Inquiry Concerning a Judge: Brandt C. Downey III SC

Similar documents
The Florida Bar v. Kayo Elwood Morgan SC

DIOCESE OF ALEXANDRIA. Code of Pastoral Conduct. Preface

Professional and Ethical Expectations for Clergy. General Assembly of the Church of God in Michigan

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

Pastoral Code of Conduct

The First Church in Oberlin, United Church of Christ. Policies and Procedures for a Safe Church

CODE OF PASTORAL CONDUCT FOR CHURCH PERSONNEL

DIOCESE OF HOUMA-THIBODAUX

Brochure of Robin Jeffs Registered Investment Advisor CRD # Ashdown Place Half Moon Bay, CA Telephone (650)

Notice of Improprieties and Negligence by Judge Jonathan Lippman and Apparent Corrupt Influence on a Member of The Judicial Nomination Commission

DIOCESE OF PALM BEACH CODE OF PASTORAL CONDUCT FOR CHURCH PERSONNEL

HEAVENLY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH SEXUAL MISCONDUCT POLICY

Page 1 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA

DIOCESE OF ROCKFORD CODE OF PASTORAL CONDUCT v

Statement of Mr and Mrs James. 3 June 2016

Code of Conduct for Priests and Deacons. Promulgated by. The Most Reverend Gregory L. Parkes. As particular law relating to the

COMMUNITY CHURCH ABUSE/HARASSMENT PREVENTION POLICY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/01/ :24 AM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 431 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/01/2018

AN ECCLESIASTICAL POLICY AND A PROCESS FOR REVIEW OF MINISTERIAL STANDING of the AMERICAN BAPTIST CHURCHES OF NEBRASKA PREAMBLE:

BEFORE THE FLORIDA JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION STATE OF FLORIDA AMENDED NOTICE OF FORMAL CHARGES

Inquiry Concerning a Judge: John R. Sloop SC05-555

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Anthony Mangan an Order to Show Cause. The Order was predicated on charges of

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA. ) Case No. CR D

REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS AND SAFETY OF THE CITY OF PERU June 1, 2015

5 INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE NO Case No: SC JUDGE RICHARD H. ALBRITTON, JR / 7

Grievance and Conflict Resolution Guidelines for Congregations

Counting the Cost. John 6:66. Sermon Transcript by Rev. Ernest O'Neill

PRESBYTERY OF SAN FERNANDO SEXUAL CONDUCT POLICY. As God who called you is holy, be holy yourselves in all your conduct. 1 Peter 1:15.

DECATUR HERITAGE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY

District Office 855 Chevy Way, Medford, OR HR Office (541) Fax (541)

Redding Christian School Old 44 Drive Palo Cedro, CA (530) (530) Fax

Heritage Christian Academy

Sexual Abuse Crisis in Church

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

November 11, 1998 N.G.I.S.C. Las Vegas Meeting. CHAIRPERSON JAMES: Commissioners, questions? Do either of your organizations have

Employment Application Form Teaching Staff

Heritage Christian Academy

IN THE MATTER OF a Proceeding under the Certified General Accountants of Ontario Act, 1983 and By-Law Four

PITTSBURGH. Issued: March 1993 Revised: October 2002 Updated: August 2003 Updated: August 2006 Updated: March 2008 Updated: April 2014

>> THE NEXT CASE ON THE DOCKET WILL BE THE FLORIDA BAR V. ROBERT ADAMS. >> WHENEVER YOU'RE READY. >> MR. CHIEF JUSTICE, AND MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT,

INNER HEALING BISHOP RONALD K. POWELL

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Gospel: Matthew 22:34-40

Grove Christian School Coaching Application

Church of God. Ministerial Licensure Application NAME OF APPLICANT: MINISTERIAL FILE NUMBER: STATE/REGION: CHURCH OF GOD INTERNATIONAL OFFICES

First Congregational Church Safe Church Policy (updated ) Safe Church Policy Concerning Abuse Prevention

Ordained Minister and Ministerial internship program (Mip)

* EXCERPT * Audio Transcription. Court Reporters Certification Advisory Board. Meeting, April 1, Judge William C.

