Led by Armstrong (1978, 1983, 1991, 1993), Fred Dretske (1977), and Michael Tooley (1977, 1987

Similar documents
PHILOSOPHY OF MIND (7AAN2061) SYLLABUS: SEMESTER 1

The readings for the course are separated into the following two categories:

Panpsychism Forthcoming in Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Experiences Don t Sum

Formative Assessment: 2 x 1,500 word essays First essay due 16:00 on Friday 30 October 2015 Second essay due: 16:00 on Friday 11 December 2015

THE NATURE OF MIND Oxford University Press. Table of Contents

Bertrand Russell and the Problem of Consciousness

Chalmers, "Consciousness and Its Place in Nature"

Panpsychism. Constitutive panpsychism

3. Campos de conocimiento en los que podría ser anunciado (máximo dos):

WEEK 1: WHAT IS KNOWLEDGE?

*Please note that tutorial times and venues will be organised independently with your teaching tutor.

Review of Torin Alter and Sven Walter (eds.) Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism

Something is phenomenally conscious if and only if there is something that it s like to be it.

History (101) Comprehensive Reading List Robert L. Frazier 24/10/2009

Ph.D. Philosophy, Princeton University 2007 Colgate University 2001, magna cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa, High Honors in Philosophy

Philosophy of Mind (104) Comprehensive Reading List Robert L. Frazier 27/11/2013

Ross Paul Cameron Curriculum Vitae

Brian Cutter Curriculum Vitae. University of Notre Dame Phone: Malloy Hall Notre Dame, IN 46556

BOOK REVIEWS. The Philosophical Review, Vol. 111, No. 4 (October 2002)

THE TWO-DIMENSIONAL ARGUMENT AGAINST MATERIALISM AND ITS SEMANTIC PREMISE

DECONSTRUCTING NEW WAVE MATERIALISM

The knowledge argument purports to show that there are non-physical facts facts that cannot be expressed in

DAVID MANLEY Department of Philosophy, University of Michigan 435 S. State Street, Ann Arbor, MI

Postmodal Metaphysics

Russellian Monism. Philip Goff and Sam Coleman. Introduction. Russellian monism is a new, or rather a rediscovered, approach to the problem of

New Wave Pluralism. Final Version forthcoming in dialectica. 1. Introduction

The modal status of materialism

M.A. PROSEMINAR, PHIL 5850 PHILOSOPHICAL NATURALISM Fall 2018 Tuesdays 2:35-5:25 p.m. Paterson Hall 3A36

Philosophy of Logic and Language (108) Comprehensive Reading List Robert L. Frazier 24/10/2009

Abstract: In this paper, I propose a way to modify panpsychism in order to avoid its notorious combination problem.

Consciousness, Theories of

Cosmic Hermeneutics vs. Emergence: The Challenge of the Explanatory Gap*

Curriculum Vitae. Other Areas of Interest: Epistemology, Philosophy of Mind, and History of Philosophy.

Thomas Nagel, "What is it Like to Be a Bat?", The Philosophical Review 83 (1974),

Areas of Specialization Philosophy of Mind, Epistemology, Metaphysics Areas of Competence Philosophy of Language, Philosophy of Religion

Philosophy 370: Problems in Analytic Philosophy

BRIE GERTLER RESEARCH

Please remember to sign-in by scanning your badge Department of Psychiatry Grand Rounds

David Chalmers on Mind and Consciousness Richard Brown Forthcoming in Andrew Bailey (ed) Philosophy of Mind: The Key Thinkers.

4AANA004 Metaphysics I Syllabus Academic year 2015/16

Thinking About Consciousness

What is consciousness? Although it is possible to offer

Chapter 11 CHALMERS' THEORY OF CONSCIOUSNESS. and yet non-reductive approach to consciousness. First, we will present the hard problem

Emergence Cannot Save Dualism, but Neo-Aristotelianism Might

Intro to Ground. 1. The idea of ground. 2. Relata. are facts): F 1. More-or-less equivalent phrases (where F 1. and F 2. depends upon F 2 F 2

Naturalism Fall Winter 2004

DUALISM VS. MATERIALISM I

2002. The Knowledge Argument Against Dualism, Theoria Vol. LXIII, pp The Knowledge Argument Against Dualism YUJIN NAGASAWA

Areas of Specialization Philosophy of Mind, Epistemology, Metaphysics Areas of Competence Neuroethics, Philosophy of Religion

CURRICULUM VITAE of Joshua Hoffman. Department of Philosophy, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, N.C.,

BRIE GERTLER. RESEARCH INTERESTS Philosophy of Mind especially self-knowledge, mental content, and consciousness.

