THEY SAY: Discussing what the sources are saying

Similar documents
ACADEMIC SKILLS PROGRAM STUDENT SERVICES AND DEVELOPMENT

Index of Templates from They Say, I Say by Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstein. Introducing What They Say. Introducing Standard Views

Templates for Research Paper

Templates for Writing about Ideas and Research

Templates for Introducing Standard Views (what everybody thinks) Templates for Making what they say something you Say

Sentence Starters from They Say, I Say

BASIC SENTENCE PATTERNS

Some Transition Words and Phrases

AND YET. IF GOOD ACADEMIC writing involves putting yourself into dialogue with others, it DETERMINE WHO IS SAYING WHAT IN THE TEXTS YOU READ

Thesis Statements. (and their purposes)

Three Ways to Respond

"As HE HIMSELF PUTS IT"

From They Say/I Say: The Moves that Matter in Academic Writing Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstein Prediction:

Language Supports for Argument Writing

introduction Entering the Conversation

Some Templates for Beginners: Template Option 1 I am analyzing A in order to argue B. An important element of B is C. C is significant because.

The Art of Quoting. AKA: Metaphor Central

Adapted from The Academic Essay: A Brief Anatomy, for the Writing Center at Harvard University by Gordon Harvey. Counter-Argument

Everything You Need to Know, or Almost, about Integrating Quotations Effectively

The Argumentative Essay

Prentice Hall U.S. History Modern America 2013

Thesis Statement. What is a Thesis Statement? What is a Thesis Statement Not?

"As HE HIMSELF PUTS IT'^

Island Civilization. Reading Rhetorically. Developed by Chris Street. Reading Selection for This Module: Prereading

Lucy: Analytical Paragraph

Epistemic Contextualism as a Theory of Primary Speaker Meaning

''AND YE^ Distinguishing What You Say from What They Say. IF GOOD ACADEMIC WRITING involves putting yourself into

Professor Lisa Yanover Napa Valley College

Prentice Hall United States History Survey Edition 2013

Essay Discuss Both Sides and Give your Opinion

THEY SAY I SAY 2ND EDITION WITH READINGS PDF

BOOK REVIEW. Weima, Jeffrey A.D., 1 2 Thessalonians (BECNT; Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2014). xxii pp. Hbk. $49.99 USD.

The SAT Essay: An Argument-Centered Strategy

In general, the simplest of argument maps will take the form of something like this:

Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Collections 2015 Grade 8. Indiana Academic Standards English/Language Arts Grade 8

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking

What is the "Social" in "Social Coherence?" Commentary on Nelson Tebbe's Religious Freedom in an Egalitarian Age

Quoting & Paraphrasing

This Message In Christ Alone We Take Our Stand

REPLY TO LUDLOW Thomas M. Crisp. Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 1 (2004): 37-46

AN OUTLINE OF CRITICAL THINKING

THEY SAY I SAY 2ND EDITION PDF

Living with Contradictory Convictions in the Church

Ask Yourself: Which points have the best supporting information? For which points can I make the best case? In which points am I most interested?

Is THERE A DOCTRINAL DIFFERENCE?

Handout Two: Argument Construction in Impromptu Speaking

Summer 2016 Course of Study, Claremont School of Theology COS 222: THEOLOGICAL HERITAGE II: EARLY CHURCH

Questions for Critically Reading an Argument

The Qualiafications (or Lack Thereof) of Epiphenomenal Qualia

Effective Academic Writing: The Argument

Prentice Hall United States History 1850 to the Present Florida Edition, 2013

Falsification or Confirmation: From Logic to Psychology

Science and Religion: Exploring the Spectrum

Argumentation Paper Honors/AP Language and Composition English 11

Does the Skeptic Win? A Defense of Moore. I. Moorean Methodology. In A Proof of the External World, Moore argues as follows:

TPS Science Department PARCC Argumentative Writing Process

Academic language paragraph frames

By world standards, the United States is a highly religious. 1 Introduction

Putnam: Meaning and Reference

Michael Dukakis lost the 1988 presidential election because he failed to campaign vigorously after the Democratic National Convention.

