Phil-004 (Galindo): Spring 14 - Quiz #4

Similar documents
Review Deductive Logic. Wk2 Day 2. Critical Thinking Ninjas! Steps: 1.Rephrase as a syllogism. 2.Choose your weapon

Announcements. Quiz #4. Review, see me before the Final Exam for help. Average? High Score? BUT, everyone will get +1pt!

INDUCTION. All inductive reasoning is based on an assumption called the UNIFORMITY OF NATURE.

Reading and Evaluating Arguments

Table of Contents. What This Book Teaches... iii Four Myths About Critical Thinking... iv Pretest...v

Introduction to Logic. Instructor: Jason Sheley

Example Arguments ID1050 Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning

Critical Thinking - Wk 3. Instructor: Jason Sheley

Chapter 4: More Inductive Reasoning

What could be some limitations to using fingerprints as evidence? Sep 2 12:58 PM

Geometry TEST Review Chapter 2 - Logic

As noted, a deductive argument is intended to provide logically conclusive support for its conclusion. We have certainty with deductive arguments in

Test Item File. Full file at

There are two common forms of deductively valid conditional argument: modus ponens and modus tollens.

In view of the fact that IN CLASS LOGIC EXERCISES

2. Refutations can be stronger or weaker.

Philosophy 12 Study Guide #4 Ch. 2, Sections IV.iii VI

C. Exam #1 comments on difficult spots; if you have questions about this, please let me know. D. Discussion of extra credit opportunities

1. To arrive at the truth we have to reason correctly. 2. Logic is the study of correct reasoning. B. DEDUCTIVE AND INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS

Norva Y S Lo Produced by Norva Y S Lo Edited by Andrew Brennan

Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me?

Philosophy 1100: Ethics

Unit 4. Reason as a way of knowing. Tuesday, March 4, 14

PRACTICE EXAM The state of Israel was in a state of mourning today because of the assassination of Yztzak Rabin.

GENERAL NOTES ON THIS CLASS

Logic: The Science that Evaluates Arguments

Chapter 1. What is Philosophy? Thinking Philosophically About Life

PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON THIS QUIZ

Three Kinds of Arguments

HuffPost: NFL September 25-26, US Adults

YouGov June 13-14, US Adults

13.6 Euler Diagrams and Syllogistic Arguments

YouGov January 31 - February 1, 2017

Geometry 2.3.notebook October 02, 2015

HuffPost: Seasons greetings December 4-6, US Adults

Basic Concepts and Skills!

1. True or False: The terms argument and disagreement mean the same thing. 2. True or False: No arguments have more than two premises.

Directions: For Problems 1-10, determine whether the given statement is either True (A) or False (B).

Part 2 Module 4: Categorical Syllogisms

Portfolio Project. Phil 251A Logic Fall Due: Friday, December 7

Categorical Logic Handout Logic: Spring Sound: Any valid argument with true premises.

Deduction. Of all the modes of reasoning, deductive arguments have the strongest relationship between the premises

Notes on types of Arguments (for Philosophy of Science) by Justin C. Fisher

Controlled Experiments

SHORT ANSWER. Write the word or phrase that best completes each statement or answers the question.

Faith indeed tells what the senses do not tell, but not the contrary of what they see. It is above them and not contrary to them.

Logic: A Brief Introduction. Ronald L. Hall, Stetson University

Follow Will of the People. Your leftist h. b. ave often d1sgusted b h

PHILOSOPHER S TOOL KIT 1. ARGUMENTS PROFESSOR JULIE YOO 1.1 DEDUCTIVE VS INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS

Baronett, Logic (4th ed.) Chapter Guide

Phil 3304 Introduction to Logic Dr. David Naugle. Identifying Arguments i

Logic Practice Test 1

1.2. What is said: propositions

In a previous lecture, we used Aristotle s syllogisms to emphasize the

HuffPost: Sexual harassment November 16-17, US Adults

The Shirt: Current Amount Sold: 2

How To Buy Material Handling Supplies Online?

Reasoning SYLLOGISM. follows.

PHI Introduction Lecture 4. An Overview of the Two Branches of Logic

Argumentative Analogy versus Figurative Analogy

1.5 Deductive and Inductive Arguments

Buy A Wedding party Dress

1.5. Argument Forms: Proving Invalidity

Relevance. Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true

Unit. Categorical Syllogism. What is a syllogism? Types of Syllogism

Logic clearly dictates that the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few or the needs of the one (Spock and Captain Kirk).