CURRICULUM VITAE. Date and place of birth: 27th December 1945, Liverpool, England

Is Property Dualism Better Off than Substance Dualism?

Machine Consciousness, Mind & Consciousness

Supervenience & Emergentism: A Critical Study in Philosophy of Mind. Rajakishore Nath, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, India

There are two explanatory gaps. Dr Tom McClelland University of Glasgow

The Exclusion Problem Meets the Problem of Many Causes Matthew C. Haug The College of William & Mary

Test 3. Minds and Bodies Review

IN THIS PAPER I will examine and criticize the arguments David

1 These two standard arguments against physicalism are presented, respectively, in Frank Jackson, What Mary Didn't Know, Journal of

(1982a). Other Bodies, in Woodfield (1982). (1982b). Two Thought Experiments Reviewed, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 23: Burge, T.

Realism and instrumentalism

ON TWO ALLEGED CONFLICTS BETWEEN DIVINE ATTRIBUTES. Torin Alter. God from being afraid and having evil desires and thus from understanding such

PARTS GROUND THE WHOLE AND ARE IDENTICAL TO IT Roberto Loss

WEEK 1: CARTESIAN SCEPTICISM AND THE COGITO

THE ANTI-ZOMBIE ARGUMENT

General Philosophy. Stephen Wright. Office: XVI.3, Jesus College. Michaelmas Overview 2. 2 Course Website 2. 3 Readings 2. 4 Study Questions 3

Philip Goff a a University of Hertfordshire. To link to this article:

Illusionism and anti-functionalism about phenomenal consciousness. Derk Pereboom, Cornell University

A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge

Panpsychism and the Combination Problem. Hyungrae Noh. A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts

Philosophy of Mind for Honours, Masters, and PhD Students

KELLY TROGDON Department of Philosophy, Virginia Tech 223 Major Williams Hall, Blacksburg, VA trogdon [at] vt [dot] edu.

Powerful qualities, the conceivability argument and the nature of the physical

Excluding the Problem: Bennett on Counterfactual Tests and Backtracking

Metaphysics & Epistemology, and History of Analytic Philosophy. [2017] Visiting Professor, Dartmouth College, Department of Philosophy

Skepticism, Naturalism, and Therapy

CAN SUBJECTS BE PROPER PARTS OF SUBJECTS? THE DE-COMBINATION PROBLEM. Gregory Miller

CAUSAL-RECOGNITIONAL ACCOUNT OF PHENOMENAL CONCEPTS: AN ALTERNATIVE PHYSICALIST ATTEMPT TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM OF CONSCIOUSNESS

CHAPTER 11. There is no Exclusion Problem

24.09 Minds and Machines spring an inconsistent tetrad. argument for (1) argument for (2) argument for (3) argument for (4)

A New Argument Against Compatibilism

Tony Chadwick Essay Prize 2006 Winner Can we Save Qualia? (Thomas Nagel and the Psychophysical Nexus ) By Eileen Walker

Naturalism and Physicalism

Address 307 Valley Street Purdue University, Department of Philosophy

Philosophy 1760 Philosophy of Language

Elizabeth Barnes Corcoran Department of Philosophy University of Virginia

Advanced Topics in Metaphysics (L6/7) Alex Grzankowski Autumn 2016

COULD WE EXPERIENCE THE PASSAGE OF TIME? Simon Prosser

Tuomas E. Tahko (University of Helsinki)

Metametaphysics. New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology* Oxford University Press, 2009

Elizabeth Barnes Corcoran Department of Philosophy University of Virginia

PHILOSOPHY 203: Introduction to Metaphysics and Epistemology, Fall Professor G. Rosen Hall (609)

The Zombies Among Us. Eric T. Olson To appear in Nous.

Outline Syllabus for Seminar G9658 on Subjects of Consciousness (Advanced Topics in the Philosophy of Mind)

Metaphysics PHIL6308 New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary Division of Theological and Historical Studies June 12-23, 2017

Metaphysics PHI225 Spring Semester 2015

Some Good and Some Not so Good Arguments for Necessary Laws. William Russell Payne Ph.D.

