Rules of Evi and Objectio. Mock Trial R

Similar documents
Mock Trial Objections. The basics of every objection allowed in the Mock Trial universe.

COURT: Simplified Rules of Evidence

The following materials are the product of or adapted from Marvin Ventrell and the Juvenile Law Society with permission. All rights reserved.

Evidence Transcript Style Essay - Bar None Review Essay Handout QUESTION 3

DEPOSITION INSTRUCTIONS

2017 National Mock Trial Questions and Answers (Revised May 1, 2017) Week of April 3, 2017

Of Mice and Men Mock Trial Defense Attorney Packet

Putting on Mock Trials

Sample Cross-Examination Questions That the Prosecutor May Ask

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

GENERAL DEPOSITION GUIDELINES

JD EXAM INSTRUCTIONS, SAMPLE QUESTIONS and ANSWERS

Seth Penalver v. State of Florida

ONE-TWO CHA-CHA-CHA A STEP BY STEP METHOD OF CROSS-EXAMINATION & IMPEACHMENT. by Fernando Freyre

Do s and Don ts of Expert Testimony by Gary R. Trugman CPA/ABV, MCBA, ASA, MVS

ASA below 40 and DIS 40 Seminar

From Article at GetOutOfDebt.org

THE COURT: All right. Call your next witness. MR. JOHNSON: Agent Mullen, Terry Mullen. (BRIEF PAUSE) (MR. MULLEN PRESENT)

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO

Cross Examination: Exposing a Lie

Effectively Examining the Difficult Witness

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 107 Filed: 04/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1817

Curtis L. Johnston Selman v. Cobb County School District, et al June 30, 2003

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 27, 2010

Thomas Peterson Testified August 29, 2012 Defense Witness

TESTIMONY FROM YOUR OWN WITNESSES: DIRECT EXAMINATION STRATEGIES

Michael Duane Zack III v. State of Florida

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRANDY NICOLE WILLIAMS NO KA-1839-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ROOSEVELT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Bar Mock Trial Competition 2017/18. Student Role Guide: Barrister England, Wales and Northern Ireland

Cross Examination. High Council of Judges and Prosecutors, Republic of Turkey, Study Visit to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts June 25, 2013

Fundamentals of Pre-Trial Practice

Case Name: R. v. Singh. Between Regina, and Joga Singh Sahota. [2011] B.C.J. No BCPC W.C.B. (2d) CarswellBC 362

>> ALL RISE. >> SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IS NOW IN SESSION. >> OKAY. GOOD MORNING. THE NEXT CASE ON THE DOCKET IS BROOKINS V. STATE. COUNSEL?

Bar Mock Trial Competition 2016/17. Case 2: R v Edwards

FINAL ORDER AND OPINION REVERSING TRIAL COURT. Appellant, Donald Dale Smith, Jr. ( Smith ), timely appeals the trial court s judgment for

1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH vs. Case No. 05 CF 381

Rule of Law. Skit #1: Order and Security. Name:

EXPOSING THE MONSTER: EFFECTIVE CROSS-EXAMINATION

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 98-CF-273. Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (F )

III. RULES OF POLICY (TEAM) DEBATE. A. General

FORWARD THEN BACKWARDS ROBIN STONE FICTION

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs August 5, 2008

Get Right (Jesus Came to Get Us Right With God)

To Kill a Mockingbird: The Trial

DUI CONSULTANTS, LLC PENNSYLVANIA S ONLY LAW FIRM DEDICATED EXCLUSIVELY TO DUI DEFENSE CLIENT REVIEWS

: Brian Stirling, Acting Chairman Suzy Hackett, Robert Haynes, Jeffery Masters, Timothy Meyer, Thomas TJ Thornberry

MOCK TRIAL SCRIPT. B.B. WOLF (a/k/a Big Bad Wolf) CURLY PIG

Eccl 7 WHERE WISDOM HIDES 1/28/18 Introduction: A. Illus.: Susan and I have a grandnephew named Griffin. He s 7. His mom, Lindsey, posted on Facebook

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Exhibit 1. Hobbes also argued that people should give up some of their freedoms and listen to a king who will protect the rest of their rights.

