Binding of Indeterminate Pronouns and Clause Structure in Japanese by Hideki Kishimoto, in press, LI

Similar documents
Exhaustification over Questions in Japanese

RECIPIENT ENCODING IN SOUTHERN SELKUP ANJA HARDER, UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG

Introduction to Transformational Grammar, LINGUIST 601 December 3, Wh-Movement

A Freezing Approach to the Ish-Construction in English

Extraposition and Covert Movement

WH-Movement. Ling 322 Read Syntax, Ch. 11

Four Proposals for German Clause Structure

What is infinitival to?

Factivity and Presuppositions David Schueler University of Minnesota, Twin Cities LSA Annual Meeting 2013

Reconsidering Raising and Experiencers in English

Toward a Feature-Movement Theory. of Long-Distance Anaphora. Norvin Richards MIT April A number of recent versions of binding theory have been

Existence, Identity, and Empty Names

The structure of this lecture. 1. Introduction (coordination vs. subordination) 2. Types of subordinate clauses 3. Functions of subordinate clauses

Questions. Yes-no: Chamorro kao left-peripherally (cf. Irish a N ) (1) Kao un-kuentusi gui? C35 Q agr-speak.to him/her 'Did you speak to him/her?

Event Participants and Implicit Arguments. Experimental Approaches to Verb Meaning

The structure of this lecture. 1. Introduction (coordination vs. subordination) 2. Types of subordinate clauses 3. Functions of subordinate clauses

Exercises Introduction to morphosyntax

CAS LX 523 Syntax II February 10, 2009 Prep for week 5: The fine structure of the left periphery

ANAPHORIC REFERENCE IN JUSTIN BIEBER S ALBUM BELIEVE ACOUSTIC

An introduction to grammatical-relation changing processes

Subject Index. Index

APPLICATIVES IN NON-CANONICAL SUBJECT CONSTRUCTIONS

TURCOLOGICA. Herausgegeben von Lars Johanson. Band 98. Harrassowitz Verlag Wiesbaden

English Reflexive Logophors

A Typology of Clause Combining

Competition and Disjoint Reference. Norvin Richards, MIT. appear; Richards 1995). The typical inability of pronouns to be locally bound, on this

JOURNAL OF LINGUISTICS

What would count as Ibn Sīnā (11th century Persia) having first order logic?

CAS LX 522 Syntax I Fall 2000 November 6, 2000 Paul Hagstrom Week 9: Binding Theory. (8) John likes him.

The Whys and How Comes of Presupposition and NPI Licensing in Questions

PASSIVES IN SOME SOUTH ASIAN LANGUAGES: A COMPARATIVE INVESTIGATION

Logophors, variable binding and the interpretation of have. *

P in ya tradition as a source for the study of the Middle Indo-Aryan labile verbs

Extra Syntax Exercises 5

Properties as anaphors

GENERAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING

hates the woman [who rejected him i hates the woman [who rejected Peter i ] is hated by him i ] (Langacker 1969: 169) (2) (3) (4a) (4b) (4) a. S b.

The role of animacy and definiteness in the clitic-dp nexus

Pronominal, temporal and descriptive anaphora

Table of Contents 1-30

B. Diagram the following verses from 1 Cor 1:10-31, marking sentence connectors with a D. AEYEl.,

Final Exam due on December 13, 2001

ACD in AP? Richard K. Larson. Stony Brook University

Dramatic Inversion. o) The club will only admit men under Only under exceptional circumstances will the club exceptional circumstances.

Reference Resolution. Announcements. Last Time. 3/3 first part of the projects Example topics

Solutions for Assignment 1

Front Range Bible Institute

Neg-Raising. The Case of Persian. Zahra Mirrazi & Ali Darzi University of Massachusetts, Amherst University of Tehran. April 28, 2017.

Reminder: Yes-no questions

GRAMMAR IV HIGH INTERMEDIATE

Sluicing. Syntax III UCSC. February 4, 2011

What Is Saving Faith According to John s Gospel? John Hepp, Jr.

