PRACTICE EXAM The state of Israel was in a state of mourning today because of the assassination of Yztzak Rabin.

Similar documents
Geometry TEST Review Chapter 2 - Logic

What is a logical argument? What is deductive reasoning? Fundamentals of Academic Writing

1.5. Argument Forms: Proving Invalidity

Directions: For Problems 1-10, determine whether the given statement is either True (A) or False (B).

PHI Introduction Lecture 4. An Overview of the Two Branches of Logic

PHILOSOPHY 102 INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC PRACTICE EXAM 1. W# Section (10 or 11) 4. T F The statements that compose a disjunction are called conjuncts.

Logic Book Part 1! by Skylar Ruloff!

5.3 The Four Kinds of Categorical Propositions

Venn Diagrams and Categorical Syllogisms. Unit 5

Philosophy 57 Day 10

1 Clarion Logic Notes Chapter 4

Logic: The Science that Evaluates Arguments

Philosophy 57 Day 10. Chapter 4: Categorical Statements Conversion, Obversion & Contraposition II

PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON THIS QUIZ

Unit 7.3. Contraries E. Contradictories. Sub-contraries

MCQ IN TRADITIONAL LOGIC. 1. Logic is the science of A) Thought. B) Beauty. C) Mind. D) Goodness

Introduction to Logic. Instructor: Jason Sheley

6: DEDUCTIVE LOGIC. Chapter 17: Deductive validity and invalidity Ben Bayer Drafted April 25, 2010 Revised August 23, 2010

Dr. Carlo Alvaro Reasoning and Argumentation Distribution & Opposition DISTRIBUTION

Deduction. Of all the modes of reasoning, deductive arguments have the strongest relationship between the premises

HW3- Sets & Arguments (solutions) Due: Tuesday April 5, 2011

1. Immediate inferences embodied in the square of opposition 2. Obversion 3. Conversion

7.1. Unit. Terms and Propositions. Nature of propositions. Types of proposition. Classification of propositions

Philosophy 1100: Ethics

1. To arrive at the truth we have to reason correctly. 2. Logic is the study of correct reasoning. B. DEDUCTIVE AND INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS

SYLLOGISTIC LOGIC CATEGORICAL PROPOSITIONS

Categorical Logic Handout Logic: Spring Sound: Any valid argument with true premises.

7. Some recent rulings of the Supreme Court were politically motivated decisions that flouted the entire history of U.S. legal practice.

Part II: How to Evaluate Deductive Arguments

Part 2 Module 4: Categorical Syllogisms

Critical Thinking - Wk 3. Instructor: Jason Sheley

Unit 4. Reason as a way of knowing. Tuesday, March 4, 14

Baronett, Logic (4th ed.) Chapter Guide

Complications for Categorical Syllogisms. PHIL 121: Methods of Reasoning February 27, 2013 Instructor:Karin Howe Binghamton University

1. True or False: The terms argument and disagreement mean the same thing. 2. True or False: No arguments have more than two premises.

Moon s Day, March 23: Elementary Reasoning

Reasoning SYLLOGISM. follows.

Logic: Deductive and Inductive by Carveth Read M.A. CHAPTER IX CHAPTER IX FORMAL CONDITIONS OF MEDIATE INFERENCE

Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics. Critical Thinking Lecture 1. Background Material for the Exercise on Validity

A short introduction to formal logic

Unit. Categorical Syllogism. What is a syllogism? Types of Syllogism

Intro Viewed from a certain angle, philosophy is about what, if anything, we ought to believe.

Example Arguments ID1050 Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning

Formal Logic. Mind your Ps and Qs!

1.6 Validity and Truth

Basic Concepts and Skills!

SHORT ANSWER. Write the word or phrase that best completes each statement or answers the question.

Logic: A Brief Introduction. Ronald L. Hall, Stetson University

Syllogism. Exam Importance Exam Importance. CAT Very Important IBPS/Bank PO Very Important. XAT Very Important BANK Clerk Very Important

LOGIC ANTHONY KAPOLKA FYF 101-9/3/2010

Identify the subject and predicate terms in, and name the form of, each of the following propositions.

Geometry 2.3.notebook October 02, 2015

5.6 Further Immediate Inferences

Philosophical Arguments

Chapter 5: Ways of knowing Reason (p. 111)

GENERAL NOTES ON THIS CLASS

Revisiting the Socrates Example

EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: Thursday, Sept. 8 at 4:00 p.m.

