RULES FOR DISCUSSION STYLE DEBATE

Similar documents
2. Public Forum Debate seeks to encourage the development of the following skills in the debaters: d. Reasonable demeanor and style of presentation

b. Use of logic in reasoning; c. Development of cross examination skills; d. Emphasis on reasoning and understanding; e. Moderate rate of delivery;

III. RULES OF POLICY (TEAM) DEBATE. A. General

DEBATING - First Speaker Guide. We, the team, believe that this statement is true/false.

Rules for NZ Young Farmers Debates

Power Match opponent has the same win/loss record as you

Research Package #1. Canadian National Style

Corporate Team Training Session # 2 June 8 / 10

Debate Vocabulary 203 terms by mdhamilton25

Corporate Team Training Session # 2 May 30 / June 1

Reaching the world for Christ through preaching, teaching, education, fellowship evangelism, and mission Oratorical Program Theme

Figures removed due to copyright restrictions.

The Manitoba Speech and Debate Association. A Brief Guide to Debate

Debate British Parliament -Roles, Rules & Regulation. UQP1331 Basic Communication

CHRISTIAN COMMUNICATORS OF OHIO SPEECH AND DEBATE PROGRAM

1) What is the universal structure of a topicality violation in the 1NC, shell version?

Speaker Roles POI. Refutation. Equity and Etiquette

Was the French Revolution Worth Its Human Cost?

!1 of!8 Nest+M Debate. Nest + M Debate

The Ohio Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Holiday Commission Regional MLK Oratorical Contest Greater Cleveland Area

Chp 5. Speakers, Speeches: The British Parliamentary Format

JUDGING Policy Debate

An Introduction to Parliamentary Debate

Writing the Persuasive Essay

DEBATE HANDBOOK. Paul Hunsinger, Ph.D. Chairman of Speech Department. Alan Price, M.A. Assistant Director of Debate

Debate and Debate Adjudication

Syllabus for GTHE 624 Christian Apologetics 3 Credit Hours Spring 2017

The Robins Debate 2017 Version /17/16 Table of Contents

Syllabus for THE 299 Introduction to Theology 3.0 Credit Hours Spring The purpose of this course is to enable the student to do the following:

Syllabus for THE 314 Systematic Theology II 3.0 Credit Hours Spring 2015

Syllabus for THE 299 Introduction to Theology 3.0 Credit Hours Fall The purpose of this course is to enable the student to do the following:

COACHING THE BASICS: WHAT IS AN ARGUMENT?

Syllabus for GTHE 507 Holy Spirit in the Now - ONLINE 2-3 Credit Hours Spring 2012

Statement. Assertion. Elaboration. Reasoning. Argument Building. Statement / Assertion

Syllabus for PRM 669 Practice Preaching 2 Credit Hours Fall 2010

The Great Debate Assignment World War II. Date Assigned: Thursday, June 11 Date Due: Wednesday, June 17 / 32 marks

Syllabus for GTHE 763 The Biblical Doctrine of Grace 3 Credit Hours Spring 2012

Four-Way Test Speech Contest

2013 IDEA Global Youth Forum in Ireland

Introduction to Philosophy: Socrates, Horses & Corruption Dr. Michael C. LaBossiere Revised: 4/26/2013

AGENDA EXHIBIT Meeting of the LWF COUNCIL Geneva, Switzerland June 2015 Page 1

Syllabus for PRM 661 Introduction to Preaching 3 Credit Hours Fall 2013

Syllabus for GTHE 763 The Biblical Doctrine of Grace 3 Credit Hours Spring 2014

Syllabus for THE 461 History of Christianity I: Early Church 3.0 Credit hours Fall 2014

BYLAWS. Church of the Saviour. Wayne, Pennsylvania FINAL REVISION STATUS: Approved by the Elder Council

Syllabus for PRM 669 Practice Preaching 3 Credit Hours Fall 2013

Syllabus for PRM 669 Practice Preaching 3 Credit Hours Spring 2017

Azusa Pacific University Department of Religion and Philosophy Syllabus THEO 303 (04) Theology and the Christian Life 3 Units Fall 2007

BS116 Old Testament Survey II 1 A Survey of the Poetic and Prophetic Books of the Old Testament

Higher National Unit Specification. General information for centres. Unit title: Philosophy C: An Introduction to Analytic Philosophy

