Module 7: ethical behavior 1. Steps in this module: 2. Complete the case study Framework for Ethical Decision Making

Similar documents
Ethics in a Historical View & A Framework for Ethical Decision Making

A Framework for Thinking Ethically

Assignment Ethical decision making

used. probably also have an ethically as that tell us behavior they find ethical sometimes do

Thinking Ethically: A Framework for Moral Decision Making

Making Decisions on Behalf of Others: Who or What Do I Select as a Guide? A Dilemma: - My boss. - The shareholders. - Other stakeholders

ETHICS IN SCIENCE FICTION. A Persuasive Assignment

Q2) The test of an ethical argument lies in the fact that others need to be able to follow it and come to the same result.

Sandra Rhoten Associate Dean of Students Student Conduct

What Is Virtue? Historical and Philosophical Context

ETHICS IN ENGINEERING. Lecture 2/4

Ethics. PHIL 181 Spring 2018 SUMMARY OBJECTIVES

Defining Civic Virtue

PUBLIC DISCIPLES BUILDING AUTHENTIC RELATIONSHIPS

Notes on Moore and Parker, Chapter 12: Moral, Legal and Aesthetic Reasoning

10/12/2015. Karen Russom, CPA, CMA, CIA, CGMA

ARCHDIOCESE OF NEWARK PARISH PRINCIPLES

Oxford Scholarship Online Abstracts and Keywords

SAMPLE Prior Learning Proposal for USM Core: Ethical Inquiry requirement

Political Science 103 Fall, 2018 Dr. Edward S. Cohen INTRODUCTION TO POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY

Family Life. CURRICULUM by TOPIC FAMILY

Computer Ethics. Normative Ethics Ethical Theories. Viola Schiaffonati October 4 th 2018

Philosophical Ethics. The nature of ethical analysis. Discussion based on Johnson, Computer Ethics, Chapter 2.

The Foundations of Christian Morality

FORMING ETHICAL STANDARDS

Virtue Ethics. Chapter 7 ETCI Barbara MacKinnon Ethics and Contemporary Issues Professor Douglas Olena

Let us begin by first locating our fields in relation to other fields that study ethics. Consider the following taxonomy: Kinds of ethical inquiries

LYING TEACHER S NOTES

Take Home Exam #2. PHI 1700: Global Ethics Prof. Lauren R. Alpert

Outline Lesson 2 - Philosophy & Ethics: Says Who?

Prentice Hall The American Nation: Beginnings Through 1877 '2002 Correlated to: Chandler USD Social Studies Textbook Evaluation Instrument (Grade 8)

NORTH SOUTH UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY DHAKA, BANGLADESH

Faithful Citizenship: Reducing Child Poverty in Wisconsin

Moral Twin Earth: The Intuitive Argument. Terence Horgan and Mark Timmons have recently published a series of articles where they

Running Header: As Leaders We Must Pave The Way For Our Young Soldiers. As Leaders We Must Pave The Way For Our Young Soldiers

Computer Ethics. Normative Ethics and Normative Argumentation. Viola Schiaffonati October 10 th 2017

Building Your Framework everydaydebate.blogspot.com by James M. Kellams

BIBLICAL INTEGRATION IN SCIENCE AND MATH. September 29m 2016

Our Statement of Purpose

1.7 The Spring Arbor University Community Covenant Biblical Principles

Agenda. PAUL FIORELLI, J.D., M.B.A. CCEP Professor of Legal Studies Xavier University

Justice and the fair innings argument. Dr Tom Walker Queen s University Belfast

PROFESSIONAL ETHICS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING

U.S. Bishops Revise Part Six of the Ethical and Religious Directives An Initial Analysis by CHA Ethicists 1

Psychological Aspects of Social Issues

APPROVED For the Common Good (Resolution of Witness: Requires 2/3 vote for passage)

The Precautionary Principle and the ethical foundations of the radiation protection system

principle of duties, p. 21 universality, p. 21 respect for persons, p. 21 virtue, p. 21 principle of virtues, p. 22 golden mean, p.

Chapter 2 Ethical Concepts and Ethical Theories: Establishing and Justifying a Moral System

GVV Pillar 1: Values. Teaching Notes for GVV Pillar 1: Values - Page 1 of 5

GUIDING PRINCIPLES Trinity Church, Santa Monica, California

SAMPLE ASSESSMENT ANSWER KEY

Florida State University Libraries

OUR MISSION OUR VISION OUR METHOD

WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY. Do the following after reading The Six Virtues of the Educated Person:

OTTAWA ONLINE PHL Basic Issues in Philosophy

Catholic Social Tradition Theology, teaching and practice that have developed over centuries

The 1O COMMANDMENTS COMMUNICATION. How to Get Your Communication Right Every Day

Our Core Values 5 Our Strategic Focus Areas and Objectives 6 Growth in discipleship 9 Emphasis on Mission Awareness and Involvement 12 Education 14

Chapter 3 PHILOSOPHICAL ETHICS AND BUSINESS CHAPTER OBJECTIVES. After exploring this chapter, you will be able to:

SUMMARIES AND TEST QUESTIONS UNIT 6

[1] Society of the Sacred Heart General Chapter 2000 Introduction, (Amiens, France, August 2000) p.14.

