Elements of Science (cont.); Conditional Statements. Phil 12: Logic and Decision Making Fall 2010 UC San Diego 9/29/2010

Similar documents
UC Berkeley, Philosophy 142, Spring 2016

Deduction by Daniel Bonevac. Chapter 1 Basic Concepts of Logic

The way we convince people is generally to refer to sufficiently many things that they already know are correct.

Logic Appendix: More detailed instruction in deductive logic

Quantifiers: Their Semantic Type (Part 3) Heim and Kratzer Chapter 6

What are Truth-Tables and What Are They For?

LOGIC ANTHONY KAPOLKA FYF 101-9/3/2010

Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics. Critical Thinking Lecture 1. Background Material for the Exercise on Validity

HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.)

Logic & Proofs. Chapter 3 Content. Sentential Logic Semantics. Contents: Studying this chapter will enable you to:

Overview of Today s Lecture

Tutorial A02: Validity and Soundness By: Jonathan Chan

THE LARGER LOGICAL PICTURE

Lecture 1 The Concept of Inductive Probability

Chapter 8 - Sentential Truth Tables and Argument Forms

Announcements. CS311H: Discrete Mathematics. First Order Logic, Rules of Inference. Satisfiability, Validity in FOL. Example.

INTERMEDIATE LOGIC Glossary of key terms

Conditionals II: no truth conditions?

Philosophy 220. Truth Functional Properties Expressed in terms of Consistency

Introduction to Philosophy Crito. Instructor: Jason Sheley

HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.)

A Judgmental Formulation of Modal Logic

TWO VERSIONS OF HUME S LAW

A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC FOR METAPHYSICIANS

Transition: From A priori To Anselm

Logic. A Primer with Addendum

Chapter 6. Fate. (F) Fatalism is the belief that whatever happens is unavoidable. (55)

Observation and categories. Phil 12: Logic and Decision Making Fall 2010 UC San Diego 10/8/2010

Recall. Validity: If the premises are true the conclusion must be true. Soundness. Valid; and. Premises are true

PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS UNDERSTANDING OF PROOF: WHAT IF THE TRUTH SET OF AN OPEN SENTENCE IS BROADER THAN THAT COVERED BY THE PROOF?

Boghossian & Harman on the analytic theory of the a priori

The antecendent always a expresses a sufficient condition for the consequent

Basic Concepts and Skills!

Selections from Aristotle s Prior Analytics 41a21 41b5

Argument Mapping. Table of Contents. By James Wallace Gray 2/13/2012

HANDBOOK. IV. Argument Construction Determine the Ultimate Conclusion Construct the Chain of Reasoning Communicate the Argument 13

PHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEMS & THE ANALYSIS OF LANGUAGE

Is anything knowable on the basis of understanding alone?

Introduction to Philosophy

Announcements. CS243: Discrete Structures. First Order Logic, Rules of Inference. Review of Last Lecture. Translating English into First-Order Logic

A. Problem set #3 it has been posted and is due Tuesday, 15 November

BENEDIKT PAUL GÖCKE. Ruhr-Universität Bochum

Logic: inductive. Draft: April 29, Logic is the study of the quality of arguments. An argument consists of a set of premises P1,

Introduction Symbolic Logic

Ayer s linguistic theory of the a priori

There are two common forms of deductively valid conditional argument: modus ponens and modus tollens.

Lecture 3 Arguments Jim Pryor What is an Argument? Jim Pryor Vocabulary Describing Arguments

A Priori Knowledge: Analytic? Synthetic A Priori (again) Is All A Priori Knowledge Analytic?

Ling 98a: The Meaning of Negation (Week 1)

Lecture 2.1 INTRO TO LOGIC/ ARGUMENTS. Recognize an argument when you see one (in media, articles, people s claims).

