HUL 841: Philosophy of Science IInd Semester,

Similar documents
Science, Inquiry, and Truth Phil 209A

PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE PHIL 145, FALL 2017

145 Philosophy of Science

Philosophy of Science PHIL 241, MW 12:00-1:15

Intro to Science Studies I

Final grades will be determined by 6 components: Midterm 20% Final 20% Problem Sets 20% Papers 20% Quizzes 10% Section 10%

MY PURPOSE IN THIS BOOK IS TO PRESENT A

PHIL 3150 Philosophy of Science Fall 2016 PHIL 6015 Theory of Knowledge

Philosophy Courses in English

Phil 1103 Review. Also: Scientific realism vs. anti-realism Can philosophers criticise science?

UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY PHILOSOPHY 110A,

CLASS PARTICIPATION IS A REQUIREMENT

EXAM PREP (Semester 2: 2018) Jules Khomo. Linguistic analysis is concerned with the following question:

6AANA026 Philosophy of Science Syllabus Academic year 2015/16

Introduction to Deductive and Inductive Thinking 2017

Unless indicated otherwise, required texts on the syllabus will be available at the Yale University Bookstore.

Course Syllabus.

We aim to cover in some detail a number of issues currently debated in the philosophy of natural and social science.

HPSC0004 Philosophy of Science 1. Course Syllabus

Sydenham College of Commerce & Economics. * Dr. Sunil S. Shete. * Associate Professor

7AAN2075 Philosophy of Science Syllabus Academic year 2016/17

ORIGINS OF MODERN PHILOSOPHY The Problem of Induction

The problems of induction in scientific inquiry: Challenges and solutions. Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction Defining induction...

PH 1000 Introduction to Philosophy, or PH 1001 Practical Reasoning

FINAL EXAM REVIEW SHEET. objectivity intersubjectivity ways the peer review system is supposed to improve objectivity

PHILOSOPHY EPISTEMOLOGY ESSAY TOPICS AND INSTRUCTIONS

COURSE GOALS: PROFESSOR: Chris Latiolais Philosophy Department Kalamazoo College Humphrey House #202 Telephone # Offices Hours:

course PHIL 80: Introduction to Philosophical Problems, Fall 2018

CLASS #17: CHALLENGES TO POSITIVISM/BEHAVIORAL APPROACH

Positive Philosophy, Freedom and Democracy. Roger Bishop Jones

Positive Philosophy, Freedom and Democracy. Roger Bishop Jones

Recap. Contents EMPIRICISM. Reductionism and Idealism. Early Carnap. Game plan. Reading and final essay. Recap: Russell s phenomenalism

Syllabus. Mr. Israelsen Office: 7145 Beering Hall Spring Term Office Hours: Wednesday 12:30 2:00pm and by appointment

DOMINICAN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE

Philosophy A465: Introduction to Analytic Philosophy Loyola University of New Orleans Ben Bayer Spring 2011

Phil 83- Introduction to Philosophical Problems Spring 2018 Course # office hours: M/W/F, 12pm-1pm, and by appointment. Course Description:

Falsification or Confirmation: From Logic to Psychology

PHIL 155: The Scientific Method, Part 1: Naïve Inductivism. January 14, 2013

SUMMARIES AND TEST QUESTIONS UNIT David Hume: The Origin of Our Ideas and Skepticism about Causal Reasoning

Learning from Mistakes Karl Popper and Thomas Kuhn

Virtual Mentor American Medical Association Journal of Ethics January 2013, Volume 15, Number 1:

HPS 1653 / PHIL 1610 Introduction to the Philosophy of Science

A Quick Review of the Scientific Method Transcript

PHILOSOPHIES OF SCIENTIFIC TESTING

Philosophy 780: After Empiricism: Experience and Reality in Kant, Hegel, and Sellars

List of Courses Taught 2. Possible Course Offerings 3. Evidence of Teaching Quality 4. Teaching Referees 9. Sample Syllabi 10

26:010:685 Social Science Methods in Accounting Research

UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA MATHEMATICS AS MAKE-BELIEVE: A CONSTRUCTIVE EMPIRICIST ACCOUNT SARAH HOFFMAN

A Brief History of Scientific Thoughts Lecture 5. Palash Sarkar

Philosophy of Science. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology

Class 6 - Scientific Method

Courses providing assessment data PHL 202. Semester/Year

HPS 1653 / PHIL 1610 Introduction to the Philosophy of Science

Josh Parsons MWF 10:00-10:50a.m., 194 Chemistry CRNs: Introduction to Philosophy, (eds.) Perry and Bratman

NORTON ANTHOLOGY OF WESTERN PHILOSOPHY: AFTER KANT TABLE OF CONTENTS. Volume 2: The Analytic Tradition. Preface Acknowledgments GENERAL INTRODUCTION

The Human Science Debate: Positivist, Anti-Positivist, and Postpositivist Inquiry. By Rebecca Joy Norlander. November 20, 2007

