Syllogism. Exam Importance Exam Importance. CAT Very Important IBPS/Bank PO Very Important. XAT Very Important BANK Clerk Very Important

Similar documents
Complications for Categorical Syllogisms. PHIL 121: Methods of Reasoning February 27, 2013 Instructor:Karin Howe Binghamton University

Baronett, Logic (4th ed.) Chapter Guide

SYLLOGISTIC LOGIC CATEGORICAL PROPOSITIONS

Venn Diagrams and Categorical Syllogisms. Unit 5

13.6 Euler Diagrams and Syllogistic Arguments

In this section you will learn three basic aspects of logic. When you are done, you will understand the following:

7.1. Unit. Terms and Propositions. Nature of propositions. Types of proposition. Classification of propositions

Dr. Carlo Alvaro Reasoning and Argumentation Distribution & Opposition DISTRIBUTION

Reasoning SYLLOGISM. follows.

Logic: A Brief Introduction. Ronald L. Hall, Stetson University

Logic Appendix: More detailed instruction in deductive logic

SHORT ANSWER. Write the word or phrase that best completes each statement or answers the question.

Unit 7.3. Contraries E. Contradictories. Sub-contraries

5.6.1 Formal validity in categorical deductive arguments

Part 2 Module 4: Categorical Syllogisms

GENERAL NOTES ON THIS CLASS

Study Guides. Chapter 1 - Basic Training

Logic: Deductive and Inductive by Carveth Read M.A. CHAPTER VI CONDITIONS OF IMMEDIATE INFERENCE

1 Clarion Logic Notes Chapter 4

Logic: Deductive and Inductive by Carveth Read M.A. CHAPTER IX CHAPTER IX FORMAL CONDITIONS OF MEDIATE INFERENCE

Chapter 1. Introduction. 1.1 Deductive and Plausible Reasoning Strong Syllogism

Deduction. Of all the modes of reasoning, deductive arguments have the strongest relationship between the premises

Improving Students' "Dialectic Tracking" Skills (Diagramming Complex Arguments) Cathal Woods for 2010 AAPT Meeting.

Bertrand Russell Proper Names, Adjectives and Verbs 1

7. Some recent rulings of the Supreme Court were politically motivated decisions that flouted the entire history of U.S. legal practice.

Chapter 8 - Sentential Truth Tables and Argument Forms

SYLLOGISM FOR SBI PO

T. Parent. I shall explain these steps in turn. Let s consider the following passage to illustrate the process:

PRACTICE EXAM The state of Israel was in a state of mourning today because of the assassination of Yztzak Rabin.

Early Russell on Philosophical Grammar

Handout for: Ibn Sīnā: analysis with modal syllogisms

Lonergan on General Transcendent Knowledge. In General Transcendent Knowledge, Chapter 19 of Insight, Lonergan does several things:

What is a logical argument? What is deductive reasoning? Fundamentals of Academic Writing

Revisiting the Socrates Example

Topics and Posterior Analytics. Philosophy 21 Fall, 2004 G. J. Mattey

Review Deductive Logic. Wk2 Day 2. Critical Thinking Ninjas! Steps: 1.Rephrase as a syllogism. 2.Choose your weapon

Part II: How to Evaluate Deductive Arguments

5.3 The Four Kinds of Categorical Propositions

PHILOSOPHY 102 INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC PRACTICE EXAM 1. W# Section (10 or 11) 4. T F The statements that compose a disjunction are called conjuncts.

Informalizing Formal Logic

MPS 17 The Structure of Persuasion Logos: reasoning, reasons, good reasons not necessarily about formal logic

9.1 Intro to Predicate Logic Practice with symbolizations. Today s Lecture 3/30/10

Suppressed premises in real life. Philosophy and Logic Section 4.3 & Some Exercises

Moore on External Relations

Philosophy 1100: Ethics

Broad on Theological Arguments. I. The Ontological Argument

15. Russell on definite descriptions

Logic Book Part 1! by Skylar Ruloff!

Geometry TEST Review Chapter 2 - Logic

Selections from Aristotle s Prior Analytics 41a21 41b5

Morality and the Senses. One Does Not Equal the Other

Chapter 6, Tutorial 1 Predicate Logic Introduction

The Names of God. from Summa Theologiae (Part I, Questions 12-13) by Thomas Aquinas (~1265 AD) translated by Brian Shanley (2006)

Phil 3304 Introduction to Logic Dr. David Naugle. Identifying Arguments i

National Quali cations

Introducing Our New Faculty

Predicate logic. Miguel Palomino Dpto. Sistemas Informáticos y Computación (UCM) Madrid Spain

I think, therefore I am. - Rene Descartes

The Problem of Induction and Popper s Deductivism

Logic, reasoning and fallacies. Example 0: valid reasoning. Decide how to make a random choice. Valid reasoning. Random choice of X, Y, Z, n

The basic form of a syllogism By Timo Schmitz, Philosopher

Announcements. CS311H: Discrete Mathematics. First Order Logic, Rules of Inference. Satisfiability, Validity in FOL. Example.