SINCE 9/11 Webinar. Freedom of Speech in the Classroom

WHEN AND HOW MUST AN EMPLOYEE S RELIGIOUS BELIEFS BE ACCOMMODATED? HEALTH DIRECTORS LEGAL CONFERENCE JUNE 8, 2017

The Law Society of Alberta Hearing Committee Report

/10/2007, In the matter of Theodore Smith Associated Reporters Int'l., Inc. Page 1419

Army-McCarthy Hearing (1954)

Ramsey media interview - May 1, 1997

Saint Demetrios Greek Orthodox Church Code of Conduct

MATTHEW S. PAPPAS A T T O R N E Y

COLUMBIA'S FIRST BAPTIST FACES LAWSUIT OVER FORMER DEACON'S CONDUCT

SUBSTITUTE TEACHER APPLICATION

DEFINITIONS GUIDELINES. and. for DISCIPLINE

Supreme Court Script: Video: Justice Broderick arrives pile of papers in hand. Good morning

GENEVA COLLEGE. at the CENTER FOR URBAN BIBLICAL MINISTRY. Serving Western Pennsylvania since 1988

THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO.

4 Lessons Learned: 20 Years After My Affair

May 15, Via U.S. mail and

RECTIFICATION. Summary 2

Parish: Address: Audit Period (corresponds to fiscal year):

TEACHER APPLICATION. Full name: Current Address:

FACULTY APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT Active for 180 Days

Inquiry Concerning a Judge: John Renke III Docket Number: SC

Sexual Ethics Policy For Clergy 1 of the Oregon Idaho Annual Conference of The United Methodist Church.

The Florida Bar v. Jorge Luis Cueto

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2012 INDEX NO /2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2012

CHIEF JUSTICE LEWIS: Good morning. And thank you. Let me first start by bringing greetings from the

Marc James Asay v. Michael W. Moore

Western Cape Division of the High Court (Deputy Judge President)

The Florida Bar v. Lee Howard Gross

Shirley Chaplin. Gary McFarlane. -v- United Kingdom

THREAD BETWEEN ALABAMA SEC. OF STATE JOHN MERRILL, HIS DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF/COMMS DIRECTOR JOHN BENNETT, AND BRADBLOG

Policy Type: Governance Policy #1 Status: Final draft dated March 18, 2016

>> ALL RISE. [BACKGROUND SOUNDS] >> SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IS NOW IN SESSION. PLEASE BE SEATED. >> GOOD MORNING. >> WE'RE IN PLANK V. STATE.

Decision. Lee A. Gronikowski appeared on behalf of the Office of Attorney Ethics. Stephen B. Sacharow appeared on behalf of respondent.

VISION STATEMENT: A large, growing, regional church of influence. MISSION STATEMENT: Showing people all they can become in Christ

Substitute Teacher Application

Re: Criminal Trial of Abdul Rahman for Converting to Christianity

State of Florida v. Victor Giorgetti

v. CASE NO CC-00816

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

TRINITY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY 979 Mary Dunn Road Barnstable, MA Phone: (508) Fax: (508)

A MESSAGE FROM THE HEADMASTER MR. TIMOTHY DUFF

A Life that Pleases God 1 Thessalonians 4:1-8

Global Change Network, U.S.A. Membership Agreement

From: Date: Tuesday, August 2, 2016 at 11:43 AM. To: Subject: 3045 Fort Chalres Drive Variance Petition 16-V6

EXPOSING THE MONSTER: EFFECTIVE CROSS-EXAMINATION

St. Joseph Parish Catechist Application

2201 Ruth Jackson Road Bogart, GA (678) FAX (678) APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT

MEMBERSHIP COVENANT GRACE COMMUNITY CHURCH CAMPUSES IN NORTH LIBERTY AND IOWA CITY

"I Was Made to Feel Like an Outsider in My Own Country" Muslim-Americans Say Racial Profiling Led to Detention, Harassment at Airport

Bell Ringer. In the world of high fashion, two-year-old shoes are considered positively archaic.