Chapter Notes (Final Exam) On April, 26, 2012

LOGIC LECTURE #3: DEDUCTION AND INDUCTION. Source: A Concise Introduction to Logic, 11 th Ed. (Patrick Hurley, 2012)

Section 3.5. Symbolic Arguments. Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

READTHEORY TEACHING STUDENTS TO READ AND THINK CRITICALLY

Critical Thinking 5.7 Validity in inductive, conductive, and abductive arguments

Pastor-teacher Don Hargrove Faith Bible Church September 8, 2011

PHLA10 Reason and Truth Exercise 1

What is a logical argument? What is deductive reasoning? Fundamentals of Academic Writing

PHIL2642 CRITICAL THINKING USYD NOTES PART 1: LECTURE NOTES

MEGHAN PERCIVAL. Adviser, McLean High School Yearbook McLean, VA

Richard L. W. Clarke, Notes REASONING

Questions for Critically Reading an Argument

"I Am the Vine" May 2018

Unit 4. Reason as a way of knowing

Philosophical Arguments

The antecendent always a expresses a sufficient condition for the consequent

Section 3.5. Symbolic Arguments. Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

The Heart of Worship, Pt. Four 1 (Hebrews 12:28-29)

What we want students to do with what they ve learned: To identify what it means to pursue righteousness in their day- to- day lives.

What is reason? The power of the mind to think, understand, and form judgments by a process of logic

Chapter Five. Persuasive Writing

PHIL / PSYC 351. Thinking and Reasoning

Paul Teaches About Spiritual Gifts

God Gives Manna. References Exodus 16:1-5, 14-26; Patriarchs and Prophets, pp

HuffPost: Hillary Clinton September 13-14, US Adults

Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics. Critical Thinking Lecture 1. Background Material for the Exercise on Validity

HOW TO ANALYZE AN ARGUMENT

Logic for Computer Science - Week 1 Introduction to Informal Logic

5.3 The Four Kinds of Categorical Propositions

Venn Diagrams and Categorical Syllogisms. Unit 5

HW3- Sets & Arguments (solutions) Due: Tuesday April 5, 2011

JESUS, NAME ABOVE ALL NAMES: I JESUS, OUR STRENGTH Karen F. Bunnell Elkton United Methodist Church March 10, Psalm 91:1-2, Luke 4:1-13

Critical Reasoning for Beginners: Four. Marianne Talbot Department for Continuing Education University of Oxford Michaelmas 2009

Also, in Argument #1 (Lecture 11, Slide 11), the inference from steps 2 and 3 to 4 is stated as:

Transcription:

Ch 8: Choose the best categorical claim translation of the claims below. (1pt each) 1. Which is the best translation for this claim: "Every baseball player is an athlete. a. All baseball players are athletes. b. All athletes are baseball players. c. Some baseball players are athletes. 2. Which is the best translation for this claim: "Not every musician can read music. a. All people who can read music are musicians. b. Some musicians are not people who can read music. c. No musicians are people who can read music. 3. Which is the best translation for this claim: "There are no hard questions on this quiz. a. All questions on this quiz are hard questions. b. Some questions on this quiz are not hard questions. c. No hard questions are questions on this quiz. 4. Which is the best translation for this claim: "Only cable modems are fast enough for online gaming." a. All modems fast enough for online gaming are cable modems. b. All cable modems are fast enough for online gaming. c. Some cable modems are not modems fast enough for online gaming. 5. Which is the best translation for this claim: "Motivated students are the only students who should take online classes." a. All students who should take online classes are motivated students. b. Some motivated students are students who should take online classes. c. All motivated students are students who should take online classes. Read the following passages and select the BEST answer available. (1pt each) Passage #1: (P1) No X are Y. (P2) Some Y are not Z.(C) So, some X are not Z 6. Which diagram from group #1 could be used to represent the conclusion? 7. Which diagram from group #2 represents both? 8. What is the middle term? a. X c. Z b. Y d. No middle term 9. Which rule is broken in this deductive argument? b. #2 distribution of middle term in d. No rules are broken. So this is a valid

