell Evening lecture series, Department of Philosophy. Dr. Keith Begley kbegley@tcd.ie 28/11/2017

Overview Early Life Education Logicism Russell s Paradox Theory of Descriptions Later Life

Early Life Bertrand Arthur William Russell, was born on the 18 th of May 1872, at Ravenscroft in Trelleck, Monmouthshire, United Kingdom. The philosopher John Stuart Mill was asked to be his secular godfather. Mill dies the next year (8 th May 1873). From a liberal and aristocratic family. Lord John Russell, a former prime minister, was Bertrand s paternal grandfather. In June and July of 1874, his mother and sister die of diphtheria. In January 1876, his father dies of bronchitis. His will states that Bertrand should be raised a free-thinker. Bertrand s paternal grandparents overturn this will, and gain custody of Bertrand and his elder brother, Frank. 1878: Bertrand s grandfather dies. He is brought up by his grandmother, Lady Francis Russell. Bertrand in 1876

Education Educated by private tutors. 1883: 11 years old. Receives lessons in Euclidean geometry from his brother, Frank. 1890: Enters Trinity College, Cambridge on a scholarship to study for the Mathematical Tripos. 1893: Awarded a first class B.A. in Mathematics. Studies philosophy for a year. 1894: Graduates from Cambridge in June. Marries Alys Pearsall Smith. 1896: Appointed lecturer at the London School of Economics, and also lectures in the United States. 1899: Appointed lecturer at Trinity College, Cambridge. 1901: Reappointed at Cambridge. Discovers Russell s paradox.

Logicism A position that was also held by Frege. In fact, Russell ends up covering much of the same ground. The truths of mathematics can be stated in terms of truths of logic. Mathematics is really a logic of numbers, a part of logic more generally. Mathematical proof is really a species of logical proof. The fact that all Mathematics is Symbolic Logic is one of the greatest discoveries of our age; and when this fact has been established, the remainder of the principles of mathematics consists in the analysis of Symbolic Logic itself (1903). The culmination of this project comes in 1910, 1912, 1913, when together with Whitehead, Principia Mathematica is published in three volumes. In this work they try to derive fundamental mathematical truths from logic. A second edition is published in the early 1920s. However, in 1931 Kurt Gödel publishes his famous incompleteness theorems. Which effectively show that the logicist project, as conceived by Frege and Russell, is doomed to failure.

Russell s Paradox A problem for Cantor s Naïve Set theory and for Frege s Logic. In these systems there is an axiom called Comprehension that allows them to specify any set. The Russell set: Let R = {x x x}, then R R R R In English: Let R be the set of all sets that are not members of themselves. Then, this set R is a member of itself if and only if R is not a member of itself. Contradiction. A simplified version: Consider a list that lists all and only the lists that do not list themselves. Is this list included on the same list itself or not? If the list lists itself, then it lists a list that lists itself. Contradiction. If the list does not list itself, then it fails to list a list that does not list itself. Contradiction. This is a problem because if a formal system produces a contradiction, then the system is trivial, because all statements can be derived from a contradiction. Russell provides a solution called Type theory. That is, a theory that restricts the Comprehension rule, such that sets can only contain elements of a lower type than themselves. This avoids the paradox.

1902: In June, Russell rereads Frege s work and realises that his paradox reveals a flaw in it. He communicates this to Frege. 1903: Russell first publishes his solution to the paradox in The Principles of Mathematics. Although, he continues to consider refinements and other solutions to the problem for a number of years. 1905: Publishes his article On Denoting, in which he presents his Theory of Descriptions. 1907: Runs for Parliament but is defeated. 1908: Elected Fellow of the Royal Society. 1910: Principia Mathematica published 1911: Wittgenstein begins to study with him. Russell separates from his wife Alys. 1916: Dismissed from Cambridge and fined due to anti-war writings. 1918: Imprisoned for five months due to further anti-war writings. Russell in 1907

