UNIVERSITY COMMITTEE ON DISCIPLINE Hearing Script

Similar documents
UNIVERSITY COMMITTEE ON DISCIPLINE Hearing Script

Student Honor Code Introduction

HONOR CODE. We will strive to build a community based on respect, honesty, and courage.

WEST POTOMAC HIGH SCHOOL HONOR CODE

The Pledge: "As a member of the William and Mary community, I pledge on my honor not to lie, cheat, or steal, either in my academic or personal life.

WEST POTOMAC HIGH SCHOOL HONOR CODE

Holding Our Sisters Accountable

BEFORE THE ALASKA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ON REFERRAL FROM THE ALASKA POLICE STANDARDS COUNCIL DECISION

COMMITTEE ON MINISTERIAL PREPARATION The American Baptist Churches of Massachusetts. A Guide for Pastors

Honor System Guidebook and Constitution

A Guide for Pastors. Getting Started. The Preordination License

COOK COUNTY SHERIFF'S MERIT BOARD. Docket # 1850 DECISION

UNIVERSITY TRIBUNAL THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO. IN THE MATTER OF charges of academic dishonesty filed October 12, 2016

REL 3148: RELIGION AND VIOLENCE Summer B 2016

ENTRY ORDER SUPREME COURT DOCKET NO JULY TERM, 2011

Course Objectives: Our goal is to develop skills and knowledge while giving equal weight to the following four areas of competence:

SOUTHWEST CHRISTIAN ACADEMY

ASSEMBLIES OF THE LORD JESUS CHRIST

d. terminate the call of a minister of Word and Service in conformity with the constitution of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America;

JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH DECISION 1315

Saint Demetrios Greek Orthodox Church Code of Conduct

Report of the Board of Trustees. In the Matter of Professor Fei Wang

The Honor Code William & Mary School of Law Honor Council Fall 2015

IN THE MATTER OF a Proceeding under the Certified General Accountants of Ontario Act, 1983 and By-Law Four

Syllabus for PRM 767 The Preacher as Evangelist 3 Credit Hours Fall 2015

AN ECCLESIASTICAL POLICY AND A PROCESS FOR REVIEW OF MINISTERIAL STANDING of the AMERICAN BAPTIST CHURCHES OF NEBRASKA PREAMBLE:

EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN AMERICA DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINE HEARING COMMITTEE

BYLAWS The Mount 860 Keller Smithfield Road Keller, TX 76248

Syllabus for PRM 661 Introduction to Preaching 3 Credit Hours Fall 2013

REL 4141, Fall 2013 RELIGION AND SOCIAL CHANGE

AS APPROVED BY THE 2016 CHURCHWIDE ASSEMBLY Official Notice of Required Provisions

Hebrew 1131: Beginning Modern Hebrew 2. Sections: 1E54, 3904, 06AD,

COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED 2016 GENERAL SYNOD CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGES Written By Howard Moths October 1, 2016

The Law Society of Alberta Hearing Committee Report

Additions are underlined. Deletions are struck through in the text.

REDEEMER CHURCH OF SOUTH HILLS

Conflict Resolution: Resources for the churches of the Canadian Baptists of Western Canada

APPEARANCES. Law Office of James C. White, P.C Emperor Blvd., Suite 400 Durham, NC 27703

Spring 2015 REL 3563 (01ED) AMERICAN CATHOLICISM

UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST BOARD STANDING RULES Reviewed and Revised October 9, 2015

STUDY OF RELIGIONS: DEPARTMENT OF COMPARATIVE RELIGION SCHOOL OF PHILOSOPHY & RELIGION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. December 2010

AMENDMENTS TO THE MODEL CONSTITUTION FOR CONGREGATIONS

GENEVA COLLEGE. at the CENTER FOR URBAN BIBLICAL MINISTRY. Serving Western Pennsylvania since 1988

Course Number: MTH 380 Course Title: Theology of the Body Term: Spring Instructor

S/PPRC Covenant Template

Church of Orange GUIDING PRINCIPLES. ARTICLE 1: MISSION PRINCIPLES (MP) Defining what difference this church will make for whom and to what extent

Definition. Policy (Westwood By-Laws call for Church Discipline of members when necessary)

The final grade is determined by class participation, an objective mid-term examination, and a minute oral examination at the end of the term.