Scientific Method and Research Ethics

PHILOSOPHY 3340 EPISTEMOLOGY

20 TH CENTURY PHILOSOPHY [PHIL ], SPRING 2017

INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY PHIL 1, FALL 2017

Epistemology. Some epistemological questions:

Two Ways of Thinking

PL 406 HISTORY OF MODERN PHILOSOPHY Fall 2009

Chapter 31. Logical Positivism and the Scientific Conception of Philosophy

Syllabus for THE 470 Philosophy of Religion 3.0 Credit Hours Fall The major goals are to enable the student to do the following:

University of International Business and Economics International Summer Sessions. PHI 110: Introduction to Philosophy

Syllabus. Primary Sources, 2 edition. Hackett, Various supplementary handouts, available in class and on the course website.

Philosophy of Science

Epistemology Naturalized

Module 1: Science as Culture Demarcation, Autonomy and Cognitive Authority of Science

The Philosophy of Logic

MARK KAPLAN AND LAWRENCE SKLAR. Received 2 February, 1976) Surely an aim of science is the discovery of the truth. Truth may not be the

complete state of affairs and an infinite set of events in one go. Imagine the following scenarios:

HPS 1653 / PHIL 1610 Revision Guide (all topics)

The Problem of Induction and Popper s Deductivism

There are two common forms of deductively valid conditional argument: modus ponens and modus tollens.

Quine And Analytic Philosophy (Korean Edition)

Conventionalism and the linguistic doctrine of logical truth

The Theory/Experiment Interface of the Observation of Black Holes

PHILOSOPHY IAS MAINS: QUESTIONS TREND ANALYSIS

LIFE, DEATH, FREEDOM A Comparative Introduction to Philosophy: The Classical Greek, Indian and Chinese Traditions

Business Research: Principles and Processes MGMT6791 Workshop 1A: The Nature of Research & Scientific Method

Naturalism Fall Winter 2004

Syllabus. Tiffany Montoya Office: 7143 Beering Hall Office Hours: 9:00am 11:00am Monday and by appointment

Post-Empiricism and Philosophy of Science

MICHAELMAS TERM 2013 ESSAY TOPICS: JUNIOR FRESHMEN SHP, TSM

Lecture 6. Realism and Anti-realism Kuhn s Philosophy of Science

PHILOSOPHY EPISTEMOLOGY

Verificationism. PHIL September 27, 2011

West Los Angeles College. Philosophy 1 Introduction to Philosophy. Spring Instructor. Rick Mayock, Professor of Philosophy

Introduction to Political Science

Karl Popper & The Philosophy of Science. What Makes a Theory Scientific?

Department of Philosophy

DAVIDSON AND CONCEPTUAL SCHEMES PAUL BROADBENT. A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY

PHIL 100 AO1 Introduction to Philosophy

Knowledge, Reality, and Values CORC 1210 SYLLABUS

Module 1: Science as Culture Methods of Science: Issues and Perspectives. Lecture 1 Methods of Science: Issues and Perspectives

V3301 Twentieth-Century Philosophy PHIL V TR 2:40pm-3:55pm- 516 Hamilton Hall - Fall Professor D. Sidorsky

Introduction: Becoming Paul M. Churchland (1942 )

A Brief History of Thinking about Thinking Thomas Lombardo

Transcription:

HUL 841: Philosophy of Science IInd Semester, 2013-14 Arudra Burra Department of Humanities and Social Science Indian Institute of Technology-Delhi January 6, 2014 Course description History, if viewed as a repository for more than anecdote or chronology, could produce a decisive transformation in the image of science by which we are now possessed. These are the famous first lines of Thomas Kuhn s classic The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962) in its own way a revolution in the study of science, and the source of a host of terms ( paradigm shift, incommensurability ) into our lexicon more generally. Our main aim in this class is to study and assess the contribution of this book to our understanding of science. We will start by trying to understand just what was the image of science by which Kuhn took his readers to be possessed, taking a close look at the work of the logical empiricists and of Karl Popper. Then we will proceed to read Structure carefully from beginning to end, making some stops and detours along the way to examine more general philosophical issues raised by the book, concerning such matters as the nature of theory and observation, meaning and reference, rationality and relativism. Pre-requisites and expectations There are no pre-requisites except enthusiasm, a willingness to work, and a tolerance for uncertainty. Since we will be carrying on a sustained conversation from one class to the next, I expect you to attend every class. The reading is likely to be in the neighbourhood of 30-40 pages a week, of varying levels of difficulty expect to read the material at least 2-3 times in order to get the hang of it. For students unfamiliar with philosophical reading and writing, I encourage you to consult Jim Pryor s invaluable advice: http://www.jimpryor.net/teaching/ index.html. Another electronic resource well worth consulting is the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: http://plato.stanford.edu/. 1

