Lecture (1) Introduction

The study of well-established meanings or ideas around a topic which shape how we can talk about it. e.g. discourse of religions, discourse of economy and social welfare

(i) The study of how meanings are established, used, challenged and changed (including in talk) Over time ( genealogical study Foucault) (ii) In ordinary life (discourse practices)

Discourse is: defined broadly as language in its contexts of use. language above the sentence or above the clause level

knowing a language is concerned with... grammar and vocabulary how to participate in a conversation how to structure a written text. Thus, it is necessary to take context into account and how the units of language combine together and structure the overall discourse.

More restricted in sense, the term discourse can also be used to refer to a particular set of ideas and how they are articulated. Examples: the discourse of religion. the discourse of environmentalism, the discourse of neo-liberalism the discourse of feminism.

In this case, the term Discourse (with capital D) refers to a type of specialised knowledge and language used by a particular social group. This meaning is associated with French post-structuralist thinkers such as Michel Foucault.

A little d discourse: as language in the contexts of its use and above the level of the sentence. Big D discourse: as ideas and how they are articulated. note the first is always singular, while the second can be pluralised

Discourse Studies can be defined as the study of language in its contexts of use and above the level of the sentence. Discourse Studies, as a discipline, essentially an interdisciplinary activity, employed in such diverse fields as anthropology, business studies, communication studies, cultural studies educational studies, environmental studies, law, literary studies, media studies, philosophy, politics, psychology, sociology, and many others, in addition to linguistics.

Structural or textual definition of discourse: Discourse is a particular unit of language (above the sentence). Functional definition of discourse: Discourse is a particular focus of language use.

Structural a text or group of texts would be broken down into their component parts. look at how elements of language are held together in coherent units functional considers the particular meanings and communicative forces associated with what is said or written. considers language as a type of communicative action

functional approach to discourse considers language as a type of communicative action. It considers questions such as: How is language used persuasively (e.g. to request, accept, refuse, complain?) What sort of language is polite language? How do people use language to convey meanings indirectly? What constitutes racist or sexist language? How do people exercise power through their use of language? What might be the hidden motivations behind certain uses of language?

functional approach to discourse can alternatively might look at particular discourse genres. Here, the discourse analyst asks: How language is used in academic essays, in research articles, in conference presentations, in letters, in reports and in meetings? Here the concern is again with communicative purposes or communicative action, but the focus is on particular contexts of use.

functional approach to discourse can also consider how language is used by particular social groups (known as register analysis). Here, the discourse analyst asks: How do teachers or politicians or business executives use language? How do men and women vary in their use of language? What is particular about the language used by such people that it identifies them as belonging to particular social groups?

Functional analysis suggests a qualitative rather than a quantitative methodology and, indeed, most Discourse Analysis is qualitative in nature. The concern is not with measuring and counting, but with describing. The use of computers, quantitative analysis has received more attention and discourse analysts may also use computers to derive quantitative findings (for example, on the relative frequency of particular language patterns by different individuals or social groups in particular texts or groups of texts).

Discourse Analysis may focus on any sort of text, written or spoken. The term text, in Discourse Analysis, refers to any stretch of spoken or written language. In written text, Discourse Analysis may consider texts as diverse as news reports, textbooks, company reports, personal letters, business letters, e-mails and faxes. In spoken discourse, it may focus on casual conversations, business and other professional meetings, service encounters (buying and selling goods and services) and classroom lessons, among many others.

in recent years, it has started to extend its field of activity to consider multimodal discourse, where written and/or spoken text is combined with visual or aural dimensions, such as television programmes, movies, websites, museum exhibits and advertisements of various kinds. These texts, which form the data of Discourse Analysis, may be contemporary or historical.

register analysis: studies the typical features of particular fields of activity or professions. cohesion, coherence and thematic development: investigate how text is held together, in terms of both structure and function. Pragmatics: studies language in terms of the actions it performs. Conversation Analysis: takes a micro-analytic approach to spoken interaction.

Genre Analysis: studies language in terms of the different recurrent stages it goes through in specific contexts. Corpus-based Discourse Analysis: uses computers in the analysis of very large bodies of text (known as corpora singular corpus) in order to identify particular phraseologies (wordings) and rhetorical patterning. Critical Discourse Analysis: interprets texts from a social perspective, analysing power relations and cases of manipulation and discrimination in discourse.

informal fields analyse how people interact in conversation and in service encounters, to analyse how they tell stories, to analyse how they gossip to analyse how they chat. formal fields fruitfully employed in the political arena in analysing the media in the law in healthcare in business and other forms of bureaucracy.