Virtue Ethics. A Basic Introductory Essay, by Dr. Garrett. Latest minor modification November 28, 2005

e x c e l l e n c e : an introduction to philosophy

Ethics (ETHC) JHU-CTY Course Syllabus

5. John Akers, former chairman of IBM, argued that ethics are not important to economic competitiveness.

Soraj Hongladarom Department of Philosophy Chulalongkorn University Workshop on Env. Ethics and Energy Equity, April 3, 2013

USF MASTERS OF SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM ASSESSMENT OF FOUNDATION STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES LAST COMPLETED ON 4/30/17

Righting Health Care Disparities: The Theological and Moral Imperative

Character and Honor CH 4-4

NEW FRONTIERS ACHIEVING THE VISION OF DON BOSCO IN A NEW ERA. St. John Bosco High School

Adlai E. Stevenson High School Course Description

Ethics on Film for Filmmakers

French Absolutism, Enlightenment, & Revolution!

Standing on Sacred Ground: Integrating Spirituality and Mental Health. Rabbi Elisa Goldberg

3. Humanism for Schools: Teaching Toolkits

National Core for Neuroethics. September 11, Chan Centre for the Performing Arts

Thank You for Arguing: What Aristotle, Lincoln and Homer Simpson Can Teach Us About the Art of Persuasion. Author: Jay Heinrichs

Overview and Explanation of the National Dialogue

Virtual Mentor American Medical Association Journal of Ethics May 2007, Volume 9, Number 5:

Department of Philosophy. Module descriptions 2017/18. Level C (i.e. normally 1 st Yr.) Modules

Guiding Principles Updated February 22, 2012

The Christian Home August 20, 2017 Colossians 3:18 4:1

EUROPEAN VALUES AND GEORGIA (IN THE LIGHT OF MERAB MAMARDASHVILI S VIEW)

The Development of Learning Content of Islamic Religious Education (IRE) Courses on Environmental Conservation in Higher Education

Seminary Student Data Form Use*

Shared Values and Guidelines of the Rigpa Community

Area: Regular Part Time (20 Hours) (salary) Supervisor: Executive Minister

A member of the Division for Evangelization and Catechesis. Morality

Everyone likes to argue!

Friedrich von Hayek Walter Heller John Maynard Keynes Karl Marx

Eating Right: The Ethics of Food Choices and Food Policy Philosophy 252 Spring 2010 (Version of January 20)

SAMPLE COURSE OUTLINE PHILOSOPHY AND ETHICS GENERAL YEAR 11

TYSON CENTER FOR FAITH AND SPIRITUALITY IN THE WORKPLACE. Faculty/Staff Testimonials

90 South Cascade Avenue, Suite 1500, Colorado Springs, Colorado Telephone: Fax:

Unfit for the Future

[name] [course] [teaching assistant s name] [discussion day and time] [question being answered] [date turned in] Cultural Relativism

AN OUTLINE OF CRITICAL THINKING

HANDBOOK. IV. Argument Construction Determine the Ultimate Conclusion Construct the Chain of Reasoning Communicate the Argument 13

Law & Ethics. Mark Quiner, Director NCSL Center for Ethics in Government, February, 2017

Transcription:

Module 7: ethical behavior 1 Your Passport to Professionalism: Module 7 Ethical Behavior Steps in this module: 1. Learn: Read the following document on ethics. 2. Complete the case study Framework for Ethical Decision Making 3. Go to Earn Your Stamp and complete the reflection activity. Step 1 Learn Introduction Thinking Ethically This document is designed as an introduction to thinking ethically. We all have an image of our better selves - of how we are when we act ethically or are "at our best." We probably also have an image of what an ethical community, an ethical business, an ethical government, or an ethical society should be. Ethics really has to do with all these levels - acting ethically as individuals, creating ethical organizations and governments, and making our society as a whole ethical in the way it treats everyone. What is Ethics? Simply stated, ethics refers to standards of behavior that tell us how human beings ought to act in the many situations in which they find themselves-as friends, parents, children, citizens, businesspeople, teachers, professionals, and so on.