FACULTY APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT Active for 180 Days

By Water and the Spirit (available at

Preaching OT Literature

LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA HEARING COMMITTEE REPORT. IN THE MATTER OF the Legal Profession Act (the LPA ); and

SAMPLE ASSESSMENT ANSWER KEY

Summary of Registration Changes

Ethics Policy of The Brandeis Hoot As adopted from The Society of Professional Journalists Ethics Code

Seventh-day Adventist Church Manual on Transfers

VII. Legislation. VII Legislation

EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN SOUTHERN AFRICA YOUNG ADULTS LEAGUE

Trial Roles. Attorney Witness Research Assistant Jury Prepare testimony with witnesses Prepare questions for crossexamination

Guidelines for Handling Abuse Allegations against a Church Leader. A. Why a Procedure for Handling Abuse Allegations Is Necessary

Revised November 2017

CONSTITUTION CAPITOL HILL BAPTIST CHURCH WASHINGTON, D.C. of the

REL 4177/5549: Christian Social Ethics Spring 2013 Tues. 4, 6 Matherly/Thurs. 4-5, 12 Matherly

TIMELINE DONALD MCGUIRE Donald McGuire is ordained and assigned to Loyola Academy, Wilmette, IL. The Jesuits send McGuire to Europe.

EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN SOUTHERN AFRICA YOUNG ADULT LEAGUE CONSTITUTION

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

ANSWER: Now comes Htin Myat Win, Respondent herein, by his attorney, Carl R. Draper,

San Joaquin Valley Christian School Association. Staff Application

REL 6387/LAS 6938: RELIGIONS IN LATIN AMERICA Spring 2017 Tues. 4, Thurs. 4/5

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION. Liquor License Appeal of Citation Notice to Bar- 40 Pa.Code 5.

Introduction to South Asia

CURRICULUM ON LEADERSHIP

THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, CAPE TOWN JUDGMENT

Syllabus for PRM 669 Practice Preaching 2 Credit Hours Fall 2010

BYLAWS. Church of the Saviour. Wayne, Pennsylvania FINAL REVISION STATUS: Approved by the Elder Council

Anthony Mangan an Order to Show Cause. The Order was predicated on charges of

Name: First Middle Last. Other names used (alias, maiden, nickname): Current Address: Street/P.O. Box City State Zip Code

SPEAKUP365: Speaker Qualification

CONWAY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION

BYLAWS OF THE JOHNSTON EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH

Course Syllabus. II. Required Reading

Frequently Asked Questions ECO s Polity (Organization & Governance)

4. Worksheet: Build a customized catechetical session for your catechumens

BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR. In the Matter of the Arbitration of a Dispute Between MILWAUKEE COUNTY. and MILWAUKEE DEPUTY SHERIFF S ASSOCIATION

Living Word. School of Ministry

Syllabus for GTHE 624 Christian Apologetics 3 Credit Hours Spring 2017

Supporting Documents Archdeacon of Hereford

Syllabus for PRM 669 Practice Preaching 3 Credit Hours Spring 2017

Missionary Discipline Policy

SIGMA PHI LAMBDA CONSTITUTION

REQUIRED TEXTS Beougher, Timothy K. Richard Baxter and Conversion: A Study of the Puritan Concept of Becoming a Christian. Christian Focus, 2008.

