BIO 221 Invertebrate Zoology I Spring Course Information. Course Website. Lecture 1. Stephen M. Shuster Professor of Invertebrate Zoology

Similar documents
From the Greek Oikos = House Ology = study of

Philosophy of Science. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology

Darwinist Arguments Against Intelligent Design Illogical and Misleading

Human Nature & Human Diversity: Sex, Love & Parenting; Morality, Religion & Race. Course Description

The activity It is important to set ground rules to provide a safe environment where students are respected as they explore their own viewpoints.

Religious and Scientific Affliations

BJ: Chapter 1: The Science of Life and the God of Life pp 2-37

Christianity and Science. Understanding the conflict (WAR)? Must we choose? A Slick New Packaging of Creationism

Charles Robert Darwin ( ) Born in Shrewsbury, England. His mother died when he was eight, a

Evolution: The Darwinian Revolutions BIOEE 2070 / HIST 2870 / STS 2871

The evolution of the meaning of SCIENCE. SCIENCE came from the latin word SCIENTIA which means knowledge.

Prentice Hall Biology 2004 (Miller/Levine) Correlated to: Idaho Department of Education, Course of Study, Biology (Grades 9-12)

The Answer from Science

Why is life on Earth so incredibly diverse yet so strangely similar? Similarities among Diverse Forms. Diversity among Similar Forms

Now you know what a hypothesis is, and you also know that daddy-long-legs are not poisonous.

SYLLABUS. Department Syllabus. Philosophy of Religion

Argument from Design. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. David Hume

Introduction to Evolution. DANILO V. ROGAYAN JR. Faculty, Department of Natural Sciences

Science and Ideology

Phil 1103 Review. Also: Scientific realism vs. anti-realism Can philosophers criticise science?

Lecture 9. A summary of scientific methods Realism and Anti-realism

Evolution and the Mind of God

UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY PHILOSOPHY 110A,

Business Research: Principles and Processes MGMT6791 Workshop 1A: The Nature of Research & Scientific Method

Key definitions Action Ad hominem argument Analytic A priori Axiom Bayes s theorem

PAUL NURSE : DSC. Mr Chancellor,

IS THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD A MYTH? PERSPECTIVES FROM THE HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

A Quick Review of the Scientific Method Transcript

What is Science? -Plato

Has not Science Debunked Biblical Christianity?

My Belief. Joe Isaac Gauthier. T w o H a r b o r s P r e s s, M i n n e a p o l i s

Revista Economică 66:3 (2014) THE USE OF INDUCTIVE, DEDUCTIVE OR ABDUCTIVE RESONING IN ECONOMICS

A Biblical Perspective on the Philosophy of Science

Sydenham College of Commerce & Economics. * Dr. Sunil S. Shete. * Associate Professor

THE SCIENTIFIC PROCESS C H A P T E R 3

THE HYPOTHETICAL-DEDUCTIVE METHOD OR THE INFERENCE TO THE BEST EXPLANATION: THE CASE OF THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION BY NATURAL SELECTION

ASA 2017 Annual Meeting. Stephen Dilley, Ph.D., and Nicholas Tafacory St Edward s University

CLASS #17: CHALLENGES TO POSITIVISM/BEHAVIORAL APPROACH

The Role of Science in God s world

THE IMPACT OF DARWIN S THEORIES. Darwin s Theories and Human Nature

Intelligent Design. Kevin delaplante Dept. of Philosophy & Religious Studies

The Problem of Induction and Popper s Deductivism

Science and the Christian Faith. Brent Royuk June 11, 2006

The Debate Between Evolution and Intelligent Design Rick Garlikov

DARWIN and EVOLUTION

YFIA205 Basics of Research Methodology in Social Sciences Lecture 1. Science, Knowledge and Theory. Jyväskylä 3.11.

EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY (L567), Fall Instructor: Curt Lively, JH 117B; Phone ;

Introduction The Definition of Science

Mètode Science Studies Journal ISSN: Universitat de València España

In today s workshop. We will I. Science vs. Religion: Where did Life on earth come from?