Theory of Descriptions Using predicate logic we can distinguish between the uses of the verb is. 1. The is of predication: e.g., Cicero is wise ; has the form x is F ; Fx. 2. The is of identity: e.g., Cicero is Tully ; has the form x is y ; x = y. 3. The is existence: e.g., Cicero is ; has the form x is ; x. In a similar fashion, Russell believed that the new logic could also be used to analyse the logical form of sentences in natural languages. A definite description is of the form The F ; as opposed to an indefinite description that has the form An F. We can distinguish between these kinds of description using the predicate calculus to state their logical forms. An F is G : There is an F and Something that is F is G x(fx & Gx) The F is G : There is an F, At most one thing is F, and Something that is F is G x(fx & y(fy x=y) & Gx) These are incomplete components and contribute to meaning without being fully meaningful themselves. This kind of analysis helps to solve a number of problems.

Negative Existentials We can form sentences that deny the existence of a thing. P: Pegasus does not exist. If we that assume that the sentence is about something that exists, i.e., the referent of Pegasus, then it is contradictory. However, if we assume that Pegasus does not have a referent, then the sentence seems to lack meaning. One solution is to posit that there are non-existent objects, which subsist ; a view put forward by Meinong, which has strange consequences. Russell s solution avoids positing non-existent objects. Russell s theory allows him to distinguish between proper names like this and that, and definite descriptions like The F. He treats Pegasus as a disguised definite description the winged horse of Greek mythology, rather than a proper name. Russell then analyses P as: It is not the case that there is a thing x, such that x is the winged horse of Greek mythology. P is true (and is not self-contradictory).

Excluded Middle The first of these is about the interaction between certain logical principles such as the principle of the excluded middle and definite descriptions. The principle of the excluded middle: P is true or not P is true. P: The present King of France is bald OR not P: The present King of France is not bald. This implies that there is a present King of France, because both options presuppose that there is; but France is a Republic. Russell instead analyses P as a conjunction of: 1. There is an x such that, x is the King of France 2. For any thing y, if y is the King of France then y=x (At most there is one King of France) 3. x is bald Thus, there is a way to deny or negate P without presupposing that there is a present King of France. That is, we can deny 1, and P will be false.

Identity Problem was addressed in a different way by Frege, who posits two kinds or components of meaning, reference and sense. Russell s solution makes do merely with references (denotation). Is Scott is the author of Waverley true? ; The answer to this is neither obvious nor necessary. Is Scott is Scott true? ; The answer to this is obvious and necessary. So, in this case, Scott cannot be substituted for the author of Waverley. If the author of Waverley meant anything other than Scott, Scott is the author of Waverley would be false, which it is not. If the author of Waverley meant Scott, Scott is the author of Waverley would be a tautology, which it is not. Therefore, the author of Waverley means neither Scott nor anything else i.e. the author of Waverley means nothing, Q.E.D. (My Philosophical Development, 1959). Scott is the author of Waverley. x[(axw & y(ayw y=x)) & x=s] ; a contingent proposition. Scott is Scott. s=s ; A tautology; a necessarily true proposition.

1921: Divorces from Alys and marries Dora Black. 1922: Runs for parliament. 1923: Runs for parliament. 1924 29: Lectures in the United States. 1931: His brother Frank dies, and Bertrand becomes the third Earl Russell. 1935: Divorces from Dora. 1936: Marries Patricia Helen Spence. 1938 41: Holds a number of professorships in America. 1944: Reappointed a Fellow of Trinity College. 1948: Involved in a plane crash on the way to Norway. 1949: Awarded the Order of Merit and elected a Lifetime Fellow at Trinity College. 1950: Awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature Russell in 1936

1952: Divorces from Patricia and marries Edith Finch. 1955: Releases Russell-Einstein Manifesto. 1957: Elected President of the first Pugwash Conference. 1958: Founding President of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament. 1961: Imprisoned for one week for involvement in anti-nuclear protests. 1963: Establishes the Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation. 1967: Launches the International War Crimes Tribunal. 1970: Aged 97. Dies February 02 at Penrhyndeudraeth, Wales. His ashes were scattered in the Welsh mountains.

Thank you for listening! Further reading: The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy's entry on Russell. Online Bertrand Russell s Autobiography.