Transcription:

The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those with disabilities and should be used for no other purpose. These are not legal documents, and may not be used as legal authority. This transcript is not an official document of the Florida Supreme Court. Inquiry Concerning a Judge: Brandt C. Downey III SC05-2228 ALL RISE. HEAR YE, HEAR YE, HEAR YE. THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IS NOW IN SESSION. ALL WHO HAVE CAUSE TO PLEA, DRAW NEAR, GIVE ATTENTION, AND YOU SHALL BE HEARD. GOD SAVE THESE UNITED STATES, THE GREAT STATE OF FLORIDA AND THIS HONORABLE COURT. LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT. PLEASE BE SEATED. >> GOOD MORNING, FRIENDS AND WELCOME TO THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT IN THE FINAL MORNING OF ARGUMENT FOR SEPTEMBER, FRIDAY 22ND. THE FIRST MATTER THAT WE MUST ADDRESS IS THE MATTER CONCERNING JUDGE BRANDT DOWNEY. JUDGE DOWNEY, WOULD YOU PLEASE APPROACH THE PODIUM. GOOD MORNING. >> GOOD MORNING. JUDGE DOWNEY THE PROCEEDING THAT IS BEFORE US TODAY REMINDS US ALL OF THE IMPORTANCE OF MAINTAINING OF THE DIGNITY APPROPRIATE THROUGH JUDICIAL OFFICE AND THE DUTY OF EACH JUDICIAL OFFICER TO ACT IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE INTEGRITY OF THE ENTIRE JUDICIAL BRANCH. NOTHING IS MORE IMPORTANT TO CIVILIZED SOCIETY IN THIS COUNTRY THAN THE THREAT OF TRUST AND CONFIDENCE THAT HOLDS OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM TOGETHER AND HOLDS OUR SOCIETY TOGETHER. IT IS IMPERATIVE FOR THOSE FOR THE EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF OUR JUSTICE

SYSTEM THAT ALL OFFICERS OF -- ABSTAIN FROM INAPPROPRIATE, DISRESPECTFUL BEHAVIOR WHICH TENDS TO REFLECT NEGATIVELY ON THE ENTIRE SYSTEM AND ON EACH AND EVERY ONE OF US. THE FAILURE OF A SINGLE JUDGE TO MAINTAIN THE DIGNITY AND THE QUORUM THAT'S COMMENCERATE WITH OUR JUDICIAL OFFICE UNMINES THE INTEGRITY OF EVERY JUDGE. NONE OF US ARE PERFECT AND WE ALL HAVE HUMAN FRAILITIES. BUT THE CONDUCT THAT BRINGS YOU HERE TODAY IS TRULY SHOCKING. WHEN YOU ARE USING THE PROPERTY OF THE PEOPLE OF FLORIDA. THE CHARGES AGAINST YOU ARISE FROM AND RELATE TO YOUR ADMITTED INAPPROPRIATE USE OF COURT EQUIPMENT. OF COURT TECHNOLOGY FOR VIEWING MATTERS OF A PORNOGRAPHIC MATTER ON THE PROPERTY BELONGING TO THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. ON MAY 26th, 2006, A STIPULATION BETWEEN YOU AND THE INVESTIGATIVE PANEL OF THE FLORIDA JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION WAS PRESENTED TO US PURSUANT TO ARTICLE V SECTION 12 OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION AND THE RULES OF THE JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION. IN THAT STIPULATION, YOU ADMITTED THE CHARGES FILED AND THE INAPPROPRIATE OF THE CONDUCT AND THE IMPRO PRYITY OF THE EVERYTHING THAT WAS INCLUDED WITHIN THE CHARGES RELATING TO YOUR HABITIAL VIEWING OF PORNOGRAPHY FROM YOUR COURTHOUSE COMPUTER. THOSE INCLUDED BEGINNING IN OR ABOUT THE YEAR OF 2002 AND CONTINUING FOR A