Worksheet Exercise 1.1. Logic Questions

Chapter 1 Why Study Logic? Answers and Comments

Logic Appendix: More detailed instruction in deductive logic

13.6 Euler Diagrams and Syllogistic Arguments

In this section you will learn three basic aspects of logic. When you are done, you will understand the following:

A Primer on Logic Part 1: Preliminaries and Vocabulary. Jason Zarri. 1. An Easy $10.00? a 3 c 2. (i) (ii) (iii) (iv)

Review Deductive Logic. Wk2 Day 2. Critical Thinking Ninjas! Steps: 1.Rephrase as a syllogism. 2.Choose your weapon

Suppressed premises in real life. Philosophy and Logic Section 4.3 & Some Exercises

A Brief Introduction to Key Terms

Study Guides. Chapter 1 - Basic Training

What could be some limitations to using fingerprints as evidence? Sep 2 12:58 PM

Tutorial A02: Validity and Soundness By: Jonathan Chan

Alice E. Fischer. CSCI 1166 Discrete Mathematics for Computing February, 2018

4.7 Constructing Categorical Propositions

Follow Will of the People. Your leftist h. b. ave often d1sgusted b h

Three Kinds of Arguments

CHAPTER 10 VENN DIAGRAMS

Reconstructing Arguments 1. Reconstructing Arguments 3. Reconstructing Arguments 2. HW #4 is due on Thursday Longer than usual (and on ch.

Faith indeed tells what the senses do not tell, but not the contrary of what they see. It is above them and not contrary to them.

In view of the fact that IN CLASS LOGIC EXERCISES

Diagramming Arguments

Lecture 3 Arguments Jim Pryor What is an Argument? Jim Pryor Vocabulary Describing Arguments

Test Item File. Full file at

Genuine dichotomies expressed using either/or statements are always true:

Chapter 1. Introduction. 1.1 Deductive and Plausible Reasoning Strong Syllogism

LOGIC LECTURE #3: DEDUCTION AND INDUCTION. Source: A Concise Introduction to Logic, 11 th Ed. (Patrick Hurley, 2012)

!Validity!Soundness. Today s Lecture 1//21/10

LOGICAL THINKING CHAPTER DEDUCTIVE THINKING: THE SYLLOGISM. If we reason it is not because we like to, but because we must.

The Roman empire ended, the Mongol empire ended, the Persian empire ended, the British empire ended, all empires end, and none lasts forever.

Introduction to Analyzing and Evaluating Arguments

Preface. Unit One Logic Basics Logic is an organized body of knowledge that evaluates reasoning. The goal of logic is disciplined critical reasoning.

EXERCISES: (from

What is an argument? PHIL 110. Is this an argument? Is this an argument? What about this? And what about this?

C. Exam #1 comments on difficult spots; if you have questions about this, please let me know. D. Discussion of extra credit opportunities

Fortunately, the greatest detective was doing some. Categorical Logic. Students will learn to...

ELEMENTS OF LOGIC. 1.1 What is Logic? Arguments and Propositions

Handout 2 Argument Terminology

BASIC CONCEPTS OF LOGIC

Introduction Chapter 1 of Social Statistics

BASIC CONCEPTS OF LOGIC

Argumentation. 2. What should we consider when making (or testing) an argument?

Practice Test Three Fall True or False True = A, False = B

Transcription:

PRACTICE EXAM 1 I. Decide which of the following are arguments. For those that are, identify the premises and conclusions in them by CIRCLING them and labeling them with a P for the premises or a C for the conclusion. Do not include premise or conclusion indicators or anything that is not a claim in what you circle. For those that are not arguments, write NA (for not an argument ). 1. It follows that the death penalty is not an effective deterrent, for several murderers have chosen their victims from states with the death penalty, even though it would have been more convenient to murder people in states without laws supporting capital punishment on the books. 2. The state of Israel was in a state of mourning today because of the assassination of Yztzak Rabin. 3. Jaywalking is against the law. Thus, walking from this corner to that one over there could result in a ticket. 4. What!? If the Mariners lost to the Angels then they re out of the playoffs, and I just heard that they lost to the Angels. So the Mariners are out of the playoffs. Wow. 5. He speaks German. Hence, because anyone who speaks German can t be evil, he can t be evil. 6. You should be more careful with that chainsaw. 7. Cindy s my cousin. She s Alice s niece and I m Alice s nephew. 8. Your Dell Optium will never process faster than my Pentium, given that laboratory tests have indicated that a Pentium is much faster than an Optium. 9. Because President Obama is guaranteed to win the states of Texas, California, and New York, and because incumbents have a decided advantage to begin with, we may infer that Obama will win reelection. 10. If we allow Jay Inslee to win the governorship of the State of Washington, then we ll all be in as much trouble as those who live in his congressional district. 11. The Earth s temperatures were the highest ever recorded last year. Furthermore, there were several major earthquakes in the last twelve months. Finally, flooding has been horrendous recently. It is obvious that the apocalypse is near. 12. Roger Smith, though he was acquitted today, is clearly guilty. I can t stand that guy. 13. All students who get A s on the homework assignments will probably get an A for the course. This is a result of the fact that the homework assignments make up 80% of the grade for the course when taken as a whole.