1) Theory Sheets 2) Trial Procedure Sheet 3) Witness Evidence Sheets 4) Exhibits (to be provided by the owner and the police officer)

Lamar Z. Brooks v. State of Florida

- 6 - Brown interviewed Kimball in the police station that evening and Kimball was cooperative and volunteered the following information:

73/J1' ORIGINAL SEP CAUSE NO THE STATE OF TEXAS VS. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY, TEXAS RODNEY REED 21ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

Language in any type of media meant to persuade or convince Common Examples: speeches, political posters, commercials, ads

1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH PLAINTIFF, JURY TRIAL TRIAL - DAY 23 5 vs. Case No.

Turning Points: It s Really About the Money - Luke 16:1-13. Parable of the Shrewd Manager (New Living)

Case 3:10-cv GPC-WVG Document Filed 03/07/15 Page 1 of 30 EXHIBIT 5

General Information about the Mock Trial

Current Average Ratings by Morgan Law Firm Clients. Overall Satisfaction: 9.9 / New Client Intake Process: 9.9 / 10.0

>> ALL RISE. SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IS NOW IN SESSION. PLEASE BE SEATED. >> GOOD MORNING TO BOTH OF YOU. THE LAST CASE THIS WEEK IS CALLOWAY V.

The Foolish Rich Man/The Rich Young Man Luke 12:13-21, Matthew 19:16-24

SIGNS ON THE ROAD OF LIFE Dr. George O. Wood

(CSI) Robert Deel Testified August 7, 2012

COUNTY OF HENNEPIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT. Plaintiff, Defendant. hearing before the Honorable Daniel C. Moreno, one of

CASE NO.: BKC-AJC IN RE: LORRAINE BROOKE ASSOCIATES, INC., Debtor. /

February 2018 Bar Examination

12/16/2018 We Can Believe 1

The Foolish Rich Man/The Rich Young Man Luke 12:13-21, Matthew 19:16-24

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE. CANADA ) HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ) PROVINCE OF ONTARIO ) against ) YOURTOWN REGION ) MARCEL(LE) LECOUTEAU

Is Negative Corpus Really a Corpse? John W. Reis, of Smith Moore Leatherwood P: E:

Hold to the Truth 9th Commandment, Week 2

Defendant (by Mt. Hartleln) [482] Closing Statement - Defendant - Mr. Hartlein 453. THE COURT: On the record. Counsel, you have

Sermons in Acts: No Partiality

in time for my stepson to start college I was 38 years old. I paid a lot of money to get my

* * * And I m actually not active at all. I mean, I ll flirt with people and I ll be, like, kissing people, but having sex is a whole different level.

Hope through a Windshield

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI. v. ) No. 16CR

Murder Begins In The Heart Message 7 in Living The Salt Life Sermon Series (A Study of Jesus Sermon On The Mount) Matthew 5:21-26 (NKJV)

Some of you may remember the country version of the 10 commandments that I found in

Immanuel Kant: Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals First Section Summary Dialogue by Micah Tillman 1. 1 (Ak. 393, 1)

E-Filed Document May :58: KA COA Pages: 19 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.

Who Says? Chapter 12: Authority. Dictionaries are like watches; the worst is better than none, and the best cannot be expected to go quite true.

Standard Terminology for Expressing Conclusions of Forensic Document Examiners

How Does the Empty Tomb Change You? Easter 2017 at Waterville FBC

Topics. Evaluating. arguments. 1 Introduction. PHI 1101, Section I (P. Rusnock) 2 Evaluating Premises. Introduction

INTRODUCTION. The State of Minnesota submits this memorandum of law to address the evidence

Powell v. Portland School District. Chronology

IDHEF Chapter 2 Why Should Anyone Believe Anything At All?

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas

Jesus wants us to be His witnesses. God gives us the Holy Spirit to help us. The Holy Spirit is God s gift to us.

