PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY

Similar documents
PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 7 : E P I S T E M O L O G Y - K A N T

PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 7 : E P I S T E M O L O G Y - K A N T

Immanuel Kant, Analytic and Synthetic. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics Preface and Preamble

Important dates. PSY 3360 / CGS 3325 Historical Perspectives on Psychology Minds and Machines since David Hume ( )

WHAT IS HUME S FORK? Certainty does not exist in science.

Excerpt from J. Garvey, The Twenty Greatest Philosophy Books (Continuum, 2007): Immanuel Kant s Critique of Pure Reason

Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

24.01 Classics of Western Philosophy

Thursday, November 30, 17. Hegel s Idealism

Tuesday, November 11, Hegel s Idealism

Rationalism. A. He, like others at the time, was obsessed with questions of truth and doubt

The CopernicanRevolution

Kant s Transcendental Idealism

Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

The Copernican Shift and Theory of Knowledge in Immanuel Kant and Edmund Husserl.

Kant & Transcendental Idealism

Lecture 18: Rationalism

Transition: From A priori To Anselm

Think by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 7c The World

Philosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy. Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2014

Tuesday, September 2, Idealism

The British Empiricism

KANT, MORAL DUTY AND THE DEMANDS OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON. The law is reason unaffected by desire.

A Priori Knowledge: Analytic? Synthetic A Priori (again) Is All A Priori Knowledge Analytic?

FACULTY OF ARTS B.A. Part II Examination,

Think by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 1b Knowledge

SCIENCE AND METAPHYSICS Part III SCIENTIFIC EPISTEMOLOGY? David Tin Win α & Thandee Kywe β. Abstract

! Jumping ahead 2000 years:! Consider the theory of the self.! What am I? What certain knowledge do I have?! Key figure: René Descartes.

Epistemology. Diogenes: Master Cynic. The Ancient Greek Skeptics 4/6/2011. But is it really possible to claim knowledge of anything?

A (Very) Brief Introduction to Epistemology Lecture 2. Palash Sarkar

UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT QUESTION BANK

A. Aristotle D. Descartes B. Plato E. Hume

Hume. Hume the Empiricist. Judgments about the World. Impressions as Content of the Mind. The Problem of Induction & Knowledge of the External World

Intro to Philosophy. Review for Exam 2

FIL 4600/10/20: KANT S CRITIQUE AND CRITICAL METAPHYSICS

Task 1: Philosophical Questions. Question 1: To what extent do you shape your own destiny, and how much is down to fate?

Empiricism. HZT4U1 - Mr. Wittmann - Unit 3 - Lecture 3

Hume on Ideas, Impressions, and Knowledge

Immanuel Kant. Retirado de: (25/01/2018)

Philosophy of Mathematics Kant

Kant s Copernican Revolution

CHAPTER III KANT S APPROACH TO A PRIORI AND A POSTERIORI

In The California Undergraduate Philosophy Review, vol. 1, pp Fresno, CA: California State University, Fresno.

WHY SHOULD ANYONE BELIEVE ANYTHING AT ALL?

History of Modern Philosophy. Hume ( )

How Trustworthy is the Bible? (1) Written by Cornelis Pronk

PHILOSOPHICAL RAMIFICATIONS: THEORY, EXPERIMENT, & EMPIRICAL TRUTH

DAVIDSON AND CONCEPTUAL SCHEMES PAUL BROADBENT. A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY

7AAN2039 Kant I: Critique of Pure Reason Syllabus Academic year 2015/16

the aim is to specify the structure of the world in the form of certain basic truths from which all truths can be derived. (xviii)

NOTES ON A PRIORI KNOWLEDGE 10/6/03

The Coherence of Kant s Synthetic A Priori

Philosophy 3100: Ethical Theory

- We might, now, wonder whether the resulting concept of justification is sufficiently strong. According to BonJour, apparent rational insight is

IDHEF Chapter 2 Why Should Anyone Believe Anything At All?

Epistemology. Theory of Knowledge

Critique of Pure Reason up to the end of the Analytic

Lecture 4.2 Aquinas Phil Religion TOPIC: Aquinas Cosmological Arguments for the existence of God. Critiques of Aquinas arguments.

In Defense of Radical Empiricism. Joseph Benjamin Riegel. Chapel Hill 2006

Kant s theory of concept formation and the role of mind

1/9. The Second Analogy (1)

Ayer s linguistic theory of the a priori

CHRISTIANITY AND THE NATURE OF SCIENCE J.P. MORELAND

Reading Questions for Phil , Fall 2012 (Daniel)

In Defense of Pure Reason: A Rationalist Account of A Priori Justification, by Laurence BonJour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,

Introduction to Philosophy PHL 221, York College Revised, Spring 2017

1/9. The First Analogy

This handout follows the handout on The nature of the sceptic s challenge. You should read that handout first.

