Directions: For Problems 1-10, determine whether the given statement is either True (A) or False (B).

Similar documents
PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON THIS QUIZ

PRACTICE EXAM The state of Israel was in a state of mourning today because of the assassination of Yztzak Rabin.

The Roman empire ended, the Mongol empire ended, the Persian empire ended, the British empire ended, all empires end, and none lasts forever.

LOGIC LECTURE #3: DEDUCTION AND INDUCTION. Source: A Concise Introduction to Logic, 11 th Ed. (Patrick Hurley, 2012)

1. To arrive at the truth we have to reason correctly. 2. Logic is the study of correct reasoning. B. DEDUCTIVE AND INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS

Chapter 1 Why Study Logic? Answers and Comments

There are two common forms of deductively valid conditional argument: modus ponens and modus tollens.

This online lecture was prepared by Dr. Laura Umphrey in the School of Communication at Northern Arizona University

Handout 2 Argument Terminology

Logic: The Science that Evaluates Arguments

Handout 1: Arguments -- the basics because, since, given that, for because Given that Since for Because

Test Item File. Full file at

Logic Book Part 1! by Skylar Ruloff!

Relevance. Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true

In view of the fact that IN CLASS LOGIC EXERCISES

Critical Thinking 5.7 Validity in inductive, conductive, and abductive arguments

Session 10 INDUCTIVE REASONONING IN THE SCIENCES & EVERYDAY LIFE( PART 1)

1.5. Argument Forms: Proving Invalidity

Non Sequitur Practice Examples In each case, answer No Technique, Non Sequitur, or Faulty Analogy.

Philosophical Arguments

PHILOSOPHY 102 INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC PRACTICE EXAM 1. W# Section (10 or 11) 4. T F The statements that compose a disjunction are called conjuncts.

Argumentation Module: Philosophy Lesson 7 What do we mean by argument? (Two meanings for the word.) A quarrel or a dispute, expressing a difference

Inductive Logic. Induction is the process of drawing a general conclusion from incomplete evidence.

Artificial Intelligence: Valid Arguments and Proof Systems. Prof. Deepak Khemani. Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Reading and Evaluating Arguments

The antecendent always a expresses a sufficient condition for the consequent

A R G U M E N T S I N A C T I O N

What is a logical argument? What is deductive reasoning? Fundamentals of Academic Writing

Lecture 3 Arguments Jim Pryor What is an Argument? Jim Pryor Vocabulary Describing Arguments

Overview of Today s Lecture

Philosophy 1100: Ethics

Three Kinds of Arguments

Review: Rhetoric. Pseudoreasoning lead us to fallacies. Fallacies: Mistakes in reasoning.

A short introduction to formal logic

CRITICAL THINKING. Formal v Informal Fallacies

Logical (formal) fallacies

Unit. Categorical Syllogism. What is a syllogism? Types of Syllogism

PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy

II Plenary discussion of Expertise and the Global Warming debate.

A Brief Introduction to Key Terms

Argument and Persuasion. Stating Opinions and Proposals

What is an argument? PHIL 110. Is this an argument? Is this an argument? What about this? And what about this?

CHAPTER 13: UNDERSTANDING PERSUASIVE. What is persuasion: process of influencing people s belief, attitude, values or behavior.

C. Exam #1 comments on difficult spots; if you have questions about this, please let me know. D. Discussion of extra credit opportunities

INDUCTION. All inductive reasoning is based on an assumption called the UNIFORMITY OF NATURE.

Revisiting the Socrates Example

Intro Viewed from a certain angle, philosophy is about what, if anything, we ought to believe.

Phil 3304 Introduction to Logic Dr. David Naugle. Identifying Arguments i

CHAPTER THREE Philosophical Argument

Logic Appendix: More detailed instruction in deductive logic

Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics. Critical Thinking Lecture 1. Background Material for the Exercise on Validity

Conditionals II: no truth conditions?

The Little Logic Book Hardy, Ratzsch, Konyndyk De Young and Mellema The Calvin College Press, 2013

Inductive Reasoning. Inductive Reasoning Example #1

5.6.1 Formal validity in categorical deductive arguments

Chapter 1. What is Philosophy? Thinking Philosophically About Life

Introduction to Logic. Instructor: Jason Sheley

Basic Concepts and Skills!