14. Sports teams have animal nicknames. Thus there are the Bears, the Cougars, the Eagles, and the Dolphins. 15. If we boost the inertial dampers we can achieve warp. If we achieve warp we can escape from the Klingons. So, Captain, if we boost the inertial dampers, then we can escape from the Klingons! 16. Political dissenters have no place in our society, for history shows that societies crumble when freedom of speech is permitted. Look at ancient Greece for just one such example. II. Determine whether: 1. the following arguments are deductive or inductive and tell me 2. what type of deductive or inductive argument they are. Also, 3. if inductive, determine whether strong or weak and 4. cogent or uncogent. Or 3. if deductive, determine whether valid or invalid and 4. sound or unsound. 1. Barak Obama is twice as tall as Hillary Clinton. Obama is 16 feet tall, and Clinton is 8 feet tall. 2. If Barak Obama is from Illinois, then he will be elected President. Obama is not from Illinois. So, Obama will not be elected President. 3. It s clear that Barak Obama will be elected President. Look, democrats have controlled the White House since 1804 and the latest poll gives him a 80 percentage point lead over Mitt Romney. 4. The President of the United States cannot be a naturalized U.S. Citizen. Thus, Arnold Schwarzenegger, who was born outside of the country to parents who were not citizens, cannot become President. 5. George W. Bush (who is not an expert with regard to baseball cards) says that there are only 4 Babe Ruth rookie cards left in existence. Hence, we may conclude that there are only 4 such cards. 6. I looked at two of Hillary Clinton s apple trees and they were Fujis, therefore probably all one hundred of her trees are Fujis. 7. No member of Hillary Clinton s family is wealthy. All members of her family are successful. Hence all wealthy persons are successful. 8. My car went 210 miles on 7 gallons of gas. Therefore I averaged 40 miles a gallon. 9. All east-west interstates (interstates that run more east-west than north-south) are evennumbered. Interstate 82 must therefore run east-west (or at least more east-west than northsouth).

10. This class has begun forty minutes late for the past week, and has averaged twenty minutes late for the past year. We can only conclude that it will begin late again next time. III. Use the counterexample (substitution) method to prove the following arguments invalid. Show all work, including the argument forms. 1. If money grows on trees, then I am rich. Hence, since I am rich, money grows on trees. 2. All politicians are liars. Some liars are gastronomes. Thus, all politicians are gastronomes. 3. Some aquatic animals are not fish. All fish are monads. Hence, no aquatic animals are monads. IV. For each of the categorical propositions in standard form please determine the following: quantifier, subject term, copula, predicate term, letter name, quantity, and quality. 1. No bananas are vegetables. 2. Some politicians are trustworthy people. 3. Some basketball players are people less than six feet tall. 4. All mammals are animals that breathe air. 5. Some criminals are not liars. V. Using the claims in section IV above, convert 1, obvert 2 and 5, and contrapose 3 and 4. (Write these out.) Then, do Venn diagrams for each of the above as well as each of the statements you ve just created. Be sure to label your diagrams the same way each time. Finally, indicate whether or not each new statement is logically equivalent to its predecessor. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. VI. Translate the following into standard form categorical propositions. 1. Some spotted owls live in the forest. 2. Only foresters know where to cut down trees. 3. If it lives in the forest, then it s an endangered species. 4. Not all animals that live in the forest are endangered species.

5. Loggers are the only ones who will be hurt. 6. Yesterday I cut down a tree. 7. No birds except spotted owls should be protected. 8. All people except loggers are represented by our government. 9. Spotted owls fly where they want to fly. 10. Spotted owls are not reptiles. VII. Determine whether the following arguments are valid or invalid. Use the square of opposition whenever applicable, and use Venn diagrams on every problem. 1. It is false that all major league baseball players are lazy people. Therefore, no major league baseball players are lazy people. 2. It is false that some pleasant people are Leprechauns. Therefore all Leprechauns are pleasant people. 3. Some foods are not round objects. Therefore, it is false that all foods are round objects. 4. No bananas are items for sale today. Therefore, some bananas are not items for sale today. 5. No diamonds are expensive items. Therefore no inexpensive items are diamonds.

