CRITICAL THINKING. Critical thinking is "reasonably and reflectively deciding what to believe or do." (Ennis (1985)

Similar documents
The Art of Critical Thinking

Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me?

The Critical Mind is A Questioning Mind

Argument Writing. Whooohoo!! Argument instruction is necessary * Argument comprehension is required in school assignments, standardized testing, job

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking

PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy

A R G U M E N T S I N A C T I O N

Argument and Persuasion. Stating Opinions and Proposals

Asking the Right Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking M. Neil Browne and Stuart Keeley

Adapted from The Academic Essay: A Brief Anatomy, for the Writing Center at Harvard University by Gordon Harvey. Counter-Argument

Some Templates for Beginners: Template Option 1 I am analyzing A in order to argue B. An important element of B is C. C is significant because.

b. Use of logic in reasoning; c. Development of cross examination skills; d. Emphasis on reasoning and understanding; e. Moderate rate of delivery;

Questions for Critically Reading an Argument

I think, therefore I am. - Rene Descartes

14.6 Speaking Ethically and Avoiding Fallacies L E A R N I N G O B JE C T I V E S

3.2: FAULTY REASONING AND PROPAGANDA. Ms. Hargen

What an argument is not

What s all the fuss about? Jim Skypeck, MA, MLIS

Reading Comprehension Fallacies in Reading

Humanizing the Future

Tools Andrew Black CS 305 1

Logical (formal) fallacies

Prologue Critical Thinking/Active Learning

2. Public Forum Debate seeks to encourage the development of the following skills in the debaters: d. Reasonable demeanor and style of presentation

Moving from Analysis to Evaluation. Or, Well, it s my opinion isn t enough anymore

Persuasive Argument Relies heavily on appeals to emotion, to the subconscious, even to bias and prejudice. Characterized by figurative language,

Full file at

Richard Carrier, Ph.D.

Critical Thinking Questions

Overview: Application: What to Avoid:

Take Home Exam #1. PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy Prof. Lauren R. Alpert

I. Claim: a concise summary, stated or implied, of an argument s main idea, or point. Many arguments will present multiple claims.

PHI 1700: Global Ethics

Argument vs Persuasion vs Propaganda. So many terms...what do they all mean??

Annotated Works Consulted

Course Learning Outcomes for Unit V

The Argumentative Essay

Critical Thinking. The Four Big Steps. First example. I. Recognizing Arguments. The Nature of Basics

Argument. What is it? How do I make a good one?

Critical Healing I: Bias & Irrational Assumptions

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 7: Logical Fallacies

Introducing Our New Faculty

THE ISSUES AT ISSUE: A DISCUSSION

Logical Appeal (Logos)

2/21/2014. FOUR WAYS OF KNOWING (Justifiable True Belief) 1. Sensory input; 2. Authoritative knowledge; 3. Logic and reason; 4. Faith and intuition

Persuasive Essay. Writing Workshop. writer s road map

Understanding Thesis and Support

The Value of the Life of Reason ( ) Alonzo Fyfe

Ethical Theory for Catholic Professionals

Warrant, Proper Function, and the Great Pumpkin Objection

How to Generate a Thesis Statement if the Topic is Not Assigned.

Socrates and Justice By Parviz Dehghani

HANDBOOK. IV. Argument Construction Determine the Ultimate Conclusion Construct the Chain of Reasoning Communicate the Argument 13

Philosophy 100: Problems of Philosophy (Honors) (Spring 2014)

ARGUMENT: CONVINCING OTHERS

36 Thinking Errors. 36 Thinking Errors summarized from Criminal Personalities - Samenow and Yochleson 11/18/2017

Fallacies in logic. Hasty Generalization. Post Hoc (Faulty cause) Slippery Slope

How To Share Your Testimony

Critical Thinking. What is critical thinking? Speaker: Frank Reed

How persuasive is this argument? 1 (not at all). 7 (very)

ARGUMENTS. Arguments. arguments

Varsity LD: It s All About Clash. 1:15 pm 2:30 pm TUESDAY, June 26

Introduction to Philosophy

From: Michael Huemer, Ethical Intuitionism (2005)

III. RULES OF POLICY (TEAM) DEBATE. A. General

Fallacies. Definition: The premises of an argument do support a particular conclusion but not the conclusion that the arguer actually draws.

