PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 7 : E P I S T E M O L O G Y - K A N T

Similar documents
PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 7 : E P I S T E M O L O G Y - K A N T

PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY

Think by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 7c The World

24.01 Classics of Western Philosophy

Immanuel Kant, Analytic and Synthetic. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics Preface and Preamble

Important dates. PSY 3360 / CGS 3325 Historical Perspectives on Psychology Minds and Machines since David Hume ( )

WHAT IS HUME S FORK? Certainty does not exist in science.

The British Empiricism

Intro to Philosophy. Review for Exam 2

The CopernicanRevolution

Philosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy. Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2014

Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Kant s Transcendental Idealism

Hume on Ideas, Impressions, and Knowledge

Excerpt from J. Garvey, The Twenty Greatest Philosophy Books (Continuum, 2007): Immanuel Kant s Critique of Pure Reason

Logic, Truth & Epistemology. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology

Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Kant & Transcendental Idealism

PHILOSOPHICAL RAMIFICATIONS: THEORY, EXPERIMENT, & EMPIRICAL TRUTH

A. Aristotle D. Descartes B. Plato E. Hume

The Problem of the External World

SCIENCE AND METAPHYSICS Part III SCIENTIFIC EPISTEMOLOGY? David Tin Win α & Thandee Kywe β. Abstract

Thursday, November 30, 17. Hegel s Idealism

KANT, MORAL DUTY AND THE DEMANDS OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON. The law is reason unaffected by desire.

Tuesday, November 11, Hegel s Idealism

History of Modern Philosophy. Hume ( )

Unit 2. WoK 1 - Perception. Tuesday, October 7, 14

Empiricism. HZT4U1 - Mr. Wittmann - Unit 3 - Lecture 3

Kant Lecture 4 Review Synthetic a priori knowledge

! Jumping ahead 2000 years:! Consider the theory of the self.! What am I? What certain knowledge do I have?! Key figure: René Descartes.

Of Skepticism with Regard to the Senses. David Hume

Introduction to Philosophy PHL 221, York College Revised, Spring 2017

Rationalism. A. He, like others at the time, was obsessed with questions of truth and doubt

John Locke. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding

GROUP A WESTERN PHILOSOPHY (40 marks)

New Chapter: Epistemology: The Theory and Nature of Knowledge

Epistemology. Diogenes: Master Cynic. The Ancient Greek Skeptics 4/6/2011. But is it really possible to claim knowledge of anything?

From Transcendental Logic to Transcendental Deduction

Transition: From A priori To Anselm

Philosophy 3100: Ethical Theory

Epistemology. Theory of Knowledge

A (Very) Brief Introduction to Epistemology Lecture 2. Palash Sarkar

- We might, now, wonder whether the resulting concept of justification is sufficiently strong. According to BonJour, apparent rational insight is

Tuesday, September 2, Idealism

UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT QUESTION BANK

CHAPTER III KANT S APPROACH TO A PRIORI AND A POSTERIORI

1/7. The Postulates of Empirical Thought

Reading Questions for Phil , Fall 2012 (Daniel)

DAVIDSON AND CONCEPTUAL SCHEMES PAUL BROADBENT. A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY

Review Tutorial (A Whirlwind Tour of Metaphysics, Epistemology and Philosophy of Religion)

Kant s Copernican Revolution

SUMMARIES AND TEST QUESTIONS UNIT David Hume: The Origin of Our Ideas and Skepticism about Causal Reasoning

Descartes Third Meditation

A Priori Knowledge: Analytic? Synthetic A Priori (again) Is All A Priori Knowledge Analytic?

Immanuel Kant. Retirado de: (25/01/2018)

the aim is to specify the structure of the world in the form of certain basic truths from which all truths can be derived. (xviii)

Class 2 - Foundationalism

From Brains in Vats.

Think by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 7b The World

Lecture 18: Rationalism

III Knowledge is true belief based on argument. Plato, Theaetetus, 201 c-d Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Edmund Gettier

The Copernican Shift and Theory of Knowledge in Immanuel Kant and Edmund Husserl.

Think by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 1b Knowledge

FIL 4600/10/20: KANT S CRITIQUE AND CRITICAL METAPHYSICS

CHRISTIANITY AND THE NATURE OF SCIENCE J.P. MORELAND

Chapter Summaries: Three Types of Religious Philosophy by Clark, Chapter 1

This handout follows the handout on The nature of the sceptic s challenge. You should read that handout first.

Mind and Body. Is mental really material?"

