FEDERALIST NUMBER ONE STUDY GUIDE

Similar documents
Hamilton's Passionate Rationalism

Peter Prejudice s Breeches: An Anti-Federalist Perspective

Purdue University. From the SelectedWorks of Peter J. Aschenbrenner. Peter J. Aschenbrenner, Purdue University. August, 2015

George Washington s Farewell Address

Name Date Class. Key Ideas

Washington Farewell Address

An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation By Jeremy Bentham

JEREMY BENTHAM, PRINCIPLES OF MORALS AND LEGISLATION (1780)

The Terror Justified:

The Principle of Utility

Warm-up 10/2. Copy the following question and your response in your notes.

April 26, 2015 ADULT SUNDAY SCHOOL LESSON WATCH OUT FOR DECEIVERS

Compelling Question: Were the colonists justified in declaring independence from Great Britain? Source 1: Excerpts from Common Sense, Thomas Paine 1

The Mormon Prophet and His Harem or An Authentic History of Brigham Young, His umerous Wives and Children. by Mrs C. V. Waite

1. An inquiry into the understanding, pleasant and useful. Since it is the understanding that sets

Slavery and Secession

Center for. Published by: autosocratic PRESS Copyright 2013 Michael Lee Round

Creative Democracy: The Task Before Us

Adam Smith and the Limits of Empiricism

Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom

To some extent, all sermon preparation is like taking a journey. And like

Purity of National Religion

I.INTRODUCTION A.WHY THE COMMANDS OF JESUS? Many years back people started telling me I was gifted to teach. After hearing this from a couple of

THE SAMARITAN STORY # 1 / LUKE 10:25-37 FIRST OUR INTRODUCTION TO THE STORY... Events leading to the Samaritan Story... [I] THE LORD - SAVIOUR LUKE

Exploring Concepts of Liberty in Islam

Purity of National Religion

Shall Religion Be Taught in the Public Schools?

On Liberty by John Stuart Mill

George Washington Carver Engineering and Science High School 2018 Summer Enrichment

From Natural Theology, William Paley, Archdeacon of Carlisle, 1800 CHAPTER I. STATE OF THE ARGUMENT.

HUME AND HIS CRITICS: Reid and Kames

Emancipation from the Invisible Hand: Thoreau s Economy of Living

Terms and Conditions

Search Me, O God, and Know My Heart

Hebrews Hebrews 12:15-17 Guard Against the Enemies of Holiness March 14, 2010

What We Seek A Kingdom Manifesto

F CHAPTER THREE PRINCIPLES OF ORDER AND GOVERNMENT F-3.01 HISTORIC PRINCIPLES OF CHURCH ORDER 1

The Great Nation of Futurity (1839)

Kant The Grounding of the Metaphysics of Morals (excerpts) 1 PHIL101 Prof. Oakes. Section IV: What is it worth? Reading IV.2.

- Online Christian Library Public Prayer by John Newton

Get Up, Stand Up: A Discourse to the Social Contract Theory and Civil Disobedience

Lumen Gentium Part I: Mystery and Communion/Session III

The Melian dialogue. 1 I.e., Spartans.

THE TOWARDS AN IDEAL BOTANICAL CURRICULUM. PART III.' ADVANCED UNIVRKSITY TEACHING.

Unveiling the 'Self-Described' Atheist and Agnostic

THE AGES DIGITAL LIBRARY SERMONS. MAKING A NEW HEART by Charles G. Finney

Module 03: A Revolution for Whom? Evidence 12: Benjamin Rush on Women's Education. Introduction. Questions to Consider. Document

How persuasive is this argument? 1 (not at all). 7 (very)

Queries and Advices. 1. Meeting for Worship. First Section: What is the state of our meetings for worship and business?

Introduction: "The Right Use of Reason in Religion"

WEEK #12: Chapter 5 HOW IT WORKS (Step 4 Sex Conduct / Harms Done)

Running head: CRITIQUE OF WALTER LIPPMANN S INDISPENSABLE OPPOSITION 1

REPRINT. PREPARED STATEMENT ON THE SPACE PROGRAM* M. Schwarzschild Princeton University Observatory

Mondays-beginning April 26 6:30 pm Pillar in the Valley 229 Chesterfield Business Parkway Chesterfield, MO 63005

DECLINE AND FALL OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE ( )

Matthew 6:25-7:29. Day 1. Sermon on the Mount: A Believer s life style. Read Matthew 6:25-34

Professional Integrative Paper. Tammy Howard. University of Tennessee at Chattanooga SOCW 441. Kathy Purnell, MSW

Fourth Step Guide Made a searching and fearless moral inventory of ourselves.

