Templates for Writing about Ideas and Research

Similar documents
Index of Templates from They Say, I Say by Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstein. Introducing What They Say. Introducing Standard Views

Sentence Starters from They Say, I Say

ACADEMIC SKILLS PROGRAM STUDENT SERVICES AND DEVELOPMENT

Templates for Research Paper

THEY SAY: Discussing what the sources are saying

Templates for Introducing Standard Views (what everybody thinks) Templates for Making what they say something you Say

BASIC SENTENCE PATTERNS

Some Transition Words and Phrases

Thesis Statements. (and their purposes)

Language Supports for Argument Writing

AND YET. IF GOOD ACADEMIC writing involves putting yourself into dialogue with others, it DETERMINE WHO IS SAYING WHAT IN THE TEXTS YOU READ

Three Ways to Respond

Rebekah, Promised Bride for the Promised Son

REASONS AND ENTAILMENT

Sermon-based Study Guide Sermon: Threading the Needle. (Matthew 19:16-30) Sermon Series: Portrait of a Follower

More on whether Muslims and Christians worship the same God

that lived at the site of Qumran, this view seems increasingly unlikely. It is more likely that they were brought from several sectarian communities

Sermon-based Study Guide

2. Now let's do the same thing for the church of Pergamum. Read Revelation 2: Fill in the column for Pergamum.

Week 8 Biblical Inerrancy

Remit 6 Study Session #2. Basis of Union Foundational Document Essential Agreement 20 Articles of Faith

Two Kinds of Ends in Themselves in Kant s Moral Theory

What is the "Social" in "Social Coherence?" Commentary on Nelson Tebbe's Religious Freedom in an Egalitarian Age

Psalms of Jesus I The Message of the Prophets II The Message of the Prophets Appeal to All Walks of Life III Upholding the Law of the Pro

How to Handle Relationship Rifts Philippians 4:2-3. Pastor Troy Dobbs Grace Church of Eden Prairie. November 8, 2015

The Doctrine of Christ "Christology" Course Outline

Unifying the Categorical Imperative* Marcus Arvan University of Tampa

Contents Contents VOLUME VOLUME VOLUME III TESTS & ANSWER KEY

The Work Of The Holy Spirit

THE CHICAGO STATEMENT ON BIBLICAL INERRANCY A Summarization written by Dr. Murray Baker

Course Description. Course objectives. Achieving the Course Objectives:

Essay Discuss Both Sides and Give your Opinion

Does the Skeptic Win? A Defense of Moore. I. Moorean Methodology. In A Proof of the External World, Moore argues as follows:

TOBY BETENSON University of Birmingham

CONCERNING BIBLICAL ECONOMIC SYSTEMS

INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY

Truth and Molinism * Trenton Merricks. Molinism: The Contemporary Debate edited by Ken Perszyk. Oxford University Press, 2011.

FAMILY COMMUNITY CHURCH ASSOCIATION STATEMENT OF FAITH MESSAGE

Outline of the Apology 1. I. Prologue: knowledge is very valuable, though sometimes esteemed too highly. F, 319

A CRITIQUE OF THE FREE WILL DEFENSE. A Paper. Presented to. Dr. Douglas Blount. Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary. In Partial Fulfillment

THE ROYAL NAVY. The Cambridge Manuals of Science and Literature

Introduction: Goddess and God in Our Lives

WHEREAS each congregation desires to keep its individual identities, but are willing to work together for sake of the Gospel:

Note: This is the penultimate draft of an article the final and definitive version of which is

Presentism and eterrnalism HAROLD W. NOONAN. Department of Philosophy. University of Nottingham. Nottingham, NG72RD, UK. Tel: +44 (0)

THE FIRST 15 FRONT INTRO...IV FIRST 15...V XIII JOURNAL... XIV XVI. Thursday Bear Burdens Friday Build Bridges Saturday Break Chains Sunday Bring Hope

Frankenstein Study Guide:

-- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text.