Logic is the study of the quality of arguments. An argument consists of a set of

PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy

SOME RADICAL CONSEQUENCES OF GEACH'S LOGICAL THEORIES

Intro Viewed from a certain angle, philosophy is about what, if anything, we ought to believe.

Lonergan on General Transcendent Knowledge. In General Transcendent Knowledge, Chapter 19 of Insight, Lonergan does several things:

Constructing the World

Let s explore a controversial topic DHMO. (aka Dihydrogen monoxide)

Reasoning and Decision-Making under Uncertainty

A s a contracts professional, from

2. Refutations can be stronger or weaker.

IIE-2015 Workshop December 12 20, K P Mohanan. Types of Reasoning

Critical Thinking is:

C. Exam #1 comments on difficult spots; if you have questions about this, please let me know. D. Discussion of extra credit opportunities

In his paper Studies of Logical Confirmation, Carl Hempel discusses

Day 3. Wednesday May 23, Learn the basic building blocks of proofs (specifically, direct proofs)

Constructive Logic, Truth and Warranted Assertibility

Wittgenstein s Logical Atomism. Seminar 8 PHIL2120 Topics in Analytic Philosophy 16 November 2012

Lay75879_ch01 11/17/03 2:03 PM Page x

Millian responses to Frege s puzzle

Logic for Computer Science - Week 1 Introduction to Informal Logic

Logic: The Science that Evaluates Arguments

Varieties of Apriority

MAIN BUILDING C

Module 5. Knowledge Representation and Logic (Propositional Logic) Version 2 CSE IIT, Kharagpur

Semantic Foundations for Deductive Methods

Rosen, Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications, 6th edition Extra Examples

Empty Names and Two-Valued Positive Free Logic

With prompting and support, identify the reasons an author gives to support points in a text.

Believing Epistemic Contradictions

Chapter 9- Sentential Proofs

Constructing the World

2.3. Failed proofs and counterexamples

Cognitivism about imperatives

Study Guides. Chapter 1 - Basic Training

Broad on Theological Arguments. I. The Ontological Argument

THE SIX DAYS OF CREATION

From Necessary Truth to Necessary Existence

Chapter 5: Freedom and Determinism

IN DEFENCE OF CLOSURE

Informalizing Formal Logic

Time, Self and Mind (ATS1835) Introduc;on to Philosophy B Semester 2, Dr Ron Gallagher Week 5: Can Machines Think?

Philosophy of Mathematics Nominalism

LENT 2018 THEORY OF MEANING DR MAARTEN STEENHAGEN

Critical Thinking, Reasoning, and Argument

3.3. Negations as premises Overview

Announcements The Logic of Quantifiers Logical Truth & Consequence in Full Fol. Outline. Overview The Big Picture. William Starr

A Brief Introduction to Key Terms

The paradox we re discussing today is not a single argument, but a family of arguments. Here s an example of this sort of argument:!

LGCS 199DR: Independent Study in Pragmatics

10 CERTAINTY G.E. MOORE: SELECTED WRITINGS

Transcription:

Elements of Science (cont.); Conditional Statements Phil 12: Logic and Decision Making Fall 2010 UC San Diego 9/29/2010 1

Why cover statements and arguments Decision making (whether in science or elsewhere) involves reasoning based on evidence Question: when does some piece of information count as (good) evidence for or against a conclusion? - When does some piece of information (evidence) serve to support (confirm) or count against (disconfirm) a hypothesis or theory? To answer these questions we need to discuss arguments, and the statements of which they re composed 2

Clicker question 1 What type of statement is the following sentence: It is sunny, but it is not sunny. A. tautology B. contingent statement C. contradiction 3

Review - 1 Statements are sentences that have a truth value are either true or false - Contingent statements: could be true or could be false - Contradictions: always false - Tautologies: always true 4

Trying to define ordinary terms Necessary and sufficient conditions can generally only be provided for technical terms (e.g., in mathematics or in legal contracts) Most ordinary terms defy such definition: For any attempted definition, a counterexample can be found A counterexample is either: 1. An example that fits the definition but we would not count as an instance of a term; or 2. An example that does not fit the definition but we would count as an instance of a term 5

