INDEX
Adhikaranas 2.16 Adhikarana ingredients of. 3.2 Adhikarana - mention of works falling in category of. 2.16 Adhikara Vidhis and modern parallels. 6.5 Alexy and Dteir, 'Statutory Interpretation in Federal Republic of Germany'. 10.5 Analogia juris 10.10 Analogy in modern legal system 10.3. Analogy - Arguments based on 10.10 Analogia legis 10.10 Analogy - Swedish Law 10.11 Analogy - use of, in French criminal law 10.8 Argumentem e contrario 10.11 Argentina Civil Code 10.12 Arthaikatva axiom 73 Arthaikatva maxim and modern law 7.10 Arthakarma and Pratipattikarma 9.4. Arthavada 5.6 Arthavada and Vidhi - distinction between 5.6 Arthur Channel 9.5 Atidesa, and extension by analogy 3.12 Atidesha - classes of 10.5. Atidesha - doctrine of 10.1 Atidesa - explanation of doctrine of, by Jaimini 3.12 Atidesha in modern law 10.6 Badha 11.2 Badhas as to superiority of various sources of rules 11.4 Badha, examples of 11.3,11.4 Badhas - modern counterparts of 11.5 Bennion, 'Statutory Interpretation' quoted 12.6 Bhatta Sankara 11.2,11.4 Bill of Rights, 1689 4.9 Blackburn Lord 12.5 Branches and sub-branches of Mimansa -evolution of 2.2 Brett, Justice 10.4 Burn - quotation of statement by 11.7 Central Acts with referential clauses 3.14 Civil Codeof Argentine, Article 1610.12 Classification of Vidhis - basis of 5.10 Code of Criminal Procedure - requirement under 9.5 Colebrooke 3.2 Comparison of the four principles 8.5 Comparison with legal Latin 3.8 Comparison with modern rules of interpretation 5.11 Conflicting usages 12.7 Constitution of India, Article 265 4.9 Constitution of United States 12.2 Constructive trusts 10.4 Contextual interpretation 8.10 Contracts - interpretation of 7.14 Costs of Leases Act, 1958 12.6 Criminal Law Act, 1967, section 13 11.9 Custom and statute 11.9 Declarative Interpretation 10.10 Departure from literal meaning of statute -instances of 8.8 Directory rule 9.2 Doctrine of what is 'opportune'.11.8 Example from case relating to statutory interpretation 3.4 Examples from modern cases as to statutory requirements 5.12 Examples of rules of interpretation
84 Legal Interpretation enumerated in Paragraph 3.5, 3.6 Extensive interpretation 10.10 Foreign words - principle in Jaimini as to construction of 12.8 Form 12.9 France - position in, as to use of analogy 10.8 French Law 10.8,12.1 French Penal Code, 1810 Article 4 - provisions under 10.8 General Clauses Act, 1897 3.15 German Civil Code, section 1 10.9 German law. 10.9 Golden rule of interpretation 4.5 Gunapradhana axiom 7.4 Gunapradhana axiom and modern law 7.11 Heydon's case 4.2 Imperative and directory rule 9.2 Indian Contract Act, 1872, section 11. 6.5 India - position in, as to procedure of statutory interpretation 10.13 International law 4.8 Interpretation (Jaimini) 12.6 Interpretation - process of 5.13 Italian law 10.10 Kratu Dharma and Purusha Dharma 9.3 Kumaraswamy, Justice 10.7 Kumarila Bhatta 2.6,2.12 Kumarila Bhatta - works of 2.7 Kumte quoted 8.3 Laghava axiom 7.2 Laghava axiom and modern law 7.9 Laugakshi Bhaskara quoted 8.2 Law of Property Act, 1925 - section 14(1) 7.7 Legal Latin 3.8 Legality, principle of 10.11 Limitation - enactments relating to 3.11 Linga principle 8.2 711 Linga - branches of 8.8 Linga principle and modern law 8.8 Literal construction 3.9 literal construction - modern form of rule of 3.10 Literal construction - rule of 7.8 Literal meaning 8.8 Literal rule, and its rationale 4.3 Literal rule not to be departed from 8.13 Lord Blackburn, quoted 12.5 Lord Macnaghten - quotation of statement by 6.5 Lord Wilberforce quoted 12.8 Jaimini 2.1 Jaimini and Vedvyasa - commentaries on works of 2.2 Jaimini -debate as to period of 2.3 Jaimini on rule of Interpretation 12.6 Jaimini - predecessors of 2.4 Jaimini - quoted 7.4,7.6,8.6 Jamaica Wharfags Law, 1895 - Schedule A 3.4 Khandadera and Narayan Bhatt 2.11 Mala fide - doctrine of 12.5 Mandana Mishra 2.8 Mandana Misra - works of 2.8 Maxim as to subsequent law 11.6 Methodology of Mimansa 3.1 Mimansa branches 2.2 Mimansa - genesis of 2.1 Mimansa - commentators on 2.5 Mimansa method: Adhikarana 3.2 Mimansa rule against superfluity 3.6 'Mischief rule 4. 