Logic. If and only if / Si et seulement si / Genau dann, wenn

Similar documents
Moore on External Relations

G.CO.C.9: Inverse, Converse, Contrapositive and Conditional Statements 1b

1.5. Argument Forms: Proving Invalidity

Perry High School. Geometry: Week 5

Part 2 Module 4: Categorical Syllogisms

The way we convince people is generally to refer to sufficiently many things that they already know are correct.

Complications for Categorical Syllogisms. PHIL 121: Methods of Reasoning February 27, 2013 Instructor:Karin Howe Binghamton University

MATH1061/MATH7861 Discrete Mathematics Semester 2, Lecture 5 Valid and Invalid Arguments. Learning Goals

3.5_djj_004_Notes.notebook. November 03, 2009

Modal Auxiliary Verbs (page 1)

Constructive Logic, Truth and Warranted Assertibility

Geometry TEST Review Chapter 2 - Logic

In more precise language, we have both conditional statements and bi-conditional statements.

Elements of Science (cont.); Conditional Statements. Phil 12: Logic and Decision Making Fall 2010 UC San Diego 9/29/2010

Rosen, Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications, 6th edition Extra Examples

Today s Lecture 1/28/10

1 Discuss the contribution made by the early Greek thinkers (the Presocratics) to the beginning of Philosophy.

PHILOSOPHY 102 INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC PRACTICE EXAM 1. W# Section (10 or 11) 4. T F The statements that compose a disjunction are called conjuncts.

Philosophy 57 Day 10

Philosophy 220. Truth Functional Properties Expressed in terms of Consistency

15 Does God have a Nature?

Grab a book! Of Mice and Men. Final Essay. I can follow a process to plan, write, edit, revise, and publish an essay

Argument Writing. Whooohoo!! Argument instruction is necessary * Argument comprehension is required in school assignments, standardized testing, job

HOW TO ANALYZE AN ARGUMENT

Philosophy 57 Day 10. Chapter 4: Categorical Statements Conversion, Obversion & Contraposition II

PART III - Symbolic Logic Chapter 7 - Sentential Propositions

Logic: A Brief Introduction

9.1 Intro to Predicate Logic Practice with symbolizations. Today s Lecture 3/30/10

1 Clarion Logic Notes Chapter 4

Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics. Critical Thinking Lecture 2. Background Material for the Exercise on Inference Indicators

PHLA Knowledge and Reliability

Today s Tasks. 1. Argument 2. Fallacies: a. Ad Hominem b. Straw Man c. Appeal to ignorance d. Begging the Question

1. Immediate inferences embodied in the square of opposition 2. Obversion 3. Conversion

Prompt: Explain van Inwagen s consequence argument. Describe what you think is the best response

Pastor-teacher Don Hargrove Faith Bible Church September 8, 2011

7. Some recent rulings of the Supreme Court were politically motivated decisions that flouted the entire history of U.S. legal practice.

CHAPTER ONE STATEMENTS, CONNECTIVES AND EQUIVALENCES

Chapter 1 - Basic Training

Section 3.5. Symbolic Arguments. Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Exercise Sets. KS Philosophical Logic: Modality, Conditionals Vagueness. Dirk Kindermann University of Graz July 2014

$4.95. Lessons for Sabbath School and Home Unit 2 The Creation Book One Beginners. Youth Educational Adventures. God s Promise.

7) UVW IWK 9) BCD TSD 11) NML NJI LNM?

The Ontological Argument

Assignment Assignment for Lesson 3.1

Tutorial A02: Validity and Soundness By: Jonathan Chan

Selections from Aristotle s Prior Analytics 41a21 41b5

Aquinas, The Five Ways

Deduction. Of all the modes of reasoning, deductive arguments have the strongest relationship between the premises

What Is a Normative Ethical Theory? Keith Burgess-Jackson 26 December 2017

Section 3.5. Symbolic Arguments. Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Faith indeed tells what the senses do not tell, but not the contrary of what they see. It is above them and not contrary to them.

JBQ Lesson 22. Quizzer Name: The Word Inspired

An Alternate Possibility for the Compatibility of Divine. Foreknowledge and Free Will. Alex Cavender. Ringstad Paper Junior/Senior Division

Conditionals IV: Is Modus Ponens Valid?

