Venn Diagrams and Categorical Syllogisms. Unit 5

Similar documents
Baronett, Logic (4th ed.) Chapter Guide

Part 2 Module 4: Categorical Syllogisms

SYLLOGISTIC LOGIC CATEGORICAL PROPOSITIONS

Deduction. Of all the modes of reasoning, deductive arguments have the strongest relationship between the premises

Dr. Carlo Alvaro Reasoning and Argumentation Distribution & Opposition DISTRIBUTION

Philosophy 1100: Ethics

Unit 7.3. Contraries E. Contradictories. Sub-contraries

5.3 The Four Kinds of Categorical Propositions

In this section you will learn three basic aspects of logic. When you are done, you will understand the following:

What is a logical argument? What is deductive reasoning? Fundamentals of Academic Writing

Unit. Categorical Syllogism. What is a syllogism? Types of Syllogism

Reasoning SYLLOGISM. follows.

7. Some recent rulings of the Supreme Court were politically motivated decisions that flouted the entire history of U.S. legal practice.

Pastor-teacher Don Hargrove Faith Bible Church September 8, 2011

7.1. Unit. Terms and Propositions. Nature of propositions. Types of proposition. Classification of propositions

Categorical Logic Handout Logic: Spring Sound: Any valid argument with true premises.

1 Clarion Logic Notes Chapter 4

Unit 4. Reason as a way of knowing. Tuesday, March 4, 14

Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics. Critical Thinking Lecture 1. Background Material for the Exercise on Validity

Revisiting the Socrates Example

PRACTICE EXAM The state of Israel was in a state of mourning today because of the assassination of Yztzak Rabin.

Logic Appendix: More detailed instruction in deductive logic

Syllogism. Exam Importance Exam Importance. CAT Very Important IBPS/Bank PO Very Important. XAT Very Important BANK Clerk Very Important

Transition to Quantified Predicate Logic

6.5 Exposition of the Fifteen Valid Forms of the Categorical Syllogism

PHI Introduction Lecture 4. An Overview of the Two Branches of Logic

Unit 4. Reason as a way of knowing

1. Immediate inferences embodied in the square of opposition 2. Obversion 3. Conversion

Identify the subject and predicate terms in, and name the form of, each of the following propositions.

The Birth of Logic in Ancient Greek.

Selections from Aristotle s Prior Analytics 41a21 41b5

Logic: A Brief Introduction. Ronald L. Hall, Stetson University

Chapter 1. Introduction. 1.1 Deductive and Plausible Reasoning Strong Syllogism

Study Guides. Chapter 1 - Basic Training

SHORT ANSWER. Write the word or phrase that best completes each statement or answers the question.

Complications for Categorical Syllogisms. PHIL 121: Methods of Reasoning February 27, 2013 Instructor:Karin Howe Binghamton University

10.3 Universal and Existential Quantifiers

SOME RADICAL CONSEQUENCES OF GEACH'S LOGICAL THEORIES

To better understand VALIDITY, we now turn to the topic of logical form.

Lecture 3 Arguments Jim Pryor What is an Argument? Jim Pryor Vocabulary Describing Arguments

Part II: How to Evaluate Deductive Arguments

MCQ IN TRADITIONAL LOGIC. 1. Logic is the science of A) Thought. B) Beauty. C) Mind. D) Goodness

LOGIC ANTHONY KAPOLKA FYF 101-9/3/2010

The basic form of a syllogism By Timo Schmitz, Philosopher

Introduction to Philosophy

13.6 Euler Diagrams and Syllogistic Arguments

CHAPTER 10 VENN DIAGRAMS

Alice E. Fischer. CSCI 1166 Discrete Mathematics for Computing February, 2018

Early Russell on Philosophical Grammar

9.1 Intro to Predicate Logic Practice with symbolizations. Today s Lecture 3/30/10

EXERCISES: (from

Geometry TEST Review Chapter 2 - Logic

HOW TO ANALYZE AN ARGUMENT

Logic, reasoning and fallacies. Example 0: valid reasoning. Decide how to make a random choice. Valid reasoning. Random choice of X, Y, Z, n

GENERAL NOTES ON THIS CLASS

Ancient Philosophy Handout #1: Logic Overview

What is reason? The power of the mind to think, understand, and form judgments by a process of logic

Logic Book Part 1! by Skylar Ruloff!