Practice Test Three Fall True or False True = A, False = B

PHI Introduction Lecture 4. An Overview of the Two Branches of Logic

Practice Test Three Spring True or False True = A, False = B

MCQ IN TRADITIONAL LOGIC. 1. Logic is the science of A) Thought. B) Beauty. C) Mind. D) Goodness

Lecture 4: Deductive Validity

The Problem of Induction and Popper s Deductivism

Curtis Solomon What is the difference between a deductive and an inductive argument?

Logic. A Primer with Addendum

EXERCISES, QUESTIONS, AND ACTIVITIES. 1) Aluminum is a limited and valuable natural resource. Therefore it s important to recycle aluminum cans.

PHIL2642 CRITICAL THINKING USYD NOTES PART 1: LECTURE NOTES

2. Refutations can be stronger or weaker.

Introducing Our New Faculty

Evaluating Arguments

Genuine dichotomies expressed using either/or statements are always true:

Ethics and Science. Obstacles to search for truth. Ethics: Basic Concepts 1

Study Guides. Chapter 1 - Basic Training

!Validity!Soundness. Today s Lecture 1//21/10

PHIL 251 Varner 2018c Final exam Page 1 Filename = 2018c-Exam3-KEY.wpd

Introduction Symbolic Logic

Answers to Practice Problems 6.5

Logical Fallacies. Continuing our foray into the world of Argument. Courtesy of:

Argumentation. 2. What should we consider when making (or testing) an argument?

HOW TO ANALYZE AN ARGUMENT

Unit 4. Reason as a way of knowing. Tuesday, March 4, 14

Tutorial A03: Patterns of Valid Arguments By: Jonathan Chan

Formal Logic. Mind your Ps and Qs!

1. There is... coffee on the shelf A. any B. a few C. some D. a lot. 2. We don t have... milk A. any B. some C. a few D. many

Chapter 7: Inductive Fallacies

Critical Thinking - Wk 3. Instructor: Jason Sheley

HW3- Sets & Arguments (solutions) Due: Tuesday April 5, 2011

Martha C. Nussbaum (4) Outline:

Lemon Bay High School AP Language and Composition ENC 1102 Mr. Hertz

INSTRUCTION: ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS or COMPLETE THE STATEMENTS BY CHOOSING THE BEST

The Fifth National Survey of Religion and Politics: A Baseline for the 2008 Presidential Election. John C. Green

In more precise language, we have both conditional statements and bi-conditional statements.

Statements, Arguments, Validity. Philosophy and Logic Unit 1, Sections 1.1, 1.2

Thinking and Reasoning

Critical Thinking is:

Appendix: The Logic Behind the Inferential Test

ELEMENTS OF LOGIC. 1.1 What is Logic? Arguments and Propositions

Logic: Deductive and Inductive by Carveth Read M.A. CHAPTER IX CHAPTER IX FORMAL CONDITIONS OF MEDIATE INFERENCE

Argument. What is it? How do I make a good one?

Transcription:

Critical Thinking Exam 2: Chapter 3 PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON THIS EXAM. Directions: For Problems 1-10, determine whether the given statement is either True (A) or False (B). 1. Valid arguments never have false premises. 2. Even when an inductive argument is cogent, there will always remain some room for doubt about whether the conclusion is true. 3. Inductive arguments are either 100% strong or 100% weak. 4. If an argument is inductively strong, then the premises in the argument must be true. 5. An argument can be sound but also have false premises. 6. Statistical arguments are generally intended to be inductive arguments. 7. Valid means basically the same thing as true. 8. Deductive arguments are either 100% valid or 100% invalid. 9. When we assess the validity or strength of an argument, we are testing the inference of the argument. 10. Arguments from definition are typically inductive arguments. 11. A three-statement argument in which all the premises begin with the words all, some, or no is called a(n) a. argument from analogy. b. hypothetical syllogism. c. modus ponens argument. d. categorical syllogism. 12. Inductive inferences can be either a. valid or invalid. b. sound or unsound. c. true or false. d. strong or weak. 13. By definition, an inductive argument with a weak inference is a. uncogent. b. deductive. c. unsound. d. invalid. 14. An argument in which the conclusion does not follow necessarily from the premises should nonetheless be treated as deductive if... a. the conclusion in the argument is clearly true. b. it is scientifically certain that the premises are true. c. the language or the context makes clear that the arguer intended to offer a logically conclusive argument. d. the premises, if true, would make the conclusion very likely to be true.