Foundation for Christian Service Term 2 Chapter 11 Sermon on the Mount 6. Chapter 11 SERMON ON THE MOUNT 6 MATTHEW 7 - PART 1

THE SHAPING IMPULSE: ENTREPRENEURS, LEADERSHIP, AND THE KENNEDY VISION

God s Family In our family Eph 5:21-6:9. Brothers and sisters, Is there a person that you admire and respect for their faith and life as a Christian?

Overview: Students will examine Civil War era African American perspectives on Lincoln s emancipation policies.

The Builder, Vol 1 p 235

USE DIRECT QUOTES FROM THE PRIMARY MATERIAL. 5.3 The Gospel of Wealth Andrew Carnegie

Hebrews Hebrews 3:1-13 Part II November 16, 2008

J.f. Stephen s On Fraternity And Mill s Universal Love 1

2Toward Maturity LESSON

A life marked by a personal discipleship and growth in relationship with Jesus. We need men who are growing in their relationship with God.

J. C. RYLE'S NOTES ON THE GOSPEL OF JOHN 16:8-15

The Morals of Aesop s Fables

O F T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S

The Apostles, John and James Sons of Thunder Lesson #4

2. Public Forum Debate seeks to encourage the development of the following skills in the debaters: d. Reasonable demeanor and style of presentation

FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE METAPHYSIC OF MORALS. by Immanuel Kant

Our Mission From Example and Through Leadership.

Jeremy Bentham, from A Fragment on Government, 1776

Psalm 119:137 Part Two

Peace without Victory January 22, Gentlemen of the Senate,

Duty and Categorical Rules. Immanuel Kant Introduction to Ethics, PHIL 118 Professor Douglas Olena

Philippians. Workbook On

Lesson 4 23 February Glorifying God in Your Bodies

Personal Transformation #2: Hatred of Sin & Transformation Of The Mind

Position Papers America on the Chain of Christianity

Ramana Bhaskara Speech delivered in Chinchinada, dated

WHAT DO WE LEARN FROM PROPHET MUHAMMAD (PBUH) AS A HUMAN BEING?

Why Study Christian Evidences?

Of the State of Men Without Civil Society Thomas Hobbes

Forever New. Wright, James, Culbert, Sheila. Published by Dartmouth College Press. For additional information about this book

THE WATCHTOWER HERESY VERSUS THE BIBLE

The Spiritual Call of Eldership

Supplement to Eschatology. What Is It?

b. Use of logic in reasoning; c. Development of cross examination skills; d. Emphasis on reasoning and understanding; e. Moderate rate of delivery;

Belief Audit. 5 Basic Types of Beliefs

This Message Faith Without Intimacy With God is Dead Come near to God and He will come near to you

LETTER TO SIR EDWARD GREY

Chapter 2. Compassion in the Middle-way. Sample Chapter from Thrangu Rinpoche s Middle-Way Instructions

Grace April 4, 2018 God s Form 4868 Text: Romans 3:21-26; Ephesians 2:8-10; Scott Burgess

BEN FRANKLIN'S ADDRESS TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION 1787 ON THE FAULTS OF THE CONSTITUTION I confess that I do not entirely approve of this

The Holy See. I greet and thank the Cardinal Vicar, the Vicegerent, the Auxiliary Bishops and all who have addressed me.

INTRODUCTION TO GUIDELINES FOR CHURCH DISCIPLINE

Transcription:

FEDERALIST NUMBER ONE STUDY GUIDE 2012 THE FEDERALIST PAPERS PROJECT

FEDERALIST #1 - INTRODUCTION SUMMARY Alexander Hamilton begins by asking his readers to consider a new Constitution because they have experienced the inefficiencies in the present form of government. He proclaims that his countrymen are in a unique position to decide whether or not "societies of men are really capable or not of establishing good government from reflection and choice, or whether they are forever destined to depend for their political constitutions on accident and force." He goes further and states that a mistake on their part would be unfortunate for the future of mankind. He then goes on to show that many people will oppose the Constitution for a variety of reasons, especially if they benefit from the current form of government - "Among the most formidable of the obstacles which the new Constitution will have to encounter may readily be distinguished the obvious interest of a certain class of men in every State to resist all changes which may hazard a diminution of the power, emolument, and consequence of the offices they hold." Hamilton, however, states he is not going to address the motives of those who oppose the Constitution "It is not, however, my design to dwell upon observations of this nature. I am well aware that it would be Page 2