THREE-YEAR PERIOD THROUGH 2005 YOU ENGAGED IN THE PRACTICE OF VIEWING INAPPROPRIATE INTERNET WEB SITES FROM THE COMPUTER IN YOUR CHAMBERS. YOUR PRACTICE OF VIEWING THIS MATERIAL FROM YOUR COMPUTER RESULTED IN FREE KPWEPBT COMPUTER VIRUSES INFECTING THE COMPUTER SYSTEM. THE COURTHOUSE ANTI-VIRUS SOFTWARE QUARANTINED THE VIRUSES ON YOUR COMPUTER WHICH IN TURN REQUIRED REMOVAL BY TECHNOLOGY STAFF MEMBERS EITHER FROM A REMOTE LOCATION OR IN PERSON BY COMING TO YOUR OFFICE TO REMOVE THOSE VIRUSES. I WOULD HAVE THOUGHT THAT YOU WOULD HAVE BEEN SO EMBARRASSED YOU WOULD HAVE NEVER DONE IT AGAIN. AS A RESULT, ON AT LEAST TWO OCCASIONS COURTHOUSE PERSONNEL WERE UNWITTINGLY EXPOSED TO IMAGES WHEN THEY REPORTED TO YOUR OFFICE THAT THEY OUGHT NOT TO HAVE BEEN EXPOSED TO. IN ADDITION, ON AT LEAST ONE OCCASION YOUR JUDICIAL ASSISTANT WAS ALSO EXPOSED TO THAT REGRETTABLE WEB SITE IMAGE OR PRESENT IN YOUR OFFICE DURING A REPAIR SERVICE CALL. YOU REPEATEDLY IGNORED E-MAIL WARNING FROM A TECHNOLOGY STAFF ADVISING YOU OF THE RISK TO THE ENTIRE COMPUTER NETWORK. YOU RISKED THE ENTIRE NETWORK DUE TO YOUR VIEWING OF THOSE WEB SITES. IN ADDITION WHILE DENYING YOUR ACTION ROSE TO THE LEVEL OF SEC -- SEXUAL HARASSMENT. WHEN YOU APPEARED HERE BEFORE YOU DID ACKNOWLEDGE THE INPROPRIETY DIRECTED

TOWARD THE FEMALE ASSISTANT STATE ATTORNEY WHILE WORKING IN ABOUT THE COURTHOUSE AND WHILE WORKING AND APPEARING BEFORE YOU. YOU MAY -- YOU MADE TELEPHONE CALLS INVITED HER TO LUNCH AND TKEUFRPB -- DINNER. YOUR BEHAVIOR TOWARD THIS LAWYER EMBARRASSED HER AND SUFFERED THE MOCK AND RIDICULE OF OTHERS. IT'S INEXCUSABLE. IN MARCH YOU ASKED OF -- OF 2005 YOU ASKED ANOTHER FEMALE ATTORNEY TO APPROACH THE BENCH WHILE THE COURT WAS IN SESSION. AND YOU ENGAGED IN PERSONAL CONVERSATIONS DURING COURT TIME. YOU SENT E-MAILS REGRETTABLE E-MAILS NICE SEEING YOU IN COURT LOOKING SO PRETTY. BEST REGARDS, GREAT SEEING YOU LAST NIGHT, YOU LOOKED GOOD ENOUGH, TO -- OH, WELL, WISHFUL THINKING. JUDGE, DOWN KPWREU, WHAT WERE YOU THINKING? WHAT WERE YOU THINKING? BY CONDUCTING YOURSELF IN THIS MANNER, YOU'VE IMPAIRED THE CONTY AGAINST OF THE CITIZENS OF THE STATE AND THE INTEGRITY THAT WE WORK SO HARD TO MAINTAIN. YOU'VE IMPAIRED THE PUBLIC'S CONTY AGAINST YOU AS A JUDGE AND YOU'VE IMPAIRED CONFIDENCE IN ALL OF US THAT SIT HERE ON THIS BENCH THIS MORNING. YOU'VE CONDUCTED YOURSELF IN A MANNER UNBECOMING OF THE MEMBER OF THE JUDICIARY AND YOU VIOLATED SEPARATE AND MULTIPLE CAN -- CANONS OF THE CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT. YOU VIE LATERED CANON ONE BY FAILING TO MAINTAIN THE INTEGRITY OF THE JUDICIARY, AND CANON-2-5 BY REOATING