Clicker question 2 Which of the following is an adequate definition of bird? A. an animal that can fly B. an animal with feathers C. an animal with a beak D. an animal with feathers and a beak that can fly 6

Define bird Flying: is every animal that flies a bird? - Not all birds fly, and most insects do Feathers: is every animal with feathers a bird? - Caudipteryx, Microraptor seem to have had feathers but not be birds 7

Doing without definitions Start with typical cases Robin Blue jay Sparrow Extend to unusual cases 8

Arguments and justification If someone asserts something which you do not believe,you frequently ask them to justify what they say An argument is a set of statements, some of which are offered as support for other statements in the set - An argument provides reasons to believe something - An argument need not involve another person: you can construct an argument to demonstrate that something is true without showing it to anyone 9

Elements of arguments Premises: statements offered in support - Often indicated by words such as because, since, given that, on account of, etc. Conclusion: the statement that is supported - Often indicated by words such as thus, therefore, this establishes that, etc. Example: Premises Conclusion The car has a large dent in it. Dents don t just appear in cars. You had an accident. 10

Good and bad arguments We don t just care whether the conclusion is true We also want to know whether the reasons stated in the premises give us good logical grounds for thinking that the conclusion is true The goal is not actual persuasion (people can be persuaded for bad reasons), but establishing the truth Two factors relevant to the evaluation of arguments: 1. Are the premises true? 2. Is the connection between the premises and the conclusion such that: if the premises were true, would they establish that the conclusion is true? 11

Valid arguments An argument is valid iff it meets the following condition: if the premises were true, the conclusion must also be true - A valid argument cannot have true premises and a false conclusion This relationship is modal: it tells us what would be the case were certain conditions to be met - These conditions might not be satisfied in reality - The definition tells you nothing about what happens when they are not satisfied A way to test for validity: if you can imagine a situation in which the premises are true and the conclusion false, then the argument is not valid 12

Sound arguments An argument is sound iff: 1. the premises are true 2. the argument is valid This definition of a sound argument does not say anything about the truth of the conclusion - But the conclusion of a sound argument must be true A sound argument meets both of the desiderata of a good argument: - True premises - Valid 13

Clicker question 3 A valid argument cannot have a false conclusion. A. True B. False 14

Clicker question 4 A sound argument cannot have a false conclusion. A. True B. False 15

Clicker question 5 An argument with a true conclusion is sound. A. True B. False 16

Conditional statements Conditional statements consist of two component statements linked by the logical connective IF, THEN - If it rains today, then there will be no game If and then are not marking premises and conclusion of an argument antecedent consequent - If it rains today, then there will be no game is not an argument! It simply asserts a conditional relationship between two statements - Compare: On account of the fact that it is raining today, there will be no picnic. 17

Truth values of conditional statements IF, THEN is a truth functional connective: the truth of a compound (whole) statement depends only on the truth values of the component statements If A, then B is false when the antecedent is true and the consequent is false. Otherwise, it is true. You trespass You are arrested If you trespass, then you will be arrested TRUE FALSE FALSE TRUE TRUE TRUE FALSE FALSE TRUE FALSE TRUE TRUE 18

Clicker question 6 The statement The alarm will not sound if the window is opened is false when: A. The alarm sounds and the window is opened B. The alarm sounds and the window is not opened C. The alarm does not sound and the window is opened D. The alarm does not sound and the window is not opened 19

Reversing antecedent and consequent IF A, THEN B is not equivalent to IF B, THEN A - - IF A, THEN B is false when A is true and B is false IF B, THEN A is false when B is true and A is false IF A, THEN B is equivalent to IF NOT B, THEN NOT A. If you trespass, then you will be arrested is equivalent to If you are NOT arrested, then you did NOT trespass 20