Rationalism. A. He, like others at the time, was obsessed with questions of truth and doubt

Similar documents
Lecture 18: Rationalism

From Transcendental Logic to Transcendental Deduction

WHAT IS HUME S FORK? Certainty does not exist in science.

! Jumping ahead 2000 years:! Consider the theory of the self.! What am I? What certain knowledge do I have?! Key figure: René Descartes.

The British Empiricism

UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT QUESTION BANK

PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 7 : E P I S T E M O L O G Y - K A N T

1/7. The Postulates of Empirical Thought

PHILOSOPHY IAS MAINS: QUESTIONS TREND ANALYSIS

Hume on Ideas, Impressions, and Knowledge

Important dates. PSY 3360 / CGS 3325 Historical Perspectives on Psychology Minds and Machines since David Hume ( )

Excerpt from J. Garvey, The Twenty Greatest Philosophy Books (Continuum, 2007): Immanuel Kant s Critique of Pure Reason

FACULTY OF ARTS B.A. Part II Examination,

Philosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy. Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2014

1/10. The Fourth Paralogism and the Refutation of Idealism

Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Chapter 18 David Hume: Theory of Knowledge

CHAPTER III KANT S APPROACH TO A PRIORI AND A POSTERIORI

René Descartes ( ) PSY 3360 / CGS 3325 Historical Perspectives on Psychology Minds and Machines since Descartes

Kant Lecture 4 Review Synthetic a priori knowledge

1/12. The A Paralogisms

1/8. The Schematism. schema of empirical concepts, the schema of sensible concepts and the

GROUP A WESTERN PHILOSOPHY (40 marks)

KANT, MORAL DUTY AND THE DEMANDS OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON. The law is reason unaffected by desire.

PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 7 : E P I S T E M O L O G Y - K A N T

Logic, Truth & Epistemology. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology

24.01 Classics of Western Philosophy

CONTENTS. CHAPTER 1. CHAPTER II. THE PROBLEM OF DESCARTES, -

Descartes to Early Psychology. Phil 255

Epistemology. Diogenes: Master Cynic. The Ancient Greek Skeptics 4/6/2011. But is it really possible to claim knowledge of anything?

PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY

Immanuel Kant, Analytic and Synthetic. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics Preface and Preamble

Think by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 7c The World

Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

1/9. The First Analogy

The CopernicanRevolution

Philosophy Quiz 12 The Age of Descartes

Copyright 2000 Vk-Cic Vahe Karamian

Kant & Transcendental Idealism

William Meehan Essay on Spinoza s psychology.

Of Skepticism with Regard to the Senses. David Hume

Kant s Transcendental Idealism

Do we have knowledge of the external world?

Thursday, November 30, 17. Hegel s Idealism

FIL 4600/10/20: KANT S CRITIQUE AND CRITICAL METAPHYSICS

PHI2391: Logical Empiricism I 8.0

Tuesday, November 11, Hegel s Idealism

A (Very) Brief Introduction to Epistemology Lecture 2. Palash Sarkar

1/9. The Second Analogy (1)

Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Supplemental Material 2a: The Proto-psychologists. In this presentation, we will have a short review of the Scientific Revolution and the

CONTENTS III SYNTHETIC A PRIORI JUDGEMENTS. PREFACE CHAPTER INTRODUCTldN

Kant and the Problem of Personal Identity Jacqueline Mariña

To be able to define human nature and psychological egoism. To explain how our views of human nature influence our relationships with other

Lecture 38 CARTESIAN THEORY OF MIND REVISITED Overview. Key words: Cartesian Mind, Thought, Understanding, Computationality, and Noncomputationality.

Kant and his Successors

Logic & Philosophy Sample Questions

Chapter Summaries: Three Types of Religious Philosophy by Clark, Chapter 1

The Ontological Argument for the existence of God. Pedro M. Guimarães Ferreira S.J. PUC-Rio Boston College, July 13th. 2011

A Priori Knowledge: Analytic? Synthetic A Priori (again) Is All A Priori Knowledge Analytic?

Immanuel Kant. Retirado de: (25/01/2018)

Absolute Totality, Causality, and Quantum: The Problem of Metaphysics in the Critique of Pure Reason. Kazuhiko Yamamoto, Kyushu University, Japan

Kant s theory of concept formation and the role of mind

The Kripkenstein Paradox and the Private World. In his paper, Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Languages, Kripke expands upon a conclusion

Introduction: Discussion:

Freedom as Morality. UWM Digital Commons. University of Wisconsin Milwaukee. Hao Liang University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Theses and Dissertations

1/8. The Third Analogy

Do you have a self? Who (what) are you? PHL 221, York College Revised, Spring 2014

Teleological: telos ( end, goal ) What is the telos of human action? What s wrong with living for pleasure? For power and public reputation?

Introduction to Philosophy PHL 221, York College Revised, Spring 2017

Analyticity, Reductionism, and Semantic Holism. The verification theory is an empirical theory of meaning which asserts that the meaning of a

PHIL 480: Seminar in the History of Philosophy Building Moral Character: Neo-Confucianism and Moral Psychology

The Copernican Shift and Theory of Knowledge in Immanuel Kant and Edmund Husserl.