PUBLIC CONFY DECEMEMBER IN THE EVIDENCE OF THE SKWREUGS ARE I. WHETHER YOU HAVE A VERY, VERY SERIOUS PROBLEM AND HAVE A SICKNESS OR JUST PLAIN STUPID THE IMPACT ON ALL OF US IS ENORMOUS. WE HAVE A CONSTITUTIONAL MANDATED PROCESS THROUGH WHICH WE ADDRESS CONDUCT SUCH AS THIS AND INVEST SUBSTANTIAL AUTHORITY TO JUDICIAL QUALIFICATION. IN ACCORDANCE WITH YOUR STIPULATION, IS THE REASON YOU ARE HERE FOR A REPRIMAND AND OUR ACCEPTANCE OF THE STIPULATION WAS ALMOST A DEAL WITH THE DEVIL BECAUSE UNDER THESE CIRCUMSTANCES WE WERE VIRTUALLY FORCED TO ACCEPT THE STIPULATION TO PLACE YOU BEYOND THE COURTROOM FOR -- ON A PERMANENT BASIS, ALTHOUGH, YOU ARE PERMITTED TO STAY FOR A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME. WE'RE HERE TODAY IN THE -- IN AN ATTEMPT TO PRESERVE AND RESTORE PUBLIC CONFIDENCE IN WHAT WE DO AND IN OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM. WHEN YOU ACCEPTED THE JUDICIAL OFFICE AND, SIR, WE DO UNDERSTAND THAT YOU SERVE WELL FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS YOU STEPPED ACROSS THE RANKS OF EASTERN OR TPHAEURD CITIZEN AND YOU ASSUMED AN OTHER TO BE A JUDGE. THAT'S MUCH MORE THAN JUST A PHYSICAL STEP. IT MUST BE A TOTAL PHYSICAL AND MENTAL COMMITMENT TO SERVE JUSTICE, TO SERVE THE IDEALS OF THE JUSTICE SYSTEM AND TO LIVE THE IDEALS OF A PROPER JUDICIAL OFFICER. OUR BEHAVIOR MUST BE OPEN FOR CONSIDERATION AT ALL TIMES IF WE ARE TO EXPECT THE JUDICIAL BRANCH TO ADVANCE AND PROTECT THE RULE

OF LAW THAT'S ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY TO HOLD US TOGETHER AS A PEOPLE. THE BEHAVIOR THAT HAS BROUGHT YOU HERE TODAY IS A TOTAL DISREGARD FOR THOSE IDEALS AND THE IDEALS THAT WE MANDATE FOR OURSELVES. NOW WHILE IN YOUR PERSONAL LIFE YOU MAY CERTAINLY HAVE LIBERTIES TO ENGAGE IN ACTIVITIES THAT MAY BE PROTECTED BY THE CONSTITUTION AND THE PRIVACY OF YOUR OWN HOME OR OTHER LOCATIONS WHETHER THAT WOULD BE DISGUSTING OR NOT FROM OTHER FOLKS, BUT AS AN OFFICER OF THE COURT IT IS COMPLETELY TOTALLY BLATANTLY INAPPROPRIATE TO USE THE PROPERTY OF THE PEOPLE OF FLORIDA IN A BUILDING OWNED BY THE PEOPLE OF FLORIDA FOR VIEWING PORNOGRAPHY. MORE THAN SIMPLY INAPPROPRIATE IT'S TOTALLY DISRESPECTFUL. DISRESPECTFUL OF THE POSITION, DISRESPECTFUL OF THE SUPPORT PERSONNEL WORKING IN THE COURTHOUSE, DISRESPECTFUL OF THE CITIZENS OF THE STATE AND DISRESPECTFUL OF EVERY JUDGE WHO IS HONORED YOU SOILED. YOU ARE GIVEN THE PRIVILEGE OF DECIDING MATTERS OF GREAT IMPORTANCE TO FAMILIES, IMPORTANCE TO SOCIETY, AND MAKING DECISIONS THAT IMPACT THE VERY ESSENCE OF OUR REPUBLIC. ALONG WITH THIS PRIVILEGE COMES THE ABSOLUTE RESPONSIBILITY OF MEETING EXPECTATIONS OF BEHAVIOR. THE RESPONSIBILITY CAN AT TIME BE VERY, VERY HEAVY. BUT WE CANNOT SLIP. THE TYPE AND DEGREE OF THE REPETITIVE UNACCEPTABLE BEHAVIOR IN WHICH YOU ENGAGED PAINTS A PICTURE OF