15. Which of the following is not a common pattern of deductive reasoning? a. modus ponens b. argument by elimination c. statistical argument d. argument from definition 16. What deductive pattern does the following argument represent? If the Warriors are ever going to develop a competitive playoff team, they will have to spend what it takes to get a premier player. But the Warriors will never spend that kind of money on one player. So, the Warriors will never develop a competitive playoff team. a. Argument by Elimination c. Categorical Syllogism d. Causal Argument 17. Which inductive pattern does the following argument best represent? The human brain is like a very complex computer. Both computer and the brain receive and store data for future reference. Both make calculations and draw conclusions from data they have collected. But when a computer is filled with inaccurate information, it will nearly always yield inaccurate calculations and yield false conclusions. Hence, it seems likely the same is true of the human brain. For these reasons, it is imperative that we avoid filling our brains with inaccurate and misleading information. a. Statistical argument. b. Argument from authority c. Predictive argument d. Argument from analogy 18. The argument All men are women; Justin Bieber is a man; so, Justin Bieber is a woman is a. valid but unsound. b. invalid and unsound. c. strong and uncogent. d. weak and uncogent. 19. An argument in which the conclusion follows with strict logical necessity from the premises is said to be a. cogent. b. valid. c. strong. d. implicative. 20. Which of the following is not a common pattern of inductive reasoning? a. causal argument b. hypothetical syllogism c. inductive generalization d. predictive argument 21. Both Sound and Cogent arguments must have a. a valid inference b. a strong inference c. true premises d. all of the above

22. Which of the common patterns below does the following argument represent: If the Democrats are going to win the election in 2008, then they had better appeal to religious voters. But Democrats will lose many progressive supporters if they appeal to religious voters. Thus, If the Democrats are going to win in 2008, they ll lose many progressive supporters. a. Modus Ponens c. affirming the consequent d. chain argument e. disjunctive syllogism 23. Which of the common patterns below does the following argument represent: Either embryos have a right to life or there are no moral grounds for objecting to stem cell research. But there are excellent reasons to object to stem cell research. Thus, Embryos must have a right to life. a. Modus Ponens c. affirming the consequent d. argument by elimination 24. In order for an argument to be sound, the argument must be a. deductive b. strong c. valid d. both a and b e. both a and c 25. In order for an argument to be cogent, the argument must be a. inductive b. strong c. valid d. both a and b e. both a and c 26. The primary difference between a deductive and an inductive argument is that a. in a deductive argument, the conclusion is always certain or necessary, whereas an inductive argument often has a false conclusion. b. an inductive argument can only establish mere opinions, but deductive arguments establish facts. c. the author of a deductive argument intends for their conclusion to follow from the premises with strict logical necessity, whereas the author of an inductive argument intends for their conclusion to follow with probability. d. all of the above Directions: For 27-32, determine whether each of the following arguments is either Deductive (A) or Inductive (B). (1 point each) 27. Everything that comes to exist must have a cause of its coming to be. Thus, the universe itself must necessarily have a cause, since it obviously came to exist. 28. No government has the right to force people to pay taxes. Therefore, the United States government has no right to force people to pay taxes.