COURSE GOALS: PROFESSOR: Chris Latiolais Philosophy Department Kalamazoo College Humphrey House #202 Telephone # Offices Hours:

1/9. Locke on Abstraction

Absolute Totality, Causality, and Quantum: The Problem of Metaphysics in the Critique of Pure Reason

Happiness and Personal Growth: Dial.

Tuesday, September 2, Idealism

Prolegomena [= Preliminaries] to any Future Metaphysic that can Present itself as a Science

Epistemology and sensation

A HOLISTIC VIEW ON KNOWLEDGE AND VALUES

1/5. The Critique of Theology

1/6. The Second Analogy (2)

Schopenhauer's Rejection off Kant's Analysis off Cause and Effect

PHILOSOPHICAL RAMIFICATIONS: THEORY, EXPERIMENT, & EMPIRICAL TRUTH

A. Aristotle D. Descartes B. Plato E. Hume

A Studying of Limitation of Epistemology as Basis of Toleration with Special Reference to John Locke

Saving the Substratum: Interpreting Kant s First Analogy

Descartes and Foundationalism

From the fact that I cannot think of God except as existing, it follows that existence is inseparable from God, and hence that he really exists.

Broad on Theological Arguments. I. The Ontological Argument

Rationalism and Empiricism. Chapter II

Minds and Machines spring The explanatory gap and Kripke s argument revisited spring 03

PHILOSOPHY 4360/5360 METAPHYSICS. Methods that Metaphysicians Use

Kantian Realism. Jake Quilty-Dunn. Kantian Realism 75

A Wesleyan Approach to Knowledge

Empiricism. HZT4U1 - Mr. Wittmann - Unit 3 - Lecture 3

Reading Questions for Phil , Fall 2012 (Daniel)

Unit 2. WoK 1 - Perception. Tuesday, October 7, 14

What is the Nature of Logic? Judy Pelham Philosophy, York University, Canada July 16, 2013 Pan-Hellenic Logic Symposium Athens, Greece

Transcription:

Rationalism I. Descartes (1596-1650) A. He, like others at the time, was obsessed with questions of truth and doubt 1. How could one be certain in the absence of religious guidance and trustworthy senses 2. Tried the typical rationalist program of finding clarity in thought a. Find clear first principles that could act as a bedrock or foundation for thought b. Decided that he could doubt everything except his own existence (1) Cognito ergo sum (2) Even the act of doubting presupposes a thinking entity 3. From such a clear first principle one could deduce all the rest deductive reason was seen to be largely infallible. B. Descartes also introduced modern dualism into philosophy and psychology 1. He was certainly not the first to see a sharp distinction between mind and body a. Aristotle b. And all the Christian, Medieval thinkers. 2. The older view portrayed a dualism between that which perishes and that which survives death a. The Medieval notion was based on Aristotle s division into three parts (1) vegetative (2) sensitive (3) rational b. The first two were allied with a conception of vital forces, those mysterious factors that allow for movement and evidence of life c. But they were only active to the extent that they were directed by the intellect or rational soul. d. The body then is seen as a husk that gave evidence of life only when animated by a soul 3. Descartes made a sharper distinction between these various components and assigned the vital forces solely to the body with the rational soul entirely separate -1-

a. Furthermore, the body is extended whereas the mind is not, unextended substance b. And the body obeys mechanical laws because it is a part of the mechanical universe, whereas the mind does not c. But in creating such a radical separation he unleashed a problem that had been camouflaged in the Medieval conception (1) How do the mind and body interact? (2) How can something without mass and weight, something that is unobservable, influence something that has mass? 4. Descartes s solution was to assume a kind of interactionism (1) The mind and body interact at the pineal gland which takes care of all the translation work (2) And when the mind influences the body, it is through the agency of will (3) That much would not have been foreign to Medieval thinkers although Descartes is far clearer about the nature of the problems (4) But the influence of the body on the mind is more complex and an issue not fully recognized by earlier thinkers in other than a passive perception sense. (a) The body is subject to passions created by sensation (b) These passions affect the mind (c) When all goes well, these passions induce will to control the body, but they can also interfere with clear thought. C. Descartes s theory of the mind was also influential 1. He distrusted sensory data which are too unreliable to produce clear truths. 2. He further reduced the importance of perception by assuming that we have innate ideas a. He doesn t seem to have meant that ideas are literally innate b. But only that we have the capacity to form certain ideas. 3. He also suggested that there re various intellectual faculties such as memory, intuition, and will. This part of his work had enormous influence and it led to much second and third rate philosophy that put French thought on the backburner for the next crucial century or two. -2-

