Critical Thinking - Section 1

Similar documents
C. Exam #1 comments on difficult spots; if you have questions about this, please let me know. D. Discussion of extra credit opportunities

Macmillan/McGraw-Hill SCIENCE: A CLOSER LOOK 2011, Grade 3 Correlated with Common Core State Standards, Grade 3

Critical Thinking. The Four Big Steps. First example. I. Recognizing Arguments. The Nature of Basics

Macmillan/McGraw-Hill SCIENCE: A CLOSER LOOK 2011, Grade 1 Correlated with Common Core State Standards, Grade 1

With prompting and support, identify the reasons an author gives to support points in a text.

2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 1

Macmillan/McGraw-Hill SCIENCE: A CLOSER LOOK 2011, Grade 4 Correlated with Common Core State Standards, Grade 4

2. Refutations can be stronger or weaker.

GMAT ANALYTICAL WRITING ASSESSMENT

QCAA Study of Religion 2019 v1.1 General Senior Syllabus

THE SCIENTIFIC PROCESS C H A P T E R 3

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking

Argumentation Module: Philosophy Lesson 7 What do we mean by argument? (Two meanings for the word.) A quarrel or a dispute, expressing a difference

2) If you do spend time in completely focused prayer, do you have a specific location where you regularly do this? 454 Answered

In general, the simplest of argument maps will take the form of something like this:

Courses providing assessment data PHL 202. Semester/Year

Critical Thinking 5.7 Validity in inductive, conductive, and abductive arguments

HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.)

GMAT ANALYTICAL WRITING ASSESSMENT

Positions 1 and 2 are rarely useful in academic discourse Issues, evidence, underpinning assumptions, context etc. make arguments complex and nuanced

18LOGICAL REASONING. sufficient assumption & supporting principle. fill the hole

HANDBOOK. IV. Argument Construction Determine the Ultimate Conclusion Construct the Chain of Reasoning Communicate the Argument 13

MISSOURI S FRAMEWORK FOR CURRICULAR DEVELOPMENT IN MATH TOPIC I: PROBLEM SOLVING

Lecture 2.1 INTRO TO LOGIC/ ARGUMENTS. Recognize an argument when you see one (in media, articles, people s claims).

A R G U M E N T S I N A C T I O N

The SAT Essay: An Argument-Centered Strategy

In a previous lecture, we used Aristotle s syllogisms to emphasize the

1. Introduction Formal deductive logic Overview

Aquinas' Third Way Modalized

Sample Questions with Explanations for LSAT India

Portfolio Project. Phil 251A Logic Fall Due: Friday, December 7

HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.)

Overview: Application: What to Avoid:

A Brief Introduction to Key Terms

Argument and Persuasion. Stating Opinions and Proposals

Instructor s Manual 1

Prentice Hall U.S. History Modern America 2013

The Critical Mind is A Questioning Mind

Asking the Right Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking M. Neil Browne and Stuart Keeley

INDUCTIVE VS. DEDUCTIVE WRITING ADAPTED PARTIALLY FROM DR. TAMARA FUDGE, KAPLAN UNIVERSITY

Part 2 Module 4: Categorical Syllogisms

Helpful Hints for doing Philosophy Papers (Spring 2000)

Writing Thesis Statements. An Interactive Activity to Develop Effective Writing Skills

What s all the fuss about? Jim Skypeck, MA, MLIS

MASTERING. Mastering the UKCAT: Second Edition Dr Christopher Nordstrom, George Rendel, Dr Ricardo Tavares 2018

Prentice Hall United States History Survey Edition 2013

Position Strategies / Structure Presenting the Issue

Thinking Skills. John Butterworth and Geoff Thwaites

Philosophy of Science. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology

1/19/2011. Concept. Analysis

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International Advanced Subsidiary and Advanced Level

Comprehension Strategy. I think: Determining a Purpose for Reading. Why am I reading this? What do I need to remember?