Sacrament of Confirmation

Syllabus for GTHE 507 Holy Spirit in the Now - ONLINE 2-3 Credit Hours Summer 2012

Master's Degree Applicants

Syllabus for THE 470 Philosophy of Religion 3.0 Credit Hours Fall The major goals are to enable the student to do the following:

2014 Examination Report 2014 Extended Investigation GA 2: Critical Thinking Test GENERAL COMMENTS

Syllabus for BIB 437 Psalms and Wisdom Literature 3.0 Credit Hours Spring 2016

Department of Religious Studies REL 2011: Introduction to Religion. Class Time: Saturday 9:30 am- 12:15 pm Semester: Spring 2019 Classroom: PC211

Diocese of Syracuse Guidelines Concerning the Ministry of Pastoral Associate

Syllabus for BIB 349 Israel in Christian Theology 3.0 Credit hours Fall 2014

You have worked, as a team, many months on your memorials. Now the time has come for you to present your legal argumentation before a Court.

Syllabus for PRM 663 Text to Sermons 3 Credit hours Fall 2003

Syllabus for GTHE 571 Church History I - ONLINE 3 Credit Hours Fall 2015

ANALYZING NAPOLEON S ACTIONS: DID HE ADVANCE OR REVERSE FRENCH REVOLUTION?

Syllabus for PRM 660- Practical Theology for Charismatic Ministry 3 Credit Hours July 8-12, 2013

P Please consider the environment before printing this

2PT510 Preaching Lab IB

Syllabus for GBIB 626 The Book of Acts 3 Credit Hours Spring 2015

Syllabus for GBIB 774 Jewish Apocalyptic Literature 3 Credit Hours Fall 2012

BYLAWS OF WHITE ROCK BAPTIST CHURCH

RESEARCH. In order to understand a topic one must read current material about it.

Minnesota Debate Teachers Association Public Forum Guide. A student and coach s guide to Public Forum Debate DRAFT

Philosophy of religion

Syllabus for BLIT 110 Survey of Old Testament Literature 3.0 Credit Hours Summer 2011

Toastmasters International Debate Organizer (Summarized)

Syllabus for GBIB 561 Old Testament Hermeneutics and Exegesis (Hebrew) 3 Credit Hours Fall 2010

DEPOSITION INSTRUCTIONS

Building Your Framework everydaydebate.blogspot.com by James M. Kellams

PARISH PASTORAL COUNCIL GUIDELINES FOR THE DIOCESE OF CHARLOTTETOWN

Religious Studies A GCSE (9 1)

ROLES OF TEAMS AND SPEAKERS

SAMPLE ASSESSMENT ANSWER KEY

St. Andrew the Apostle Church Sudbury, ON P3A 3V7 PARISH PASTORAL COUNCIL CONSTITUTION

BIRTH CONTROL: CHRISTIAN ETHICAL PERSPECTIVE

An Introduction to British Parliamentary Debating

MINISTERIAL STANDING: A HOLISTIC PROCESS FOR UNDERGRADUATE MINISTRY FORMATION Michael A. Kipp and Mark A. Maddix, Northwest Nazarene University

Church Planter Summary Report for Shane Planter

Social Studies 10-1: The Position Paper

A Guide for Pastors. Getting Started. The Preordination License

Syllabus for THE 103 Spirit-Empowered Living 3.0 Credit hours Fall 2015

Syllabus for GBIB 766 Introduction to Rabbinic Thought and Literature 3 Credit Hours Fall 2013

Youth Director Information and Application Packet

Syllabus for BIB 424 Hebrew Prophets 3.0 Credit Hours Spring 2012

Opposition Strategy. NCFA Rookie Debate Camp

Writing Essays at Oxford

Syllabus for GBIB 729 Colossians/Ephesians (Greek) 3 Credit Hours Fall 2013

COMMITTEE ON MINISTERIAL PREPARATION The American Baptist Churches of Massachusetts. A Guide for Pastors

ORDINATION WITHIN THE AMERICAN BAPTIST CHURCHES OF THE ROCHESTER GENESEE REGION

PR 610 Servant as Proclaimer

BOARD OF DEACONS FUNCTION:

Three Steps to Good Structure

Transcription:

RULES FOR DISCUSSION STYLE DEBATE Junior High Discussion (2 Person Teams) Beginner Level Open Level 1 st Affirmative Constructive 5 min 6 min 1 st Negative Constructive 5 min 6 min 2 nd Affirmative Constructive 5 min 6 min 2 nd Negative Constructive 5 min 6 min Discussion Period 10 min 10 min Break 5 min 5 min Rebuttal Speech by 1 st Negative 4 min 5 min Rebuttal Speech by 1 st Affirmative 4 min 5 min Bilingual Junior High Discussion (2 person teams) Beginner Open 1 st Affirmative Constructive in French 5 min 6 min 1 st Negative Constructive in French 5 min 6 min 2 nd Affirmative Constructive in French 5 min 6 min 2 nd Negative Constructive in French 5 min 6 min Discussion Period (Debaters must show an ability and 10 min 10 min willingness to use both French and English) Break 5 min 5 min Rebuttal by 1 st Negative in English 4 min 5 min Rebuttal by 1 st Affirmative in English 4 min 5 min 1. In this style of debate, each debater is expected to deliver a constructive speech and to rebut the arguments of the opposing team. After the first four speeches, a 10 minute discussion period is held in which a debater may, after being called upon by the moderator, make a comment or pose a question to an opposing debater. 2. The debate will be presided over by the moderator. The affirmative team shall sit on the right side of the moderator and the negative team shall sit on the left. Debaters will speak only when called upon by the moderator. 3. Debaters should always preface their remarks by addressing the moderator. They may also acknowledge the presence of the judges, though this is not mandatory. All references to other debaters should be made in the third person. 4. Discussion period: During the discussion period, the moderator will call on the debaters to ask questions or make comments. She will attempt to ensure that each debater is offered an equal amount of time in which to ask or answer questions. Questions should alternate from side to side. Debaters should raise their hand, and upon being recognized by the moderator, proceed to ask, and respond to questions by their opponents. Each contribution should not exceed one minute. When questioning, the questioner should ask questions rather than make speeches. He/she may not insist on a yes or no answer. The debater being questioned must answer any questions asked. Answers should not be longer than a sentence or two. No new constructive arguments may be introduced during the discussion period, although new evidence may be used. Judges should penalize debaters for a lack of participation.

5. Following the discussion period, the first debater for each team makes a team rebuttal and summary speech. During the rebuttal speech, debaters may not bring up any new arguments or new evidence except in direct refutation of material which has already been presented. 6. No points of order, privilege or heckles are permitted. 7. At the conclusion of the debate, the moderator will ask the debaters if there were any serious rules violations made by their opponents. Each team will be allowed to speak only once. The judges will determine if the infraction is legitimate, and whether any action is appropriate.

ALBERTA DEBATE AND SPEECH ASSOCIATION JUNIOR HIGH BEGINNER DISCUSSION Guide for Chairpersons/Timekeepers Before the debate begins, write the resolution on the blackboard in your room and have the debaters write their names on the blackboard. Ensure that you have an odd (1, 3, 5 or 7) number of judges and that each judge has a ballot. When the debate is ready to begin, close the door and say this: On behalf of, I welcome you to round of the The resolution for debate is Seated on my right and representing the Affirmative are the First Speaker: and the To my left, and supporting the Negative side, are the First Speaker and the On behalf of the House, I extend a special welcome to our Judges,, and. Our Timekeeper is and I, am your Moderator. I now introduce the first speaker of the affirmative team, who will speak for 5 minutes. (After the first affirmative speech say:) I now introduce the first speaker of the negative team, who will speak for 5 minutes. I now introduce the second speaker of the affirmative team, who will speak for 5 minutes. I now introduce the second speaker of the negative team, who will speak for 5 minutes. There will now be a 10 minute discussion period, where debaters may ask and answer questions, refute or provide further evidence supporting contentions made in the constructive speeches. No new constructive arguments or contentions can be introduced. I will controol the discussion, alternating where possible from side to side commencing with the first debater who catches my eye. Each contribution to the discussion may not exceed one (1) minute. (After the discussion period say:) There will now be a five minute break while the debaters prepare their rebuttal. (At this time ask the debaters who will be giving the rebuttal. After the five minute break say :) I now call on _ to give the negative rebuttal speech for 4 minutes. I now call on _ to give the affirmative rebuttal speech for 4 minutes. (after this speech ) Wait for the Judges to complete their scoring of the debate. As the Judge finishes, collect his/her score sheet. When you have collected all the score sheets, check to see which team won the debate. When you are certain which team won the debate, stand at the front of the room and say: It is the considered decision of our judges that this debate has been won by the (affirmative or negative). I would now invite our judges to make their comments on this debate. At this point, take the ballots to the statistics office. Then return to the room and prepare for the next debate.