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT (If submission is not text, cite appropriate resource(s))

[JGRChJ 9 (2013) R28-R32] BOOK REVIEW

IN DEFENCE OF CLOSURE

THEY SAY I SAY WITH READINGS ONLINE PDF

Introduction to Technical Communications 21W.732 Section 2 Ethics in Science and Technology Formal Paper #2

METAETHICAL MORAL RELATIVISM AND THE ANALOGY WITH PHYSICS

History of Modern Philosophy Fall nd Paper Assignment Due: 11/8/2019

The Samaritan Way. Lifestyle Compassion Ministry Study Guide. David W. Crocker

Darwinist Arguments Against Intelligent Design Illogical and Misleading

Name The Crucible: Argument Essay

EMBEDDING QUOTATIONS

Consciousness might be defined as the perceiver of mental phenomena. We might say that there are no differences between one perceiver and another, as

BOOK REVIEW. Thomas R. Schreiner, Interpreting the Pauline Epistles (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2nd edn, 2011). xv pp. Pbk. US$13.78.

Overview: Application: What to Avoid:

Writing Module Three: Five Essential Parts of Argument Cain Project (2008)

Questioning Contextualism Brian Weatherson, Cornell University references etc incomplete

Claim Types C L A S S L E C T U R E N O T E S Identifying Types of Claims in Your Papers

ELA CCSS Grade Five. Fifth Grade Reading Standards for Literature (RL)

3. Understand the history of the creeds and ecumenical councils.

Against the Vagueness Argument TUOMAS E. TAHKO ABSTRACT

Topics and Activities for Critical Response

CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTORY MATTERS REGARDING THE STUDY OF THE CESSATION OF PROPHECY IN THE OLD TESTAMENT

ALTERNATIVE SELF-DEFEAT ARGUMENTS: A REPLY TO MIZRAHI

PROSPECTS FOR A JAMESIAN EXPRESSIVISM 1 JEFF KASSER

Structuring and Analyzing Argument: Toulmin and Rogerian Models. English 106

T.M. Luhrmann. When God Talks Back: Understanding the American Evangelical Relationship

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Bronze Level '2002 Correlated to: Oregon Language Arts Content Standards (Grade 7)

SPEAKING THE TRUTH IN LOVE: COMMUNICATION AND CONFLICT Scott Turcott Eastern Nazarene College. Introduction

Emory Course of Study School COS 222 Theological Heritage II: Early Church

English Language Arts: Grade 5

Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me?

(i) Morality is a system; and (ii) It is a system comprised of moral rules and principles.

Transitional comments or questions now open each chapter, creating greater coherence within the book as a whole.

You will be assigned a primary source reading that will address the following question from a particular perspective. What is the meaning of life?

How to Write a Philosophy Paper

Philosophy of Religion 21: (1987).,, 9 Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht - Printed in the Nethenanas

Richard L. W. Clarke, Notes REASONING

SB=Student Book TE=Teacher s Edition WP=Workbook Plus RW=Reteaching Workbook 47

Lecture 7.1 Berkeley I

Position Strategies / Structure Presenting the Issue

Transcription:

School of Liberal Arts University Writing Center Because writers need readers Cavanaugh Hall 427 University Library 2125 (317)274-2049 (317)278-8171 www.iupui.edu/~uwc Academic Conversation Templates: How to Indicate When a Source is Speaking and Declare Your Position This handout aims to provide user-friendly templates based on the book, They Say, I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing by Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstein. These templates help writers summarize and synthesize the arguments and ideas of their sources, and help writers agree, disagree, or both agree and disagree with sources to declare their position relative to the views they ve summarized or quoted. Thus, this handout contains two sections: (1) They Say, which addresses how to discuss what your sources are saying, and (2) I Say, which addresses how to declare your position in relation to the sources. THEY SAY: Discussing what the sources are saying Academic writing, broadly speaking, is argumentative writing. To argue well, writers need to know the conversation that has taken place on their topic. For example, if a politician is to propose a new law, the politician needs to know whether his idea has ever been suggested before and whether people would support or oppose the new law and why they support or oppose the new law. In writing, writers do the same thing. They give background on their topic to show their knowledge of the ongoing conversation and use the conversation to argue their points. VERB TENSE & SOURCES APA: In APA, when you discuss cited sources, you are required to use PAST TENSE (e.g., Smith argued) or PRESENT PERFECT TENSE (e.g., Smith [and Jones] has [have] argued). See pg. 33 in the APA Manual for more information. MLA: Generally, in MLA, when you discuss cited sources, use PRESENT TENSE (e.g. Smith believes). PRESENT PERFECT TENSE can also be used, but definitively there are no rules for verb tense and sources in the MLA Handbook. Introducing an Ongoing Debate When it comes to the topic of, most of us will readily agree that. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of. Whereas some are convinced that, others maintain that. In discussion of X, one controversial issue has been. On the one hand, argues. On the other hand, contends. Others even maintain. My own view is. 1

