Ace the Bold Face Sample Copy Not for Sale

Similar documents
2014 Examination Report 2014 Extended Investigation GA 2: Critical Thinking Test GENERAL COMMENTS

ChakraActivationSystem.com 1

Reason and Argument. Richard Feldman Second Edition

Copyright. Copyright 2017 Abby Rike Rockenbaugh of rockthis.org. All rights reserved.

Logic Appendix: More detailed instruction in deductive logic

CRITICAL THINKING (CT) MODEL PART 1 GENERAL CONCEPTS

CBT and Christianity

Wittgenstein on the Fallacy of the Argument from Pretence. Abstract

AICE Thinking Skills Review. How to Master Paper 2

Fallacies. Definition: The premises of an argument do support a particular conclusion but not the conclusion that the arguer actually draws.

Take Home Exam #1. PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy Prof. Lauren R. Alpert

The Power of Positive Thinking

Letters.org. APPEAL LETTER TEMPLATE. Included: Appeal letter template

CHAPTER 5. CULTURAL RELATIVISM.

CRITICAL REASONING DAY : 04 BOLD-FACED QUESTIONS

Commentary on Sample Test (May 2005)

Rosen, Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications, 6th edition Extra Examples

VibrationalManifestation.com 1

! Prep Writing Persuasive Essay

10 Studies in Ecclesiastes

Lawrence Brian Lombard a a Wayne State University. To link to this article:

Relativism and Subjectivism. The Denial of Objective Ethical Standards

1. Clarity: Understandable, the meaning can be grasped; free from confusion or ambiguity; to remove obscurities.

1. Introduction Formal deductive logic Overview

Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me?

Comments on Lasersohn

GCSE Religious Studies B June 2014 Exemplars with Commentaries

Sample Questions with Explanations for LSAT India

Pearson Education Limited Edinburgh Gate Harlow Essex CM20 2JE England and Associated Companies throughout the world

CONTEMPORARY MORAL PROBLEMS LECTURE 14 CAPITAL PUNISHMENT PART 2

OC THINK TANK - CLOSING THE BACK DOOR

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking

The Critical Mind is A Questioning Mind

2016 Philosophy. Higher. Finalised Marking Instructions

Am I free? Freedom vs. Fate

The Power of Critical Thinking Why it matters How it works

Argument Mapping. Table of Contents. By James Wallace Gray 2/13/2012

The Unbearable Lightness of Theory of Knowledge:

Logical (formal) fallacies

Genre Guide for Argumentative Essays in Social Science

Russell: On Denoting

THE BELIEF IN GOD AND IMMORTALITY A Psychological, Anthropological and Statistical Study

Living Victoriously in Difficult Times

Resolved: Connecticut should eliminate the death penalty.

7600 Macon Road P. O. Box 1030, Cordova, TN p f

QCAA Study of Religion 2019 v1.1 General Senior Syllabus

Truth and Evidence in Validity Theory

5(9(/$7,21 7+( */25,),(' &+5,67 :22'52:.52// CROSSWAY BOOKS A PUBLISHING MINISTRY OF GOOD NEWS PUBLISHERS WHEATON, ILLINOIS

TEACHER APPLICATION. Full name: Current Address:

Law as a Social Fact: A Reply to Professor Martinez

Coordination Problems

Copyright 2014 SuccessVantage Pte Ltd. All rights reserved. Published by Winter & Alvin

CHRISTIANITY AND THE NATURE OF SCIENCE J.P. MORELAND

Four Arguments that the Cognitive Psychology of Religion Undermines the Justification of Religious Belief

INFORMATIONAL ROBOT HAND PLAN (facts or details)

CHAPTER 13: UNDERSTANDING PERSUASIVE. What is persuasion: process of influencing people s belief, attitude, values or behavior.

GMAT. Verbal Section Test [CRITICAL REASONING] - Solutions. 2019, BYJU'S. All Rights Reserved.

CRITICAL REASONING. Preparation Guide

Resolved: The United States should adopt a no first strike policy for cyber warfare.