Syllabus for PRM 669 Practice Preaching 3 Credit Hours Fall 2013

MANUAL ON MINISTRY. Student in Care of Association. United Church of Christ. Section 2 of 10

Application for Member in Discernment

Southside Baptist Church of Jacksonville, Florida Bylaws

CANONS III.7.9-III.8.2

Political Science 206 Modern Political Philosophy Spring Semester 2011 Clark University

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

Constitution First Baptist Church Camden, Arkansas. Preamble. Article I. Name. Article II. Purpose Statement (amended May 10, 2006)

REL 315/JST 315: Hebrew Bible (icourse) Fall 2016

Transcription:

OSC UCOD HEARING SCRIPT Page 1 OFFICE OF STUDENT CONDUCT & COMMUNITY EXPECTATIONS UNIVERSITY COMMITTEE ON DISCIPLINE Hearing Script NOTES: A quorum of four is necessary; five is preferred. The Chairperson of the committee will be a faculty member and will be responsible for leading the process. The Office of Student Conduct will have a hearing officer present to ensure that the process is followed properly. All witnesses will wait outside the hearing room until called by the case officer. Portions in RED are to be read by the chairperson. STAGE 1 INTRODUCTORY STAGE CASE OFFICER reads the following: (Tape recorder does not need to be on): This hearing is to determine whether the accused student (organization) is responsible for the listed violations of the University Code of Conduct. The University community has developed this fundamentally fair process to provide a forum for matters like this to be resolved. We begin by making sure that all the involved people are aware of their rights and responsibilities, and that the accused is aware of the charges in this case. The accused is asked to enter a plea on each charge and then is given the opportunity to make a statement. We then move into the information seeking stage. First, any witnesses called forth by the University are questioned by the panel, then by the accused. In Stage 3, the accused can then make a statement and the accused s witnesses, if any, are called and questioned by the accused and then by the panel. In Stage 4, the accused is then questioned by the committee. The accused does not have to answer any questions. In Stage 5, any witnesses that were notified previously are recalled and questioned. In academic integrity cases, we always recall the professor involved and summarize the student s testimony. In Stage 6, the accused can make a final statement and the hearing room is cleared. In private session, the board determines whether the accused is responsible or not responsible based on a preponderance of the evidence. The accused is then informed of the determination. If responsible, the judicial case officer will review all past judicial matters in which the student was found responsible. Then the student makes a statement. The room is cleared and a decision on sanctions and rationale are developed by the committee. This determination is read to the accused. The accused is reminded of the appeals process.

OSC UCOD HEARING SCRIPT Page 2 Would everyone please introduce themselves and explain their function at this hearing? AT THIS POINT THE CASE OFFICER MAY DECIDE TO CALL ALL WITNESSES IN AT ONE TIME TO REVIEW THE HONESTY STATEMENT. PLEASE ASK THE HEARING OFFICER FOR ASSISSTANCE. (to accused) You have been accused of violating the Lehigh University Code of Conduct and, therefore, are not required to answer any questions that are asked of you at any disciplinary proceedings. However, any information you choose to provide must be true and correct. If you intentionally provide false or misleading information to the hearing panel, you will be in violation of the Lehigh University Expectations of Conduct and additional charges may be filed against you. Additionally, a pattern of lying or fabrication will be considered by the hearing panel/conduct officer when imposing sanctions in this case. * Do you understand this statement? * Did you receive notification of the charges against you? * Did you have a pre-hearing interview with a member of the Dean of Students Office? * Do you understand your rights and responsibilities as outlined in the Lehigh University Code of Conduct? If the accused student answers NO to any of these questions, the hearing officer will make a reasonable attempt to rectify this situation. You have been accused of the following charges related to the incident described below. Please enter a plea of responsible or not responsible to each charge. The Chairperson will read the narrative and charges making sure to note the pleas that are entered by the accused. You make now make a statement that we will not question until later in the hearing. STAGE 2 INFORMATION SEEKING PART 1 The first witness brought forward by the University will be brought into the room. They will be read one of the following statements depending on their status: STUDENT WITNESSES: Lehigh University expects that all information presented will be true, complete, and correct. If you intentionally provide false or misleading information to the hearing panel, you will be in violation of the Lehigh University Expectations of Conduct ; specifically, Expectation IV: Respect for the Lehigh University Community. You are subject to disciplinary action for providing false information. A pattern of lying or fabricating information by the respondent may be considered when sanctions are being imposed. FACULTY/STAFF: The Office of Student Conduct has called you to provide information related to a student conduct matter. The University expects that all the information you provide will be true and correct.