From Descartes to Locke. Consciousness Knowledge Science Reality

FACULTY OF ARTS B.A. Part II Examination,

PHILOSOPHY (PHIL) Philosophy (PHIL) 1

Supplemental Material 2a: The Proto-psychologists. In this presentation, we will have a short review of the Scientific Revolution and the

1/8. Reid on Common Sense

So, among your current vast store of indubitable beliefs are the following: It seems to me that I am in Philosophy 100.

Ever since W. V. O. Quine wrote his famous Two Dogmas of

PHI2391: Logical Empiricism I 8.0

In The California Undergraduate Philosophy Review, vol. 1, pp Fresno, CA: California State University, Fresno.

KANT S EXPLANATION OF THE NECESSITY OF GEOMETRICAL TRUTHS. John Watling

Philosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy. Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2015

COURSE GOALS: PROFESSOR: Chris Latiolais Philosophy Department Kalamazoo College Humphrey House #202 Telephone # Offices Hours:

Kant s theory of concept formation and the role of mind

What da ya know? (And how do you know?)

A HOLISTIC VIEW ON KNOWLEDGE AND VALUES

I. Traditional Epistemologies

Introductory Kant Seminar Lecture

ABSTRACT of the Habilitation Thesis

From the Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Reid Against Skepticism

John Locke. British Empiricism

Do we have knowledge of the external world?

Philosophy Epistemology. Topic 3 - Skepticism

New Chapter: Epistemology: The Theory and Nature of Knowledge

PHILOSOPHY IAS MAINS: QUESTIONS TREND ANALYSIS

Epistemology and sensation

Introduction to Philosophy. Daniel von Wachter

From Rationalism to Empiricism

Rethinking Knowledge: The Heuristic View

It doesn t take long in reading the Critique before we are faced with interpretive challenges. Consider the very first sentence in the A edition:

Class #3 - Illusion Descartes, from Meditations on First Philosophy Descartes, The Story of the Wax Descartes, The Story of the Sun

Descartes and Foundationalism

Transcription:

PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 7 : E P I S T E M O L O G Y - K A N T

AGENDA 1. Review of Epistemology 2. Kant Kant s Compromise Kant s Copernican Revolution 3. The Nature of Truth

KNOWLEDGE: THREE KINDS 1. Knowledge by acquaintance (knowing someone/thing, familiarity) 2. Knowing how (competence, skill) 3. Propositional knowledge (know that) In philosophy, we are almost always concerned with #3 So epistemology is.

THE MAJOR THEORIES OF KNOWLEDGE Knowledge is true, justified belief. So, how can we justify our belief as being true? 1. Skepticism You can t. Problem with this theory? Global skepticism is not very practical (law, science, morality, etc..) 2. Rationalism Through reason and logic Problem with theory? Many truths are simply true by definition and do not say anything about the world. Truth that does say something often relies on empirical evidence. 3. Empiricism Through your sense experiences. Problem with this theory? 1) Senses can be deceiving, 2) subjectivity, 3) can t trust majority experience

EPISTEMOLOGY: QUICK REVIEW Rationalist (1596 1650) Empiricist (1632 1704) Senses can t be trusted. Mind is a blank slate. Knowledge comes from reason (e.g. mathematics, I think, therefore I am.) Descartes Solving the perc. problem: Two qualitiesprimary & secondary. Our perceptions represent reality. Locke Empiricist (1685 1753) Only experience ideas, so only ideas exist no material world. Mind important: To exist is to be perceived. Berkeley Empiricist (1711-1776) Can never have general knowledge. Can never experience causes. Hume

KANT S COMPROMISE We need to change the way we look at knowledge and say there are different types of truths. In addition to knowledge being a priori and a posteriori, let s make another distinction: Analytic = true by definition, not new info. Synthetic = truth beyond definition alone, provides new info

KANT S COMPROMISE 4 CLASSIFICATIONS OF JUDGMENTS Synthetic Analytic a priori knowledge The shortest distance between two points is a straight line. The velocity of a body remains unchanged unless acted on by an outside force. Every event has a cause All bachelors are unmarried. All triangles have three angles. A red ball has color. a posteriori knowledge All humans are under 12 ft tall. Mount Everest is the highest mountain on Earth There are more people in San Francisco than Milpitas. This comes from experience. Where does this come from? This comes from definition.

KANT S REVOLUTIONARY IDEA, The mind does not passively conform to its objects. On the contrary, the objects of consciousness conform to the inherent, a priori structures & categories of the mind itself. Two big ways the mind structures reality: time and space 9

KANT S COPERNICAN REVOLUTION IMPACT ON SYNTHETIC A PRIORI TRUTHS Truth : Every event has a cause (or even simply causation exists ). Our mind understands objects as existing in time. This truth is true because of how the mind structures reality as existing sequentially, in the flow of time.