KANT S EXPLANATION OF THE NECESSITY OF GEOMETRICAL TRUTHS. John Watling

RESPONSE FROM FLUORIDE FREE NZ - ASA COMPLAINT 16/359 FUNDRAISING PAGE SUBJECT TO COMPLAINT

Make a Positive Statement, so People Understand Right Away without Having to Unpack a Nest of Negatives

What we want to know is: why might one adopt this fatalistic attitude in response to reflection on the existence of truths about the future?

occasions (2) occasions (5.5) occasions (10) occasions (15.5) occasions (22) occasions (28)

Romans What About The Jews - Part 2 August 16, 2015

INTERMEDIATE LOGIC Glossary of key terms

RMPS Assignment. National 5/Higher. Name: Class: Teacher: My Question:

Establishing premises

Elements of Science (cont.); Conditional Statements. Phil 12: Logic and Decision Making Fall 2010 UC San Diego 9/29/2010

The Critique (analyzing an essay s argument)

The Precautionary Principle and the ethical foundations of the radiation protection system

EPISTEMOLOGY for DUMMIES

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A Survey Highlighting Christian Perceptions on Criminal Justice

TITUS. Bible Books Chapter by Chapter Series

AP European History. Sample Student Responses and Scoring Commentary. Inside: Short Answer Question 3. Scoring Guideline.

GMAT ANALYTICAL WRITING ASSESSMENT

Critical Reasoning. Chapter 1 Foundations of Arguments

INJUSTICE ARGUMENT ESSAY

The Philosophy of Ethics as It Relates to Capital Punishment. Nicole Warkoski, Lynchburg College

ECONOMETRIC METHODOLOGY AND THE STATUS OF ECONOMICS. Cormac O Dea. Junior Sophister

Just once more and then. I ll quit... Looking Deeper

Sample Fundamental Skills Exercises

Letters.org. SCHOLARSHIP REJECTION LETTER. Included: Scholarship rejection letter

Chapter 5: Freedom and Determinism

How to Generate a Thesis Statement if the Topic is Not Assigned.

HSC EXAMINATION REPORT. Studies of Religion

Managing Job Stress. 0 = Never 1 = Occasionally 2 = Somewhat often 3 = Frequently 4 = Almost Always

Let s explore a controversial topic DHMO. (aka Dihydrogen monoxide)

I N THEIR OWN VOICES: WHAT IT IS TO BE A MUSLIM AND A CITIZEN IN THE WEST

Divine command theory

Contents. Course Directions 4. Outline of Romans 7. Outline of Lessons 8. Lessons Recommended Reading 156

Use the following checklist to make sure you have revised everything.

Moral Argument. Jonathan Bennett. from: Mind 69 (1960), pp

Introduction Paragraph 7 th /8 th grade expectation: 150+ words (includes the thesis)

1) What is the universal structure of a topicality violation in the 1NC, shell version?

A Brief Examination of Conscience Based on the Ten Commandments

AncientSecretsOfKings.com 1

MILL ON JUSTICE: CHAPTER 5 of UTILITARIANISM Lecture Notes Dick Arneson Philosophy 13 Fall, 2005

HISTORY A Theme: Tudor Rebellions (Component 3)

Museum of Social History An Integration Project PL 3370 British Social Philosophy London Semester Fall 2003

Transcription:

Ace the Bold Face Sample Copy Not for Sale GMAT and GMAC are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council which neither sponsors nor endorses this product

3 Copyright, Legal Notice and Disclaimer: All contents copyright by Aristotle Prep. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form, by any means (electronic, photocopying, recording, or otherwise) without the prior written permission of Aristotle Prep Any trademarks, service marks, product names, or named features are assumed to be the property of their respective owners and are used only for reference. There is no implied endorsement if we use one of these terms. Although the authors and publisher have made every reasonable attempt to achieve complete accuracy of the content in this Guide, they assume no responsibility for errors or omissions. You should use this information at your own risk. Aristotle Prep Ace the Bold Face 10-digit International Standard Book Number: 81-926637-3-6 13-digit International Standard Book Number: 978-81-926637-3-9 Publisher: Aristotle Prep Copyright 2013 Aristotle Prep www.aristotleprep.com

Contents Introduction...... 5 Bold Face Questions 1-50....7 Answers & Explanations 32