16. Universal derivation

What would count as Ibn Sīnā (11th century Persia) having first order logic?

A Short Course in Logic Example 3

Unit 4. Reason as a way of knowing. Tuesday, March 4, 14

6.5 Exposition of the Fifteen Valid Forms of the Categorical Syllogism

Russell: On Denoting

Does Deduction really rest on a more secure epistemological footing than Induction?

Date Interpretation Info Chart Questions Quiz for Bank PO Exams.

Logic clearly dictates that the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few or the needs of the one (Spock and Captain Kirk).

Also, in Argument #1 (Lecture 11, Slide 11), the inference from steps 2 and 3 to 4 is stated as:

Prof. Dr. Nasreen Taj Prof. of Law, B.M.S Law College, Bangalore (India) I. INTRODUCTION

Responses to the sorites paradox

Thinking and Reasoning

HANDBOOK. IV. Argument Construction Determine the Ultimate Conclusion Construct the Chain of Reasoning Communicate the Argument 13

Follow Will of the People. Your leftist h. b. ave often d1sgusted b h

Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics. Critical Thinking Lecture 1. Background Material for the Exercise on Validity

Vol 2 Bk 7 Outline p 486 BOOK VII. Substance, Essence and Definition CONTENTS. Book VII

Kantian Humility and Ontological Categories Sam Cowling University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Semantic Entailment and Natural Deduction

A New Parameter for Maintaining Consistency in an Agent's Knowledge Base Using Truth Maintenance System

Chapter 5: Ways of knowing Reason (p. 111)

Philosophy 57 Day 10

Figure 1 Figure 2 U S S. non-p P P

Richard L. W. Clarke, Notes REASONING

The Roman empire ended, the Mongol empire ended, the Persian empire ended, the British empire ended, all empires end, and none lasts forever.

A R G U M E N T S I N A C T I O N

Criticizing Arguments

There are two common forms of deductively valid conditional argument: modus ponens and modus tollens.

Unit. Categorical Syllogism. What is a syllogism? Types of Syllogism

2.3. Failed proofs and counterexamples

LOGICAL FALLACIES/ERRORS OF ARGUMENT

The Birth of Logic in Ancient Greek.

(Refer Slide Time 03:00)

(3) The middle term must be distributed at least once in the premisses.

How Do We Know Anything about Mathematics? - A Defence of Platonism

Categorical Logic Handout Logic: Spring Sound: Any valid argument with true premises.

Philosophy 57 Day 10. Chapter 4: Categorical Statements Conversion, Obversion & Contraposition II

Comments on Truth at A World for Modal Propositions

Transcription:

1 About Disha publication One of the leading publishers in India, Disha Publication provides books and study materials for schools and various competitive exams being continuously held across the country. Disha's sole purpose is to encourage a student to get the best out of preparation. Disha Publication offers an online bookstore to help students buy exam books online with ease. We, at Disha provide a wide array of Bank Exam books to help all those aspirants who wish to crack their respective different levels of bank exams. At Disha Publication, we strive to bring out the best guidebooks that students would find to be the most useful for Bank Probationary exams. 6 Syllogism Exam Importance Exam Importance CAT Very Important IBPS/Bank PO Very Important XAT Very Important BANK Clerk Very Important IIFT Very Important SSC Very Important SNAP Very Important CSAT Very Important NMAT Very Important Other Govt Exams Very Important Other Aptitude Test Very Important Introduction Syllogism is one of the very important chapters for any aptitude test exam. In these types of questions premise has generally two statements on the basis of which a deduction has to be made for conclusion. And then that conclusion we have to select from the given options

2 Text here Text here We may have a case where from the given premise no conclusion can be drawn There are two methods to solve these types of questions:- Venn Diagram (ii) Rules of deduction. Now we will see how to derive conclusion from the given premise from these two methods but before that let s have a look at the different components of the premise and for that take two example of premise- All are Hats.. All Hats are.. (ii) The premises normally start with qualifiers or quantifiers, e.g. the word All, No, some and Some Not. The word All has its synonyms as Every, Any, Each, whereas the word Some can also be replaced by Many, Few, A little, Most of, Much of, More, etc. (ii) A premise consists of a subject and a predicate wherein the first term [e.g. in statement ] is the