GROUP A WESTERN PHILOSOPHY (40 marks)

Hume, skepticism, and the search for foundations

Introductory Kant Seminar Lecture

Supplemental Material 2a: The Proto-psychologists. In this presentation, we will have a short review of the Scientific Revolution and the

ABSTRACT of the Habilitation Thesis

Class #3 - Illusion Descartes, from Meditations on First Philosophy Descartes, The Story of the Wax Descartes, The Story of the Sun

Logic, Truth & Epistemology. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology

1/7. The Postulates of Empirical Thought

Introduction to Philosophy

Kantian Realism. Jake Quilty-Dunn. Kantian Realism 75

Philosophy Epistemology. Topic 3 - Skepticism

Logic and the Discursive Intellect

Introduction to Philosophy. Daniel von Wachter

1/8. The Schematism. schema of empirical concepts, the schema of sensible concepts and the

Modern Philosophy II

Unit 2. WoK 1 - Perception. Tuesday, October 7, 14

Of Skepticism with Regard to the Senses. David Hume

Understanding How we Come to Experience Purposive. Behavior. Jacob Roundtree. Colby College Mayflower Hill, Waterville, ME USA

Epistemology and sensation

MORAL RESPONSIBILITY AND THE NATURAL ORDER

Theme 1: Arguments for the existence of God inductive, AS

From Transcendental Logic to Transcendental Deduction

I: Context in MATSEC AM 25: Module 3, Question 3

KANTIAN ETHICS: A CRITIQUE

EPISTEMOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS OF KANT S NOTION OF SPACE AND TIME

Class 2 - Foundationalism

THE IDEA OF A PRIORI REVISITED* SANJIT CHAKRABORTY

A HOLISTIC VIEW ON KNOWLEDGE AND VALUES

PHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEMS & THE ANALYSIS OF LANGUAGE

PHIL 155: The Scientific Method, Part 1: Naïve Inductivism. January 14, 2013

What da ya know? (And how do you know?)

So, among your current vast store of indubitable beliefs are the following: It seems to me that I am in Philosophy 100.

Transcription:

PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 7 - D A Y 2 ( T / T H ) : E P I S T E M O L O G Y E M P I R I C I S M, R A T I O N A L I S M, M I D T E R M D I S C U S S I O N

REVIEW: EPISTEMOLOGY How do We Know Anything? Three Major Theories of Justification: Skepticism Empiricism Rationalism

REVIEW: EMPIRICISTS We Can Know Through Experience/Perception! But Our Perceptions Are not Always Trustworthy 1 Problems of Perception

REVIEW: EMPIRICISTS We Can Tell You - John s brain has brain cells. But They Can t Tell Us - All brain s have brain cells. 2. Problems of Induction

REVIEW: EMPIRICISTS We Can Tell You - Pool stick hit cue ball, cue ball hit, 8 ball, 8 ball goes into corner pocket. But They Can t Tell Us - One thing caused the other to happen. 3. Problems of Causation

REVIEW: RATIONALISM What do the rationalists say about these problems? WE DON T HAVE THESE PROBLEMS. REAL KNOWLEDGE ONLY COMES FROM REASON!!

REVIEW: RATIONALISM Using Our Intellect (reason/logic) Example #1 If know sum of angles = 180 degrees, angle C =? Example #2 If one plank is 2 in. long How long are two planks together? What s the empirical approach to this question? What s the empirical approach to this question?

REVIEW: RATIONALISM Necessary Truths Exist (Truth is not Contingent on Experience) A bachelor is an unmarried male. 2+1 = 3 A sister is a female sibling. Two is more than one.

REVIEW - RATIONALISM: USE OF DEDUCTION Use of Reason to Expand Knowledge Ex ample1: If John is a bachelor. Then John does not have a wife. Example 2: If 2 + x = 3 Then X = 1 Example 3: If Mary has a female sibling, Then Mary has a sister. Example 4: If Juan has 2 cars, and Jen has 1 car, Then Juan has more cars than Jen.

CRITIQUE OF RATIONALISM So is rationalism the only path to true knowledge? 1. Wait a minute. Let s look at those necessary truths again. A bachelor is an unmarried male. 2+1 = 3 A sister is a female sibling. Two is more than one. They are all truths by definition. They don t tell us anything about the world. Can that really be knowledge?

CRITIQUE OF RATIONALISM So is rationalism the only path to true knowledge? 2. Let s take a look at that deductions again. If John is a bachelor. Then John does not have a wife. If Mary has a female sibling, Then Mary has a sister. If Juan has 2 cars, and Jen has 1 car, Then Juan has more cars than Jen. To know anything about the world, you needed to have used empiricism before you use deduction.