5 Introduction Bold Face Question is one question type in which, even those students who are good at Critical Reasoning, tend to face difficulty. The problem is compounded by the fact that the OG contains only a few of these questions and there is no other dedicated resource for these questions that students can practice from. To solve this problem, we have launched this exclusive set of 50 Bold Face questions that will provide you sufficient practice of all the different argument types and the confusing terminologies used in these questions. In order to make the questions in this book a close representation of those on the actual GMAT, we have tried to word the options in the same manner as you would see on any official question. Also, to avoid unnecessary clutter, we have skipped the question stem from the questions in. Each question simply requires you to identify the role being played by the two bold parts in the argument as a whole. Since bold faced questions and their options tend to be extremely dense and difficult to understand, we recommend that you practice no more than 5-7 of these questions at a stretch and then spend some time analysing the questions. Even if you get the answer correct, it would be a good idea to go through the remaining choices to understand why they were wrong. The beauty of this book is that, by the time you complete all 50 questions, you will actually start to see how the question maker tries to trap you by using confusing language and other common misdirection traps. Please note that this book is just intended to be a practice resource for Bold Face questions; to learn how to approach these questions and for other Critical Reasoning strategies please refer to our bestselling GMAT book the Critical Reasoning Grail. We hope that you will find this book useful in your quest to achieve a high GMAT score. Please send us your thoughts on this book at feedback@aristotleprep.com. Good luck! www.aristotleprep.com

1. Studies of the relationship between public opinion and political action on a wide range of subjects show nothing unique or very interesting about the state of public opinion on climate change. Significant policy action has occurred on other issues with less public support on many occasions. However, instead of motivating further support for action, efforts to intensify public opinion through apocalyptic visions or appeals to authority, have instead led to a loss of trust in campaigning scientists and a deep politicization of the climate issue. (A) The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion; the second is that conclusion. (B) The first provides the findings of a study; the second provides data that raises doubts on these findings. (C) The first is the primary conclusion of the argument; the second provides evidence to question this conclusion. (D) The first provides the findings of a study; the second provides further elaboration of these findings. (E) The first is a claim used to justify a conclusion; the second is a counter-claim that questions that conclusion. 2. Despite what most people believe, heart attacks rarely happen out of the blue. In fact, your body may be trying to warn you of an impending heart attack for days, weeks, perhaps even a month or two before it occurs. Unfortunately, by the time you actually recognize you re suffering a heart attack, it could be too late to prevent death or debilitating heart damage. Thus it makes sense to be aware of the key signs that tell you that you may suffer from a heart attack in the next few days. (A) The first provides a generally accepted statement of truth; the second is a conclusion arrived at from this statement of truth. (B) The first is a claim put forward by the argument; the second explains why the knowledge of this claim will not benefit you. (C) The first elaborates on the contradiction to a generally accepted belief; the second is the primary conclusion of the argument, arrived at from this contradiction. (D) The first provides a contradiction that the author uses to arrive at a conclusion; the second is that conclusion. (E) The first provides evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second states that position.

7 3. While reporting a conflict between two political parties, a reporter must not allow his personal biases to unfairly present one of the parties in a negative light. After all, a good reporter must always be impartial and objective. This, however, does not mean that the reporter needs to hide the injustices perpetrated by either party in the name of appearing fair to that party because such a style of reporting will convey to the public that both the parties are equally just or unjust, whereas in real life that seldom tends to be the case. (A) The first describes an action that the argument is in favour of; the second argues against arriving at a particular conclusion from that action. (B) The first describes evidence that has been used to support a conclusion; the second provides justification for such a support. (C) The first describes an action that the argument is in favour of; the second states why such an action will fail to achieve its intended objective. (D) The first is a claim, the validity of which is at issue in the argument; the second is a conclusion drawn on the basis of that claim. (E) The first describes an action that the argument supports; the second states an implication of that action. 4. People who drink coffee regularly say that they are addicted to caffeine because they feel that they can t live without it. Addiction is defined as a state in which a person strongly depends on a drug with severe withdrawal symptoms. He should have an urge to consume it more and more and is tolerant to a particular dose. Based on this definition, caffeine consumption does not qualify as an addiction. Researches too have shown that caffeine does not cause any kind of addiction. Alcohol or other drug addiction can have severe social and physical consequences but this is not the case with caffeine which further strengthens the belief that it is not addictive or does not cause addiction. (A) The first provides the definition of a term that has been used to arrive at a conclusion; the second provides further support for that conclusion. (B) The first provides the definition of a term; the second provides further support for that definition. (C) The first provides a definition that constitutes the main premise of the argument; the second is the conclusion of the argument as a whole. (D) The first and second are contradictory claims, both of which together provide support for the primary conclusion of the argument. (E) The first provides evidence in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second provides further justification for this evidence. www.aristotleprep.com