ZOMBIES, EPIPHENOMENALISM, AND PERSONAL EXPLANATIONS: A TENSION IN MORELAND S ARGUMENT FROM CONSCIOUSNESS

Transcription:

Albahari, M. Forthcoming. Beyond Cosmopsychism and the Great I Am: How the World might be Grounded in Universal Advaitic Consciousness, in W. Seager (Ed.) Routledge Handbook on Panpsychism. Led by Armstrong (1978, 1983, 1991, 1993), Fred Dretske (1977), and Michael Tooley (1977, 1987 Alexander, S. 1920. Space, Time and Deity, London: Macmillan. Alter, T. & Nagasawa, N. 2015. What is Russellian monism? in Alter & Nagasawa 2015. Alter, T. & Nagasawa, N. 2015. Consciousness and the Physical World, Oxford Alter, T. & Walter, S. 2007. Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge, Oxford/New York: Oxford Armstrong, D. M. 1968. A Materialist Theory of Mind, Routledge and Kegan Paul. Armstrong, D. 1978. A Theory of Universals, Cambridge: Cambridge Armstrong, D. M. 1983. What Is a Law of Nature?, Cambridge: Cambridge Armstrong, D. 1997. A World of States of Affairs, Cambridge: Cambridge Augustine 426/1998. The City of God against the pagans, translated by R. W. Dyson, edited by G. B. Matthews, Cambridge Balog, K. 2012. Acquaintance and the mind-body problem, in C. Hill and S. Gozzano (Eds.) New Perspectives on Type Identity: The Mental and the Physical, Cambridge: Cambridge Baxter, D. 1988. Identity in the Loose and Popular Sense. Mind 97: 575-582. Bayne, T. 2001. Chalmers on Acquaintance and Phenomenal Judgment, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 62:407-19. Bayne, T. J. & Chalmers, D. J. 2003. What is the unity of consciousness? in A. Cleeremans (Ed.) Oxford Ben-Yami, H. 2015. Descartes Philosophical Revolution: A Reassessment, Palgrave Macmillan. Bird, A. 2007a. Nature's Metaphysics: Laws and Properties, Oxford: Oxford Bird, A. 2007b, The Regress of Pure Powers?, The Philosophical Quarterly 57, 513 534. Blackburn, S. 1990. Filling in space, Analysis 50: 62 65. Block, N. 2006. Max Black s Objection to Mind-Body Identity, in D. Zimmerman (Ed.) Oxford Studies in Metaphysics II, Oxford Block, N. and R Stalnaker, 1999. Conceptual analysis, dualism and the explanatory gap, Philosophical Review 108/1: 1-46. Bradley, F. H. 1935. Relations in his Collected Essays: Vol. II, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 630 76.

Broad, C. D. 1925. The Mind and its Place in Nature, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Brüntrup, G. & Jaskolla, L. (Eds.) 2016. Panpsychism, Oxford: Oxford Campbell, K. 1976. Metaphysics: An Introduction, Encino, CA: Dickenson. Cameron, R. 2008. Truthmakers and Ontological commitment: or, how to deal with complex objects and mathematical ontology without getting into trouble, Philosophical Studies 140:1. Cameron, R. 2010. Quantification, Naturalness and Ontology, in A. Hazlett (Ed.) New Waves in Metaphysics, New York: Palgrave-Macmillan, 8-26. Carruthers, P. 2000. Phenomenal Consciousness: A Naturalistic Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge Carruthers, P. 2004. Phenomenal Concepts and Higher-Order Experiences. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68: 2, 316 36. Chalmers, D. J. 1995. Facing up to the problem of consciousness, Journal of Consciousness Studies 2:3. Chalmers, D. J. 1996. The Conscious Mind: Towards a Fundamental Theory, Oxford Chalmers, D. J. 2002. Consciousness and its place in nature, in his Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings, Oxford Chalmers, D. J. 2003. The content and epistemology of phenomenal belief, in Q. Smith & A. Jokic (Eds.) Consciousness: New Philosophical Perspectives, Oxford: Oxford Chalmers, D.J. 2004. Epistemic two-dimensional semantics. Philosophical Studies 118:153-226. Chalmers, D. J. 2009. The Two-Dimensional Argument Against Materialism, in B. McLaughlin (Ed.) Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Mind, Oxford University Press, 313 39. Chalmers, D. J. 2012. Constructing the World, Oxford: Oxford Chalmers, D. J. Forthcoming a. Panpsychism and panprotopsychism, in Alter & Nagasawa Forthcoming. Chalmers, D. J. Forthcoming b. The combination problem for panpsychism, in Brüntrop & Jaskolla. Churchland, P. 2013. Touching a Nerve, New York/London: W. W. Norton and Company. Coates, P. & Coleman, S. 2015. Phenomenal Qualities: Sense, Perception and Consciousness, Oxford Coleman, S. 2006. Being Realistic: Why Physicalism May Entail Panexperientialism, Journal of Consciousness Studies 13: 10-11, 40-52. Coleman, S. 2012. Mental chemistry: Combination for panpsychists, Dialectica 66: 1, 137-66.