SACRED PACE STUDY GUIDE

2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 1

Writing Module Three: Five Essential Parts of Argument Cain Project (2008)

WHO'S IN CHARGE? HE'S NOT THE BOSS OF ME. Reply. Dear Professor Theophilus:

Step 1 Pick an unwanted emotion. Step 2 Identify the thoughts behind your unwanted emotion

Logic Practice Test 1

Course Learning Outcomes for Unit III

Becoming A Blessed Church. Mid Week Instruction Reid Temple AME Church Pastor Washington

Arguments. 1. using good premises (ones you have good reason to believe are both true and relevant to the issue at hand),

Logical Fallacies. Define the following logical fallacies and provide an example for each.

PHIL 480: Seminar in the History of Philosophy Building Moral Character: Neo-Confucianism and Moral Psychology

Make sure you are properly registered Course web page : or through Class Notes link from University Page Assignment #1 is due

Waking Up Is... Answers/Insights by our Elder Brother Christ Jesus, via Paul

Robert Scheinfeld. Friday Q&As. The Big Elephant In The Room You Must See And Get Rid Of

Lesson 2 of 4. Doctrine: Obedience, Evangelism, Devotion. Acts 7:55 Who is seen standing at the right hand of God?

Language in any type of media meant to persuade or convince Common Examples: speeches, political posters, commercials, ads

Writer: Sean Sweet Project Supervisor: Nick Diliberto Artwork: Creative Juice Editor: Tom Helm Created by PreteenMinistry.net

Video Reaction. Opening Activity. Journal #16

Prentice Hall U.S. History Modern America 2013

PHI 300: Introduction to Philosophy

Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Collections 2015 Grade 8. Indiana Academic Standards English/Language Arts Grade 8

College Writing: Supporting Your Thesis

Ideas Have Consequences

Please visit our website for other great titles:

CRITICAL THINKING (CT) MODEL PART 1 GENERAL CONCEPTS

that the only way a belief can be justified is if it is based on sufficient evidence. However,

The Testimony Cultivating Authentic Christian Community 1 John 5:6-12 Pastor Bryan Clark

Weaknesses in arguments

The Critique (analyzing an essay s argument)

Overcoming the trap of Delusion, Denial, Deception

11/6/2016 An Antidote to the Age of Anxiety: Alan Watts on Happiness and How to Live with Presence Brain Pickings

What Makes A Real Hero?

Basic Bible Principles

Debate Vocabulary 203 terms by mdhamilton25

Transcription:

CRITICAL THINKING Critical thinking is "reasonably and reflectively deciding what to believe or do." (Ennis (1985) Critical thinking is "the art of thinking about your thinking while you are thinking in order to make your thinking better: more clear, more accurate, or more defensible." (Paul, Binker, Adamson, and Martin (1989) "Critical thinking is best understood as the ability of thinkers to take charge of their own thinking. This requires that they develop sound criteria and standards for analyzing and assessing their own thinking and routinely use those criteria and standards to improve its quality." (Elder, L. and Paul, R. "Critical Thinking: Why we must transform our teaching." Journal of Developmental Education 18:1, Fall 1994, 34-35.) Uses of critical thinking: "underlies reading, writing, speaking, and listening... the basic elements of communication" "plays an important part in social change... institutions in any society - courts, governments, schools, businesses - are the products of a certain way of thinking." "helps us uncover bias and prejudice." "is a path to freedom from half-truths and deceptions." "the willingness to change one point of view as we continue to examine and re-examine ideas that may seem obvious. Such thinking takes time and the willingness to say three subversive words: I don't know." Critical thinkers: distinguish between fact and opinion; ask questions; make detailed observations; uncover assumptions and define their terms; and make assertions based on sound logic and solid evidence. (Ellis, D. Becoming a Master Student, 1997.)