KANT S COPERNICAN REVOLUTION IMPACT ON SYNTHETIC A PRIORI TRUTHS Truth : The shortest distance between two points is a straight line. Our mind understands objects as existing in space. This truth is true because of how the mind structures reality as existing WITHIN space. (you actually can t see straightness)

KANT S COPERNICAN REVOLUTION Synthetic a Priori knowledge The shortest distance between two points is a straight line. The velocity of a body remains unchanged unless acted on by an outside force. Every event has a cause Descartes: I think therefore I am. Synthetic a Posteriori Knowledge There are two doors in this room. Our class is comprised of both men and women. I received an A on my midterm. The Revolutionary Idea: The mind is not a passive agent of experience. ALL sensory experience is based on active processing of the mind (Hume on the right track). AND ALL synthetic, a priori knowledge is true because it is imposed on reality by our mind How our mind best makes sense of its experience.

KANT S COPERNICAN REVOLUTION: IMPACT ON SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI TRUTHS All sense experience is then filtered and shaped by our minds.

KANT S COPERNICAN REVOLUTION: IMPACT ON SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI TRUTHS

KANT S COPERNICAN REVOLUTION: IMPACT ON SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI TRUTHS

KANT S COPERNICAN REVOLUTION: IMPACT ON SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI TRUTHS

KANT S COPERNICAN REVOLUTION: IMPACT ON SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI TRUTHS

KANT S COPERNICAN REVOLUTION: IMPACT ON SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI TRUTHS

KANT S COPERNICAN REVOLUTION All understanding and perception of reality is filtered and shaped by our biology and mind. Therefore: Our truths are never about reality. Our truths are about how our mind best makes sense of reality. Therefore: We never know reality as it is (Noumena). We can only know it as shaped by our mind (Phenomena).

GROUP DISCUSSION Synthetic A priori knowledge The shortest distance between two points is a straight line. The velocity of a body remains unchanged unless acted on by an outside force. Every event has a cause Descartes: I think therefore I am. Synthetic a Posteriori Knowledge There are two doors in this room. Our class is comprised of both men and women. I received an A on my midterm. Kant believes that we cannot know the truth about reality as it is, why not? What justifications would Kant give for denying the absolute reality of the synthetic a priori and a posteriori truths like these?

KANT AND KNOWLEDGE Do you think Kant s philosophy denies the existence of knowledge? He actually says that knowledge is possible, because knowledge is about how things appear to us, not about how things are in themselves. What does he mean by this? Without our mind to structure reality, we only have sensations, and sensation alone isn t knowledge. Knowledge is how we make sense of raw sensation.

KANT AND KNOWLEDGE Hence: Our brain creates knowledge. Does this make sense if knowledge is justified, true belief. Justified? Belief? True?

SO WHAT IS TRUTH? Correspondence Theory of Truth: A belief is true if and only if, it corresponds with something that exist in the world (common understanding of truth). Example: My belief that a table is in the room is true, if and only if there actually is a table in the room. Objections?: Kant has a problem with the idea that there is actually a table in the room.

SO WHAT IS TRUTH? Coherence Theory of Truth: A belief is true if it coheres with a body of other statements that we take to be true (fits within our web of beliefs). Example: My belief that a table is in the room is true if it coheres with other beliefs I take to be true. What beliefs does must this fit into. A room is a space that can be occupied. To be in a room means to exist in that space. A table is a piece of furniture with a flat top and one or more legs, providing a level surface on which objects may be placed. This is a room. I sense a table that occupies space in this room. Objections? Could just be fitting into a web of false beliefs: racist, psychotic, an ancient scientist (earth is flat).

SO WHAT IS TRUTH? Pragmatic Theories of Truth: Americans to the Rescue! Let s take a step back for a second. What is the point of finding the truth?

SO WHAT IS TRUTH? Pragmatic Theories of Truth: Americans to the Rescue! Charles S. Pierce (1839-1914) Truth is tentative, dependent upon further scientific inquiry. John Dewey (1859-1952) Truth is what works. F = MA because it works. William James (1842-1910) Truth is useful to believe, has practical value in our lives.

SO WHAT IS TRUTH? Pragmatic Theories of Truth: Americans to the Rescue! In response to Correspondence Theory: Truth is tentative and always in need of re-evaluation. In response to Coherence Theory: We can t objectively know reality anyway, so let s just settle on truth as being statements of belief that is practical and works.