SOMEONE WHO IS SIMPLY DOES NOT UNDERSTAND THE RUDEMENTRY BOUNDS OF JUDICIAL DECORUM OR JUST DOESN'T CARE. THE USE OF TECHNOLOGY PROVIDED BY THE PEOPLE OF FLORIDA TO VIEW THESE WEB SITES ON THE TIME OF THE PEOPLE OF FLORIDA WOULD NOT BE TOLERATED BY ANY EMPLOYEE AND THAT BEHAVIOR CERTAINLY AND CANNOT BE TOLERATED BY OUR JUDICIAL OFFICERS. THE CONDUCT AS -- IS FALLEN SHORT OF THE STANDARD THAT WE SIT -- SET FOR OURSELVES AND IT'S DISREGARD FOR THE ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITY YOU ASSUMED WHEN YOU ENTERED THIS OFFICE. ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS WHEN THE COURTHOUSE SUPPORT PERSONNEL AND YOUR JUDICIAL ASSISTANT WAS EXPOSED TO THIS MATERIAL YOU HAD NO RIGHT TO EXPOSE THEM TO THAT KIND OF MATERIAL. THE COURTHOUSE JUST AS IN OTHER WORKPLACE ENVIRONMENT CANNOT AND WILL NOT BE A PLACE IN WHICH EMPLOYEES ARE EXPOSED TO UNWELCOME AND DISCUSSING IMAGES OF ANY VARIETY. FAR FROM SERVING A MODEL TO OTHER WORKPLACES, YOUR RECKLESS BEHAVIOR CONTRIBUTED TO THE CREATION OF REALLY WHAT WAS A HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT IN THAT COURTHOUSE AND IN YOUR CHAMBERS. WE WILL NOT AND CANNOT TOLERATE THAT TYPE OF ENVIRONMENT FOR ANY OF OUR EMPLOYEES. THE DISREGARD FOR THE TECHNOLOGY OF OTHER JUDGES IS ALSO FAR BEYOND BELIEF. AFTER NUMEROUS WARNING THAT THOSE WEB SITES CARRIED VIRUSES AND CAUSING INFECTION, YOU CONTINUED ON