LOGICAL THINKING CHAPTER DEDUCTIVE THINKING: THE SYLLOGISM. If we reason it is not because we like to, but because we must.

16. Universal derivation

MPS 17 The Structure of Persuasion Logos: reasoning, reasons, good reasons not necessarily about formal logic

Intro Viewed from a certain angle, philosophy is about what, if anything, we ought to believe.

Logic: Deductive and Inductive by Carveth Read M.A. CHAPTER IX CHAPTER IX FORMAL CONDITIONS OF MEDIATE INFERENCE

Syllogisms in Aristotle and Boethius

Announcements. CS311H: Discrete Mathematics. First Order Logic, Rules of Inference. Satisfiability, Validity in FOL. Example.

Philosophy 57 Day 10

Am I free? Freedom vs. Fate

Chapter 6, Tutorial 1 Predicate Logic Introduction

INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC 1 Sets, Relations, and Arguments

Chapter 8 - Sentential Truth Tables and Argument Forms

5.6 Further Immediate Inferences

1. Introduction Formal deductive logic Overview

5.6.1 Formal validity in categorical deductive arguments

HW3- Sets & Arguments (solutions) Due: Tuesday April 5, 2011

Philosophy 57 Day 10. Chapter 4: Categorical Statements Conversion, Obversion & Contraposition II

1.5. Argument Forms: Proving Invalidity

BASIC CONCEPTS OF LOGIC

Moore on External Relations

What is reason? The power of the mind to think, understand, and form judgments by a process of logic

Section 3.5. Symbolic Arguments. Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Formal Logic. Mind your Ps and Qs!

Announcements. CS243: Discrete Structures. First Order Logic, Rules of Inference. Review of Last Lecture. Translating English into First-Order Logic

PART III - Symbolic Logic Chapter 7 - Sentential Propositions

FACULTY OF ARTS B.A. Part II Examination,

Logic: A Brief Introduction

An Introduction to TRADITIONAL LOGIC. Scott M. Sullivan

Possibility and Necessity

Recall. Validity: If the premises are true the conclusion must be true. Soundness. Valid; and. Premises are true

S U M M A R Y O F L O G I C

4.7 Constructing Categorical Propositions

Section 3.5. Symbolic Arguments. Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Handout for: Ibn Sīnā: analysis with modal syllogisms

Inference in Cyc. Copyright 2002 Cycorp

What could be some limitations to using fingerprints as evidence? Sep 2 12:58 PM

LOGIC LECTURE #3: DEDUCTION AND INDUCTION. Source: A Concise Introduction to Logic, 11 th Ed. (Patrick Hurley, 2012)

CRITICAL THINKING (CT) MODEL PART 1 GENERAL CONCEPTS

Review Deductive Logic. Wk2 Day 2. Critical Thinking Ninjas! Steps: 1.Rephrase as a syllogism. 2.Choose your weapon

6: DEDUCTIVE LOGIC. Chapter 17: Deductive validity and invalidity Ben Bayer Drafted April 25, 2010 Revised August 23, 2010

SYLLOGISM FOR SBI PO

Thinking and Reasoning

Transcription:

Venn Diagrams and Categorical Syllogisms Unit 5

John Venn 1834 1923 English logician and philosopher noted for introducing the Venn diagram Used in set theory, probability, logic, statistics, and computer science

Classes of things represented in circles:

Shading means the class or set of items is empty there are none that fit that description:

Comparing two different classes:

All are, every vs. No are, none, nothing

Representing subjects and predicates visually:

All S are P. Universal Categorical Statement All members of the subject class are also members of the predicate class. All sharks are predators. (The circle on the left represents sharks, the circle on the left is predators.) All apples are sweet. We ve shaded out the area where the non-predator sharks would have been, and where the non-sweet apples would have been. This is known as an A statement.

