Class #37 - Translation Using Identity I ( 8.7)

Similar documents
Qué es la filosofía? What is philosophy? Philosophy

Introduction to Philosophy: The Big Picture

Class 33 - November 13 Philosophy Friday #6: Quine and Ontological Commitment Fisher 59-69; Quine, On What There Is

TABLE OF CONTENTS. A. "The Way The World Really Is" 46 B. The First Philosophers: The "Turning Point of Civilization" 47

Philosophy Courses-1

Philosophy Courses-1

Hume on Ideas, Impressions, and Knowledge

Announcements. CS311H: Discrete Mathematics. First Order Logic, Rules of Inference. Satisfiability, Validity in FOL. Example.

PL 406 HISTORY OF MODERN PHILOSOPHY Fall 2009

Course Text. Course Description. Course Objectives. StraighterLine Introduction to Philosophy

Philosophy Quiz 12 The Age of Descartes

Courses providing assessment data PHL 202. Semester/Year

Philosophy & Religion

Class 33: Quine and Ontological Commitment Fisher 59-69

Workbook Unit 17: Negated Categorical Propositions

Syllabus. Primary Sources, 2 edition. Hackett, Various supplementary handouts, available in class and on the course website.

Reading Questions for Phil , Fall 2016 (Daniel)

Syllabus. Primary Sources, 2 edition. Hackett, Various supplementary handouts, available in class and on the course website.

9.1 Intro to Predicate Logic Practice with symbolizations. Today s Lecture 3/30/10

I SEMESTER B. A. PHILOSOPHY PHL1B 01- INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY QUESTION BANK FOR INTERNAL ASSESSMENT. Multiple Choice Questions

e x c e l l e n c e : an introduction to philosophy

Announcements. CS243: Discrete Structures. First Order Logic, Rules of Inference. Review of Last Lecture. Translating English into First-Order Logic

History of Modern Philosophy

24.01 Classics of Western Philosophy

A Major Matter: Minoring in Philosophy. Southeastern Louisiana University. The unexamined life is not worth living. Socrates, B.C.E.

Introduction to Philosophy (PHIL 1301) Credit: 3 semester credit hours (3 hours lecture) Prerequisite/Co-requisite: None.

KINGSBOROUGH COMMUNITY COLLEGE of The City University of New York. Common COURSE SYLLABUS

Spring 2015 Undergraduate Philosophy Department Courses

10.3 Universal and Existential Quantifiers

Introduction to Philosophy 1301

Philosophy Courses for Fall 2012

Introduction to Philosophy

DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY (GRAD)

DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY FALL 2013 COURSE DESCRIPTIONS

The British Empiricism

Any Philosophy that can be put in a nut shell belongs in one. - Hillary Putnam. Course Description

Course Objectives: Upon successful completion of this course, students will have demonstrated

Philosophy Courses. Courses. Philosophy Courses 1

(INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY)

Only fuzzy animals are bears. Whoever is logical is clever. One or more. bears are not mean. Wolverines are ferocious. Wolverines are not vegetarians.

Essential Logic Ronald C. Pine

Undergraduate Calendar Content

A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC FOR METAPHYSICIANS

Only fuzzy animals are bears. Whoever is logical is clever. One or more. bears are not mean. Wolverines are ferocious. Wolverines are not vegetarians.

PHILOSOPHY IAS MAINS: QUESTIONS TREND ANALYSIS

PHILOSOPHY 111: HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY EARLY MODERN Winter 2012

UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT SCHOOL OF DISTANCE EDUCATION. (2011 Admn. onwards) VI Semester B.A. PHILOSOPHY CORE COURSE CONTEMPORARY WESTERN PHILOSOPHY

Philosophy (PHILOS) Courses. Philosophy (PHILOS) 1

Philosophy Catalog. REQUIREMENTS FOR A MAJOR IN PHILOSOPHY: 9 courses (36 credits)

Transition to Quantified Predicate Logic

LA Mission College Mark Pursley Fall 2016 Note:

UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT QUESTION BANK

Key Vocab and Concepts. Ethics, Epistemology, Aesthetics, logic, social and political, religious, metaphysics

Class 8 - The Attributive/Referential Distinction

Teachur Philosophy Degree 2018

PH 701 Faith, Reason, and Christian Belief

Philosophy exit exam (Logic: 1-10; Ancient: 11-20; Modern: 21-30; Ethics: 31-40; M&E: 41-50)

UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT SCHOOL OF DISTANCE EDUCATION

PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 4 : I M M A T E R I A L I S M, D U A L I S M, & T H E M I N D - B O D Y P R O B L E M

Revisiting the Socrates Example

Philosophical Logic. LECTURE SEVEN MICHAELMAS 2017 Dr Maarten Steenhagen

Introduction to Philosophy (PHIL 1301) Online. Credit: 3 semester credit hours (3 hours lecture)

1. What arguments does Socrates use in Plato s Republic to show that justice is to be preferred over injustice?

A History of Western Thought Why We Think the Way We Do. Summer 2016 Ross Arnold

Philosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy. Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2014