3 subject and the second term [e.g. Hats in statement ] the predicate. Similarly, in statement (ii), Hats is called the subject and is the predicate. (iii) The word that occurs in both the premises is known as the middle term (in this example since Hats is in both the premise hence it is called middle term). (iv) The conclusion of the premise middle term should not appear and conclusion should consist of the other two words ( and in the above example) and the. The premises can be divided into 2 types (Based on qualifier) (A) Universal statements [ if the qualifier used in the premise is All, Every, Any, Each ] (B) Particular statements [if the qualifier used in the premise is Some, Many, Few, A little, Most of, Much of, More, etc] The premises can be divided into 2 types (Based on type of statement)- (A) Positive (affirmative) statements [ if premise has no negation] (B) Negative statements [If premise has a negative term like not or no] The combination of the two different categories of classifications leads to four different premises as given in Table below. All, Every, Any, Each Universal/ Particular Universal Affirmative/ Negative Affirmative No, Not None Universal Negative Some, Many Particular Affirmative Some not, Many not Particular Negative The subject or the predicate can be either distributed or not distributed in the given premise. The subject and the predicate are either distributed (indicated as yes) or not distributed (indicated as no) depending on what kind of a statement it is. Table below shows the distribution pattern of the subject and the predicate. Please note that:- Universal affirmative Example Subject Predicate All, Every, Any, Each Yes Universal negative No, Not None Yes Yes Particular affirmative Some, Many No No Particular negative Some not, Many not No Yes Subject is distributed only in Universal statements. (ii) Predicate is distributed in Negative statement. RULES FOR DEDUCTIONS 1. Every deduction should contain three and only three distinct terms. 2. The middle term must be distributed at least once in the premises. 3. If one premise is negative, then the conclusion must be negative. 4. If one premise is particular, then the conclusion must be particular. 5. If both the premises are negative, no conclusion can be drawn. 6. If both the premises are particular, no conclusion can be drawn. 7. No term can be distributed in the conclusion, if it is not distributed in the premises. Now let s take few examples to understand this- Example 1) Find the conclusion of No

4 All are (ii) All are Solution : Now look at the minute details of each premise- Here the first statement starts with All which is Universal affirmative hence it is a universal affirmative statement, and the subject () is distributed but the predicate () is not distributed. (ii) The second statement is also Universal affirmative, the subject is distributed and the predicate is not distributed. (iii) Here the middle term is as it occurs in both the premises. (iv) Middle term is is distributed once in the premises (In this example Premise ii) hence it satisfies Rule [2] hence we can find a conclusion. (v) Conclusion will have two terms and these terms are and (vi) As is distributed in the 1 st premises and is not distributed, (vii) In final conclusion is distributed but is not distributed. Conclusion: All are Note of Caution: The conclusion cannot be All are as in this case we have distributed the Venn diagram approach:- All are : Can be represented as- (ii) All are : Can be represented as- Overall conclusion is: Hence final conclusion is all rats are cats. Example 2) Find the conclusion of All are (ii) Some are Solution: Now look at the minute details of each premise- Here the first statement starts with All which is Universal affirmative hence it is a universal affirmative statement, and the subject () is distributed but the predicate () is not distributed. (ii) Here the 2 nd statement starts with Some which is Particular affirmative hence it is a Particular affirmative

statement, and the subject () is not distributed and the predicate () is not distributed. (iii) Here the middle term is as it occurs in both the premises. (iv) Middle term is is distributed once in the premises (In this example Premise i) hence it satisfies Rule [2] hence we can find a conclusion. (v) Conclusion will have two terms and these terms are and (vi) In premise neither nor are distributed; so in conclusion they should not be distributed. Conclusion: Some are or some are Venn diagram approach All are : Can be represented as- (ii) Some are : Can be represented as- 5

6 Overall conclusion is: Hence final conclusion is Some are or some are. Or Example 3) Find the conclusion of All are (ii) No are Solution: Now look at the minute details of each premise- Here the first statement starts with All which is Universal affirmative hence it is a universal affirmative statement, and the subject () is distributed but the predicate () is not distributed. (ii) Here the 2 nd statement starts with No which is Universal negative hence both subject () and the predicate () is distributed. (iii) Here the middle term is as it occurs in both the premises. (iv) Middle term is is distributed once in the premises (In this example Premise ii) hence it satisfies Rule [2] hence we can find a conclusion. (v) Conclusion will have two terms and these terms are and (vi) Since one of the premises is negative hence conclusion must be negative. (vii) In premise both and is distributed, so in final conclusion they should be distributed. Conclusion: No are cats or No are