ALBERTA DEBATE AND SPEECH ASSOCIATION JUNIOR HIGH OPEN DISCUSSION Guide for Chairpersons/Timekeepers Before the debate begins, write the resolution on the blackboard in your room and have the debaters write their names on the blackboard. Ensure that you have an odd (1, 3, 5 or 7) number of judges and that each judge has a ballot. When the debate is ready to begin, close the door and say this: On behalf of, I welcome you to round of the The resolution for debate is Seated on my right and representing the Affirmative are the First Speaker: and the To my left, and supporting the Negative side, are the First Speaker and the On behalf of the House, I extend a special welcome to our Judges,, and. Our Timekeeper is and I, am your Moderator. I now introduce the first speaker of the affirmative team, who will speak for 6 minutes. (After the first affirmative speech say:) I now introduce the first speaker of the negative team, who will speak for 6 minutes. I now introduce the second speaker of the affirmative team, who will speak for 6 minutes. I now introduce the second speaker of the negative team, who will speak for 6 minutes. There will now be a 10 minute discussion period, where debaters may ask and answer questions, refute or provide further evidence supporting contentions made in the constructive speeches. No new constructive arguments or contentions can be introduced. I will controol the discussion, alternating where possible from side to side commencing with the first debater who catches my eye. Each contribution to the discussion may not exceed one (1) minute. (After the discussion period say:) There will now be a five minute break while the debaters prepare their rebuttal. (At this time ask the debaters who will be giving the rebuttal. After the five minute break say :) I now call on _ to give the negative rebuttal speech for 5 minutes. I now call on _ to give the affirmative rebuttal speech for 5 minutes. (after this speech ) Wait for the Judges to complete their scoring of the debate. As the Judge finishes, collect his/her score sheet. When you have collected all the score sheets, check to see which team won the debate. When you are certain which team won the debate, stand at the front of the room and say: It is the considered decision of our judges that this debate has been won by the (affirmative or negative). I would now invite our judges to make their comments on this debate. At this point, take the ballots to the statistics office. Then return to the room and prepare for the next debate.

Debate Judge s Ballot Junior High Discussion (Judges may not discuss the debate with one another until they complete the ballot) Step 1 - Please complete the information below a) Judge s name b) Room # _ c) Category of debate (please check) Jr. Beg. Jr. Open d) Round (please check) 1 st round 2 nd round 3 rd round Semi-final Final Step 2 - Fill in the names of the debaters and, if applicable, their team code. Then go to step 3. Affirmative (Team code ) Negative (Team code ) 1 st Affirmative 2 nd Affirmative Criteria for individual evaluation A scale of 1 to 5, 1 is poor and 5 is excellent 1 st Negative 2 nd Negative Organization: The speech should be well structured, logical & coherent, containing and effective introduction and conclusion Evidence/Logic: Facts, statistics & authorities offered in support of contentions must be sound. Credit should be given for thorough and relevant research. Delivery: Poise quality & use of voice, combined with emphasis, variety and enunciation. Effectiveness and ease of gestures, and eye contact should be assessed. Refutation/Clash: The ability to apply logic and evidence in refuting the opponents contentions while defending your own. Format: Each student is expected to participate. Questions & answers should be concise & well phrased revealing a sound understanding of the issues. The students should be courteous & cooperative. /25 /25 Totals (please double check addition) /25 /25 Step 3 - Use the flowsheet on the following page to take notes on the debate & record your impressions of the debate. Step 4 - In the space provided below, please check which team you believe has won the debate. (Your decision should be based on an objective appraisal of the arguments (clash), evidence/logic & refutation which you have witnessed in the debate). The winning team is: Affirmative Negative Step 5 - Please complete the individual evaluations in the table above. Step 6 - If time permits, the chairperson will call on you to make constructive and positive remarks. Thank you!