II. Spinoza (1632-1677) A. He lay outside the mainstream of Continental thought until rediscovered toward the end of the last century 1. Partially because he was Jewish and thus had a different kind of background 2. Partially because he was so rejected 3. And partially because he was geographically isolated B. He is most famous for having a different sort of solution to the mind-body problem and dualism parallelism 1. God and his creations are not separable 2. Therefore there can be no radical separation between mind and body 3. They are really two sides to the same coin today we might be inclined to say that they are just different language systems to describe the same thing 4. But there is at least one important implication in terms of causality a. Since the body is part of the physical world that obeys immutable laws, it follows that the mind (the other side of the coin) must also be so determined b. And hence our mental lives just as our physical are fully determined. C. He also had an important theory of emotion and passion largely influenced by the Stoics 1. Emotions were directed at clear objects whereas the passions were merely generalized disruptions a. Those emotions that we share with God are perfect and are emotions b. Whereas those that are not are imperfect and disruptive c. Emotions will serve as agents of the intellect in helping to channel thought and commit us to reasoned action d. Whereas the passions will disrupt 2. Truth itself is known most clearly when accompanied by emotion and we grasp truth as a kind of intuition a. Our searchings for ultimate truth will be guided by emotion b. And we will experience pleasure when we get there -3-

III. Leibniz (1646-1716) A. Contemporary of Locke and much of his philosophy is an attempt to refute him 1. Nothing is in the intellect which is not first in the senses 2. To which he replied: Nothing except the intellect itself B. Also a dualist and adopted a parallelism position 1. Being consists of monads which are basically ideal points of psychic energy 2. However, when concentrated in one place they take on extension and give the impression of body 3. Mind and body obey different laws but are adjusted by God to show perfect agreement pre-established harmony C. One of his most important contributions lay in his theory of consciousness 1. Each monad has mental activity 2. However, the mental activity of an individual monad is so small that it is not conscious note the distinction between mental activity and consciousness 3. Consciousness results when monads are combined a. Note that consciousness thus exists on a continuum b. And there must be a threshold of sorts as to what is conscious c. This idea would be the first subject of psychological experimentation D. But he also had important ideas on how we think at what we might call the macro level 1. Conscious mental thought is not merely a result of sensation 2. It must be guided by higher mental structures through a process he called apperception a. This term came to mean many things, but for him it was a kind of cognitive schema that guided thought. b. It is that which gives form to thought and can be identified with the Platonic Forms or Aristotlean categories. E. Leibniz had great influence on the development of psychology in the 19 th century, more so probably than did Kant, who is by all accounts a greater thinker. 1. Psychophysics and the issue of thresholds of consciousness 2. The notion of apperception and schematic thinking Wundt 3. Conflict between ideas Freud and others -4-

IV. Kant (1724-1804) A. His major work was a response to Hume s skepticism 1. He was deeply bothered by the implications for religion and morality a. If nothing could be known with certainty then theology and morality were on shaky grounds b. So there must be a way of finding certainty 2. Kant did not deny the importance of experience and sensation, but he did deny that they were sufficient 3. But somewhat inaccurately Hume and the empiricists would say that we know because we perceive, but the rationalists (and certainly Kant) would say that we perceive because we know. B. The formal way that this comes down requires an understanding of the distinction between analytic and synthetic propositions an old distinction 1. Analytic propositions are those that are true more or less by definition, so they are linguistic in nature the predicate is logically implied by the subject a. Bodies have extension b. Bachelors are unmarried males c. Men have penises 2. Synthetic propositions are those with empirical content where the predicate bears only a contingent relationship to the subject a. They are contingent b. They are probabilistically true c. And they can be assessed only a posteriori d. Examples (1) Rice students are smart (2) Frenchmen are average in height 3. Kant s program was to show that there are synthetic propositions that have a priori validity a. His method of demonstrating this takes the major part of a very large and complex book (The Critique of Pure Reason 1781). b. But the outlines are clear (1) In the first place, even the building blocks of Hume s analysis of -5-

causality are not given in experience (a) Requires that we understand there are actually two objects which requires a notion of extended space (b) And that one follows the other, which requires time (2) To be sure, as Hume recognized, the ideas of space and time are subject to the same skeptical view, but Kant s point is a different one, and one common to all rationalist programs (a) Whether or not one has the idea of space and time, one must have the implicit categories of same (b) And these categories must be innate because logically they must precede all experience. (3) And by extension causality may also be an innate category (4) There is a better and more extended proof in terms of Kantian analogies, part of which is given in Robinson 4. Thus there are categories of thought (12 of them) and these are logically required for any thought a. Negation b. Plurality c. Causality 5. Having thus proved that things like causality are not merely inventions of the mind, he can proceed to develop similar arguments for morality a. Certain moral truths are self-evident b. The famous categorical imperative: Act in such a way that the maxim of your action could serve as a universal law of nature C. Kant also had some negative influences on the history of psychology 1. He firmly believed that there could be no science of psychology a. Because mental processes were fleeting and could never be caught. Thus mental processes are of but not in the mind. b. He also believed that such processes could not be measured, and he understood that measurement in one essential ingredient of science. 2. This served as a challenge for subsequent thinkers a. Herbart and measurement b. Fechner and psychophysics -6-