Coleman, S. 2014. The real combination problem: Panpsychism, micro-subjects and emergence, Erkenntnis 79: 1, 19-44. Coleman, S. 2015. Neuro-cosmology, in Coates & Coleman 2015. Coleman, S. 2016. Panpsychism and neutral monism: How to make up one s mind, in Brüntrup & Jaskolla 2016. Cutter, B. 2016. Review of Phenomenal Qualities: Sense, Perception and Consciousness (edited by P. Coates and S. Coleman, Oxford University Press), Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. Dainton, B. (2011). Review of Consciousness and its Place in Nature. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research V83:1, 238 261. Dancy, J. 2000. Practical Reality, Oxford: Oxford Dennett, D. 1991. Consciousness Explained, Little Brown. Descartes, R. 1645/1996. Meditations on First Philosophy. Reprinted in Meditations on First Philosophy with Selections from the Objections and Replies, red. Edn. J. Cottingham, (Ed), Cambridge: Cambridge derosset, L. 2010. Getting Priority Straight, Philosophical Studies 149: 1, 73-97. Dowell, J. L. 2006. The physical: empirical, not metaphysical, Philosophical Studies, 131: 25-60. Dretske, F., 1977, Laws of Nature, Philosophy of Science, 44: 248 68. Eddington, A. 1928. The Nature of the Physical World, Cambridge Ellis, B. 2001, Scientific Essentialism, Cambridge: Cambridge Ellis, B. 2002, The Philosophy of Nature: A Guide to the New Essentialism, Montreal: McGill-Queen's Feigl, H. 1967. The Mental and the Physical : the Essay and a Postscript, University of Minnesota Press. Fine, K. 1994. Essence and modality, Philosophical Perspectives 8: 1-16. Fine, K. 2001. The question of realism, Philosophers Imprint 1. Fine, K. 2012. A guide to ground, in F. Correia & B. Schneider (Eds.) Metaphysical Grounding, Cambridge University Press, 37-80. Frege, G. 1951. On concept and object, in Mind, 60, 168-180, translated by P. T. Geach, and revised by Max Black. Foster, J. 1982. The Case for Idealism, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Foster 1991. The Immaterial Self: A Defence of the Cartesian Dualist Conception of the Mind, Oxford Galileo, G. The Assayer, 1623; reprinted in S. Drake (Ed.) Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo, 1957, Doubleday. Geach, P. 1965. Assertion, in Philosophical Review, 74: 449-65. Goff, P. 2009. Why pansychism doesn t help explain consciousness,' Dialectica, 63: 3. Goff, P. 2010a. Ghosts and sparse properties: Why the physicalist has more to fear from ghosts than zombies,' Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81. Goff 2010b. Orthodox truthmaker theory cannot be defended by cost/benefit analysis,' Analysis 79: 1. Goff, P. 2011. A Posteriori Physicalists Get Our Phenomenal Concepts Wrong, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89:2. Goff, P. 2012a. 'A priori physicalism, lonely ghosts and Cartesian doubt,' Consciousness and Cognition 21. Goff, P. 2012b. Spinoza on Monism, Palgrave Macmillan. Goff, P. 2014. The Cartesian argument against physicalism, in J. Kallestrup & M. Sprevak (Eds.) New Waves in the Philosophy of Mind, Palgrave Macmillan. Goff, P. & Paineau, D. 2014. 'What s wrong with strong necessities?, Philosophical Studies, 167: 3, 749-62. Goff, P. 2015a. Against constitutive Russellian monism, in Alter & Nagasawa 2015. Goff, P. 2015b. Real acquaintance and physicalism, in Coates & Coleman 2015. Goff, P. 2016a. The phenomenal bonding solution to the combination problem, in Brüntrop, G. & Jaskolla. Goff, P. 2016b. Fundamentality and the Mind-Body Problem, 81: 4, 881-98. Goff, P. Forthcoming. 'Cosmopsychism, micropsychism and the grounding relation, in W. Seager (Ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Panpsychism. Harris, S. 2010. The Moral Landscape: How science can determine human values, New York: Free Press. Hartshorne, C. 1934. The Philosophy and Psychology of Sensation, University of Chicago Press. Howell, R. 2013. Consciousness and the Limits of Objectivity: The Case for Subjective Physicalism, Oxford