OSC UCOD HEARING SCRIPT Page 3 The committee will begin by questioning the witness. When the committee has completed its questioning, the accused will be given a chance to question the witness. After ensuring that there are no more immediate questions, the chairperson will ask the following: Is there any reason this witness needs to be recalled. (In cases of academic integrity violations the professor is always recalled) If the witness needs to be recalled, they will be instructed to wait outside and not discuss the case with anyone. This process will be repeated for each witness that the University has called. STAGE 3 ACCUSED S PRESENTATION You may now make a statement that will not be questioned until later in the hearing. The first witness brought forward by the accused will be brought into the room. They will be read one of the following statements depending on their status: STUDENT WITNESSES: Lehigh University expects that all information presented will be true, complete, and correct. If you intentionally provide false or misleading information to the hearing panel, you will be in violation of the Lehigh University Expectations of Conduct ; specifically, Expectation IV: Respect for the Lehigh University Community. You are subject to disciplinary action for providing false information. A pattern of lying or fabricating information by the respondent may be considered when sanctions are being imposed. FACULTY/STAFF: The Office of Student Conduct has called you to provide information related to a student conduct matter. The University expects that all the information you provide will be true and correct. The accused will begin by questioning the witness. When the accused has completed his or her questioning, the committee will be given a chance to question the witness. After ensuring that there are no more immediate questions, the chairperson will ask the following: Is there any reason this witness needs to be recalled. If the witness needs to be recalled, they will be instructed to wait outside and not discuss the case with anyone. This process will be repeated for each witness that the University has called. STAGE 4 QUESTIONING OF THE ACCUSED We will now begin questioning you. You are reminded that you do not have to answer any questions, but you are still bound by the honesty statement that you were read at the beginning of this hearing. The committee questions the accused. STAGE 5 RECALLED WITNESSES If there are witnesses to be recalled, they will be recalled at this time. The witness will be questioned first by whoever chose to recall them (the Committee or the accused) In cases involving academic integrity violations, the professor who brought the case forward will be recalled first and given a brief summary of the testimony that was given. After that summary, the committee and the accused will be able to question the professor. In cases such as this, the committee will begin the questioning.

OSC UCOD HEARING SCRIPT Page 4 STAGE 6 FINAL STATEMENT You may now make a final statement that will not be questioned. The student will be permitted to make a statement. The accused student is now dismissed while we deliberate each of the charges separately. The accused and the case officer and any other persons present who are not members of the University Committee on Discipline will be asked to wait outside until the Committee calls them back in. STAGE 7 DELIBERATION The committee will now review each charge individually and determine, using the standard of preponderance of evidence, if the accused is responsible for any of the charges. The Committee will recall the hearing officer and the accused student and their university friend to the room. CHAIRPERSON: You were charged with violations of the Code of Conduct related to the following incident (READS NARRATIVE) I will now read the charges, your plea and our finding. (CHARGE) You pled (PLEA) We found you (FINDING) This will be repeated for each charge. The rationale for our finding is : (RATIONALE) If the student is found not responsible for all charges, then the hearing is over. If the student has been found responsible, the hearing will continue. STAGE 8 SANCTIONS The hearing officer will review any previous incidents in which the student was found responsible for violations of the Code of Conduct. You may now make a statement prior to the committee determining sanctions. THE COMMITTEE MAY ASK QUESTIONS CONCERNING THE PAST CONDUCT OR THE STUDENT S FINAL STATEMENTS BUT THE STUDENT IS NOT REQUIRED TO ANSWER. The hearing officer will give the Committee a list of similar cases and how they were resolved in the past. The room will then be cleared of everyone except the Committee members. The Committee will determine sanctions and an appropriate rationale for the sanctions imposed. The Committee will recall the hearing officer and the accused student and their university friend to the room.

OSC UCOD HEARING SCRIPT Page 5 CHAIRPERSON: We have assigned the following sanctions in this case with the below rationale. You have the right to appeal this decision. Please contact the Office of Student Conduct immediately following this hearing for information regarding the appeals process. This hearing is concluded. HEARING ENDS