No S are P. Universal Categorical Statement No members of the subject class are also members of the predicate class. No salmon are porpoises. We shaded the area where a salmon-porpoise would have been, because there cannot be anything existing in that area. This is known as an E statement.

Some S are P. Particular Categorical Statement Some members of the subject class are also members of the predicate class. Some sailors are privates. The X is placed where the sailors who are also privates would exist. This is known as the I statement.

Some S are not P. Particular Categorical Statement Some members of the subject class are not members of the predicate class. Some scholars are not philosophers. This is known as the O form statement.

A, E, I, O There are four basic categorical statement types, named A, E, I, and O. The quantity of a categorical proposition is either universal, or particular. The quality of a categorical proposition is either affirmative, or negative.

A, E, I, O and their quantity and quality A is the universal affirmative statement. E is the universal negative statement. I is the particular affirmative statement. O is the particular negative statement.

The meaning of some In categorical logic some means at least one, which is considered its minimal meaning. Some is the standard form particular quantifier. So, for example, the I statement, Some buses used by the city are roadworthy machines, would mean there s at least one bus used by the city (but not necessarily any more than that one) that is a roadworthy machine.

The Square of Opposition: How the four types of categorical statements relate to each other

Practice: Which diagram goes with each of the following categorical propositions? Give the letter type, and draw the Venn diagram. 1. No Catholics are Protestants. 2. Some cats are Persians. 3. Some dogs are not hunters. 4. All Georgians are Americans. 5. No fish are bipeds.

Categorical Syllogisms Made up of three statements, giving three specific classes of things and how they relate http://philosophy.hku.hk/think/venn/tute3.ph p The webpage above is interactive, and shows how the three statements can be placed on a Venn Diagram made of three circles.

Imagine how to shade in: All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Therefore, Socrates is mortal.

First shade in All men are mortal:

Socrates is a Man And check to see if there is a space where Socrates can be mortal as well there is, where the X appears below: This is considered valid because the Venn diagram shows that the conclusion is necessarily true: there is no space left for a Socrates who is nonmortal!

Checking what is true on a Venn diagram:

Checking what is true on a Venn diagram:

Venn Diagram checker http://philosophy.hku.hk/think/venn/vennprogram.php Use this link to double check how you represent statements on Venn diagrams The page immediately after it explains how to use ticks on a Venn diagram to check Categorical Syllogism arguments for validity

Mood (cont.) Example: All dictators are tyrants. All czars are dictators. Therefore, all czars are tyrants. The mood of this example is AAA.

A Question For You Selecting from the list below, what is the mood of this syllogism? No candidates are witnesses. Some lawyers are witnesses. So, some lawyers are not candidates. A. OIE B. IOE C. EIO D. AOI

Answer Selecting from the list below, what is the mood of this syllogism? No candidates are witnesses. Some lawyers are witnesses. So, some lawyers are not candidates. A. OIE B. IOE C. EIO (Correct) D. AOI

Figure The figure of a syllogism is determined by the position of the middle term. Example: All dictators are tyrants. All czars are dictators. Therefore, all czars are tyrants. In this example the middle term is dictators.

Substituting the letters for the terms (M) dictators- (P) tyrants (S) czars- (M) dictators (S) czars- (P) tyrants This gives us: M P S M S P S refers to the subject term of the conclusion. P refers to the predicate term of the conclusion. M is the middle term, it only appears in the premises.

The 4 Figures: M P P M M P P M S M S M M S M S S P S P S P S P 1 ST figure 2 ND figure 3 rd figure 4 th figure

Figures represented as a bow tie and collar on the M (middle terms) Figure: 1 2 3 4