Mørch, H. H. 2014. Panpsychism and Causation: A New Argument and A Solution to the Combination Problem, PhD Thesis, University of Oslo. Hawthorne, J. 2001. Causal Structuralism, 35: s15, 361-78. Hawthorne, J. & Nolan, J. 2006. What would teleological causation be? in J. Hawthorne Metaphysical Essays, Oxford University Press, 265-84. Heil, J. & A. Mele (Eds.) 1993. Mental Causation, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Heil, J. 2003. From an Ontological Point of View, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Heil, J. 2012. The Universe as We Find It, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Hill, C. 1997. Imaginability, conceivability, possibility and the mind-body problem, Philosophical Studies 87/1: 61-85. Hill, C. and B. McLaughlin, B. 1999. There are fewer things in reality that are dreamt of in Chalmers s philosophy, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59/2: 445-54. Horgan, T., 1993, From Supervenience to Superdupervenience: Meeting the Demands of a Material World, Mind, 102(408): 555 586. Horgan, T. 2006. Materialism: Matters Of Definition, Defense, and Deconstruction, Philosophical Studies October 2006, Volume 131, Issue 1, pp 157-183. Horgan, T. and Potrč, M. 2008. Austere Realism: Conceptual Semantics Meets Minimal Ontology, MIT Press. Horgan, T. and Potrč, M. 2012. xxx Jackson, F. 1982. Epiphenomenal Qualia, Philosophical Quarterly 32. Jackson, F., 1986. What Mary Didn't Know, Journal of Philosophy 83. Jackson, F. 1998. From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis, Oxford University Press. Jackson, F. 2007. The knowledge arguments, diaphanousness and representationalism, in Alter and Walter 2007. James, W. 1890/1981. Principles of Psychology, vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard James, W. 1904. Does consciousness exist?, Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, and Scientific Methods 1: 477-491. Jaskolla, L. & Buck, A. J. 2012. Does panexperientialism solve the combination problem, Journal of Consciousness Studies 19: 9-10. Johnston, M. 1992. How to speak of the colors, Philosophical Studies, 68: 221-63.