disingenuous to resolve indiscriminately the opposition of any set of men (merely because their situations might subject them to suspicion) into interested or ambitious views. Candor will oblige us to admit that even such men may be actuated by upright intentions; and it cannot be doubted that much of the opposition which has made its appearance, or may hereafter make its appearance, will spring from the honest errors of minds led astray by preconceived jealousies and fears" - rather, his intent is to make arguments that are for the Constitution. He then goes on to say that he expects there to be vigorous and at times bitter debate "A torrent of angry and malignant passions will be let loose. To judge from the conduct of the opposite parties, we shall be led to conclude that they will mutually hope to evince the justness of their opinions, and to increase the number of their converts by the loudness of their declamations and the bitterness of their invectives. An enlightened zeal for the energy and efficiency of government will be stigmatized as the offspring of a temper fond of despotic power and hostile to the principles of liberty." He addresses people questioning his willingness to listen to their arguments because he has already made up his mind to support the Constitution "Yes, my countrymen, I own to you that, after having given it an attentive consideration, I am clearly of opinion it is your Page 3

interest to adopt it. I am convinced that this is the safest course for your liberty, your dignity, and your happiness. I affect not reserves which I do not feel. I frankly acknowledge to you my convictions, and I will freely lay before you the reasons on which they are founded. My arguments will be open to all, and may be judged of by all. They shall at least be offered in a spirit which will not disgrace the cause of truth." Finally, he outlines the specific issues that he will address in the Federalist Papers, namely: The utility of the UNION to your political prosperity The insufficiency of the present Confederation to preserve that Union The necessity of a government at least equally energetic with the one proposed, to the attainment of this object The conformity of the proposed Constitution to the true principles of republican government Its analogy to your own state constitution The additional security which its adoption will afford to the preservation of that species of government, to liberty, and to property. Hamilton then writes that it might seem unnecessary to plead for a strong Union, but the fact is, that we already hear it whispered in the private circles of those who oppose the new Constitution, that the thirteen States are of too great extent for any general system, and that we must of necessity resort to separate confederacies of distinct portions of the whole. Page 4

He then concludes the first of the Federalist Papers by saying that the ultimate question is whether the people adopt the Constitution or whether they dissolve the Confederation and devolve into separate countries. CORRESPONDING ANTIFEDERALIST PAPER: Antifederalist No. 1 - A Dangerous Plan of Benefit only to the "Aristocratick Combination Page 5

QUOTES FROM FEDERALIST #1 "It has been frequently remarked, that it seems to have been reserved to the people of this country to decide, by their conduct and example, the important question, whether societies of men are really capable or not, of establishing good government from reflection and choice, or whether they are forever destined to depend, for their political constitutions, on accident and force. If there be any truth in the remark, the crisis at which we are arrived may, with propriety, be regarded as the period when that decision is to be made; and a wrong election of the part we shall act, may, in this view, deserve to be considered as the general misfortune of mankind." "This idea will add the inducements of philanthropy to those of patriotism, to heighten the solicitude which all considerate and good men must feel for the event. Happy will it be if our choice should be directed by a judicious estimate of our true interests, unperplexed and unbiased by considerations not connected with the public good." "[I]t would be disingenuous to resolve indiscriminately the opposition of any set of men (merely because their situations might subject them to suspicion) into interested or ambitious views. Candor will oblige us to admit that even such men may be actuated by upright intentions; and it cannot be doubted that much of the opposition which has made its Page 6

appearance, or may hereafter make its appearance, will spring from sources, blameless at least, if not respectable the honest errors of minds led astray by preconceived jealousies and fears." "So numerous indeed and so powerful are the causes which serve to give a false bias to the judgment, that we, upon many occasions, see wise and good men on the wrong as well as on the right side of questions of the first magnitude to society. This circumstance, if duly attended to, would furnish a lesson of moderation to those who are ever so much persuaded of their being in the right in any controversy. And a further reason for caution, in this respect, might be drawn from the reflection that we are not always sure that those who advocate the truth are influenced by purer principles than their antagonists." "Ambition, avarice, personal animosity, party opposition, and many other motives not more laudable than these, are apt to operate as well upon those who support as those who oppose the right side of a question. Were there not even these inducements to moderation, nothing could be more ill-judged than that intolerant spirit which has, at all times, characterized political parties. For in politics, as in religion, it is equally absurd to aim at making proselytes by fire and sword. Heresies in either can rarely be cured by persecution." "A torrent of angry and malignant passions will be let loose. To judge from the conduct of the opposite parties, we shall be led to conclude that they will mutually hope to evince the justness of their opinions, and to increase the number of their converts by the loudness of their declamations and the bitterness of their invectives. An enlightened zeal for the energy Page 7