5. Corporal punishment is a physical punishment in which pain is deliberately inflicted on a perpetrator of a wrong in order to exact retribution and to deter similar behaviour in future. An accepted form of discipline through the ages, it has been upheld by all the Abrahamic religions, and has been practiced in some form in almost every human civilization. In the latter half of the 20th century, however, a growing number of states have outlawed the use of corporal punishment, particularly in schools. Corporal punishment in schools is now illegal in all European countries, except for France and Czech Republic and also in 30 states in the United States. (A) The first describes the historical attitude towards a practice; the second describes the current attitude towards this practice. (B) The first describes the historical attitude towards a practice; the second provides evidence highlighting the current attitude towards this practice. (C) The first provides the definition of a term; the second provides evidence undermining the implications of this definition. (D) The first describes the historical attitude towards a practice; the second is a prediction that the historical attitude does not apply any more. (E) The first is a consideration used to justify a particular practice; the second provides evidence to question such a justification.

9 Answers and Explanations 1. Studies of the relationship between public opinion and political action on a wide range of subjects show nothing unique or very interesting about the state of public opinion on climate change. Significant policy action has occurred on other issues with less public support on many occasions. However, instead of motivating further support for action, efforts to intensify public opinion through apocalyptic visions or appeals to authority, have instead led to a loss of trust in campaigning scientists and a deep politicization of the climate issue. (A) The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion; the second is that conclusion. (B) The first provides the findings of a study; the second provides data that raises doubts on these findings. (C) The first is the primary conclusion of the argument; the second provides evidence to question this conclusion. (D) The first provides the findings of a study; the second provides further elaboration of these findings. (E) The first is a claim used to justify a conclusion; the second is a counter-claim that questions that conclusion. OA D Argument Summary According to studies, while there is generally a positive correlation between public opinion and political action, in case of the topic of climate change such a correlation does not hold; in fact it gets reversed at times. Prediction for the two bold parts The first provides the findings of a study and the second provides more details on these findings. A If anything, the first is the conclusion and the second provides further support for it by providing more details. B While the first part is correct, the second does not raise doubts on the first. C While the first may be considered the conclusion, the second does not by any means question it. D This perfectly matches our prediction above and should be the correct answer. E There is no such conclusion in the entire stimulus that is supported by the first bold part and questioned by the second. www.aristotleprep.com

2. Despite what most people believe, heart attacks rarely happen out of the blue. In fact, your body may be trying to warn you of an impending heart attack for days, weeks, perhaps even a month or two before it occurs. Unfortunately, by the time you actually recognize you re suffering a heart attack, it could be too late to prevent death or debilitating heart damage. Thus it makes sense to be aware of the key signs that that tell you that you may suffer from a heart attack in the next few days. (A) The first provides a generally accepted statement of truth; the second is a conclusion arrived at from this statement of truth. (B) The first is a claim put forward by the argument; the second explains why the knowledge of this claim will not benefit you. (C) The first elaborates on the contradiction to a generally accepted belief; the second is the primary conclusion of the argument, arrived at from this contradiction. (D) The first provides a contradiction that the author uses to arrive at a conclusion; the second is that conclusion. (E) The first provides evidence that has been used to support a position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second states that position. OA C Argument Summary Heart attacks don t take place out of the blue; rather, your body tries to warn you of an impending heart attack and thus, it pays to be aware of these warning signs. Prediction for the two bold parts The first elaborates on the opening statement of the argument. The second is the main conclusion of the argument. The second, in a way, follows from the first. A There is nothing to suggest that the first is a generally accepted statement. In fact it is the opposite because the author clearly states that most people believe otherwise. B In fact the second explains why such knowledge will benefit you. C The opening sentence provides a contradiction by stating that the belief of most people regarding one aspect of heart attacks is incorrect. The second sentence i.e. the first bold sentence actually provides more support for this. The second bold sentence is but obviously the primary conclusion of the argument. Thus C is the best answer. D As discussed above, the first bold sentence does not provide the contradiction; it merely builds upon it. The contradiction is in the first sentence of the argument, which is not in bold. E The argument never opposes this position; rather it supports it.