The definitions given above for Discourse Analysis and Discourse Studies refers to the study of language in its contexts of use. Hymes (1972a) identified 16 features of situation, or context, some of which are listed as follows: the physical and temporal setting; the participants (speaker or writer, listener or reader); the purposes of the participants;

features of situation, or context...cont. the channel of communication (e.g. face to face, electronic, televised, written); the attitude of the participants; the genre, or type of speech event: poem, lecture, editorial, sermon; background knowledge pertaining to the participants.

The things we know about the world assist us in the interpretation of discourse.

Example: participants Sit down! is likely to be interpreted as appropriate when spoken by a parent to a child. When addressed to a superior, however, it would likely be interpreted as rude. The important variable, therefore, in this example, is the participants, whether one of them is a child or a superior.

Example: channel of communication CUL8ER the following might be perfectly acceptable as a text message sent via the channel of a mobile phone: CUL8ER (that is to say, see you later ), but sent by means of another channel, such as a business letter, it would more likely be perceived as uneducated or rude.

Example: background knowledge suppose two people are playing a game and one says to the other Make sure you follow all the rules. This person is relying on the other person knowing what these rules are. It would be redundant to have to specify all of the rules. In this way, background knowledge makes communication more efficient.

van Dijk (2008: x) stresses how contexts are not some kind of objective condition or direct cause, but are, rather, subjective constructs that develop over the course of an interaction. Individuals each develop and define their own contexts according to their (on-going) subjective interpretations of communicative situations (van Dijk, 2008: x). Context, for van Dijk, is thus not just a social phenomenon, but a sociocognitive one.

discourse analysts have come to accept the importance of considering other texts in the analysis of a given text. One text cannot be understood except in relation to other texts which have gone before (and, indeed, which are likely to follow).

The intertextuality (Bakhtin, 1981) in this example how one text relates back to another text or texts is made explicit. Another example of intertextuality, which is even more explicit, would be direct quotation of one text in another, indicated through the use of inverted commas.

Here are some other examples of intertextuality from newspaper headlines: Merkel is no Bond Girl (German leader Angela Merkel says that she will not support the issuance of Eurobonds; intertext: James Bond movies, each of which features a Bond girl

Here are some other examples of intertextuality from newspaper headlines: American Airlines is Terminal (The airline is on the verge of bankruptcy; intertext: aircraft operate out of terminals)

Here are some other examples of intertextuality from newspaper headlines: It s Acropolis Now, Greece! (Greece is on the verge of bankruptcy; intertext: the Vietnam War film Apocalypse Now! Directed by Francis Ford Coppola)

Here are some questions you may address to analyse a given discourse: Type 1 questions: who is doing what to whom? Type 2 questions: attitudes, beliefs, and opinions Type 3 question: Holding the discourse together

We re at War President G. W. Bush September 14, 2001 I ve asked the highest levels of our government to come to discuss the current tragedy that has so deeply affected our nation. Our country mourns for the loss of life and for those whose lives have been so deeply affected by this despicable act of terror. I am going to describe to our leadership what I saw: the wreckage of New York City, the signs of the first battle of war. We re going to meet and deliberate and discuss but there s no question about it, this act will not stand; we will find those who did it; we will smoke them out of their holes; we will get them running and we ll bring them to justice. We will not only deal with those who dare attack America, we will deal with those who harbor them and feed them and house them. Make no mistake about it: underneath our tears is the strong determination of America to win this war. And we will win it. I m going to ask the Secretary of State to say a few things, and then the Attorney General.

Type 1 questions: who is doing what to whom? 1. Who is the discourse aimed at? 2. Who is involved in this discourse? 3. What is the intention or purpose of this discourse?

Type 2 questions: attitudes, beliefs, and opinions 1. What is your overall impression of the speaker s feelings? 2. Can you point to the words/phrases that indicate these feelings of you? 3. What kind of phrases/sentences does he use that demonstrate his state of mind? 4. Is there any phrase/sentence that stands out as an indicator of the speaker s feelings?