and efficiency of government will be stigmatized as the offspring of a temper fond of despotic power and hostile to the principles of liberty." "An over-scrupulous jealousy of danger to the rights of the people, which is more commonly the fault of the head than of the heart, will be represented as mere pretense and artifice, the stale bait for popularity at the expense of the public good. It will be forgotten, on the one hand, that jealousy is the usual concomitant of love, and that the noble enthusiasm of liberty is apt to be infected with a spirit of narrow and illiberal distrust. On the other hand, it will be equally forgotten that the vigor of government is essential to the security of liberty; that, in the contemplation of a sound and well-informed judgment, their interest can never be separated; and that a dangerous ambition more often lurks behind the specious mask of zeal for the rights of the people than under the forbidden appearance of zeal for the firmness and efficiency of government." "History will teach us that the former has been found a much more certain road to the introduction of despotism than the latter, and that of those men who have overturned the liberties of republics, the greatest number have begun their career by paying an obsequious court to the people; commencing demagogues, and ending tyrants." Page 8

"I have had an eye, my fellow-citizens, to putting you upon your guard against all attempts, from whatever quarter, to influence your decision in a matter of the utmost moment to your welfare, by any impressions other than those which may result from the evidence of truth." "I am convinced that this is the safest course for your liberty, your dignity, and your happiness." Page 9

FULL TEXT - FEDERALIST #1 INTRODUCTION Written by Alexander Hamilton Published October 27th, 1787 To the People of the State of New York: AFTER an unequivocal experience of the inefficacy of the subsisting federal government, you are called upon to deliberate on a new Constitution for the United States of America. The subject speaks its own importance; comprehending in its consequences nothing less than the existence of the UNION, the safety and welfare of the parts of which it is composed, the fate of an empire in many respects the most interesting in the world. It has been frequently remarked that it seems to have been reserved to the people of this country, by their conduct and example, to decide the important question, whether societies of men are really capable or not of establishing good government from reflection and choice, or whether they are forever destined to depend for their political constitutions on accident and force. If there be any truth in the remark, the crisis at which we are arrived may with propriety be regarded as the era in which that decision is to be made; and a wrong election of the part we shall act may, in this view, deserve to be considered as the general misfortune of mankind. This idea will add the inducements of philanthropy to those of patriotism, to heighten the solicitude which all considerate and good men must feel for the event. Happy will it be if our choice should be directed by a judicious estimate of our true interests, unperplexed and unbiased by considerations not connected with the public good. But this is a thing more ardently to be wished than seriously to be expected. The plan offered to Page 10

our deliberations affects too many particular interests, innovates upon too many local institutions, not to involve in its discussion a variety of objects foreign to its merits, and of views, passions and prejudices little favorable to the discovery of truth. Among the most formidable of the obstacles which the new Constitution will have to encounter may readily be distinguished the obvious interest of a certain class of men in every State to resist all changes which may hazard a diminution of the power, emolument, and consequence of the offices they hold under the State establishments; and the perverted ambition of another class of men, who will either hope to aggrandize themselves by the confusions of their country, or will flatter themselves with fairer prospects of elevation from the subdivision of the empire into several partial confederacies than from its union under one government. It is not, however, my design to dwell upon observations of this nature. I am well aware that it would be disingenuous to resolve indiscriminately the opposition of any set of men (merely because their situations might subject them to suspicion) into interested or ambitious views. Candor will oblige us to admit that even such men may be actuated by upright intentions; and it cannot be doubted that much of the opposition which has made its appearance, or may hereafter make its appearance, will spring from sources, blameless at least, if not respectable the honest errors of minds led astray by preconceived jealousies and fears. So numerous indeed and so powerful are the causes which serve to give a false bias to the judgment, that we, upon many occasions, see wise and good men on the wrong as well as on the right side of questions of the first magnitude to society. This circumstance, if duly attended to, would furnish a lesson of Page 11