Module 9- Inductive and Deductive Reasoning

PHILOSOPHIES OF SCIENTIFIC TESTING

Richard L. W. Clarke, Notes REASONING

LOGIC LECTURE #3: DEDUCTION AND INDUCTION. Source: A Concise Introduction to Logic, 11 th Ed. (Patrick Hurley, 2012)

Common Core Standards for English Language Arts & Draft Publishers' Criteria for History/Social Studies

Grade 7 Math Connects Suggested Course Outline for Schooling at Home 132 lessons

1.5 Deductive and Inductive Arguments

Responses to the sorites paradox

Language Supports for Argument Writing

2nd International Workshop on Argument for Agreement and Assurance (AAA 2015), Kanagawa Japan, November 2015

College and Career Readiness Anchor Standards for Reading. Step Into the Time 36 Step Into the Place 92, 108, 174, 292, 430

CRITICAL THINKING (CT) MODEL PART 1 GENERAL CONCEPTS

Reading Critically LEARNING SKILLS

Why Good Science Is Not Value-Free

WHY SHOULD ANYONE BELIEVE ANYTHING AT ALL?

Interpersonal Communication and Conflict Management

Chapter 2: Two Types of Reasoning

Semantic Entailment and Natural Deduction

On Freeman s Argument Structure Approach

Truth and Evidence in Validity Theory

Foundationalism Vs. Skepticism: The Greater Philosophical Ideology

ISSA Proceedings 1998 Wilson On Circular Arguments

Argument vs Persuasion vs Propaganda. So many terms...what do they all mean??

Russell s Problems of Philosophy

Norva Y S Lo Produced by Norva Y S Lo Edited by Andrew Brennan

The Appeal to Reason. Introductory Logic pt. 1

Argument Writing. Whooohoo!! Argument instruction is necessary * Argument comprehension is required in school assignments, standardized testing, job

INTRODUCTION TO HYPOTHESIS TESTING. Unit 4A - Statistical Inference Part 1

A Short Course in Logic Example 3

The Church Was Divided

Free Critical Thinking Test Arguments

Of Mice and Men Mock Trial Expert Witness Packet

2016 Philosophy. Higher. Finalised Marking Instructions

StoryTown Reading/Language Arts Grade 3

High School / College Sample Questions Reason for Belief Norman L Geisler. (Updated 14 JUL 2016)

1. Clarity: Understandable, the meaning can be grasped; free from confusion or ambiguity; to remove obscurities.

Improving Students' "Dialectic Tracking" Skills (Diagramming Complex Arguments) Cathal Woods for 2010 AAPT Meeting.

HOW TO ANALYZE AN ARGUMENT

Now you know what a hypothesis is, and you also know that daddy-long-legs are not poisonous.

McDougal Littell High School Math Program. correlated to. Oregon Mathematics Grade-Level Standards

The Most Important Thing You'll Ever Study (Set): A Survey Of The Bible PDF

2 The Cartesian Soul and the Paranormal

Level 2 Award Thinking and Reasoning Skills. Mark Scheme for January Unit B902: Thinking and Reasoning Skills Case Study.

24.09 Minds and Machines Fall 11 HASS-D CI

The St. Petersburg paradox & the two envelope paradox

YFIA205 Basics of Research Methodology in Social Sciences Lecture 1. Science, Knowledge and Theory. Jyväskylä 3.11.

Argument Mapping. Table of Contents. By James Wallace Gray 2/13/2012

Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me?

Transcription:

Critical Thinking - Section 1 BMAT Course Book Critical Reasoning Tips Mock Questions Step-by-Step Guides Detailed Explanations Page 57

Table of Contents Lesson Page Lesson 1: Introduction to BMAT Section 1 3 Lesson 2: Understanding Argument - Introduction 7 Lesson 3: Understanding Argument - Conclusion 9 Lesson 4: Understanding Argument - Conclusion Qs 13 Lesson 5: Understanding Argument - Conclusion Qs 13 Lesson 6: Understanding Argument - Assumptions 23 Lesson 7: Understanding Argument - Assumptions Qs 27 Lesson 8: Understanding Argument - Assumptions Qs 27 Lesson 9: Understanding Argument - Flaws 33 Lesson 10: Understanding Argument - Flaws 33 Lesson 11: Understanding Argument - Flaws 33 Lesson 12: Strengthening & Weakening Arguments 43 Lesson 13: Strengthening & Weakening Arguments 43 Lesson 14: Strengthening & Weakening Arguments 43 Detailed Explanations Page 58