4.4 Modern law - comparison with 9.5 Modern principle of interpretation
Index 85 by context 8.10 Murari School 2.14 Namadheya 5.7 Narayan Bhatta 2.11 Nishedha 5.4 Niyama 9.1 Nyayas and Rules of identical sense 3.15 Operative force - classification on the basis of 6.1 'Opportune'- doctrine of 11.8 Parusankhya 9.1 Peczenik and Berghotz, 'Statutory Interpretation in Sweden'. 10.11 Poorva Mimansa 2.2 Prabhakara - commentaries on works of 2.13 Prabhakara school 2.12 Prabhakara school and Rumania - distinction between approaches of 2.12 Prabhakara - works of 2.12 Prakaranas - mention of works falling in category of 2.17 Prakarana principle 8.4 Prakarana rule, and modern law as to construing Act as a whole 8.11 Prayoga Vidhis 6.6 Presumption against action based on one's own wrong 4.7 Principles of interpretation laid down by Jaimini 12.1 Sarthakya axiom.7.1 Sarthakya maxim, and modern law 7.7 Sir Arthur Channell quoted 9.5 Smriti as authoritative 12.3 Smritis as authoritative sources, and modern analogies 12.1 Smriti text as to in perverse motive 12.5 Sources of law - enumeration of 11.7 Sources of rules - Badhas as to superiority of 11.4 Sree Bhatt Sankara 11.2,11.4 Sruti and 'Smriti': conflict between 12.4 Sruti, examples of, in modern law 8.7 Sruti principle 8.1 Sruti principle, and modern law 8.6. Sruti rule, and the plain meaning rule 3.8 Sruti, Smriti, Achara - hierarchy of 11.5 Sruti - superiority of 8.12 Statute and custom 11.9 Statutory instrument - taxation by 4.9 Statutory interpretation - presumptions relating to 4.6 Statutory powers - nullifying exercise of 5.12 Statutory requirement - non-compliance with 5.12 Structure in Mimansa : rules classified 3.5 Succession Duty Act, 1853 - section 21 6.5 Superfluity 3.6 Supremacy clause in U.S. Constitution 12.2 Swedish law - analogy in 10.11 Swedish legal normsl2.1 Swedish Parents and Children Act, Ch. 9, section 10.11 Referential legislation 3.14 Restrictive interpretation 10.10 Restraint on alienation 7.11 Sabaraswami 10.2 Sabaraswami - explanation by, as to Atidesdha 10.2 Sabraswami - importance of, as a commentator on Mimansa 2.5(f) Samanjasya maxim 7.5 Tagore v. Tagore, case of 3.13 Taxation by statutory instrument 4.9 Transfer of Property Act, 1882, section 10,11 7.11 Translations and other works 2.18 Uha 3.12,11.1 Umbeka Bhatta and Parthasarathi Misra 2.9 Ungoed Thomas, Justice 11.9
86 Legal Interpretation Usage according to Mimansa, and modern position 12.6 Usages, conflicting 12.7 Utpatti Vidhis6.2 Uttar Mimansa 2.2 Vakya principle 8.3 Vakya principle, and modern law 8.9 Various sources of law - conflict between 11.7 Vedic texts as classified by Jaimini S.2 Vidhi and the element of duty and sanction 5.3 Vidhis - categories of 6.1 Vidhi - classification of 5.8, 5.10 Vidhi, Niyama and Parisankhya 9.1 Vidhi, Niyama, Parisankhya - distinction between 5.10 Vidhi - relevance of 5.5 Vidhi vakya 5.6 Vidyaranyaswami Madhavacharya 2.10 Vikalpa axiom 7.6 Vikalpa axiom and modern law 7.13 Viniyoga - mention of later writers on 6.4 Viniyoga Vidhis 6.3 Vrittis 2.15 Wilberforce 12.8 Words conveying gender 3.15 Wright, Justice 7.9