29. In a recent Gallup poll, 72 percent of Californians said they support the death penalty for minor crimes such as drug possession and petty theft. Gallup polls are, in general, highly reliable. Thus, approximately 72 percent of Californians probably do approve of using the death penalty to punish minor crimes such as drug possession and petty theft. 30. My accusers say that I am an atheist and that I do not believe in the gods. But they agree that I do believe in demigods. But if so, it follows that I am not an atheist. For if the demigods are the illegitimate sons of gods, whether by the nymphs or by any other mothers, then this necessarily implies the existence of the gods, their parents. 31. If Denise plays first base, then Laura plays shortstop; if Laura plays shortstop, then Tess plays catcher; so, if Denise plays first base, then Tess plays catcher. 32. Many teenagers who listen to heavy metal music act violently later on. So, it seems likely that listening to heavy metal music causes young people to engage in violent behavior. Directions: For 33-42, determine whether the following deductive arguments are either Valid (A) or Invalid (B). (1 point each) 33. Yesterday, the professor said that anyone caught cheating on the exam would receive an F on the test. And I happen to know that several students did receive an F on the exam. So it follows that some students must have been caught cheating. 34. All Republicans are opposed to the federal healthcare law. Barack Obama is a Republican. So, Barack Obama is opposed to the federal healthcare law. 35. If Arnold is an Austrian citizen, then he s European. But Arnold is not a citizen of Austria. So he must not be European. 36. Some Asian American voters are Republicans. Many Republicans voted for George W. Bush. Hence, it follows that at least some Asians voted for George W. Bush. 37. Either Donnor or Wilhelm will prevail in the running contest. However, Wilhelm has dropped out due to a sprained ankle. Thus, Donnor will surely win. 38. Carl: I m going to bring my cigar to the restaurant tonight. That way, if I get the urge for a nicotine fix, I ll just light it up. Sam: Are you crazy? People will be outraged if you smoke a cigar at the restaurant. After all, it s against the law to smoke indoors in public! Carl: I respectfully disagree. I read the notice at the restaurant carefully last time I was there. It stated, Smoking of cigarettes and pipe tobacco is prohibited in this restaurant, and cigars are obviously neither. So they must be allowed. 39. Whatever Oprah says is true. Oprah said that eating meat is dangerous. So eating meat must be dangerous. 40. A person is addicted to a substance if he or she cannot voluntarily stop using it. Many smokers are unable to quit. Thus, for these people at least, smoking is an addiction.

41. Professor Martin never intentionally lies for any reason. Professor Martin says that there have been contacts between the CIA and intelligent aliens from outer space for decades. It clearly follows that there have been such contacts since at least the 1990s. 42. Some animals are blue. Some animals are birds. So, at least some animals must be blue birds. Directions: For 43-50 Indicate whether each of the following inductive arguments are Strong (A) or Weak (B). (1 point each) 43. If it rains, the ceremony will be moved indoors. According to the National Weather Service, there s a 75 percent chance of rain. So, it would be sensible to prepare to set up for the ceremony indoors. 44. Its ridiculous to claim that women are underrepresented in positions of political power. After all, Hillary Clinton is the Secretary of State for the most powerful country on Earth. Angela Merkel is Chancellor of Germany, the strongest economy in Europe. And the president of Chile, one of the most prosperous countries in South America, is Michelle Bachelet, a woman! 45. Last Tuesday I went to the Icky Enchilada for lunch. I ordered a burrito that turned out to have a cockroach in it. I ate there again on Thursday evening and I found fingernail clippings in my refried beans. On Saturday, I decided not to order food there, yet they served my beer in a glass that still had lipstick on it. I d have to say the Icky Enchilada is not a very sanitary place to dine. 46. For the last 3 years, I ve visited Chicago on the Fourth of July, and the weather was always sunny and beautiful. My cousin Jim, who visits Chicago for a Blues music festival every June, has always commented on the mild and pleasant weather. I think I ll take the family to Chicago for Christmas this year since the weather there is always so nice and warm. 47. Four out of my five professors this semester are women. I guess most professors are women. 48. Last Monday evening I crashed my car. Just before the accident, I noticed the moon was full. A few weeks ago, I was walking across the quad and I tripped on a rock. Oddly, this happened just as I was noticing the moon was full. So, I suppose I ought to make sure I mark my calendar so that I ll remember to just stay home during the next full moon. 49. The Bank of America on Main St. was robbed yesterday. It may sound strange, but I know Jenny needed money to pay off her student loans. Two days ago, she told me she bought a gun for protection. Yesterday morning, I saw her at the bus stop right in front of the very Bank that was robbed. And today I noticed Jenny and her boyfriend, Mark, eating at that expensive restaurant on 2 nd and Lotus St. drinking a fancy bottle of wine. We d better call the police. I bet its Jenny who robbed the Bank of America yesterday. 50. According to my dentist, Dr. Snow, fluoride helps prevent tooth decay by making the tooth more resistant to acid attacks from plaque bacteria and sugars in the mouth. Moreover, the American Dental Association and virtually every other major association of professional dentists as well as faculty at dentistry colleges agree that fluoride is a safe and effective method of reducing the occurrence of tooth decay. Admittedly, a minority of experts disagree with this conclusion. Yet, it seems reasonable to accept that fluoride likely does help prevent tooth decay.