Kim, J. 1989, Mechanism, Purpose, and Explanatory Exclusion, Philosophical Perspectives, 3: 77 108. Reprinted in Kim 1993a, 237 64. Kim, J. 1993a. The Non-Reductivist's Troubles with Mental Causation, in Heil & Mele 1993,189 210. Reprinted in Kim 1993b, pp. 336-57. Kim, J. 1993b, Supervenience and Mind: Selected Philosophical Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge Kim, J. 1998. Mind in a Physical World, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Kim, J. 2005. Physicalism, or Something Near Enough, Princeton: Princeton Kirk, R. 2013. The Conceptual Link from the Mental to the Physical, Oxford Kripke, S. 1972. Naming and necessity, in G. Harman and D. Davidson (Eds) The Semantics of Natural Language; reprinted as Naming and Necessity 1980, Harvard Leuenberger, S. 2014. Grounding and Necessity, Inquiry 57: 2, 151-74. Levine, J. 1983. Materialism and qualia: the Explanatory gap, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 64/9: 354-61. Lewis, D. 1966. An Argument for the Identity Theory, Journal of Philosophy 63. Lewis, D. 1970. How to Define Theoretical Terms, Journal of Philosophy 67. Lewis, D. 1986. On The Plurality of Worlds, Blackwell. Lewis, D. 1988. What experience teaches, Proceedings of the Russellian Society, University of Sydney. Lewis, D. 1991. Parts of Classes. Cambridge: Blackwell. Lewis, D. 1994. Reduction of Mind, in S. Guttenplan (Ed.) Companion to the Philosophy of Mind, Blackwell. Lewis, D. 1995. Should a materialist believe in qualia? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73: 1. Levin, J. 2007a. Nagel vs. Nagel on the Nature of Phenomenal Concepts. Ratio 20: 3, 293 307. Levin, J. 2007b. What is a Phenomenal Concept? in Alter & Walter 2007. Loar, B. 1990. Phenomenal states, in Philosophical Perspectives 4: 81-108. Loar, Brian. 1990/1997. Phenomenal States. Originally published in J. Tomberlin (Ed.) Philosophical Perspectives 4: Action Theory and Philosophy of Mind, Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview, 81 108. Reprinted in substantially revised form in N. Block, O. Flanagan & Guüven Guüzeldere (Eds.) The Nature of Consciousness: Philosophical Debates, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 597 616. Loar, B. 2003. Qualia, Properties, Modality, Philosophical Issues 1: 1, 113 29.

Loar, B. 2003. Qualia, properties, modality, Philosophical Issues 13/1: 113-29. Locke, J. 1689. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Lockwood, M. 1989. Mind, Brain and the Quantum, Oxford Lockwood, M. 1996. The grain problem, in H. Robinson (Ed.) Objections to Physicalism, Oxford Lowe, E. J. 2000. Locke, Martin and Substance, Philosophical Quarterly, 50: 201, 499-514. Lowe, E. J. 2006. The Four-Category Ontology: A Metaphysical Foundation for Natural Science, Oxford: Oxford Lowe, E. J. 2012. What is the Source of Our Knowledge of Modal Truths? Mind 121: 484, 919-950. Lycan, W. G. 1996. Consciousness and Experience, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Mach, E. 1886. The Analysis of Sensations and the Relation of Physical to the Psychical, translated by C. M. Williams, Open Court, 1984. Malcolm, N. 1968. The Conceivability of Mechanism, Philosophical Review, 77: 45 72. Martin, C. B. 1980. Substance substantiated, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 58, 3-10. Martin, C. B. 2007. The Mind in Nature, New York: Oxford Martin, C. B. & Heil, J. 1998. Rules and powers, Noûs, 32, 283 312. Martin, M.G.F., 1997, The Reality of Appearances, in Thought and Ontology, M. Sainsbury (Ed.), Milan: Franco Angeli, pp. 77 96. Matthews, F. 2011. Panpsychism as Paradigm? in Blamauer, M. (Ed.) 2011. The Mental as Fundamental in Process Thought Series (Ed. N. Rescher, J. Seibt and M. Weber), Ontos Verlag, Frankfurt Heusenstamm. Maxwell, G. 1979. Rigid Designators and Mind-Brain Identity, in C. W. Savage (Ed.) Perception and Cognition, University of Minnesota Press. McGinn, C. 1989. Can we solve the mind-body problem?, Mind 98: 391, 349-66. McLaughlin, B. 1992. The Rise and Fall of British Emergentism, in A. Beckermann et al. (eds.) 1992. McLaughlin, B. P. 2001. In defence of new wave materialism: A response to Horgan and Tienson, in C. Gillett & B. Loewer (Eds.) Physicalism and its Discontents, Cambridge, New York: Cambridge Mellor, D. H. 1974. In defense of dispositions. Philosophical Review 83: 157 181.