We re at War President G. W. Bush September 14, 2001 A catastrophic event, grief, sadness I ve asked the highest levels of our government to come to discuss the current tragedy that has so deeply affected our nation. Our country mourns for the loss of life and for those whose lives have been so deeply affected by this despicable act of terror. I am going to describe to our leadership what I saw: the wreckage of New York City, the signs of the first battle of war. We re going to meet and deliberate and discuss but there s no question about it, this act will not stand; we will find those who did it; we will smoke them out of their holes; we will get them running and we ll bring them to justice. We will not only deal with those who dare attack America, we will deal with those who harbor them and feed them and house Making them. judgment Make no mistake about it: underneath our tears(tinged is the strong with determination anger) of America to win this war. And we will win it. I m going to ask the Secretary of State to say a few things, and then the Attorney General.

We re at War President G. W. Bush September 14, 2001 Uttering threats and making promises of future I ve asked the highest levels of our government to come to discuss the current tragedy that has so deeply affected our nation. Our countryaction mourns for the loss of life and for those whose lives have been so deeply affected by this despicable act of terror. I am going to describe to our leadership what I saw: the wreckage of New York City, the signs of the first battle of war. We re going to meet and deliberate and discuss but there s no question about it, this act will not stand; we will find those who did it; we will smoke them out of their holes; we will get them running and we ll bring them to justice. We will not only deal with those who dare attack America, we will deal with those who harbor them and feed them and house them. Make no mistake about it: underneath our tears is the strong determination of America to win this war. And we will win it. I m going to ask the Secretary of State to say a few things, and then the Attorney General.

Include the words will or We re at War President G. W. Bush September 14, 2001 Uttering threats and making promises of future I ve asked the highest levels of our government to come to discuss the current going to tragedy that has so deeply affected our nation. Our countryaction mourns for the loss of life and for those whose lives have been so deeply affected by this despicable act of terror. I am going to describe to our leadership what I saw: the wreckage of New York City, the signs of the first battle of war. We re going to meet and deliberate and discuss but there s no question about it, this act will not stand; we will find those who did it; we will smoke them out of their holes; we will get them running and we ll bring them to justice. We will not only deal with those who dare attack America, we will deal with those who harbor them and feed them and house them. Make no mistake about it: underneath our tears is the strong determination of America to win this war. And we will win it. I m going to ask the Secretary of State to say a few things, and then the Attorney General.

Include the words will or We re at War President G. W. Bush September 14, 2001 Uttering threats and making promises of future I ve asked the highest levels of our government to come to discuss the current going to tragedy that has so deeply affected our nation. Our countryaction mourns for the loss of life and for those whose lives have been so deeply affected by this despicable act of terror. I am going to describe to our leadership what I saw: the wreckage of New York City, the signs of the first battle of war. We re going to meet and deliberate and discuss but there s no question about it, this act will not stand; we will find those who did it; we will smoke them out of their holes; we will get them running and we ll bring them to justice. We will not only deal with those who dare attack America, we will deal with those who harbor them and feed them and house them. Make no mistake about it: underneath our tears is the strong determination of America to win this war. And we will win it. I m going to ask the Secretary of Short/to State to say a the few point things, and then the Attorney General. (making the threat easy to identify) All have the same form (statements)

We re at War President G. W. Bush September 14, 2001 I ve asked the highest levels of our government to come to discuss the current tragedy that has so deeplycommand/have affected our nation. Our strong country mourns for the loss of life and for those whose lives impact have been so deeply affected by this despicable act of terror. I am going to describe to our At leadership the end what of his I saw: call the to wreckage of New York City, the signs of the first battle arm of war. speech We re going to meet and deliberate and discuss but there s no question about it, this act will not stand; we will find those who did it; we will smoke them out of their holes; we will get them running and we ll bring them to justice. We will not only deal with those who dare attack America, we will deal with those who harbor them and feed them and house them. Make no mistake about it: underneath our tears is the strong determination of America to win this war. And we will win it. I m going to ask the Secretary of State to say a few things, and then the Attorney General.

Type 3 question: Holding the discourse together 1. What words and phrases does the speaker use to let us know that he is focusing on particular themes or topics? 2. How can listeners/readers, in general, and listeners of his speech, in particular, recognize that a specific discourse is a unified whole as opposed to just a collection of individual sentences.

Type 3 question: Holding the discourse together Vocabulary chains War Tragedy President We/us Them/those

Type 3 question: Holding the discourse together Vocabulary chains War Tragedy President We/us Them/those act of terror, deeply, wreckage affected, the loss of life The highest levels, government, leadership Describe, meet, deliberate, discuss, find, smoke them out, get them running, bring them to justice their holes, bring them to justice, deal with, dare attack, those who harbor them, feed them, and house them