DISCUSSION Describe three issues (perception, induction, causation) with empiricism. How might you defend it against its critics? Why do some find rationalism more appealing than empiricism as a justification for knowledge? Do we ever really know anything a priori? If so provide examples. If not explain why.

KANT S EPISTEMOLOGY Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) German Philosopher Changed epistemology forever with 1) Kant s Compromise 2) Kant s Copernican Revolution

KANT S COMPROMISE Yes, empiricists, there are contingent truths known by experience. But the mind does not passively take in sensory information. We are not blank slates. Yes, rationalists, there are necessary truths known through reason. But knowledge is not gained by reason alone. Let s make a compromise!!

KANT S COMPROMISE We need to change the way we look at knowledge and say there are different types of truths. Distinction #1: a priori (before experience) a posteriori (after experience) Distinction #2: Let s make another distinction: Analytic = true by definition, not new info. Synthetic = truth beyond definition alone, provides new info

KANT S COMPROMISE 4 CLASSIFICATIONS OF JUDGMENTS See! Reason does give us knowledge! Synthetic a priori knowledge The shortest distance between two points is a straight line. The velocity of a body remains unchanged unless acted on by an outside force. Every event has a cause a posteriori knowledge John is under 12 ft tall. Mount Everest is the highest mountain on Earth There are more people in San Francisco than Milpitas. Analytic All bachelors are unmarried. All triangles have three angles. A red ball has color. This comes from experience. Where does this come from? This comes from definition.

KANT S REVOLUTIONARY IDEA The mind does not passively conform to its objects. On the contrary, the objects of consciousness conform to the inherent, a priori structures & categories of the mind itself. Two big ways the mind structures & categorizes reality: Time and Space

KANT S REVOLUTIONARY IDEA What does this mean? Rationalist and Empiricist Knowledge Isn t Noumena You Can t Know Anything About How Reality Actually Is! Not about evil demons or dreams, but about how your mind works.

KANT S COPERNICAN REVOLUTION 1. IMPACT ON RATIONAL TRUTHS OF THE WORLD (SYNTHETIC A PRIORI) Example #1: Every event has a cause (or even simply causation exists ). Our mind understands objects as existing in time. This truth is true because of how the mind structures reality as existing sequentially, in the flow of time.

KANT S COPERNICAN REVOLUTION 1. IMPACT ON RATIONAL TRUTHS OF THE WORLD (SYNTHETIC A PRIORI) Example #2 The shortest distance between two points is a straight line. Our mind understands objects as existing in space. This truth is true because of how the mind structures reality as existing WITHIN space. (you actually can t see straightness)

KANT S COPERNICAN REVOLUTION: 2. IMPACT ON EMPIRICAL TRUTHS (SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI TRUTHS) All sense experience is then filtered and shaped by our minds. 1 2

KANT S COPERNICAN REVOLUTION: 2. IMPACT ON EMPIRICAL TRUTHS (SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI TRUTHS) D Which segment is longest: AB, AD, DB, DC, BC?

KANT S COPERNICAN REVOLUTION: 2. IMPACT ON EMPIRICAL TRUTHS (SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI TRUTHS)

KANT S COPERNICAN REVOLUTION: 2. IMPACT ON EMPIRICAL TRUTHS (SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI TRUTHS)

KANT S COPERNICAN REVOLUTION: 2. IMPACT ON EMPIRICAL TRUTHS (SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI TRUTHS)

KANT S COPERNICAN REVOLUTION: 2. IMPACT ON EMPIRICAL TRUTHS (SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI TRUTHS)

KANT S COPERNICAN REVOLUTION: 2. IMPACT ON EMPIRICAL TRUTHS (SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI TRUTHS)

KANT S COPERNICAN REVOLUTION: 2. IMPACT ON EMPIRICAL TRUTHS (SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI TRUTHS)

KANT S COPERNICAN REVOLUTION: 2. IMPACT ON EMPIRICAL TRUTHS (SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI TRUTHS)

KANT S COPERNICAN REVOLUTION: 2. IMPACT ON EMPIRICAL TRUTHS (SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI TRUTHS)

KANT S COPERNICAN REVOLUTION: 2. IMPACT ON EMPIRICAL TRUTHS (SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI TRUTHS)

KANT S COPERNICAN REVOLUTION All rational understanding and perception of reality is filtered and shaped by our biology and mind. Therefore: Our truths are never about reality. Our truths are about how our mind best makes sense of reality. Therefore: We never know reality as it is (Noumena). We can only know it as shaped by our mind (Phenomena).

NEW THEORY OF THE UNIVERSE

NEW THEORY OF THE UNIVERSE Leonard Susskind Raphael Bousso What?!!!

NEW THEORY OF THE UNIVERSE Holographic Universe? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16wilrjxnry&index=30&list=plcf863678a8b511b8