AND ON AND ON. NOTWITHSTANDING THOSE WARNINGS. IN A DAY IN AGE WHEN THE COURT ARE INCREASINGLY DEPENDENT ON OUR COMPUTER SYSTEMS FOR THE VERY OPERATION OF OUR DAY-TO-DAY BUSINESS YOUR CALLOUS DISREGARD FOR THAT RISK POSED A TERRIBLE INEXCUSABLE CIRCUMSTANCE. IT'S IRRESPONSIBLE THE WAY YOU BEHAVED AND ALL JUDICIAL OFFICERS MUST UNDERSTAND THAT. THE PUBLIC FACE OF THE JUDICIARY IS EACH JUDGE AS WE WORKDAY IN AND DAY OUT OUR MAYOR CAN SERVE AS A POSITIVE MODEL FOR IMPRESSIONABLE YOUTH OF THIS STATE. WE WOULD HOPE THAT THE HIGH ETHICAL STANDARD WE SET FOR ALL OFFICERS WOULD FOSTER A SITUATION IN WHICH EVERY JUDGE WOULD BE VIEWED AS THE PITAMY FOR THE POSITIVE EXAMPLE FOR THE YOUNGEST CITIZEN OF FLORIDA IN CITY -- INSTEAD OF SERVING AS THAT ROLE MODEL YOUR BEHAVIOR TEST NOT ONLY AN UNFAVORABLE IMAGE OF THE JUDICIARY, IT PRESENTED THE WORST OF ALL POSSIBILITIES TO DARK CLOUD ON ALL OF US TO OUR CHILDREN. THIS MORNING REPRIMAND IS AN EMBARRASSING MOMENT, NOT ONLY FOR YOU BUT FOR ALL OF US ON THIS BENCH FOR THE ENTIRE JUDICIAL BRANCH AN EMBARRASSMENT FOR THE PEOPLE OF FLORIDA. WE UNDERSTAND THAT THERE'S ROOM FOR FUN AND FOR FROLIC AND HUMAN NATURE BUT NOTHING, NOTHING ABOUT THE PATTERN OF THE BEHAVIOR THAT'S BROUGHT YOU HERE EVEN HENCE OF PROPRIETY. I AM EMBARRASSED TO SIT IN

THE MIDDLE CHAIR THIS MORNING IN FRONT OF THE CITIZENS OF FLORIDA TO HAVE TO CALL YOU BEFORE THE COURT FOR THIS TYPE OF CONDUCT. TO HAVE A JUDGE COMPELLED TO COME BEFORE THIS COURT BECAUSE OF THE TYPE OF BEHAVIOR WHICH YOU HAVE STIPULATED CONSTITUTES A TRUE TARNISH. IF YOU ARE NOT, I AM EMBARRASSED FOR YOU FAMILY, FOR YOUR FRIENDS AND FOR YOUR COMMUNITY. AND I WOULD HOPE THAT WE WOULD ALL APOLOGIZE TO ALL OF THEM, YOUR BEHAVIOR IS DISRESPECTFUL TO ALL OF THE PEOPLE ACROSS THIS GREAT STATE WHO HAVE PROVIDED YOU WITH THE SUPPORT AND PROVIDED YOU LOVE AND HAVE ALLOWED YOU TO OBTAIN AND MAINTAIN YOUR POSITION AS A JUDICIAL OFFICER. YOU OWE THEM AN APOLOGY AS MUCH AS TO ANYONE ELSE. ACCORDING TO THE STIPULATION, YOU WILL RETAIN YOUR POSITION UNTIL JANUARY 1, 2007 AT WHICH TIME YOU MUST RETIRE PERMANENTLY FROM THE BENCH. YOU WILL NOT SERVE AS A SENIOR JUDGE AND WILL NOT SEEK APPOINTMENT OR ELECTION AS A JUDGE IN ANYTIME IN THE FUTURE. YOU MUST ALSO SIGN AND PROVIDE TO THE JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION A LETTER OF PUBLIC APOLOGY FOR YOUR ACTIONS THAT WE ADDRESSED TODAY AND IT MUST BE ADDRESSED TO THE CITIZENS OF FLORIDA, YOUR FELLOW JUDGES, AND TO THE LEGAL COMMUNITY. WHILE YOU REMAIN IN THAT POSITION FOR THIS SHORT PERIOD OF TIME, YOU WILL HAVE RESTRICTED ACCESS TO E-MAIL AND THE INTERNET ON