How to Write a Philosophy Paper

CONTENTS. INTRODUCTORY Chapter I ETHICAL NEUTRALITY AND PRAGMATISM

Christian Training Center of Branch of the Lord

Topics and Activities for Critical Response

Concerning God Baruch Spinoza

The Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy

Before I was even sure where I stood in my own faith, I was asked to lead a group and was provided with a set of Bible studies entitled Conversations

Philosophy of Religion 21: (1987).,, 9 Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht - Printed in the Nethenanas

SAMPLE. Introduction. Book Theme

CONTENTS A SYSTEM OF LOGIC

I.INTRODUCTION A.WHY THE COMMANDS OF JESUS? Many years back people started telling me I was gifted to teach. After hearing this from a couple of

PROSPECTS FOR A JAMESIAN EXPRESSIVISM 1 JEFF KASSER

The Ethics. Part I and II. Benedictus de Spinoza ************* Introduction

Cumulative Arguments and Smoking Guns. Mark Vorobej. Following David Ray Griffin, we can distinguish between the following three propositions

Sermon-based Study Guide Sermon: The Master s Plan (Matthew 10:16-25) Sermon Series: Portrait of a Follower

PRESENTATIONS ON THE VATICAN II COUNCIL PART II DEI VERBUM: HEARING THE WORD OF GOD

Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission.

Free will and foreknowledge

Philosophy 125 Day 13: Overview

CONSTITUTION EASTERN SYNOD EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN CANADA 2018

Contents. Acknowledgments... ix. Foreword...xix. Introduction...xxi

Annual Faith Formation Report (AFFR) Directions for Faith Formation Leaders

introduction Entering the Conversation

What God Could Have Made

Through Gates of Splendor Book Discussion Guide. What were some of the life experiences that shaped Jim into the man he was?

Christ Renews His Parish Summary 12/14/15

*Essays are found in the lesson Resources and Omnibus Textbook

HOW TO BE (AND HOW NOT TO BE) A NORMATIVE REALIST:

Indian Home Rule [or Hind Swaraj] * by M. K. Gandhi Hind Swarajya was written in Gujarati between November 13 and 22, 1909 on boar

A RELIGIOUS STUDIES CURRICULUM FOR ANGLICAN SCHOOLS

Catholic Church Closings Karen M. Andolina Scott University at Buffalo Law Student

d) The (first) debate about Pantheism

To Provoke or to Encourage? - Combining Both within the Same Methodology

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Reviewed Work: Why We Argue (and How We Should): A Guide to Political Disagreement, by Scott Aikin and Robert Talisse

contents U No. III, August 29, Draft of an Essay on Power, c. August 29, Humphrey Ploughjogger No. III, September 5,

Relativism and Subjectivism. The Denial of Objective Ethical Standards

THE FINAL 15 BACK FINAL 15...V XVII JOURNAL...XVIII XX

THERE IS BUT ONE GOD YHWH

I read an article this week entitled: 6 Things No One Tells You About Being A Parent

AN OUTLINE OF CRITICAL THINKING

Thesis Statement. What is a Thesis Statement? What is a Thesis Statement Not?

PLATO: PLATO CRITICIZES HIS OWN THEORY OF FORMS, AND THEN ARGUES FOR THE FORMS NONETHELESS (PARMENIDES)

Adapted from The Academic Essay: A Brief Anatomy, for the Writing Center at Harvard University by Gordon Harvey. Counter-Argument

The Chicago Statements

Empty Names and Two-Valued Positive Free Logic

THE REFORMED ROAD AND THE SIGNIFICANCE SUPRALAPSARIANISM FOR CALVINISM

LODGE VEGAS # 32 ON EDUCATION

PREPARING LAY WITNESSES FOR TRIAL

The Abolition of Man

Consciousness might be defined as the perceiver of mental phenomena. We might say that there are no differences between one perceiver and another, as

MEASURING THE TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN THE INDONESIAN UNIVERSITIES: FROM THE PERSPECTIVES OF FACULTY MEMBERS THESIS

Transcription:

Templates for Writing about Ideas and Research One of the more difficult aspects of writing an argument based on research is establishing your position in the ongoing conversation about the topic. The templates below are meant to help you make standard moves that all researchers use to present, discuss, critique and argue about ideas. You should feel free to adapt any template to your own style once you are comfortable with using it--such adaptation should happen naturally, anyway. I. Introducing What They Say A number of critics have recently suggested that X s work has several fundamental problems. It has become common today to dismiss X s contribution to the field of Y. In their recent work, X and Y have harsh critiques of Z for II. Introducing Standard Views Americans today tend to believe that According to conventional wisdom Common sense seems to dictate that The standard way of thinking about [topic X] has it that It is often said that Many people assume that III. Introducing Something Implied or Assumed One implication of X s treatment of is that While they rarely admit as much, often take for granted that Although X does not say so directly, she apparently assumes that IV. Introducing an Ongoing Debate In discussions of X, one controversial issue has been On the one hand, argues On the other hand, contends Others even maintain My own view is When it comes to the topic of, most of us will readily agree that Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of Whereas some are convinced that, others maintain that In conclusion, then, as I suggested earlier, defenders of cannot have it both ways. Their assertion that is contradicted by their claim that

