The literal golden rule: If you want X to do something to you, then do this same thing to X.

Similar documents
Chapter 7. GR Logic. Chapter 8. GR Applications. Chapter 9. GR Frameworks

Golden Rule Thomas Carson

Making Decisions on Behalf of Others: Who or What Do I Select as a Guide? A Dilemma: - My boss. - The shareholders. - Other stakeholders

Is Morality Rational?

Ethics and Religion. Cambridge University Press Ethics and Religion Harry J. Gensler Frontmatter More information

Self Evaluation. 1. What did I do today or yesterday that was GOOD? 2. Where did I blow it today or yesterday?

Action in Special Contexts

Philosophy 1100: Ethics

5:21-6:4 30, 2012 L.G.

Normative Ethical Theories

SUMMARIES AND TEST QUESTIONS UNIT 6

Kant's Moral Philosophy

Mill s Utilitarian Theory

Deontology, Rationality, and Agent-Centered Restrictions

Suicide. 1. Rationality vs. Morality: Kagan begins by distinguishing between two questions:

Reply to Gauthier and Gibbard

Critical Reasoning and Moral theory day 3

OUTLINE Safe Environment Program Salt Lake / Amarillo

March April May 2018 Unit 1 Celebrate Easter!

CLIMBING THE MOUNTAIN SUMMARY CHAPTER 1 REASONS. 1 Practical Reasons

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking

Gale on a Pragmatic Argument for Religious Belief

The Church and the Bible

Common Morality: Deciding What to Do 1

Kant. Deontological Ethics

Deontological Ethics. Kant. Rules for Kant. Right Action

(i) Morality is a system; and (ii) It is a system comprised of moral rules and principles.

Ima Emotivist (EM) X is good means Hurrah for X! Moral judgments aren t true or false. We can t reason about basic moral principles.

Recognizing the Voice of God

Tactics in Conversation

A CONTRACTUALIST READING OF KANT S PROOF OF THE FORMULA OF HUMANITY. Adam Cureton

Is Life Fair? Parashat Vayetze November 17, 2018 Rabbi Carl M. Perkins Temple Aliyah, Needham

Consider... Ethical Egoism. Rachels. Consider... Theories about Human Motivations

The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Ethics.

Ich Habe Genug / Eight Ounces of Grace Matthew 20:1-16

PHI 1700: Global Ethics

Introduction. In light of these facts, we will ask, is killing animals for human benefit morally permissible?

A Judgmental Formulation of Modal Logic

Challenges to Traditional Morality

Kindergarten-2nd. July 20-21, Joseph. God is always with us (in good times and bad times). Genesis 37-48

CURRICULUM ON LEADERSHIP

Survey of Proverbs, Ecclesiastes & Song of Solomom. by Duane L. Anderson

Firth and Hill: Two Dispositional Ethical Theories. Margaret Chiovoloni. Chapel Hill 2006

Sections 1 and 2 of this essay

Choosing Rationally and Choosing Correctly *

Safe and Caring School Policy. Our Context: A Parental School

Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics. Critical Thinking Lecture 1. Background Material for the Exercise on Validity

APPENDIX 1 FULL TEXT OF THE MADINAH CHARTER

AN ECCLESIASTICAL POLICY AND A PROCESS FOR REVIEW OF MINISTERIAL STANDING of the AMERICAN BAPTIST CHURCHES OF NEBRASKA PREAMBLE:

Q2) The test of an ethical argument lies in the fact that others need to be able to follow it and come to the same result.

Evaluating actions The principle of utility Strengths Criticisms Act vs. rule

CHAPTER 2 Test Bank MULTIPLE CHOICE

The 10 Rules of Happiness Mridula Agrawal

Prompt: Explain van Inwagen s consequence argument. Describe what you think is the best response

THE CONCEPT OF OWNERSHIP by Lars Bergström

ASSEMBLIES OF GOD THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY. PTHM 650 Building the Disciple-Making Ministry

Bayesian Probability

Practical Rationality and Ethics. Basic Terms and Positions

Deontological Ethics

Well-Being, Time, and Dementia. Jennifer Hawkins. University of Toronto

HOLY SCRIPTURE...John 8:1-11, KJV esus went unto the mount of Olives. 2 And early in the morning he came again

ETHICAL EGOISM. Brian Medlin. Introduction, H. Gene Blocker

Suppose... Kant. The Good Will. Kant Three Propositions

Professional Ethics. Today s Topic Ethical Egoism PHIL Picture: Ursa Major. Illustration: Cover art from Ayn Rand s The Fountainhead

Philosophical Perspectives on Ethics

University of York, UK

A Categorical Imperative. An Introduction to Deontological Ethics

Catholic philosophy anthology. my background. history vs. topics

Darwinian Morality. Why aren t t all the atheists raping and pillaging? Ron Garret (Erann( Gat) September 2004

Preliminary Remarks on Locke's The Second Treatise of Government (T2)

The William Glasser Institute

The Greatest Question Ever Asked No. 198

Duty Based Ethics. Ethics unit 3

Bayesian Probability

Some of the repetitions include: Joseph recognizes his brothers but they do not recognize him: 42.7; 45.1 Brothers come to buy grain: 42.7; 43.