DON T BE RATIONAL; BE REASONABLE Why? I can think of several reasonable reasons: I am human, and no human can be completely rational all the time. If I attempt to be so, I will merely appear more foolish than people normally do [or I will appear to others as a cold, unreasoning, unflinching automaton a la Spok!]. Rationality depends on tight chains of reasoning; so one weak link can break a chain of rationality. Reasonableness uses multiple chains to arrive at conclusions some rational, some emotional; some data-based, some intuitive; some internally derived, some from external sources. Thus, reasonableness may not be as sharp and efficient, but it s more secure and less likely to lead to monstrous mistakes. Nobody likes a know-it-all Adapted from: Weinberg, Gerald M. (2002). More secrets of consulting: The consultant s tool kit. New York, N.Y.: Dorset House Publishing. Page 16.

Name Calling "Bad names have played a tremendously powerful role in the history of the world and in our own individual development. They have ruined reputations, stirred men and women to outstanding accomplishments, sent others to prison cells, and made men mad enough to enter battle and slaughter their fellowmen. They have been and are applied to other people, groups, gangs, tribes, colleges, political parties, neighborhoods, states, sections of the country, nations, and races." (Institute for Propaganda Analysis, 1938) The name-calling technique links a person, or idea, to a negative symbol. The propagandist who uses this technique hopes that the audience will reject the person or the idea on the basis of the negative symbol, instead of looking at the available evidence. The most obvious type of name-calling involves bad names. For example, consider the following: Commie Yuppie Fascist Fanatic Pig Weirdo According to the IPA, we should ask ourselves the following questions when we spot an example of name-calling. What does the name mean? Does the idea in question have a legitimate connection with the real meaning of the name? Is an idea that serves my best interests being dismissed through giving it a name I don't like? Leaving the name out of consideration, what are the merits of the idea itself?

OPEN YOUR MIND! Learning to think critically Bramwell Osula, Ph.D. Bramwell Osula, Ph.D. 2005

Most people are followers of authority: most do not question, are not curious. Most people, therefore, do not think for themselves, but rely on others to think for them. Most people, therefore, do not think critically. ~(Steven D. Schafersman, 1991)

CRITICAL THINKING THINKING

THE DYING ART OF THINKING "5% think, 10% think they think, 85% would rather die than think." ~ Anonymous

THE TWO SIDES OF CRITICAL The common sense use: "negative or faultfinding." (The Jerry Springer Show) The critical thinking use: "involving or exercising skilled judgment or observation. (the legal profession)

Teachers complain about students who arrive at school with strong convictions but not enough knowledge to argue persuasively for their beliefs.... Having opinions without knowledge is not of much value; not knowing the difference between them is a positive indicator of ignorance." -- Diane Ravitch, The Schools We Deserve, p. 8

"We should be teaching students how to think. Instead, we are teaching them what to think." (Clement and Lochhead, 1980, Cognitive Process Instruction. )

THE TWO GOALS OF EDUCATION 1. WHAT to think? : So obvious that instructors and students focus most of their energies and efforts on transmitting and acquiring basic knowledge. - Can be so overwhelming that students and teachers have time for little else. 2. HOW to think? : This is critical thinking and is often so subtle that instructors fail to recognize it - and students fail to realize its absence!

EVERYONE THINKS But much of our thinking, left to itself, is biased, distorted, partial, uninformed, or downright prejudiced.

CHARACTERISTICS OF A GOOD CRITICAL THINKER Can strip a verbal argument of irrelevancies and phrase it in its essential terms. Habitually questions one s own views and attempts to understand the assumptions that are critical to those views and the implications of the views.