Module 7: ethical behavior 2 It is helpful to identify what ethics is NOT: Ethics is not the same as feelings. Feelings provide important information for our ethical choices. Some people have highly developed habits that make them feel bad when they do something wrong, but many people feel good even though they are doing something wrong. And often our feelings will tell us it is uncomfortable to do the right thing if it is hard. Ethics is not religion. Many people are not religious, but ethics applies to everyone. Most religions do advocate high ethical standards but sometimes do not address all the types of problems we face. Ethics is not following the law. A good system of law does incorporate many ethical standards, but law can deviate from what is ethical. Law can become ethically corrupt, as some totalitarian regimes have made it. Law can be a function of power alone and designed to serve the interests of narrow groups. Law may have a difficult time designing or enforcing standards in some important areas, and may be slow to address new problems. Ethics is not following culturally accepted norms. Some cultures are quite ethical, but others become corrupt - or blind to certain ethical concerns (as the United States was to slavery before the Civil War). "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" is not a satisfactory ethical standard. Ethics is not science. Social and natural science can provide important data to help us make better ethical choices. But science alone does not tell us what we ought to do. Science may provide an explanation for what humans are like. But ethics provides reasons for how humans ought to act. And just because something is scientifically or technologically possible, it may not be ethical to do it. Why Identifying Ethical Standards is Hard There are two fundamental problems in identifying the ethical standards we are to follow:

Module 7: ethical behavior 3 1. On what do we base our ethical standards? 2. How do those standards get applied to specific situations we face? If our ethics are not based on feelings, religion, law, accepted social practice, or science, what are they based on? Many philosophers and ethicists have helped us answer this critical question. They have suggested at least five different sources of ethical standards we should use. Five Sources of Ethical Standards The Utilitarian Approach Some ethicists emphasize that the ethical action is the one that provides the most good or does the least harm, or, to put it another way, produces the greatest balance of good over harm. The ethical corporate action, then, is the one that produces the greatest good and does the least harm for all who are affected-customers, employees, shareholders, the community, and the environment. For instance, ethical warfare balances the good achieved in ending terrorism with the harm done to all parties through death, injuries, and destruction of war. The utilitarian approach deals with consequences; it tries both to increase the good done and to reduce the harm done. The Rights Approach Other philosophers and ethicists suggest that the ethical action is the one that best protects and respects the moral rights of those affected. This approach starts from the belief that all humans have dignity based on their human nature per se or on their ability to choose freely what they do with their lives. On the basis of such dignity, they have a right to be treated as ends and not merely as means to other ends. The list of moral rights - including the rights to make one's own choices about what kind of life to lead, to be told the truth, not to be injured, to a degree of privacy, and so on-is widely debated; some now argue that non-humans have rights, too. Also, it is often said that rights imply duties - in particular, the duty to respect others' rights. The Fairness or Justice Approach Aristotle and other Greek philosophers have contributed the idea that all equals should be treated equally. Today we use this idea to say that ethical actions treat all human beings equally - or if unequally, then fairly based on some standard that is defensible. We pay people more based on their harder work or the greater amount that they contribute to an organization, and say that is fair. But there is a debate over CEO salaries that are hundreds of times larger than the pay of others; many ask whether the huge disparity is based on a defensible standard or whether it is the result of an imbalance of power and hence is unfair.

Module 7: ethical behavior 4 The Common Good Approach The Greek philosophers have also contributed the notion that life in community is a good in itself and our actions should contribute to that life. This approach suggests that the interlocking relationships of society are the basis of ethical reasoning and that respect and compassion for all others-especially the vulnerable - are requirements of such reasoning. This approach also calls attention to the common conditions that are important to the welfare of everyone. This may be a system of laws, effective police and fire departments, health care, a public educational system, or even public recreational areas. The Virtue Approach A very ancient approach to ethics is that ethical actions ought to be consistent with certain ideal virtues that provide for the full development of our humanity. These virtues are dispositions and habits that enable us to act according to the highest potential of our character and on behalf of values like truth and beauty. Honesty, courage, compassion, generosity, tolerance, love, fidelity, integrity, fairness, self-control, and prudence are all examples of virtues. Virtue ethics asks of any action, "What kind of person will I become if I do this?" or "Is this action consistent with my acting at my best?" Putting the Approaches Together Each of the approaches helps us determine what standards of behavior can be considered ethical. There are still problems to be solved, however. The first problem is that we may not agree on the content of some of these specific approaches. We may not all agree to the same set of human and civil rights. We may not agree on what constitutes the common good. We may not even agree on what is a good and what is a harm. The second problem is that the different approaches may not all answer the question "What is ethical?" in the same way. Nonetheless, each approach gives us important information with which to determine what is ethical in a particular circumstance. And much more often than not, the different approaches do lead to similar answers. Making Decisions Making good ethical decisions requires a trained sensitivity to ethical issues and a practiced method for exploring the ethical aspects of a decision and weighing the considerations that should impact our choice of a course of action. Having a method for ethical decision making is absolutely essential. When practiced regularly, the method becomes so familiar that we work through it automatically without consulting the specific steps.