Administrative matters The course will meet once a week for three hours, tentatively from 5-8 pm on Wednesdays in the HSS Committee Room (MS 610), starting 8.1.2014. Readings will be available from SCOOPS, and online as well (Structure is available on flipkart.com: it is expensive, but well worth buying). Please note that I do not permit the use of laptops in class or in exams, so you must bring hardcopies. I will finalise my office hours in the first couple of weeks of the semester, but in general it is best to email me (burra@hss.iitd.ac.in) in order to make an appointment first. (I do not check email at night or over the weekend). My office is MS 620. Evaluation Pass-marks: 40% 50%: response-papers 50%: in-class final exam (4-6 hours) You will be required to submit six response-papers of about two pages each during the course of the semester (roughly one every two weeks), as indicated in the schedule below. Each will be graded out of 10 marks: I will choose the top five to compute your grade for this component of the course. In these papers I will expect you to reflect upon the readings and class discussions, and raise one or two points which you wish to discuss further in class. You will be graded on the basis of the clarity of your exposition, and the evident sincerity of your efforts to grapple with the material. Please arrange to have a hardcopy of your paper in my department mailbox by 5 pm on the day before class: you will lose one mark for every day of delay. In order to pass this class you must have submitted all response-papers in a timely fashion. The final, in-class, open-book exam will cover material from the entire course. Schedule of readings The following schedule is tentative, in that I may add or drop readings along the way, but the structure will remain more-or-less the same. 2

Week 1: Introduction 1. James Ladyman, Understanding Philosophy of Science [UPS], chapter one ( Induction and inductivism ), pp. 1-18 2. Peter Godfrey-Smith, Theory and Reality [TR], chapter one ( Introduction ), pp. 1-13 Week 2: Logical empiricism I 1. David Hume, Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (Selby-Bigge edition), pp. 163-5 2. TR, chapter two ( Logic plus Empiricism ), pp. 19-30 and 34-37 3. Alfred Ayer, Editor s Introduction, in Ayer, ed. Logical Positivism, pp. 3-17 4. Rudolf Carnap, The Elimination of Metaphysics through Logical Analysis of Language, in Ayer, ed. Logical Positivism, pp. 60-81 Week 3: Logical empiricism II Response paper #1 due 1. Carl Hempel, Philosophy of Natural Science, chapters two ( Scientific Inquiry: Invention and Test ) and three ( The Test of a Hypothesis: Its Logic and Its Force ), pp. 2-32 2. Ernest Nagel, The Structure of Science, chapter eleven ( The Reduction of Theories ), pp. 336-45 Week 4: Induction and confirmation 1. UPS, chapter one ( Induction and inductivism ), pp. 18-30 2. Martin Curd and J. A. Cover, Commentary on Induction, Prediction, and Evidence, in Curd and Cover, ed. Philosophy of Science: The Central Issues [PSCI] (2nd ed), pp. 457-463 3. Bertrand Russell, The Problems of Philosophy, chapter six ( On Induction ), pp. 60-9 4. Carl Hempel, Aspects of Scientific Explanation, chapter one ( Studies in the Logic of Confirmation ), pp. 3-13 3

Week 5: Falsificationism Response paper #2 due 1. Karl Popper, Science: Conjectures and Refutations, in Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, pp. 33-59 2. UPS, chapter three ( Falsificationism ), pp. 62-92 3. W. H. Newton-Smith, The Rationality of Science, chapters three ( Popper The Irrational Rationalist ) and four ( In Search of the Methodologist s Stone ), pp. 46-49, 59-64, 70-76 Week 6: Structure I 1. Structure, chapter one ( Introduction: A Role for History ), pp. 1-9 2. UPS, chapter four ( Revolutions and rationality ), pp. 93-98 3. Ian Hacking, Representing and Intervening, chapter one ( Introduction: Rationality ), pp. 1-7 4. Israel Scheffler, Science and Subjectivity, chapter one ( Objectivity under Attack ), pp. 1-19 Week 7: Structure II Response paper #3 due 1. UPS, chapter four contd., pp. 98-101 2. Structure, chapters two-five and Postscript 1-3, pp. 10-51 and 174-91 Week 8: Interlude I theory and observation 1. UPS, chapter four contd., pp. 109-115 2. Norwood Russell Hanson, Patterns of Discovery, chapter one ( Observation ), pp. 4-30 3. Peter Achinstein, Concepts of Science, chapters five ( Observational Terms ) and six ( Theoretical Terms ), pp. 157-65, 179-86 Week 9: Structure III Response paper #4 due 1. Structure, chapters six-eight, pp. 52-91 4

Week 10: Interlude II holism 1. Pierre Duhem, Physical Theory and Experiment in PSCI, pp. 227-49 2. Quine, Two Dogmas of Empiricism ( 6) in PSCI, pp. 265-8 Week 11: Structure IV Response paper #5 due 1. Structure, chapters nine-eleven, pp. 92-143 Week 12: Interlude III incommensurability Readings TBA Week 13: Structure V Response paper #6 due 1. Structure, chapters twelve-thirteen, pp. 144-73 Week 14: Rationality and Scientific Progress Readings TBA 5