moderation to those who are ever so much persuaded of their being in the right in any controversy. And a further reason for caution, in this respect, might be drawn from the reflection that we are not always sure that those who advocate the truth are influenced by purer principles than their antagonists. Ambition, avarice, personal animosity, party opposition, and many other motives not more laudable than these, are apt to operate as well upon those who support as those who oppose the right side of a question. Were there not even these inducements to moderation, nothing could be more ill-judged than that intolerant spirit which has, at all times, characterized political parties. For in politics, as in religion, it is equally absurd to aim at making proselytes by fire and sword. Heresies in either can rarely be cured by persecution. And yet, however just these sentiments will be allowed to be, we have already sufficient indications that it will happen in this as in all former cases of great national discussion. A torrent of angry and malignant passions will be let loose. To judge from the conduct of the opposite parties, we shall be led to conclude that they will mutually hope to evince the justness of their opinions, and to increase the number of their converts by the loudness of their declamations and the bitterness of their invectives. An enlightened zeal for the energy and efficiency of government will be stigmatized as the offspring of a temper fond of despotic power and hostile to the principles of liberty. An over-scrupulous jealousy of danger to the rights of the people, which is more commonly the fault of the head than of the heart, will be represented as mere pretense and artifice, the stale bait for popularity at the expense of the public good. It will be forgotten, on the one hand, that jealousy is the usual concomitant of love, and that the noble enthusiasm of liberty is apt to be infected with a spirit of narrow and Page 12

illiberal distrust. On the other hand, it will be equally forgotten that the vigor of government is essential to the security of liberty; that, in the contemplation of a sound and well-informed judgment, their interest can never be separated; and that a dangerous ambition more often lurks behind the specious mask of zeal for the rights of the people than under the forbidden appearance of zeal for the firmness and efficiency of government. History will teach us that the former has been found a much more certain road to the introduction of despotism than the latter, and that of those men who have overturned the liberties of republics, the greatest number have begun their career by paying an obsequious court to the people; commencing demagogues, and ending tyrants. In the course of the preceding observations, I have had an eye, my fellowcitizens, to putting you upon your guard against all attempts, from whatever quarter, to influence your decision in a matter of the utmost moment to your welfare, by any impressions other than those which may result from the evidence of truth. You will, no doubt, at the same time, have collected from the general scope of them, that they proceed from a source not unfriendly to the new Constitution. Yes, my countrymen, I own to you that, after having given it an attentive consideration, I am clearly of opinion it is your interest to adopt it. I am convinced that this is the safest course for your liberty, your dignity, and your happiness. I affect not reserves which I do not feel. I will not amuse you with an appearance of deliberation when I have decided. I frankly acknowledge to you my convictions, and I will freely lay before you the reasons on which they are founded. The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity. I shall not, however, multiply professions on this head. My motives must remain in the depository of my own breast. My arguments will be open to all, and Page 13

may be judged of by all. They shall at least be offered in a spirit which will not disgrace the cause of truth. I propose, in a series of papers, to discuss the following interesting particulars: The utility of the UNION to your political prosperity The insufficiency of the present Confederation to preserve that Union The necessity of a government at least equally energetic with the one proposed, to the attainment of this object The conformity of the proposed Constitution to the true principles of republican government Its analogy to your own state constitution and lastly, The additional security which its adoption will afford to the preservation of that species of government, to liberty, and to property. In the progress of this discussion I shall endeavor to give a satisfactory answer to all the objections which shall have made their appearance, that may seem to have any claim to your attention. It may perhaps be thought superfluous to offer arguments to prove the utility of the UNION, a point, no doubt, deeply engraved on the hearts of the great body of the people in every State, and one, which it may be imagined, has no adversaries. But the fact is, that we already hear it whispered in the private circles of those who oppose the new Constitution, that the thirteen States are of too great extent for any general system, and that we must of necessity resort to separate confederacies of distinct portions of the whole.1 This doctrine will, in all probability, be gradually propagated, till it has votaries enough to countenance an open avowal of it. For nothing can be more evident, to those who are able to take an enlarged view of the subject, than the alternative of an adoption of the new Page 14

Constitution or a dismemberment of the Union. It will therefore be of use to begin by examining the advantages of that Union, the certain evils, and the probable dangers, to which every State will be exposed from its dissolution. This shall accordingly constitute the subject of my next address. For an online version CLICK HERE Page 15

NOTES Page 16