Melnyk A., 2003. A Physicalist Manifesto: Thoroughly Modern Materialism, Cambridge: Cambridge Melnyk, A. Forthcoming. Pereboom s robust non-reductive physicalism, Erkenntnis. Mill, J. S. 1843. System of Logic, London: Longmans, Green, Reader and Dyer. [8 th ed., 1872] Molnar, G. 2003, Powers: A Study in Metaphysics, Oxford: Oxford Mumford, S. 2004. Laws in Nature, London: Routledge. Nagasawa, Y. & Wager, K. 2016. 'Panpsychism and Priority Cosmopsychism', in Brüntrop & Jaskolla 2016. Nagel, T. 1975. What s it like to be a bat?, The Philosophical Review 83. Nagel, T. 2012. Mind and Cosmos: Why the materialist, Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature is almost Certainly False, Oxford Nemirow, L. 1980. Review of Nagel s Mortal Questions, Philosophical Review 89, 475-6. Nemirow, L. 1988. Physicalism and the cognitive role of acquaintance, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (University of Sydney). Neurath, O. 1932a/1983, Sociology in the Framework of Physicalism, in Neurath 1983, 58 90. Ney, A. 2008a. Defining physicalism, Philosophy Compass, 3: 5, 1033-48. Ney, A., 2008b, Physicalism as an Attitude, Philosophical Studies, 138: 1 15. Nida-Rümelin, M., 1996. What Mary couldn't know, in Thomas Metzinger (Ed.), Phenomenal Consciousness, Schoenigh: Paderborn. Nida-Rümelin, M. 1998, On Belief About Experiences: An Epistemological Distinction Applied to the Knowledge Argument, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (1): 51 73. Nida-Rümelin, M. 2007. Grasping Phenomenal Properties, in Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge, ed. T. Alter & S. Walter, New York: Oxford University Press: 307 36. Nida-Rümelin, M. Forthcoming. The Experience Property Framework A Misleading Framework, Synthese. Papineau, D. 1993. Philosophical Naturalism, Oxford: Blackwell. Papineau, 2002. Thinking about Consciousness, Clarendon Press: Oxford. Parsons, J. 2004. Distributional Properties, in F. Jackson & G. Priest (Eds.) Lewisian Themes: The Philosophy of David K, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 173-80. Parsons, J. 2015. A Phenomenological Argument for Stage Theory, Analysis 75: 2, 237 42.

Pereboom, D. 2011. Consciousness and the Prospects of Physicalism, Oxford, New York: Oxford Perry, H. 2001. Knowledge, Possibility and Consciousness, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Putnam, H. 1960. Mind and machines, reprinted in Putnam 1975: 362-85. Putnam, H. 1967. The nature of mental states, reprinted in Putnam 1975, 429-440. Putnam, H. 1973. Meaning and reference, Journal of Philosophy 70: 299-711. Putnam, H. 1975/1985. The meaning of meaning in Putnam 1975. Putnam, H. 1975. Mind, Language, and Reality, Cambridge: Cambridge Quine, W. V. O. 1948. On what there is, Review of Metaphysics 2: 21-38. Robinson, H. 1982. Matter and Sense, Cambridge: Cambridge Robinson, H. 1985. The General Form of the Argument for Berkeleian Idealism, Essays on Berkeley: A Tercentennial Celebration, J. Foster and H. Robinson (Eds.) Oxford: Clarendon Press, 163 186. Robinson, H. 1994, Perception, London: Routledge. Robinson, H. 2016. From the Knowledge Argument to Mental Substance: Resurrecting the Mind, Cambridge Roelofs, L. 2014. Combining Minds: A Defence of the Possibility of Experiential Combination, PhD thesis, University of Toronto. Rosen, G. 2010. Metaphysical Dependence: Grounding and Reduction, in B. Hale & A Hoffman (Eds.) Modality: Metaphysics, Logic, and Epistemology, ed. Bob Hale and Aviv Hoffman, Oxford University Press, 109 36. Russell, B. 1910. Knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 11: 108-28. Russell, M. 1921. The Analysis of Mind, George Allen and Unwin. Russell, B. 1927. The Analysis of Matter, Kegan Paul. Ryle, G. 1949. The Concept of Mind, Chicago From Nihilism to Monism Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85.2 (2007), 175-91 Schaffer, J. 2009. On what grounds what, in Chalmers, Manley and Wasserman (Eds.) Metametaphysics, Oxford University Press, 347-83. Schaffer, J. 2009. Spacetime the One Substance, Philosophical Studies 145: 1, 131-48. Schaffer, J. 2010a. The Least Discerning and Most Promiscuous Truthmaker, Philosophical Quarterly 60, 307-24.