PRACTICE EXAM 1 ANSWER KEY Answers are in bold type 1. It follows that C: the death penalty is not an effective deterrent, for P: several murderers have chosen their victims from states with the death penalty, even though it would have been more convenient to murder people in states without laws supporting capital punishment on the books. 2. NA (report, though you don t have to identify this) 3. P: Jaywalking is against the law. Thus, C: walking from this corner to that one over there could result in a ticket. 4. What!? P: If the Mariners lost to the Angels then they re out of the playoffs, and I just heard that they lost to the Angels. So C: the Mariners are out of the playoffs. Wow. 5. P: He speaks German. Hence, because P: anyone who speaks German can t be evil, C: he can t be evil. 6. NA (warning) 7. C: Cindy s my cousin. P: She s Alice s niece and I m Alice s nephew. 8. C: Your Dell Optium will never process faster than my Pentium, given that P: laboratory tests have indicated that a Pentium is much faster than a Optium. 9. Because P: President Obama is guaranteed to win the states of Texas, California, and New York, and because P: incumbents have a decided advantage to begin with, we may infer that C: Obama will win reelection. 10. NA (single conditional statement) 11. P: The Earth s temperatures were the highest ever recorded last year. Furthermore, P: there were several major earthquakes in the last twelve months. Finally, P: flooding has been horrendous recently. It is obvious that C: the apocalypse is near. 12. NA (loosely associated statements) 13. C: All students who get A s on the homework assignments will probably get an A for the course. This is a result of the fact that P: the homework assignments make up 80% of the grade for the course when taken as a whole. 14. NA (illustration)

15. P: If we boost the inertial dampers we can achieve warp. P: If we achieve warp we can escape from the Klingons. So, Captain, C: if we boost the inertial dampers, then we can escape from the Klingons! 16. C: Political dissenters have no place in our society, for P: history shows that societies crumble when freedom of speech is permitted. P: Look at ancient Greece for just one such example. II. 1. Barak Obama is twice as tall as Hillary Clinton. Obama is 16 feet tall, and Clinton is 8 feet tall. Deductive Math Valid Unsound 2. If Barak Obama is from Illinois, then he will be elected President. Obama is not from Illinois. So, Obama will not be elected President. Deductive Hypothetical Syllogism Invalid Unsound 3. It s clear that Barak Obama will be elected President. Look, democrats have controlled the White House since 1804 and the latest poll gives him a 80 percentage point lead over John McCain. Inductive Prediction Strong Uncogent 4. The President of the United States cannot be a naturalized U.S. Citizen. Thus, Arnold Schwarzenegger, who was born outside of the country to parents who were not citizens, cannot become President. Deductive Definition Valid Sound 5. George W. Bush (who is not an expert with regard to baseball cards) says that there are only 4 Babe Ruth rookie cards left in existence. Hence, we may conclude that there are only 4 such cards. Inductive Argument from Authority Weak Uncogent 6. I looked at two of Hillary Clinton s apple trees and they were Fujis, therefore probably all one hundred of her trees are Fujis. Inductive Inductive Generalization Weak Uncogent 7. No member of Hillary Clinton s family is wealthy. All members of her family are successful. Hence all wealthy persons are successful. Deductive Categorical Syllogism Invalid Unsound 8. My car went 210 miles on 7 gallons of gas. Therefore I averaged 40 miles a gallon. Deductive Math Invalid Unsound 9. All east-west interstates (interstates that run more east-west than north-south) are evennumbered. Interstate 82 must therefore run east-west (or at least more east-west than northsouth). Deductive Math or Definition Invalid Unsound 10. This class has begun forty minutes late for the past week, and has averaged twenty minutes late for the past year. We can only conclude that it will begin late again next time. Inductive Prediction Strong Uncogent