Introducing Quotations and Summaries She demonstrates that. In fact, they celebrate the fact that., he admits. He states. Verbs for Introducing Summaries and Quotations Verbs for Making a Claim Verbs for Expressing Agreement Argue Insist Acknowledge Endorse Assert Observe Admire Extol Believe Remind us Agree Praise Claim Report Celebrate the fact that Reaffirm Emphasize Suggest Corroborate Support Do not deny Verify Verbs for Questioning or Disagreeing Verbs for Making Recommendations Complain Question Advocate Implore Complicate Refute Call for Plead Contend Reject Demand Recommend Contradict Renounce Encourage Urge Deny Repudiate Exhort Warn Deplore the tendency to Disavow Frame Every Quote Since quotations do not speak for themselves, you need to build a frame around them in which you do that speaking for them. You need to make a quotation sandwich *Introduction-quotation-explanation]. Introduce the quotation adequately by explaining who is speaking and setting up what the quotation says. Then follow up with explaining why you consider the quotation important and what you take it to say. [The () represents the placement of your in-text citation.] For introducing quotations X states (). As the prominent X put it, (). According to X (). X himself writes, (). In her book,, X maintains that (). Writing in the journal, X complains that (). In X s view, (). X agrees when she writes, (). X disagrees when he writes, (). X complicates matters further when she writes, (). 2

For explaining quotations Basically, X is saying. In other words, X believes. In making this comment, X argues that. X is insisting that. X s point is that. The essence of X s argument is that. Templates for Introducing Something Implied or Assumed Summarizing a point that is not directed stated by the source(s) but implied or assumed. One implication of X s treatment of is that. Although X does not say so directly, she apparently assumes that. While scientists rarely admit X, often take for granted that. DO NOT introduce quotations by saying something like X asserts an idea that or A quote by X says. Introductory phrases like these are both redundant and misleading. I SAY: declaring your position in relation to the sources Experienced writers know how to express their thoughts. Since academic writing, broadly speaking, is argumentative, college writers need to argue well. Thus, writers need to be able to assert their own ideas as well as enter the ongoing conversation (they say) on a topic and use the ideas of others as a launching pad for furthering their ideas. Many times the use of I is appropriate. Check with your instructor if unsure of using I in your paper. Disagreeing, with Reasons I think X is mistaken because she overlooks. X s claim that rests upon the questionable assumption that. I disagree with X s view that because, as recent research has shown,. X contradicts himself/can t have it both ways. On the one hand, he argues. But on the other hand, he also says. By focusing on, X overlooks the deeper problem of. X claims, but we don t need him to tell us that. Anyone familiar with has long known that. Agreeing I agree that because my experience confirms it. X is surely right about because, as she may not be aware, recent studies have shown that. X s theory of is extremely useful because it shed insight on the difficult problem of. I agree that, a point that needs emphasizing since so many people believe. Those unfamiliar with this school of thought may be interested to know that it basically boils down to. 3