Chapter 4. Credibility

Walk in Holiness I Peter 1: Today marks the beginning of many things new hymnals, planning for the new

Marshall Lee Gore vs State of Florida

STATE OF OHIO DARREN MONROE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

(Caers - Cross) (Caers - Redirect)

Case 1:04-cr TJM Document Filed 09/26/2006 Page 1 of 7

The Unshakeable Evidence

Transcription:

Rules of Evi dence and Objectio ns Mock Trial R ules

Why have evidence rules? 0Ensure a fair hearing 0Avoid wasting time/resources 0Keep out unreliable or prejudicial evidence

Leading Questions 0Question suggests the answer that the attorney wants 0NOT allowed during direct examination Objectionable: Is it true that you locked the door when you left the house? Better: What did you do, if anything, when you left the house? Best: What did you do next?

Argumentative Questions 0Do not badger, harass, or argue with the witness!for a difficult or hostile witness, rephrase your question or use the impeachment process Objectionable: Don t lie to me. You were stupid and drunk and ran that red light, didn t you? Didn t you? You ran it and didn t even care.

Speculation 0Question requires the witness to guess Objectionable: Would the driver have had time to slow down if he saw the light turn red? Better: Where was the driver when the light turned red?

Narration 0Witness gives more information than necessary Q: Where do you work? Objectionable: I went to college to be an architect but I got a job as a business consultant after graduation because my father knew the owner. I didn t like that very much, so I quit when I met Jessica, who is a real estate developer and good friend. We decided to go into business together, using my architectural background to build and manage apartment buildings. We call it Cool Living Designs because...

Relevance 0Questions and answers must relate to a disputed issue 0Relevant information adds to the understanding of the case Objectionable: What s your favorite coffee shop in Seattle?

Hearsay 0Statements made outside the courtroom are generally NOT allowed Objectionable: The bartender told me that the driver had been drinking all night.

Hearsay Exceptions 0Statement made about event when it happened that demonstrates the speaker s intent, knowledge, or belief Admissible: After he got out of the car, the driver said I m sorry, I didn t see the light turn red. 0Statement made by a party in the case if it goes his or her side against Admissible: The next day, the driver told me she had been texting her boyfriend, so she didn t see the light.

First-hand Knowledge 0Witness must have directly seen, heard, or experienced something to testify about it Objectionable: Everyone has been talking about how the driver ran the red light and caused that accident. Better: I saw the light turn red while I was in the intersection, and the driver was about 100 feet behind me. A few seconds later I heard a huge crash.

Opinions 0 Usually reserved for qualified expert witnesses regarding scientific, technical, or specialized subjects 0 Rationally based on the witness s perception and observations Objectionable: The driver was definitely too drunk to drive. Better: She seemed drunk to me because she was slurring her speech and couldn t stand up straight. 0 No opinions on how the case should be decided (Ultimate Issue) Objectionable: Do you think that the driver committed seconddegree murder?

Beyond the Scope of Cross Examination 0Re-direct limited to topics discussed during cross examination 0In a real trial, cross examination is limited by the topics discussed on direct

Beyond the Scope of the Packet 0Significant or material facts that aren t in the mock trial packet cannot be added to testimony 0Minor details added to get into the role are fine

Rules of Evidence Review Is there a violation? If so, which objection would you make?

When to Object 0Attorney questioning witness 0Witness giving answer 0Attorney admitting evidence

How to Object 0Stand up 0Address the judge 0State the violation 0Give a reason for the objection Ex: Objection, Your Honor, the witness is narrating. The attorney s question has already been answered.

Practice Making Objections

Introducing Physical Evidence 0Mark for identification 0Show to opposing counsel 0Build foundation with witness Hand to witness Ask witness if he/she recognizes it Ask witness to explain/describe evidence Ask questions about the evidence 0Admit evidence as an exhibit

Impeaching a Witness 0Discredit the witness 0Show motives for lying 0Show inconsistency in testimony Clarify witness s potentially false answer Ask witness if he/she recognizes the statement Ask witness to read the relevant section Move on with your questions

Group Activity