III. (There are many other substitutions which work besides mine.) 1. If money grows on trees, then I am rich. Hence, since I am rich, money grows on trees. If M, then R M= George Carlin was executed R R= George Carlin is dead M 2. All politicians are liars. Some liars are gastronomes. Thus, all politicians are gastronomes. All P are L. P= cats Some L are G. L= mammals All P are G. G= dogs 3. Some aquatic animals are not fish. All fish are monads. Hence, no aquatic animals are monads. Some A are not F. A= dogs All F are M. F= cats No A are M. M= mammals IV. 1. Q: No, S.T.: bananas, C: are, P.T.: vegetables, LN: E, Quantity: U, Quality: N 2. Q: Some, S.T.: politicians, C: are, P.T.: trustworthy people, LN: I, Quantity: P, Quality: A 3. Q: Some, S.T.: basketball players, C: are, P.T.: people less than six feet tall, LN: I, Quantity: P, Quality: A 4. Q: All, S.T.: mammals, C: are, P.T.: animals that breathe air, LN: A, Quantity: U, Quality: A 5. Q: Some, S.T.: criminals, C: are not, P.T.: liars, LN: O, Quantity: P, Quality: N V. (I want to see your Venn diagrams here, with both circles properly labeled, but due to my lack of talent when it comes to graphics, I ve merely described the diagrams here.) 1. No vegetables are bananas. In both diagrams the left circle should be labeled Bananas and the right should be labeled Vegetables and the middle section should be shaded. Logically Equivalent 2. Some politicians are not untrustworthy people. In both diagrams the left circle should be labeled Politicians and the right circle should be labeled Trustworthy People and the middle section should have an X in it. Logically Equivalent 3. Some people six feet tall and taller are non-basketball players. The left circle should be labeled Basketball players and the right circle should be labeled People Less than Six Feet Tall and in the first diagram there should be an X in the middle and in the second there should be an X outside of both circles. Not Logically Equivalent 4. All animals that do not breathe air are non-mammals. In both diagrams the left circle should be labeled Mammals and the right circle should be labeled Animals that Breathe Air and the left section should be shaded. Logically Equivalent 5. Some criminals are non-liars. (or people who tell the truth ) In both diagrams the left circle should be labeled Criminals and the right circle should be labeled Liars and the left section should have an X in it. Logically Equivalent

VI. 1. Some spotted owls live in the forest. Some spotted owls are animals that live in the forest. 2. Only foresters know where to cut down trees. All people who know where to cut down trees are foresters. 3. If it lives in the forest, then it s an endangered species. All things that live in the forest are endangered species. 4. Not all animals that live in the forest are endangered species. Some animals that live in the forest are not endangered species. 5. Loggers are the only ones who will be hurt. All people who will be hurt are loggers. 6. Yesterday I cut down a tree. All days identical to yesterday are days I cut down a tree. 7. No birds except spotted owls should be protected. All birds that should be protected are spotted owls. 8. All people except loggers are represented by our government. All non-loggers are people represented by our government and no loggers are people represented by our government. 9. Spotted owls fly where they want to fly. All spotted owls are animals that fly where they want to fly. 10. Spotted owls are not reptiles. No spotted owls are reptiles. (Don t say All spotted owls are not reptiles! ) VII. (Be sure to label your Venn Diagrams the same from premise to conclusion. Again, my lack of graphics is on display here, but I hope it s clear enough.) 1. It is false that all major league baseball players are lazy people. Therefore, no major league baseball players are lazy people. PF CT Premise Venn Diagram: The left section should have an X in it. A E Conclusion Venn Diagram: The middle section should be shaded. I O INVALID 2. It is false that some pleasant people are Leprechauns. Therefore all Leprechauns are pleasant people. The square of opposition cannot be used on this immediate inference because the subject and predicate terms are not the same from the premise to the conclusion. Premise Venn Diagram: The middle section should be shaded. Conclusion Venn Diagram: The right section should be shaded. Both Venn Diagrams should be labeled Pleasant People and Leprechauns. INVALID

3. Some foods are not round objects. Therefore, it is false that all foods are round objects. CF Premise Venn Diagram: The left section should have an X in it. A E Conclusion Venn Diagram: The left section should have an X in it. I PT O VALID 4. No bananas are items for sale today. Therefore, some bananas are not items for sale today. PT Premise Venn Diagram: The middle section should be shaded. A E Conclusion Venn Diagram: The left section should have an X in it. I CT O INVALID 5. No diamonds are expensive items. Therefore no inexpensive items are diamonds. The square of opposition cannot be used on this immediate inference because the subject and predicate terms are not the same from the premise to the conclusion. Premise Venn Diagram: The middle section should be shaded. Conclusion Venn Diagram: The left section should be shaded. Both Venn Diagrams should be labeled Diamonds and Expensive Items. INVALID Facts you may or may not need to know for the first exam: Washington state does not have an income tax. To compute a rectangular room s area, you multiply the length of one set of walls by the length of the other set of walls. Symbolic Logic and Philosophy in the Cinema are both five credit classes at EvCC. Some animals are not carnivores. John Lennon was murdered.