CRITICAL THINKING TWO DISTINCT ACTIVITIES Analysis: Understanding an argument Criticism: Evaluating the truth of an argument.

THE SMALLEST UNIT OF MEANING Critical thinking is NOT concerned with the claim, the sentence, or the belief. Rather, the smallest unit of meaning is THE ARGUMENT.

STOP WASTING YOUR TIME! Don t get caught up in wasteful and irrelevant talk by agreeing and disagreeing on theses (claims or beliefs). The aim of critical thinking is to construct a set of reasons that adequately support a belief (a thesis, a claim) and DO SO BETTER THAN SOME OTHER SET.

BARRIERS TO CRITICAL THINKING 1: EGOCENTRISM This requires that we: Recognize the impact of self-interested thinking on our thinking. Understand the peril of self-serving bias.

BARRIERS TO CRITICAL THINKING 2: SOCIOCENTRISM This requires that we: Grasp the danger posed by group bias. Understand the risks associated with the herd instinct or conformism.

BARRIERS TO CRITICAL THINKING 3: ASSUMPTIONS Recognize that some assumptions are warranted by the fact that we have good reasons to believe them. Recognize that an unwarranted assumption is something we take for granted without good reason.

EVERYONE THINKS But much of our thinking, left to itself, is biased, distorted, partial, uninformed, or downright prejudiced.

ARGUMENTUM AD POPULUM ( appeal to the people ) Attempting to convince by appealing to the natural desire we all have to be included, or liked, or recognized. 1. Appeal to Common Practice: "Hey, everyone speeds. So speeding isn't wrong". 2. The Fallacy of Popularity: Reliable opinion polls show that 70% of all Americans favor the death penalty. If so many people are in favor of it, it has to be right.

ARGUMENT AGAINST THE PERSON (AD HOMINEM) Attacking the source of an argument instead of the argument itself. Abusive: Craig says that the government should spend more money on education because doing so would result in a more productive workforce. But Craig is a bleedingheart, liberal from Seattle -- so you know that his opinion is worthless. ( Get personal; who cares about the argument! ) From Hypocrisy: You've claimed that smoking is bad for one's health; but you smoke too. ( Practice what you preach! )

OVERGENERALIZING Coming to a conclusion without enough supporting data. 1. We hear about many teenagers using drugs and alcohol, then conclude that the younger generation is going "to pot. 2. We ve found school uninteresting and conclude that we will never like to study. 3. We find two red spots on our nose and conclude we have cancer ( catastrophizing ).

MUSTANG DREAMS! Sex Appeal? In the Ford Mustang ad the lonely accountant buys a Mustang, and suddenly girls chase him down the street. Nobody thinks that will happen, right? Well, sales of Mustangs went up in correlation to the ad campaign.

THE DREAMLIKE PROMISE "When was the last time you felt this comfortable in a relationship?" ~ (An ad for sneakers) "You can love it without getting your heart broken." ~ (An ad for a car) "Until I find a real man, I'll settle for a real smoke." ~ (A woman in a cigarette ad)

TOUCHY TOPICS & SORE POINTS The stuff that can set our minds reeling and mess up our thinking. Making a mistake or being surprised may shut down your brain for a moment; Being laughed at or treated with disrespect may infuriate you; Being envious or jealous may distract your thoughts. It is important to understand what is happening to our thinking in these situations, in order to gain some control and peace of mind.

I heard that

"The world needs leaders... who possess opinions and a will who will not lose their individuality in a crowd who will not say they do it 'because everybody else does it

... who are not ashamed or afraid to stand for the Truth when it is unpopular; who can say 'no' with emphasis, although the rest of the world says 'yes.' ~ Ted Engstrom, 1976

CHARACTERISTICS OF CRITICAL THINKERS Are honest with themselves Resist manipulation Look for connections between subjects Are intellectually independent Ask questions Base judgments on evidence Overcome confusion

Critical Thinking Please give us your feedback.