11 3. While reporting a conflict between two political parties, a reporter must not allow his personal biases to unfairly present one of the parties in a negative light. After all, a good reporter must always be impartial and objective. This, however, does not mean that the reporter needs to hide the injustices perpetrated by either party in the name of appearing fair to that party because such a style of reporting will convey to the public that both the parties are equally just or unjust, whereas in real life that seldom tends to be the case. (A) The first describes an action that the argument is in favour of; the second argues against arriving at a particular conclusion from that action. (B) The first describes evidence that has been used to support a conclusion; the second provides justification for such a support. (C) The first describes an action that the argument is in favour of; the second states why such an action will fail to achieve its intended objective. (D) The first is a claim, the validity of which is at issue in the argument; the second is a conclusion drawn on the basis of that claim. (E) The first describes an action that the argument supports; the second states an implication of that action. OA A Argument Summary The argument states that a reporter must be fair while reporting a conflict between two parties. However this does not mean that the reporter makes both the parties look equally good or bad by hiding their negative features. Prediction for the two bold parts The first describes an act that a reporter must not indulge in. The second states a conclusion that the argument asserts should not be arrived at using the first bold sentence. A The correct answer. The second basically states that, from the first bold sentence, reporters should not arrive at the conclusion that they are expected hide or gloss over the injustices committed by either party to the conflict. B The second does not provide justification for the conclusion; in fact if anything the second is the primary conclusion of the argument. C The second never states why such an action will fail. D The validity of the first bold sentence is never at issue in the argument. E The second is not an implication of the first; rather the second urges reporters to not arrive at a particular implication from the first. www.aristotleprep.com

4. People who drink coffee regularly say that they are addicted to caffeine because they feel that they can t live without it. Addiction is defined as a state in which a person strongly depends on a drug with severe withdrawal symptoms. He should have an urge to consume it more and more and is tolerant to a particular dose. Based on this definition, caffeine consumption does not qualify as an addiction. Researches too have shown that caffeine does not cause any kind of addiction. Alcohol or other drug addiction can have severe social and physical consequences but this is not the case with caffeine which further strengthens the belief that it is not addictive or does not cause addiction. (A) The first provides the definition of a term that has been used to arrive at a conclusion; the second provides further support for that conclusion. (B) The first provides the definition of a term; the second provides further support for that definition. (C) The first provides a definition that constitutes the main premise of the argument; the second is the conclusion of the argument as a whole. (D) The first and second are contradictory claims, both of which together provide support for the primary conclusion of the argument. (E) The first provides evidence in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second provides further justification for this evidence. OA A Argument Summary Coffee drinkers are incorrect in their belief that they are addicted to caffeine because coffee consumption does not satisfy many of the criteria that constitute an addiction. Prediction for the two bold parts The first defines the term addiction. The second provides one reason why caffeine should not be considered addictive A The first clearly defines Addiction, a fact that the author uses to conclude that caffeine is not addictive. The second provides further evidence to support that caffeine is not addictive. Thus A is the best answer. B The second does not provide any support for the definition; it provides support for the conclusion of the argument. C The second is not the conclusion of the argument. D While it is true that the first and second both support the argument s primary conclusion, these are not contradictory claims. E The second provides further justification for the conclusion of the argument and not for the evidence in the first bold part.

13 5. Corporal punishment is a physical punishment in which pain is deliberately inflicted on a perpetrator of a wrong in order to exact retribution and to deter similar behaviour in future. An accepted form of discipline through the ages, it has been upheld by all the Abrahamic religions, and has been practiced in some form in almost every human civilization. In the latter half of the 20th century, however, a growing number of states have outlawed the use of corporal punishment, particularly in schools. Corporal punishment in schools is now illegal in all European countries, except for France and Czech Republic and also in 30 states in the United States. (A) The first describes the historical attitude towards a practice; the second describes the current attitude towards this practice. (B) The first describes the historical attitude towards a practice; the second provides evidence highlighting the current attitude towards this practice. (C) The first provides the definition of a term; the second provides evidence undermining the implications of this definition. (D) The first describes the historical attitude towards a practice; the second is a prediction that the historical attitude does not apply any more. (E) The first is a consideration used to justify a particular practice; the second provides evidence to question such a justification. OA B Argument Summary The argument provides a history of corporal punishment and states that it has now been banned in several countries of the world. Prediction for the two bold parts The first provides a background of Corporal punishment. The second provides the current state of the same. Basically the argument contrasts the popularity of Corporal Punishment in the past with its growing unpopularity in recent times. A While the first bold statement does provide the historical attitude towards corporal punishment, the second does not provide the current attitude. The current attitude is, in fact, highlighted in the previous sentence that is not in bold - in the latter half of the 20th century... particularly in schools. B The second does provide evidence highlighting the current attitude in the non-bold part, making this the correct answer. C The first does not provide the definition (which is in the non-bold part), nor does the second undermine any implications of this definition. D The second is not a prediction; it is more of an observation. E The argument never justifies or criticizes corporal punishment anywhere. www.aristotleprep.com