7.1. Unit. Terms and Propositions. Nature of propositions. Types of proposition. Classification of propositions

ISBN-13: ISBN-10: Library of Congress Catalog Number:

Handout for: Ibn Sīnā: analysis with modal syllogisms

Math Propositions and Their Combinations Fall 2003 Page 1. Propositions

1.2. What is said: propositions

Study Guides. Chapter 1 - Basic Training

PHLA10F 2. PHLA10F What is Philosophy?

Living in Christ: First and Second Corinthians

Can logical consequence be deflated?

Critical Thinking. The Four Big Steps. First example. I. Recognizing Arguments. The Nature of Basics

Day 3. Wednesday May 23, Learn the basic building blocks of proofs (specifically, direct proofs)

BASIC CONCEPTS OF LOGIC

6: DEDUCTIVE LOGIC. Chapter 17: Deductive validity and invalidity Ben Bayer Drafted April 25, 2010 Revised August 23, 2010

1.6 Validity and Truth

What am I? An immaterial thing: the case for dualism

The dinosaur existed for a few literal hours on earth!

LOGIC ANTHONY KAPOLKA FYF 101-9/3/2010

Introduction to Philosophy

There are a number of writing problems that occur frequently enough to deserve special mention here:

WHAT IS HUME S FORK? Certainty does not exist in science.

Possibility and Necessity

Two Outings. READTHEORY.ORG Name Date. Passage 1

Intro. First-Order Necessity and Validity. First Order Attention. First Order Attention

Friends and strangers

If I hadn t studied as much as I did, I wouldn t have passed my exams.

Ayer s linguistic theory of the a priori

6.080 / Great Ideas in Theoretical Computer Science Spring 2008

Searle vs. Chalmers Debate, 8/2005 with Death Monkey (Kevin Dolan)

Department of Philosophy

Deduction by Daniel Bonevac. Chapter 1 Basic Concepts of Logic

Intro Viewed from a certain angle, philosophy is about what, if anything, we ought to believe.

Ayer and Quine on the a priori

The basic form of a syllogism By Timo Schmitz, Philosopher

Kindergarten & 1st Grade (Norfolk Campus) Week 2, June 11 The Matchmaker Bible Story: Bottom Line: Memory Verse: Life App:

KANT S EXPLANATION OF THE NECESSITY OF GEOMETRICAL TRUTHS. John Watling

From Necessary Truth to Necessary Existence

How important are the reasons?

May. Write the long i words. Remember to use a silent e. Draw pictures to solve the problem. Write the addition problem.

A romp through the foothills of logic Session 3

PHLA10 Reason and Truth Exercise 1

Lecture 3 Arguments Jim Pryor What is an Argument? Jim Pryor Vocabulary Describing Arguments

Unit 4. Reason as a way of knowing. Tuesday, March 4, 14

In Reference and Definite Descriptions, Keith Donnellan makes a

Annotated Bibliography. seeking to keep the possibility of dualism alive in academic study. In this book,

SUNDAY MORNINGS July 9, 2017, Week 2 Grade: 1-2

Situations in Which Disjunctive Syllogism Can Lead from True Premises to a False Conclusion

Transcription:

Logic If and only if / Si et seulement si / Genau dann, wenn Logic is important for all mathematics! In mathematics, true means always true. Something which is often true is declared to be false. Negation: Negating an assertion exchanges true with false, and negating twice does nothing: 2 + 3 equals 5 (true) 2 + 3 is not equal to 5 (false) 2 + 3 equals 5 (true) And, or: If you use the word AND to connect two assertions, they should both be true in order that the whole phrase is true: 2 + 3 = 5 (true) and 4 + 5 = 8 (false) is a false statement If you use the word OR to connect two assertions, at least one of them (possibly, both) should be true in order that the whole phrase is true: 2 + 3 = 5 (true) or 4 + 5 = 8 (false) is a true statement If you use the construction EITHER... OR to connect two assertions, then exactly one of them should be true (if both are true, or both are false, then the statement is false) either 2 + 3 = 5 (true) or 4 + 5 = 9 (true) is a false statement The negation exchanges and and or! The negation of I want pizza and pasta is I don t want pizza or I don t want pasta Maybe I want only pizza, maybe only pasta, maybe nothing at all... The negation of I want cinema or theater is I don t want cinema and I don t want theater I want neither of them! Implications: The word If suggests an implication: If you do this, I will do that. There is a premise (you do this) and a consequence (I do that). An implication, meant as a 1