Class 2 - Foundationalism

The Ontological Argument

Logic & Philosophy Sample Questions

GROUP A WESTERN PHILOSOPHY (40 marks)

Descartes' proof is also related to his ideas about causes and effect. r~laborate this J! connection,

A History Of Philosophy, Vol. 5: Modern Philosophy - The British Philosophers From Hobbes To Hume By Frederick Copleston

Logic & Philosophy. SSB Syllabus

Philosophy 308 The Language Revolution Russell Marcus Hamilton College, Fall 2014

PHIL 1313 Introduction to Philosophy Section 09 Fall 2014 Philosophy Department

Philosophy (PHIL) Philosophy (PHIL) Courses Philosophy Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences

Introduction to Philosophy 1301

Fall 2012 Syllabus Dr. Timothy J. Freeman THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT HILO

Prepared by: John Culp (626) , ext. 5243, Duke 241 Office Hours: MW 2:00-4:00 PM Other times by appointment

Unit Four: Epistemology

EXAMINERS REPORT AM PHILOSOPHY

1 Discuss the contribution made by the early Greek thinkers (the Presocratics) to the beginning of Philosophy.

DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY. Course Descriptions Undergraduate and Graduate SPRING /07/19-04/27/19

Sample Paper. Philosophy

CC1: Invitation to Philosophy

361 PU M A Philosophy

Courses Description. Philosophy Department

The Routledge Philosophy Guidebook To Nietzsche On Morality (Routledge Philosophy GuideBooks) By Brian Leiter READ ONLINE

10.7 Asyllogistic Inference

FIRST PUBLIC EXAMINATION. Preliminary Examination in Philosophy, Politics and Economics INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY TRINITY TERM 2013

CHAPTER III KANT S APPROACH TO A PRIORI AND A POSTERIORI

Philosophy (PHIL) Department of Philosophy Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences

History of Modern Philosophy. Hume ( )

Chapter 1 The Activity of Philosophy 2 Chapter 2 Philosophy's History 10 Chapter 3 Philosophy and the Examined life 18

PHILOSOPHY COURSE DESCRIPTIONS

4.00 cr. Phone: (541) SYLLABUS*

Divisibility, Logic, Radical Empiricism, and Metaphysics

PHILOSOPHY 111: HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY EARLY MODERN

Robert Kiely Office Hours: Monday 4:15 6:00; Wednesday 1-3; Thursday 2-3

1/7. Metaphysics. Course Leader: Dr. Gary Banham. Room Tel. Ext.: 3036

Philosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy. Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2015

Transcription:

Class #37 - Translation Using Identity I ( 8.7) I. The identity predicate is a special predicate, with a special logic Consider the following logical derivation: 1. Superman can fly. Fs 2. Superman is Clark Kent.??? So, Clark Kent can fly. Fc Identity, as in premise 2, is a relation among individuals. We could write it Esc. But, identity has special logical properties, so we give it its own symbol, =. Identity sentences thus look a little different from other dyadic relations. Clark Kent is Superman Mary Ann Evans is George Eliot c=s m=g But, they are just two-place relations. To deny an identity, we can write either a=b or a b. Negation applies to the identity predicate, and not to the objects related by that predicate. We will discuss the special properties of the identity predicate on Monday. Today, we will learn a bit of translating, using a group exercise called a jigsaw. II. The jigsaw Overview: Organize your base groups and divide tasks. (10 minutes) Go to work groups and learn something. (10 minutes) Go back to base groups and teach what you learned in the work groups to the other members of your base group. (25 minutes, 5 minutes per topic)

, Prof. Marcus; Translation Using Identity I, page 2 Work Group: At Least b: Berkeley; c: The Critique of Pure Reason; d: Descartes; f: Frege Cx: x is a coherentist; Ix: x is an idealist; Mx: x is a materialist; Px: x is a philosopher Mxy: x is read more widely than y; Rxy: x respects y; Sxy: x studies y; Wxy: x wrote y 1. At least one materialist respects Berkeley. ( x)(mx Rxb) 2. At least two materialists respect Berkeley. ( x)( y)(mx Rxb My Ryb x y) 3. There are at least three materialists who respect Berkeley. ( x)( y)( z)(mx Rxb My Ryb Mz Rzb x y x z y z ) 4. At least two idealist philosophers respect each other. ( x)( y)(ix Px Iy Py x y Rxy Ryx) 5. At least three coherentists respect some book by Descartes. ( x)( y)( z){cx Cy Cz x y x z y z ( w)[(bw Wdw) Rxw] ( w)[(bw Wdw) Ryw] ( w)[(bw Wdw) Rzw]} 6. At least two philosophers are read more widely than Frege. 7. There are at least three philosophers who are read more widely than Frege. 8. At least four idealists study The Critique of Pure Reason.