Introduction to BMAT Section 1 Lesson 1 To gain a brief understanding of the different question types and the timing for this intense section. What is BMAT Section 1? BMAT Section 1 is the longest section in the test, being 1 hour. Many students find Section 1 to be the most difficult section, and most similar to the UKCAT in terms of its nature as being more aptitude based rather than content based (like Section 2). What are the different skills tested? 1. Understanding Argument You will get 10 questions on Understanding Argument. These questions require the following skills: Being able to draw conclusions Spotting deficiencies in arguments Page 3

Introduction to BMAT Section 1 Lesson 1 Understand the logic behind an argument Be able to identify the use of assumptions in conclusions 2. Problem Solving You will get 13 questions on Problem Solving. These questions require the following skills: Applying relevant algebraic operations. Applying relevant numerical operations. Being able to deduce what information is relevant. Being able to understand when information is related to each other. 3. Data Analysis and Inference You will get 12 questions on Data Analysis and Inference. These questions require the following skills: Data interpretation Being able to reach appropriate conclusions from graphical, statistical and verbal information Determining the correct skills required to interpret information Using scientific inference skills to reach correct and appropriate conclusions How are the questions structured? There are two main structure types of questions: Page 4

Introduction to BMAT Section 1 Lesson 1 Type 1: Single Answer Questions Here you will be given one of four options and you will have to pick one of the four answers. A. Option A B. Option B C. Option C D. Option B Type 2: Multiple Answer Questions Here you will be given three statements, and you will have to identify whether one of them, two of them, three of them or none of them correspond to the correct answer. 1. Statement 1 2. Statement 2 3. Statement 3 A. 1 only B. 2 only C. 3 only D. 1, 2 only E. 2, 3 only F. 1, 3 only G. 1, 2, 3 H. None Page 5

Introduction to BMAT Section 1 Lesson 1 What does a typical argument consist of? BMAT Section 1 questions often require you to assess arguments. A typical argument consists of three elements: Conclusion One or more premise Link between premise and conclusion We will explore arguments in more detail in future tutorials. Page 6

Understanding Argument I: Introduction Lesson 2 To gain an understanding of how to break down arguments, and identify conclusion, assumptions and flaws. Understanding Argument Questions In Understanding Argument questions you will be given a short paragraph of information and you will have to judge a variety of things with respect to the validity of an argument. There are various types of Understanding Argument question, which we will explore below. 1. Recognising Conclusions What is the main conclusion of this passage? In Recognising Conclusion questions, you need to chose which statement (A-D) correctly matches the main argument of the passage. Often you will be asked to draw your own conclusion from the information presented. To answer these questions you should consider whether the passage presented gives you a valid argument to accept one of the correct answers. Establish the main aim of the argument, the message being conveyed, and the manner in which the aim is being established. 2. Recognising Flaws What is the flaw in the above argument? In Recognising Flaw questions, you need to spot the weakness in an argument, and assess why the conclusion in the argument does not follow from the information that is presented. Page 7

Understanding Argument I: Introduction Lesson 2 As with Recognising Conclusion questions, establish the main aim of the argument, the message being conveyed, and the manner in which the aim is being established. Ask yourself - is there anything missing in the trail of logic used in the passage? 3. Recognising Assumptions What is the assumption made in the above argument? In Recognising Assumption questions, you have to spot the assumption made by the passage. These questions are very similar to the Decision Making section of the UKCAT. An assumption is an aspect of an argument that is not explicitly stated in the passage but is accepted as being true, despite a lack of evidence. A good way to approach these questions is to identify the conclusion of the argument, and then identify the gap between the evidence and conclusion - the assumption. Scan through the statement options (A-D), and identify which one bridges the gap between the evidence and conclusion to complete the argument. 4. Recognising the Effect of Evidence Which of the following statements would, if true, strengthen the argument? In Recognising the Effect of Evidence questions, you have to judge whether certain statements presented will weakens or strengthens an argument that is being made. You need to identify the aim of the passage and measure how well a piece of evidence adds to or takes away from the main conclusion. Page 8