Passage #2: (P1) All X are Y. (P2) No Y are Z. (C) So, no X are Z 10. Which diagram from group #1 could be used to represent the conclusion? 11. Which diagram from group #2 could be used to represent both? 12. What is the middle term? a. X c. Z b. Y d. No middle term 13. Which rule is broken in this deductive argument? b. #2 distribution of middle term in d. No rules are broken. So this is a valid Passage #3: (P1) No coinsurance policies are policies that cover the full value of the property. (P2) Some policies that cover the full value of the property are discounted policies. (C) So, some discounted policies are not coinsurance policies. 14. Which diagram from group #1 could be used to represent the conclusion? 15. Which diagram from group #2 could be used to represent both? 16. What is the middle term? a. Coinsurance policies c. Discounted policies b. Policies that cover the full value of the d. No middle term property 17. Which rule is broken in this deductive argument? Passage #4: (P1) The Johnson s new lawn furniture is made out of plastic. (P2) Plastic furniture is always cheap. (C) So all of their lawn furniture must be cheap. 18. Which diagram from group #1 could be used to represent the conclusion? 19. Which diagram from group #2 could be used to represent both? 20. What is the middle term? a. The Johnson s new lawn furniture. c. Cheap furniture. b. Plastic furniture. d. No middle term 21. Which rule is broken in this deductive argument? Passage #5: Every college professor dresses well, and nobody who dresses well is ugly. Therefore, no college professor is ugly. 22. Which diagram from group #1 could be used to represent the conclusion? 23. Which diagram from group #2 could be used to represent both? 24. What is the quality of this deductive argument? a. Valid b. Invalid b. Strong d. Weak Passage #6: Only people who hold stock in the company may vote, so Mr. Hansen must not hold any stock in the company, because I know he was not allowed to vote. 25. What is the middle term? a. People who hold stock in the company c. People who are allowed to vote b. All people identical to Mr. Hansen d. No middle term

26. Which rule is broken in this deductive argument? Use any method you choose to determine if the argument below is valid or invalid. (3pts that s why you have to provide the answer three times.) Passage #1: None of the southern provinces of Spain were outside the control of the Moors before the end of the fifteenth century. So all the provinces of Andalucia must have been within Moorish control, because all of them are southern provinces. 27. a. Valid b. Invalid 28. a. Valid b. Invalid 29. a. Valid b. Invalid Ch 10: Choose the BEST answer to the questions below. (1pt each) 30. Which of the following syllogisms is stronger? a. Copper conducts electricity. This fork is made entirely of copper. So, this fork will conduct electricity. b. Sixteen out of twenty people in this room are first-borns. Shelly is in the room. Shelly is a first-born. 31. Which type of inductive argument moves from something we know about the population to a claim about an individual member of the population? 32. Which type of inductive arguments moves from something we know about a sample of a population to a claim about the entire population? 33. Which type of inductive argument is based upon comparing the similarity between terms? 34. When analyzing an inductive generalization, which of the following could make the argument stronger? a. Larger sample size c. More similarities between the terms of the analogy. b. Smaller sample size d. Vague features 35. When analyzing an inductive argument from analogy, which of the following could make the argument stronger? a. Larger sample size c. More similarities between the terms of the analogy. b. Smaller sample size d. Vague features Read the following passages and select the best answer available. (1pt each) Passage #1: They say Japanese carmakers put out the best cars in the world, all things considered. But that can t be right the Toyota I bought last year had to be returned to the shop five times! 36. What is the sample? 37. What is the target population?

38. What is the feature of this inductive argument? Passage #2: Marcia owns a small fruit stand. She has placed seven orders with wholesale fruit supplier Sweet & Juicy Farms and all of them have been filled with fresh looking fruit. Lately, however, some wholesale competitors have been trying to get her to order from them. But, when it s time to make the next order, she decides she s better off with Sweet & Juicy because she s pretty sure she ll get fresh looking fruit. (Do not assume that you know anything about the fruit business.) 39. If Marcia had placed four orders with Sweet & Juicy Farms with the same result, her argument would be a. Stronger c. No change b. Weaker d. Weaker and stronger at the same time 40. If all the preceding orders had been for apples, then her argument would be stronger if the new order was for a. both apples and oranges. c. just oranges. b. just apples. d. fruit seeds. 41. If we don t know what kind of fruit she s about to order, we have the strongest argument if the previous orders were a. both apples and oranges. c. just oranges. b. just apples. d. fruit seeds. 42. The original passage is an (a) a. Inductive generalization c. Inductive syllogism. b. Argument from analogy d. No argument is presented. 43. The feature here is a. Sweet & Juicy Farms. c. Good looking fruit. b. Marcia s fruit stand. d. Wholesale competitors. Passage #3: Julia is good at bowling. I bet she d be great at poker, they are both games that require skill. 44. Which of the following is a term (analogue) of the analogy? 45. Which of the following is a similarity between the terms of the analogy? 46. Which of the following is the feature (attribute of interest) of the analogy? 47. Which of the following is the conclusion of the argument? a. Julia is good at bowling. c. Bowling and poker are both games that require skill. b. Julia would be great a poker. d. There is no conclusion because it is an anlogy. Passage #4: Most of the time I drive to class there s crazy traffic on the freeway. We ve had around sixteen class meetings already, and I ve been late twelve times!! I m almost certain that out of the next eight class meeting I ll be late about six times! 48. What is the sample size? a. 6 c. 12 b. 8 d. 16

49. What is the confidence level indicator of the conclusion of the argument? a. Most c. Almost certain b. Around d. About 50. Which of the following is the margin of error indicator in the conclusion of the argument? a. Most c. Almost certain b. Around d. About