Schaffer, J. 2010b. The Internal Relatedness of All Things, Mind 119, 341-76. Schaffre, J. 2010c. Monism: The Priority of the Whole, Philosophical Review 119: 1, 31-76; reprinted in Spinoza on Monism, ed. Goff (2012), 9-50: Palgrave) Schaffer, J. 2012. Why the World has Parts: Reply to Horgan & Potrc, in Goff 2012b. Schaffer, J. 2013. The Action of the Whole, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 87, 67-87. Schaffer, J. 2014. Review of Sider s Writing the Book of the World, Philosophical Review 123, 125-129. Schaffer, J. Forthcoming. The ground between the gaps, Philosophers Imprint. Shoemaker, S. 1981. Absent qualia are impossible--a reply to Block, The Philosophical Review, 581-599. Shoemaker, S. 1982. The inverted spectrum, The Journal of Philosophy, 357-381. Schroer, R. 2010. What s the beef? Phenomenal concepts as both demonstrative and substantial, The Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88, 505-22. Seager, W.E. 1995. Consciousness, information, and panpsychism, Journal of Consciousness Studies 2:272-88. Seager, W. E. Forthcoming. Panpsychism, aggregation and combinatorial infusion, in Brüntrop & Jaskolla Forthcoming. Searle, J. 1998. Mind, Language and Society, Basic Books. Shani, I. 2010. Mind Stuffed with Red Herrings: Why William James Critique of the Mind-Stuff Theory Does Not Substantiate a Combination Problem for Panpsychism, Acta Analytica 25: 4, 413-434. Shani, I. 2015. Cosmopsychism: A Holistic Approach to the Metaphysics of Experience, Philosophical Papers Volume 44: 3. Shoemaker, S. 2001. Realization and mental causation, in C. Gillett & B. Loewer (Eds.) Physicalism and its Discontents, Cambridge: Cambridge Shoemaker, S. 2007. Physical Realization, Oxford: Oxford Sider 2009. Ontological Realism, in D. Chalmers, D. Manley, and R. Wasserman (Eds.) Metametaphysics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 384-423. Sider 2012. Writing the Book of the World, Oxford: Oxford Siewert, C. 1993. What Dennett Can't Imagine and Why, Inquiry 36: 1-2, 93-112. Sprigge, T. L. & Montefiore, A. 1971. Final Causes, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 45, 149 92.

Stoljar, D. 2001. Two Conceptions of the Physical, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62. Stoljar, D. 2006. Ignorance and Imagination, Oxford: Oxford Strawson, G. 1986. Red and red, Synthese 78: 193-232. Strawson, G. 1986, reprinted with corrections 1991. Freedom and Belief, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Strawson, G. 2003. Real Materialism, in L. Antony & N Hornstein (Eds.) Chomsky and his Critics, Blackwell; reprinted in G. Strawson (Ed.) 2008 Real Materialism and other essays, Oxford University Press. Strawson, G. 2006. Realistic materialism: Why physicalism entails panpsychism, 13: 10-11. Strawson, G. 2006. Panpsychism? Replies to commentators and a celebration of Descartes, Journal of Consciousness Studies 13: 10-11. Swinburne, R. 1980. Properties, causation, and projectibility: Reply to Shoemaker, in L. J. Cohen & M. Hesse (Eds.), Applications of Inductive Logic, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 313 20. Taylor, J. H. 2013. Physicalism and Phenomenal Concepts: Bringing Ontology and Philosophy of Mind Together, Philosophia 41, 1283-97. Tooley, M., 1977, The Nature of Laws, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 7: 667 98. Trogdon, K. Forthcoming. An introduction to grounding, in M. Hoeltje, B. Schnieder, and A. Steinberg (Eds.) Dependence: Basic Philosophical Concepts, Philosophia Verlag. Turausky, K. MS. Picturing panpsychism: New approaches to the combination problem. Tye, M. 1995. Ten Problems of Consciousness: A Representational Theory of the Phenomenal Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Tye, M. 2000. Consciousness, Color, and Content, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Unger, P. 1999. The Mystery of the Physical and the Matter of Qualities, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 23, 75-99. Van Fraassen, B., 2002. The Empirical Stance, New Haven: Yale Van Inwagen, P.,1993. Metaphysics, Oxford: Oxford Wilson, J. 1999. How super-duper does supervenience need to be? Philosophical Quarterly 82: 33-52. Wilson, J. 2005. Supervenience-based formulations of physicalism, Nous 29: 426-59. Wilson, J. 2006. On characterising the physical, Philosophical Studies 131: 1.