whole, is true unless the premise is true but the consequence is false. Your boss could tell you : If you come late at work, you are fired. Maybe there are other behaviours leading to your dismissal (you could get fired even if you are punctual) but the boss is not keeping his/her word only if you come late at work and he/she does not fire you. Usually you cannot swap premise and consequence: If you have 2 candies, then you have an even number of candies (true) If you have even number of candies, then you have 2 candies (false) Necessity: The construction only if suggests a necessary condition: Only if you have an even number of candies you can have 2 candies (true) Equivalence: Two conditions are equivalent means that one is necessary and sufficient for the other: You have 2 candies, if and only if you have an even number of candies from 1 and 3 (true) Contraposition (of an implication): The implication If A, then B (A B) gives you exactly the same information as If not B, then not A (notb nota). If a triangle has 3 equal angles, then it has 2 equal angles If a triangle does not have 2 equal angles, then it has not 3 equal angles Transitivity of an implication: Knowing both implications If A, then B and If B, then C gives you automatically the implication If A, then C. For example, If I am in Belval, I am in Luxembourg and If I am in Luxembourg, I am in Europe give automatically: If I am in Belval, I am in Europe. A rule is usually expressed by the words Every, All... : Every triangle has three sides. All triangles have three sides. A rule is false even if there is only one single exception (counterexample). You cannot prove a rule just by looking at a few examples. 2

An example (or a counterexample) is usually expressed by the words there is/are : There is one mammal that can run at a speed of 30km/h. There are mammals that can run at a speed of 30km/h. In mathematics there is one means there is at least one (another phrasing is one can find a ). The negation exchanges All and There is : The negation of All mammals can move at a speed of 50km/h. is There is at least one mammal that cannot move at a speed of 50km/h. The negation of Every mammal cannot reach a speed of 100km/h. is There is at least one mammal that can reach the speed of 100km/h. For all x and for all y is the same as For all y and for all x. For every monkey and for every tree, the monkey can climb the tree. For every tree and for every monkey, the monkey can climb the tree. These are equivalent and mean: Every monkey can climb every tree (no exceptions for the monkeys, no exceptions for the trees). There is an x and there is an y is the same as There is an y and there is an x. There is a tree and there is a cat such that the cat can climb the tree. There is a cat and there is a tree such that the cat can climb the tree. Here it suffices to know that my cat can climb the tree in my garden. There are many possibilities: maybe one tree is too much for every cat, or there is a cat that can climb no tree, or every cat can climb some tree but not all, or every cat can climb every tree... There is an y, such that for all x could be stronger than For all x there is an y. The difference is that in the first case y must be the same for every x: For every animal there is an appropriate food (true) There is some food which is appropriate to every animal (false) 3

Problems around Logic 1. Yes or No? Associate correctly a wish with its negation (and explain your choice): Please, let s watch Star Wars or Star Trek! Please, let s watch Star Wars and Star Trek! Please, let us not watch Star Wars or let us not watch Star Trek! Please, let us not watch Star Wars and let us not watch Star Trek! 2. Fishes and sharks Which of the following implications convey the same information? Which among them are true? (a) Shark Fish (b) Fish Shark (c) Fish Shark (d) Not a fish Not a shark (e) Not a shark Not a fish (f) Not a fish Not a shark 3. Zebra logic Zebras are black&white. Old movies are black&white. So zebras are old movies! What went wrong in the reasoning? 4. A zoo of possibilities Order the following assertions from the strongest to the weakest (are any two assertions the same?): (a) At the zoo there is an animal that flies or swims (b) At the zoo there is an animal that flies or there is an animal that swims (c) At the zoo there is an animal that flies and swims (d) At the zoo there is an animal that flies and there is an animal that swims 5. Darwin! Darwin and Mendel studied plants, but we do not know which ones... Among the following assertions there are two that can be true at the same time and false at the same time. There are also two assertions that can be false at the same time but cannot be true at the same time. Which are they? (a) Darwin studied all plants that Mendel studied. (b) There is a plant that Mendel studied and that Darwin also studied, but Darwin did not study all plants that Mendel studied. (c) There is a plant that Mendel studied and that Darwin did not study. 4

6. A matter of preferences Which of the following assertions mean the same, which one is the strongest? (a) Every student liked every movie that was played at school. (b) Every movie played at school was liked by one of the students. (c) One of the students liked every movie played at schools. (d) Among the movies played at school, there was one liked by every student. (e) Every student liked one of the movies played a school. ANY QUESTION? JUST ASK! 5