Module 7: ethical behavior 5 The more novel and difficult the ethical choice we face, the more we need to rely on discussion and dialogue with others about the dilemma. Only by careful exploration of the problem, aided by the insights and different perspectives of others, can we make good ethical choices in such situations. We have found the following framework for ethical decision making a useful method for exploring ethical dilemmas and identifying ethical courses of action. A Framework for Ethical Decision Making Recognize an Ethical Issue 1. Could this decision or situation be damaging to someone or to some group? Does this decision involve a choice between a good and bad alternative, or perhaps between two "goods" or between two "bads"? 2. Is this issue about more than what is legal or what is most efficient? If so, how? Get the Facts 3. What are the relevant facts of the case? What facts are not known? Can I learn more about the situation? Do I know enough to make a decision? 4. What individuals and groups have an important stake in the outcome? Are some concerns more important? Why? 5. What are the options for acting? Have all the relevant persons and groups been consulted? Have I identified creative options? Evaluate Alternative Actions 6. Evaluate the options by asking the following questions: Which option will produce the most good and do the least harm? (The Utilitarian Approach) Which option best respects the rights of all who have a stake? (The Rights Approach) Which option treats people equally or proportionately? (The Justice Approach) Which option best serves the community as a whole, not just some members? (The Common Good Approach) Which option leads me to act as the sort of person I want to be? (The Virtue Approach) Make a Decision and Test It

Module 7: ethical behavior 6 7. Considering all these approaches, which option best addresses the situation? 8. If I told someone I respect - or told a television audience - which option I have chosen, what would they say? Act and Reflect on the Outcome 9. How can my decision be implemented with the greatest care and attention to the concerns of all stakeholders? 10.How did my decision turn out and what have I learned from this specific situation? *This framework for thinking ethically is the product of dialogue and debate at the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics at Santa Clara University. Primary contributors include Manuel Velasquez, Dennis Moberg, Michael J. Meyer, Thomas Shanks, Margaret R. McLean, David DeCosse, Claire André, and Kirk O. Hanson. It was last revised in May 2009. http://www.scu.edu/ethics/practicing/decision/framework.html

Module 7: ethical behavior 7 Step 2 decide the case study Please select ONE of the following Case Studies to complete Case Study 1: Popcorn for the Study Group John is a work-study student in the campus store. They discovered that if they provide free bags of popcorn for store customers that customers will shop longer and buy more items. Part of John s job is to pop the popcorn in the movie popcorn machine and fill the give-away bags for browsing customers. The store usually has a few bags of popped popcorn left over at closing time that they throw away. Every Tuesday night John has a meeting with his study group. He always brings them the leftover popcorn from the store that night. But his study group has grown to become quite a large group. Because the group loves the popcorn as snack and appreciates John s contribution, John has begun popping a new batch of popcorn late in the afternoon on Tuesdays to ensure that there will be a lot of leftover popcorn to take to his larger study group. Nobody in the store notices or seems to care about the extra popcorn left over and besides it s very cheap to make. Please use the Framework for Ethical Decision Making in the next section to identify ethical issues in John s situation. Case Study 2: Pizza for Events Sally is a student worker in the Activities office on campus. Part of her job is to confirm schedules and food orders that are held in the student union building. Last summer Sally worked for a large pizza restaurant chain located two blocks from campus. She was an excellent employee and the manager said he might offer her a promotion next summer if things worked out. Sally is interested in a hotel and restaurant management career and is excited about the prospects of gaining management experience and training while in college. The manager said that he would give all student groups10% off any pizzas if they purchased it from his restaurant. Although food for all campus events is supposed to go through catering services, they don t often cite student groups who bring in their own food in the evenings. Whenever Sally sees a student group make an event reservation through the Activities office she offers the group the 10% discount her former boss guarantees. This makes everyone happy. The students save money, Sally is happy to help out her former boss, and the restaurant is happy for increased business.

Module 7: ethical behavior 8 Please use the Framework for Ethical Decision Making in the next section to identify ethical issues in Sally s situation. Step 3 Check your Success Application 1. After analyzing the case study write down some of the ethical issues in this case in the space provided, or use a separate sheet of paper for more comment space. Module 7: Framework for Ethical Decision Making What is the ethical issue problem? What are the facts? What are some alternatives using the different approaches: Utilitarian, Rights, Justice, Virtue, Common Good

Module 7: ethical behavior 9 What decision would you make and why? Passport to Professionalism Complete this reflection below to save and review with your boss. Module 7: Ethical Behavior A. Review the process described for making ethical decisions. What parts of the process do you feel will be naturally easy for you? B. What parts of the process you feel will be difficult for you?

Module 7: ethical behavior 10 C. a. For the steps that you feel you ll find difficult, devise some strategies for success. b. What ethical issues are most likely to arise at your current job?