William B. Provine. February 19, 1942 September 8, 2015

Darwin Max Bagley Chapter Two - Scientific Method Internet Review

EXERCISES, QUESTIONS, AND ACTIVITIES My Answers

Establishing premises

Information and the Origin of Life

Science, Evolution, And Creationism By National Academy of Sciences, Institute of Medicine READ ONLINE

Chapter 2 Ethical Concepts and Ethical Theories: Establishing and Justifying a Moral System

ON CAUSAL AND CONSTRUCTIVE MODELLING OF BELIEF CHANGE

FINAL EXAM REVIEW SHEET. objectivity intersubjectivity ways the peer review system is supposed to improve objectivity

A Textbook Case THE TEACHING OF EVOLUTION: BSCS RESPONDS TO A STUDENT'S QUESTIONS

Rezensionen / Book reviews

DO YOU KNOW THAT THE DIGITS HAVE AN END? Mohamed Ababou. Translated by: Nafissa Atlagh

FAITH & reason. The Pope and Evolution Anthony Andres. Winter 2001 Vol. XXVI, No. 4

1 Scientific Reasoning

Hindu Paradigm of Evolution

Characteristics of Science: Understanding Scientists and their Work (adapted from the work of Prof. Michael Clough)

Time is limited. Define your terms. Give short and conventional definitions. Use reputable sources.

Scientific Dimensions of the Debate. 1. Natural and Artificial Selection: the Analogy (17-20)

There are two common forms of deductively valid conditional argument: modus ponens and modus tollens.

APOLOGETICS The Mind s Journey to Heaven

Unit 1: Philosophy and Science. Other Models of Knowledge

Session 10 INDUCTIVE REASONONING IN THE SCIENCES & EVERYDAY LIFE( PART 1)

Abstract. Introduction

Integrated Studies 002: Human Morality and Emotions University of Pennsylvania Spring 2017

Universe and Child: Presiding Over the Meeting

15-1 The Puzzle of Life's Diversity Slide 1 of 20

A Brief History of Scientific Thoughts Lecture 5. Palash Sarkar

FAQ: Is ID just a religious or theological concept?

Darwin s Theologically Unsettling Ideas. John F. Haught Georgetown University

PHI 1700: Global Ethics

SCIENCE & MATH IN ANCIENT GREECE

Harper College ANT Introduction to Anthropology Fall Semester 2010

The Nature of Science: Methods for Seeking Natural Patterns in the Universe Using Rationalism and Empiricism Mike Viney

Charles Darwin: The Naturalist Who Started A Scientific Revolution By Cyril Aydon READ ONLINE

Philosophy Courses in English

Post-Modernism and Science: Challenges to 21 st Century Christian Witness

THEISM, EVOLUTIONARY EPISTEMOLOGY, AND TWO THEORIES OF TRUTH

Hume's Is/Ought Problem. Ruse and Wilson. Moral Philosophy as Applied Science. Naturalistic Fallacy

CHRISTIANITY AND THE NATURE OF SCIENCE J.P. MORELAND

Sunday, September 1, 2013 Mankind: Special Creation Made in the Image of God. Romans 10:8-9 With the heart men believe unto righteousness.

What Is Science? Mel Conway, Ph.D.

PHILOSOPHY. Minor in Philosophy. Philosophy, B.A. Ethical theory: One course required. History: Two courses required.

Lecture One: The Aspiration for a Natural Science of the Social

Kant s Copernican Revolution

Outline Lesson 5 -Science: What is True? A. Psalm 19:1-4- "The heavens declare the Glory of God" -General Revelation

Part 3. Science and Spirituality: Mysteries, Obstacles, Integration

MISSOURI S FRAMEWORK FOR CURRICULAR DEVELOPMENT IN MATH TOPIC I: PROBLEM SOLVING

Direct Realism and the Brain-in-a-Vat Argument by Michael Huemer (2000)

Review of Science and Ethics. Bernard Rollin Cambridge University Press pp., paper

Heidi Anne E. Mesmer Tall Oaks Dr School of Education

Transcription:

BIO 221 Invertebrate Zoology I Spring 2010 Stephen M. Shuster Northern Arizona University http://www4.nau.edu/isopod Lecture 1 Course Information Stephen M. Shuster Professor of Invertebrate Zoology Office: BS 302 Office Hrs: Th 10:50-12:00 Phone: 523-9302, 523-4641, 523-2381 Stephen.shuster@nau.edu http://www4.nau.edu/isopod Course Website http://www4.nau.edu/isopod Current Teaching -> BIO 221 All course information and updates will be posted there. Lecture pdfs will be available there also, usually the day before lecture. Lecture pdfs also posted on VISTA

A Survey of the Biology of Animals Without Backbones 1. We will consider: a. The lower invertebrate animal phyla using selected taxa to illustrate concepts in: 1. Evolution 2. Systematics 3. Physiology 4. Morphology 5. Life history 6. Ecology 7. Behavior My Goal To give you an appreciation for animals that make up >95% of all animal species!!! My Plan for this Course 1. To provide you with: a. Increased understanding and appreciation of animal life on this planet b. Factual and conceptual tools to become professional biological scientists: 1. botanists, zoologists, geneticists, psychologists 2. physicians, dentists, veterinarians, etc.

Understanding These Principles May seem somewhat removed from what you may expect for yourself after watching Grey s Anatomy or reading All Creatures Great and Small. However, in a medical/scientific career you must be: a. Skilled observers of detail. b. Accurate record keepers (including diagrams). c. Critical thinkers/diagnosticians. d. Managers of large mental databases. e. Able to apply your knowledge in practical situations. You must develop these skills in this class to do well.

In this course and on exams I will expect you to be: a. Skilled observers of detail. b. Accurate record keepers (including diagrams). c. Critical thinkers/diagnosticians. d. Managers of large mental databases. e. Able to apply your knowledge in practical situations. Syllabus 1. Be sure to read it over 2. Additional copies are available on the class website (http://www4.nau.edu/isopod/) 3. Note: Freshmen, undeclared majors are not eligible for this class. Textbooks and Reading 1. Textbooks are in the bookstore; Laboratory manuals are at University Text and Tools. They are Required. 2. PDF copies of Chapter 1 from Manual is available on the class website. 3. Additional readings for the course are also posted here. 4. Questions?

Laboratory 1. Laboratory will meet once per week in BS 146 (Tuesday 1-4, 4-7). 2. Your TA is Rachel Durben 3. Most labs will involve examination of slides or preserved material; as much live material as we can get. 4. Labs are designed to give you a feel for invertebrate diversity. Laboratory, continued 1. Anything presented in laboratory is fair game for practical exams. 2. Information presented in lecture and laboratory will overlap considerably. 3. The best strategy is to learn as much as you can Know Everything! 4. Consider this an opportunity to learn how your brain retains information. Field Trips 1. A possible field trip to Kohls s Ranch. 2. An afternoon field trip to Payson, AZ. 3. More details to follow.

Field Trips 1. This course is associated with a trip to the Gulf of California, Mexico (BIO 227). 2. This year, the trip IS scheduled 24-28 February 2010 About Me B.S., Zoology, University of Michigan 1976. M.S., Biology, University of New Mexico 1979. Ph.D., Zoology, University of California, Berkeley 1987. Postdoctoral Associate, Biochemical Genetics, University of California, Riverside, 1987-88. Postdoctoral Associate, Theoretical Population Genetics, University of Chicago, 1988-90. Northern Arizona University 1990-present Biology as a Scientific Discipline 1. A conceptual means for learning about living things a. You will see that this framework is not much different from common sense. b. Foundation built on an understanding of the process of natural selection.

Natural Selection The current hypothesis for explaining biological diversity Crystalized by Charles Darwin and Alfred R. Wallace in 1858. What Science is NOT: 1. NOT magic or metaphysical; Science only deals with what can be directly observed. 2. NOT evil or good; Science is incapable of making value judgments. 3. NOT concerned with truth; Truth is absolute; there are no absolutes in science. What Science is NOT: 4. NOT judgmental in the philosophical sense There is no right or wrong, no absolutes only tendencies; some tendencies are more convincing than others. If these are what science is NOT, what IS science?