Zimmerman, Michael J. Subsidiary Obligation, Philosophical Studies, 50 (1986):

Phil 3121: Modern Philosophy Fall 2016 T, Th 3:40 5:20 pm

The Pledge: "As a member of the William and Mary community, I pledge on my honor not to lie, cheat, or steal, either in my academic or personal life.

KANTIAN ETHICS (Dan Gaskill)

Ethical Egoism. Ethical Egoism Things You Should Know. Quiz: one sentence each beginning with The claim that

Tutorial A03: Patterns of Valid Arguments By: Jonathan Chan

Occultism, Satanism, and the Left

Gracious Loving God, you are God above all, and we come to worship you. We

Chapter 2 Determining Moral Behavior

Utilitarianism. But what is meant by intrinsically good and instrumentally good?

How to respond When People Hurt You

Quote. Analyzing Ethical Dilemmas. Chapter Two. Determining Moral Behavior. Integrity is doing the right thing--even if nobody is watching

Proverbs 6. (2015). The Bible not only reveals God s eternal plans purposes and promises. But also shows how you can know God for yourself.

The Foundations of Christian Morality

1. LEADER PREPARATION

A Guide To the Romans Road

Fate and the Extraordinary Man in Dostoevsky s Crime and Punishment. In Crime and Punishment, Dostoevsky s hero, Raskolnikov, formulates a theory

Equality, Fairness, and Responsibility in an Unequal World

GOD S NOT GUILTY. Andrew Wommack

Ethics Prof. Vineet Sahu Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology-Kanpur

Christ Before Pilate John 18:28-19:16 Part Two

CAPITAL BIBLE CHURCH June 28, A.D. the Series. The First Roman Pygmy. Acts 10

d. Many in the unsaved world will quote Matthew 7:1 to us and accuse us of being judgmental and intolerant.

Don t Store It Up! (Romans 2:1-16)

Filthy Lucre Titus 1:7 By Russ Earl

Transcription:

The literal golden rule: If you want X to do something to you, then do this same thing to X. This leads to absurdities in two cases: different situations flawed desires If you want Dr. Davis to remove your appendix, then remove her appendix. If you want others to hate you, then hate them.

Gensler s GR Treat others only as you consent to being treated in the same situation. GR forbids this combination: I do something to another. I m unwilling that this be done to me in the same situation.

If you re conscientious and impartial, then you won t steal Detra s bicycle unless you re willing that your bicycle be stolen in the same situation: You steal Detra s bicycle You re willing that your bicycle be stolen in the same situation conscientious conscientious You believe it would be all right for you to steal her bicycle impartial You believe it would be all right for your bicycle to be stolen in the same situation

Gensler s GR Treat others only as you consent to being treated in the same situation. Formulating GR correctly requires: (1) a SAME-SITUATION clause, (2) a present attitude toward a hypothetical situation (say WILLING THAT IF ), and (3) a CONSISTENCY form that forbids a combination (acting + being unwilling to be treated that way) instead of commanding specific actions.

GR involves imagining yourself in the other person s situation. I m a waiter who hates broccoli and thus don t want it served to me. If I follow GR, can I serve broccoli to a customer who ordered it? Ask this Am I now willing that if I were in the same situation then this be done to me?

GR involves a present attitude toward a hypothetical situation. Little Will puts his finger into electrical outlets. Does GR let us discipline him? Ask this Am I now willing that if I were in the same situation then this be done to me?

GR forbids an inconsistent action-desire combination. Satisfying GR-consistency doesn t guarantee that your action is right. I grow rich with my coal mine while paying my workers only $1 a day. The owner (ignorant of what $1 can buy) is willing that he be paid $1 in his workers place. It doesn t follow that his act is right.

Ima Masochist: I want to be hurt. Does GR tell me to hurt others? Can I hurt others without violating GR? Have her imagine herself in the place of her non-masochist victim. Criticize Ima s irrational desires. GR forbids an inconsistent action-desire combination. Satisfying GR-consistency doesn t guarantee that her action is right.

The golden rule: procedure (KITA) 1. Know: How would my action affect others? 2. Imagine: What would it be like to have this done to me? 3. Test for consistency: Am I now willing that if I were in the same situation then this be done to me? 4. Act toward others only as you re willing to be treated in the same situation. The love norm: motivation Love your neighbor as yourself. (Seek to do good and not harm to others, and do this for their own sake.)

Treat others as you want to be treated Treat others as they treat you. Does the golden rule apply to our treatment of animals?

The Golden Rule is a GLOBAL STANDARD that s deeply rooted in different religions and cultures. As the world becomes more and more a single interacting global community, the need for such a common standard is becoming more urgent. http://www.harryhiker.com/goldrule.htm

GR s Relatives Self-regard: Treat yourself only as you re willing to have others treat themselves in the same situation. Future-regard: Treat yourself (in the future) only as you re willing to have been treated by yourself (in the past). Universal law: Act only as you re willing for anyone to act in the same situation regardless of imagined variations of time or person. CELI FUGS Conscientiousness, ends-means, logicality, impartiality Future-regard, universal law, golden rule, self-regard

GR: Our attitudes are defective if we treat others as we aren t willing that we ourselves be treated in the same situation. Whyffollow GR? GR is a demand of our culture. GR is self-evident (and provable). GR fits my altruistic feelings. God wants us to follow GR. I m happier if I follow GR.