, Prof. Marcus; Translation Using Identity I, page 3 Work Group: At Most b: Berkeley; d: Descartes; h: Hume; k: Kant; n: Nietzsche Ex: x is an empiricist; Ix: x is an idealist; Px: x is a philosopher; Rx: x is a rationalist Lxy: x likes y; Mxy: x is read more widely than y; Pxy: x plays billiards with y; Rxy: x respects y; Wxy: x wrote y Lxyz: x likes y better than z Note that at most statements make no existential commitments. 1. Nietzsche respects at most one philosopher. ( x)( y)[(px Rnx Py Rny) x=y] 2. Nietzsche respects at most two philosophers. ( x)( y)( z)[(px Rnx Py Rny Pz Rnz) (x=y x=z y=z)] 3. Kant likes at most two empiricists better than Hume. ( x)( y)( z)[(ex Lkxh Ey Lkyh Ez Lkzh) (x=y x=z y=z)] 4. At most one idealist plays billiards with some rationalist. ( x)( y){ix ( z)(rz Pxz) Iy ( z)(rz Pyz)] x=y} 5. At most two rationalists wrote a book more widely read than every book written by Hume. ( x)( y)( z){{rx ( w)[bw Wxw ( z)(bz Whz) Mwz] Ry ( w)[bw Wyw ( z)(bz Whz) Mwz] Rz ( w)[bw Wzw ( z)(bz Whz) Mwz]} (x=y x=z y=z)} 6. At most one philosopher is both an empiricist and a rationalist. 7. Berkeley respects at most two philosophers. 8. Some empiricists like Descartes but at most two.

, Prof. Marcus; Translation Using Identity I, page 4 Work Group: Superlatives c: The Critique of Pure Reason; e: The Ethics; h: Hume; k: Kant; l: Locke; q: The Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding; s: Spinoza Bx: x is a book; Ex: x is an empiricist; Px: x is a philosopher; Rx: x is a rationalist Bxy: x is bigger than y; Dxy: x is more difficult to read than y; Mxy: x is read more widely than y; Oxy: x is more original than y; Wxy: x wrote y 1. The Ethics is more difficult to read than The Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Deq 2. Hume is the biggest philosopher. Ph ( x)[(px x h) Bhx] 3. Hume is not the most difficult empiricist to read. Eh ( x)[(ex x h) Dhx] 4. The Ethics is the most difficult book by Spinoza to read. Be Wse ( x)[(bx Wsx x e) Dex] 5. Either The Critique of Pure Reason or The Ethics is the most difficult book to read. Bc Be ( x)[(bx x c x e) (Dcx Dex)] 6. Spinoza is the most original philosopher. 7. The Critique of Pure Reason is the most well-read book written by Kant. 8. Some book is the biggest book written by an empiricist.

, Prof. Marcus; Translation Using Identity I, page 5 Work Group: Except a: Aristotle; b: Berkeley; d: Descartes; g: Heidegger; i: Leibniz; l: Locke; n: Nietzsche; p: Plato; r: Arendt; s: Spinoza; t: Socrates Bx: x is a book; Mx: x is a materialist; Px: x is a philosopher Lxy: x likes y; Rxy: x respects y; Sxy: x studies y; Wxy: x wrote y 1. Every philosopher respects Locke. ( x)(px Rxl) 2. Every philosopher except Berkeley respects Locke Pb Rbl ( x)[(px x b) Rxl] 3. Nietzsche does not respect any philosopher except Spinoza. Ps Rns ( x)[(px x s) Rnx] 4. Some philosopher likes all philosophers except Plato and Aristotle. Pp Pa ( x){px ( y)[(py y p y a) Lxy]} 5. Every philosopher but Socrates wrote a book. Pt ( x)(bx Wtx) ( x)[(px x t) ( y)(by Wxy)] 6. All philosophers are materialists except Leibniz and Berkeley. 7. No philosopher but Arendt respects Heidegger. 8. Some books are studied by every philosopher except Nietzsche.

, Prof. Marcus; Translation Using Identity I, page 6 Work Group: Only I. Translation key b: Berkeley; d: Descartes; h: Hume; k: Kant; l: Locke; n: Nietzsche; s: Spinoza; Ex: x is an empiricist; Px: x is a philosopher; Rx: x is a rationalist Lxy: x likes y; Mxy: x is read more widely than y; Pxy: x plays billiards with y; Rxy: x respects y 1. Nietzsche respects Spinoza Rns 2. Nietzsche respects only Spinoza Rns ( x)(rnx x=s) 3. Only Nietzsche doesn t like Nietzsche. Lnn ( x)( Lxn x=n) 4. Only Locke plays billiards with some rationalist who is read more widely than Descartes. ( x)(rx Mxd Plx) ( x)[(rx Mxd) ( y)(pyx y=l)] 5. Only Kant is read more widely than Descartes and Hume. Mkd Mkh ( x)[(mxd Mxh) x=k] 6. Nietzsche is the only philosopher read more widely than Descartes. 7. Kant is the only empiricist who is also a rationalist. 8. Only Locke and Berkeley are empiricist philosophers respected by some rationalist philosopher.