THE PUBLIC PROPERTY. YOU MUST CONTINUE YOUR COUNSELING UNTIL SUCH TIME AS YOUR COUNSELOR RELEASES YOU FROM THAT TREATMENT. YOU WILL PROVIDE A COPY OF THAT RELEASE TO THE FLORIDA JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION. AND MOST IMPORTANTLY YOU MUST ALSO SIGN A LETTER OF RESIGNATION THAT WILL TAKE EFFECT SHOULD THE JUC FIND PROBABLE CAUSE TO CHARGE YOU WITH ANY TKEURBLG ETHICAL VIOLATION OR IF YOU FAIL TO ABIDE WITH BY THE TERMS OF THE STIPULATION. JUDGE DOWNEY, BECAUSE THERE'S NO WAY THAT ANY OF US CAN UNDO WHAT YOU HAVE DONE, WE REQUIRED THAT YOU BE HERE TODAY FOR THIS PUBLIC REPRIMAND. THE DISCIPLINING OF JUDGES WHO COMMIT ETHICAL BREACHES IS A RESPONSE THABLT THIS COURT REGARDS AS VITALLY NECESSARY TO MAINTAINING THE INTEGRITY OF THE JUDICIAL BRANCH. IT IS BUT A SMALL WAY THAT WE CAN ASSURE THE PUBLIC, THE CITIZENS OF FLORIDA THAT WE TAKETHCAL BREECHES BY JUDGES VERY, VERY SERIOUSLY. AS A JUDGE IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOR THELENTH OF YOUR CAREER YOU SHOULD HAVE KNOWN BETTER. BUT YOU ACTED OUT OF IGNORANCE, ARROGANCE, WITHOUT THINKING, IT'S A SHADOW ON ALL OF US. I SINCERELY HOPE THAT THIS REPRIMAND WILL CONVEY TO YOU AND ALL OFFICERS AND THE PEOPLE OF FLORIDA THE IMPORTANCE OF THEDY REESE SUSPECTFUL GROSSFULLY INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR AS WELL AS ANY BEHAVIOR THAT THREATENS THE INTEGRITY OF OUR PROCESS.

THE JUDICIARY SERVES TO IMPORTANT ROLE IN OUR SOCIETY, TO ALLOW ANY ONE OF US TO JEOPARDIZE THE INTEGRITY. YOUR BEHAVIOR JUDGE DOWNEY HAS THREATENED TO DO JUST THAT. LET THIS BE A MESSAGE THAT SUCH BEHAVIOR BY JUDICIAL OFFICERS SIMPLY WILL NOT BE TOLERATED. JUDGE DOWNEY, I REGRET THAT YOU HAVE TO BE HERE TODAY. AND I'M EMBARRASSED TO HAVE TO ADDRESS THIS MATTER. YOU ARE OUT YOUR PUBLIC REPRIMAND IS CONCLUDED AND YOU MAY LEAVE NOW, SIR. >> MAY I SAY A WORD. >> YES, SIR. I WOULD LIKE TO HUMBLY ACCEPT THE REPRIMAND YOU HAVE GIVEN ME. I HAVE ACKNOWLEDGED THAT MY ACTIONS CERTAINLY WERE INAPPROPRIATE FOR A JUDGE. CERTAINLY ONE OF MY LONG. I HAVE ALREADY SIGNED THE APOLOGY TO THE JQC DIRECTED TO JUDGE WOLF. I'VE ALREADY SIGNED THE LETTER OF RESIGNATION DIRECTED TO THE GOVERNOR SHOULD THE JQC FIND FURTHER ACTION. I HAVE ALREADY APOLOGIZED PROFUSE WILL Y TO MY FAMILY AND FRIENDS FOR ANY EMBARRASSMENT THIS MIGHT HAVE CAUSED. I AM HUBBELLABLY AND TRUTHFULLY SORRY FOR MY ACTION. AND I HAVE BEGGED EVERYONE FORGIVENESS. IN MY RELIGION I AM TAUGHT THAT IF YOU ADMIT YOUR SHORTCOMINGS AND SINS TO GOD AND ASKED FOR FORGIVENESS THAT YOU WILL BE FORGIVEN. I FEEL IN MY HEART HAVING DONE THAT, THAT GOD HAS FORGIVEN ME FOR MY SINS.

I FEEL THAT MY FAMILY AND FRIENDS HAVE TOO. INCLUDING THOSE FRIENDS OF MINE WHO EVEN WITH THE CHARGES PENDING URGE ME TO RUN FOR REELECTION. BUT I DECLINED THAT BECAUSE I DID NOT WANT TO CAUSE ANY ADDITIONAL EMBARRASSMENT OR PUBLICITY OF THIS MATTER TO MY FAMILY. I THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.