What Science IS A way of finding out how and why the universe works the way it does. A way of knowing." John A. Moore. Science Accomplishes This By: 1. Discovering facts about the universe 2. Organizing them into conceptual schemes called: a. Hypotheses b. Theories c. Laws This Process is Called the Hypothetico-Deductive Method But as T. H. Huxley said, science is really just trained, organized commonsense.

Trained, Organized Common Sense Science is nothing but trained and organized common sense, differing from the latter only as a veteran may differ from a raw recruit; and its methods differ from those of common sense only so far as the guardsman s cut and thrust differ from the manner in which a savage shields his club. T. H. Huxley, 1825-1895. This Deductive Approach is Extremely Powerful 1. It generates yes/no answers; therefore eliminates possibilities. 2. It reveals what appears to be true and what is not; therefore it allows us to order our perceptions. 3. It permits classification of phenomena; therefore permits understanding. Science is Powerful: Why? 1. It is RATIONAL not RELATIVISTIC. 2. It REDUCES rather than INCREASES the number of possible explanations. 3. It promotes HONESTY and EVIDENCE, not simply force of CLEVER ARGUMENT.

The Components of this Approach: 1. Observation 2. Generalization 3. Hypothesis formation 4. Hypothesis testing 5. Conclusion (and reformulation of hypothesis) Science and Human Perception "Man's brain, like the rest of him, may be looked upon as a bundle of adaptations. But what it is adapted to has never been self-evident. We are anything but a mechanism set up to perceive the truth for its own sake. Rather, we have evolved a nervous system that acts in the interest of our gonads, and one attuned to the demands of reproductive competition. If fools are more prolific than wise men, then to that degree folly will be favored by selection. And if ignorance aids in obtaining a mate, then men and women will tend to be ignorant. In order for so imperfect an instrument as a human brain to perceive the world as it really is, a great deal of self-discipline must be imposed." Michael T. Ghiselin, 1969 The Rules 1. Phenomena must be OBSERVABLE a. Directly or indirectly b. Observability prevents bias. c. Limits the number of possible interpretations of results. d. Results OTHER THAN those predicted justify revision of the current hypothesis.

Combining volumes of H 2 and O 2 : 1. We can t SEE them combine. 2. But we CAN predict certain events based on what is know about free energy and electron interactions. 3. Predictable amounts of heat and H 2 O will be produced. 4. Results OTHER than those predicted would be cause for revision of hypotheses. The Rules 2. Hypotheses must be FALSIFIABLE i.e., testable a. The type of data that will demonstrate the hypothesis to be untrue, must be clearly identified before any data are collected. b. Leads to ideas that make sense under a variety of circumstances. c. Leads to the hierarchical structure of scientific arguments. d. Usually provides the simplest possible explanations. Darwin and Natural Selection: If it can be shown that a single characteristic of one species exists for the sole benefit of another, it would annihilate my hypothesis, for such could not be produced by natural selection.

The Rules 2. FALSIFABILITY e. Falsification is necessary to prevent bias. 1. logical arguments can lead to false conclusions. 2. this is also why science is incapable of considering value or moral judgements. 3. they are not observable, not falsifiable. The Rules 3. Science must be PRAGMATIC a. An hypothesis is considered true only until a more comprehensive one comes along. b. Science is thus, in principle, non-dogmatic and self-correcting. The Rules 4. Science must be HONEST a. What is the evidence?" b. Accumulated evidence (honestly given) permits recognition of patterns. c. The system breaks down with lies or bad information. d. Also, science is HARD WORK! e. This is why cheaters, liars, plagiarizers, and datafudgers are so relentlessly exposed and eliminated by scientists.

These fundamentals of science Amount to trained, organized common sense They are the basis of scientific understanding They also provide solid values for our society Components of the Scientific Process 1.Observation 2. Generalization 3. Hypothesis formation 4. Hypothesis testing 5. Conclusion (and reformulation of hypothesis)

Imagine Yourself in Mexico You order soup Components of the Scientific Process 1.Observation 2. Generalization 3. Hypothesis formation 4. Hypothesis testing 5. Conclusion (and reformulation of hypothesis)