Agreeing and Disagreeing Simultaneously Although I agree with X up to a point, I cannot accept his overall conclusion that. Although I disagree with much that X says, I fully endorse his final conclusion that. Though I concede that, I still insist that. X is right that, but she seems on more dubious ground when she claims that. While X is probably wrong when she claims that, she is right that. Whereas X provides ample evidence that, Y and Z s research on and convinces me that instead. I m of two minds about X s claims that. On the one hand, I agree that. On the other hand, I m not sure if. My feelings on the issue are mixed. I do support X s position that, but I find Y s arguments about and Z s research on to be equally persuasive. Signaling who is Saying What in Your Own Writing I can be used in well-grounded and well supported arguments just as those that don t use I. Some occasions may warrant avoiding first person ( I ). Overuse of I can also result in a monotonous series of I statements I believe, I think, I argue. It is a good idea to mix first-person assertions with assertions that signal your position without using I. X argues. According to both X and Y. Politicians, X argues, should. Most athletes will tell you that. My own view, however, is that. I agree, as X may not realize, that. X is right that. X s assertion that does not fit the facts. Anyone familiar with should agree that But are real, and are arguably the most significant factor in. Signaling who is Saying What in Your Own Writing X argues. According to both X and Y. Politicians, X argues, should. Most athletes will tell you that. My own view, however, is that. I agree, as X may not realize, that. X is right that. X s assertion that does not fit the facts. Anyone familiar with should agree that But are real, and are arguably the most significant factor in. Indicate Multiple Perspectives I versus They [p.70] Point-of-view clues in the text that clearly separates the views of the writer ( I ) from those of source authors ( they ). X overlooks what I consider an important point about. My own view is that what X insists is a is in fact a. I wholeheartedly endorse what X calls. These conclusions, which X discusses in, add weight to the argument that. 4

Entertaining Objections Notice that the following examples are not attributed to any specific person or group, but to skeptics, readers, or many. This kind of nameless, faceless naysayer is appropriate in some cases. Yet some readers may challenge my view that. After all, may believe that. Indeed, my own argument that seems to ignore and. Of course, many will probably disagree with this assertion that. Naming Your Naysayers The underlined words can be interchanged with another specific group. Here many feminists would probably object that. But social Darwinists would certainly taken issue with the argument that. Biologists, of course, may want to dispute my claim that. Nevertheless, both followers and critics of Malcolm X will probably suggest otherwise and argue that. To minimize stereotyping Although not all Christians think alike, some of them will probably dispute my claim that. Non-native English speakers are so diverse in their views that it s hard to generalize about them, but some are likely to object on the grounds that. Making Concessions While Still Standing Your Ground Although I grant that, I still maintain that. Proponents of X are right to argue that. But they exaggerate when they claim that. While it is true that, it does not necessarily follow that. On the one hand, I agree with X that. But on the other hand, I still insist that. Indicating Who Cares Underlined words can be replaced with other groups or references to certain people. used to think. But recently [or within the past few decades], suggests that. This interpretation challenges the work of those critics who have long assumed that. These finding challenge the work of earlier researchers, who tended to assume that. Recent studies like these shed new light on, which previous studies had not addressed. These findings challenge dieters common assumption that. At first glance, teenagers might say. But on closer inspection. Why Your Claim Matters X matters/is important because. Although X might seem trivial, it is in fact crucial in terms of today s concern over. Ultimately, what is at stake here is. These findings have important consequences for the broader domain of. My discussion of X is in fact addressing the larger matter of. These conclusions/this discovery will have significant applications in as well as in. 5

So What and Who Cares Although X may seem of concern to only a small group of, it should in fact concern anyone who cares about. Page References for They Say, I Say Pages 1-47 contain They Say templates and explanations Pages 51-97 contain I Say templates and explanations Pages 101-135 contain Tying it All Together templates and explanations Pages 163-176 contain the Index of Templates use in the book Additional Resources American Psychological Association. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. 5 th ed. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 2001. Print. Graff, Gerald and Cathy Birkenstein. They Say, I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2006. Print. Modern Language Association of America, The. MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers. 7 th ed. New York: The Modern Language Association of America, 2009. Print. Created by Keva Sherven for the UWC April 2010 Most of the examples are taken directly from They Say, I Say by Graff & Birkenstein SCHOOL OF LIBERAL ARTS INDIANA UNIVERSITY University Writing Center IUPUI 6