V. Capturing Authorial Action X acknowledges that X agrees that X argues that X denies/does not deny that X claims that X complains that X concedes that X demonstrates that X deplores the tendency to X emphasizes that X insists that X observes that X questions whether X refutes the claim that X reminds us that X reports that X suggests that X urges us to VI. Introducing Quotations X states, (citation). As the prominent philosopher X puts it, (cit) According to X, (cit) X himself writes, (cit) In her [book/article],, X maintains that (cit) Writing in the journal [Title], X complains that (cit) In X s view, (cit) X agrees when she writes, (cit) X disagrees when he writes, (cit) X complicates matters for the future when he writes, (cit)

VII. Explaining Quotations Briefly, X is saying In other words, X thinks In making this comment, X argues that X is insisting that X s point is that The essence of X s argument is that VIII. Disagreeing, with Reasons I think X is mistaken because she overlooks X s claim that rests upon the questionable assumption that I disagree with X s view that because, as recent research has shown, X contradicts herself/cannot have it both ways. On the one hand, she argues But on the other hand, she also says By focusing on, X overlooks the deeper problem of X claims, but we do not need him to tell us that. Anyone familiar with has long known that is just not the case because IX. Agreeing with a Difference I agree that because my experience confirms it. X surely is right about because, as she may not be aware, recent studies have shown that X s theory of is extremely useful because it sheds insight on the difficult problem of I agree that, a point that needs emphasizing since so many people believe Those unfamiliar with this school of though may be interested to know that it is fundamentally If group X is right that, as I think they are, then we need to reassess the popular assumption that X. Agreeing and Disagreeing Simultaneously Although I agree with X up to a point, I cannot accept his overall conclusion that

Although I disagree with much that X says, I fully endorse his final conclusion that Though I concede that, I still insist that Whereas X provides ample evidence that, Y and Z s research on and convinces me that instead. X is right that, but she seems on more dubious ground when she claims that While X is probably wrong when she claims that, she is right that XI. Signaling Who Is Saying What X argues According to both X and Y, Politicians, X argues, should But are real and, arguably, the most significant factor in But X is wrong that It is, however, simply not true that Indeed, it is highly likely that But the view that does not fit all the facts. X is right that X is wrong that X is both right and wrong that Nevertheless, new research shows Anyone familiar with should see that XII. Embedding Voice Markers X overlooks what I consider an important point about My own view is that what X insists is a is in fact a I wholeheartedly endorse what X calls These conclusions, which X discusses in, add weight to the argument that XIII. Entertaining Objections Yet some readers may challenge the view that After all, many believe Indeed, my own argument that seems to ignore and

Of course, many will probably disagree with this assertion that XIV. Naming Your Naysayers Here many Rationalists would probably object that But Pragmatists would certainly take issue with the argument that Biologists, of course, may want to dispute my claim that Nevertheless, both followers and critics of X will probably argue that Although not all Christians think alike, some of them will probably dispute my claim that Non-native English speakers are so diverse in their views that it is hard to generalize about them, but some are likely to object on the grounds that. XV. Making Concessions While Still Standing Your Ground Although I grant that, I still maintain that Proponents of X are right to argue that But they exaggerate when they claim that While it is true that, it does not necessarily follow that On the one hand, I agree with X that But on the other hand, I still insist that XVI. Indicating Who Cares used to think But recently [or within the past few decades] suggests that What this new research does, then, is correct the mistaken impression, held by many earlier researchers, that These findings challenge the work of earlier researchers, who tended to assume that Recent studies like these shed new light on, which previous studies had not addressed. Researchers have long assumed that For instance, one eminent scholar of Renaissance England,, assumed in, her seminal work on the social construction of gender, that women As herself put it, (page #). Another leading scholar,, argued that women (page #). Ultimately, when it came to the nature of gender, the basic assumption was that!! But a new body of research shows that the process of gendering was far more complex and that

If sports enthusiasts stopped to think about it, many of them might simply assume that the most successful athletes New research shows, however, that These findings challenge dieters common assumptions that At first glance, teenagers appear to But on closer inspection XVII. Establishing Why Claims Matter X matters/is important because Although X may seem trivial, it is in fact crucial in terms of today s concern over Ultimately, what is at stake here is These findings have important consequences for the broader domain of My discussion of X is in fact addressing the larger matter of These conclusions/this discovery will have significant applications in as well as in Although X may seem of concern to only a small group of, it should in fact concern anyone who cares about