Holger Diessel University of Jena.

Classification of Reflexives. Maki Kishida University of Maryland, College Park. Several languages have more than one type of reflexive anaphor:

BOOK 1 OF PLATO S REPUBLIC: A WORD BY WORD GUIDE TO TRANSLATION (VOL 2: CHAPTERS 13 24) BrownWalker.com

Instrumental Music in worship and Ephesians 5:19

Note: NEW = teachers should expect the grammar point to be new to most students at that level who have followed the ELI curriculum.

What can understudied languages teach us about syntax?

Psych Nouns and Predication. David Adger and Gillian Ramchand. Queen Mary, University of London and University of Tromsø

Birmingham Theological Seminary 2200 Briarwood Way Birmingham, Alabama COURSE PURPOSE. Objectives of the Course

The Development of Binding Theory Handout #1

Some Anaphoric/Elliptical Constructions of English

SEED & BREAD FOR THE SOWER ISA.55:10 FOR THE EATER BRIEF BIBLICAL MESSAGES FROM

ROBERT STALNAKER PRESUPPOSITIONS

Infinitives, gerunds, participles

Reference Resolution. Regina Barzilay. February 23, 2004

Dative External Possessor Constructions in Sidaama

Contemporary Theology I: Hegel to Death of God Theologies

15 DEPENDENT CLAUSES. 1 Note that other alternatives than those shown here may be possible:

, and Imperfect Verbs

Anaphoric Deflationism: Truth and Reference

SLAMET PAPER RESEARCH SITI KOMARIAH

Parametric Variation in Classification of Reflexives

Applicatives (well, and some Distinctness...) Pylkkänen: applicatives. Topics in the syntax-phonology interface: day 5

08 Anaphora resolution

Some remarks on Hungarian ethical datives GYÖRGY RÁKOSI. Institute of English and American Studies University of Debrecen

The Structure Of Argument 8th Edition

Neg-raising and positive polarity: The view from modals

Anaphoricity and Logophoricity*

NT 662 Exegesis of Philippians

Jenney s First Year Latin Lesson 40

12/17/2017 Original Document: JAS1-71 / 705

Coreference Resolution Lecture 15: October 30, Reference Resolution

Ling 98a: The Meaning of Negation (Week 1)

Religion Oral How I see Jesus

SHORT STUDIES THE OMOIO~ WORD-GROUP AS INTRODUCTION TO SOME MATTHEAN PARABLES

Classification of Reflexives *

TWO KINDS OF PERSPECTIVE TAKING IN NARRATIVE TEXTS

Introduction to Koiné Greek

ILLOCUTIONARY ORIGINS OF FAMILIAR LOGICAL OPERATORS

Lesson 7: Pain. In today's chapters Jonas receives painful memories from The Giver. How do you think he will respond to these memories?

An Introduction to Anaphora

ROB VAN DER SANDT R V D S A N D H I L.K U N.N L

Syntactic, Semantic and Information Structures of Floating Quantifiers

PRINCIPLES: 09/17/2017 Original Document: James: Chapter One 09/17/2017 Original Document: JAS1-53 / 525

ANAPHORA RESOLUTION IN MACHINE TRANSLATION

Category Mistakes in M&E

HS01: The Grammar of Anaphora: The Study of Anaphora and Ellipsis An Introduction. Winkler /Konietzko WS06/07

Scriptural Promise The grass withers, the flower fades, but the word of our God stands forever, Isaiah 40:8

Abusing Christian Liberty in Church Inappropriate Behavior for Women 1 Corinthians 11:2-17

Transcription:

Linguistic Theory and the Japanese Language 24.946, Fall 01 Shigeru Miyagawa Binding of Indeterminate Pronouns and Clause Structure in Japanese by Hideki Kishimoto, in press, LI Binding of indeterminate pronouns by the Q particle mo allows LF configurations to be diagnosed. Arguments must move into the checing domain of their licensing head by LF and must be Casechecked there for the derivation to converge. Indeterminate pronoun (dare 'anyone', doko 'anywhere', nani 'anything') and the Q particle mo NPI (Mcgloin 1976) (1) a. Taroo-wa nani-mo kawa-nakat-ta. Taro-Top anything-q buy-neg-past 'Taro did not buy anything.' b. Dare-mo sono-hon-o kawa-nakat-ta. anyone-q that-book-acc buy-neg-past 'No one bought that book.' The Q-particle mo need not be placed next to the indeterminate pronoun (Kuroda 1965). (2) a. Taroo-wa nani-o kai-mo si-nakat-ta. Taro-Top anything-acc buy-q do-neg-past 'Taro did not buy anything.' b. Hanako-wa [Taroo-ga nani-o ka-ta to-mo] omowa-nakat-ta. Hanako-Top [Taro-Nom anything-acc bought that-q] think-neg-past 'Hanako did not think that Taro bought anything.' mo may attach to different kinds of lexical heads; if the "host" is nominal constituent or a complementizer, it typically appears at the rightmost periphery of the constituent; when associated with a verbal element, it is affixed to some element appearing to its left, and the verbal complex separated from it is associated with a dummy verb su(ru) 'do' (3) Taroo-wa Hanako-o [hasir-ase-mo si-nakat-ta] Taro-Top Hanako-Acc [run-cause-q do-neg-past 'Taro also made Hanako run.' Clause structure and the indeterminate pronoun/q-particle Arguments: subject/non-subject asymmetry (4) a. subject * Dare-ga warai-mo sina-kat-ta. anyone-nom laugh-q do-neg-past 'Anyone did not laugh.' b. non-subject Taroo-wa nani-o kai-mo si-nakat-ta. Taro-Top anything-acc buy-q do-neg-past 'Taro did not buy anything.' 1

Adjuncts: TP/non-TP scope asymmetry (5) a. TP scope * Taroo-wa itu/dooyuu-riyuu-de hasiri-mo si-nakat-ta. Taro-Top anytime/any-reason-for run-q do-neg-past 'Taro did not run anytime/for any reason.' b. vp scope Taroo-wa doko-kara/doko-de hasiri-mo si-nakat-ta. Taro-Top anywhere-from/anywhere-at run-q do-neg-past 'Taro did not run (from) anywhere.' Scope of mo (6) Y is in the domain of a head X if it is contained in Max (X), where Max (X) is the least fullcategory maximal projection dominating X. (i) mo on V; V raises to v, so, any element below vp is in the domain of V-mo (cf. (9) on p. 5) (ii) V-mo does not raise to T (thus the subject/non-subect asymmetry; TP/non-TP asymmetry) (iii) subject moves obligatorily into TP-Spec (Miyagawa 2001) If mo attaches to C, the domain includes everything in the TP (7) Subject Taroo-ni-wa [dare-ga Masao-o home-ta to-mo]omo-e-nakat-ta. Taro-Dat-Top [anyone-nom Masao-Acc admired C-Q] think-can-neg-past 'Taro could not think that anyhone admired Masao.' (8) TP adjunct Taroo-ni-wa [Hanako-ga itu asonda to-mo] omo-e-nakat-ta. Taro-Dat-Top [Hanako-Nom anytime played C-Q] think-can-neg-past 'Taro could not think that Hanako played anywhere.' A-chain: the tail does not count (9) a. passive * Nani-ga (Taroo-ni) yom-are-mo si-nakat-ta. anything-nom (Taro-Dat) read-pass-q do-neg-past 'Anything was not read (by Taro).' b. unaccusative * Nani-ga koware-mo si-nakat-ta. anything-nom break-q 'Anything did not break down.' Scrambling of the object to the left periphery takes it outside the domain of Q (10)?* Dare-o i Taroo-wa t i home-mo si-nakat-ta. anyone-acc i Taro-Top t i praise-q 'Anyone, Taro did not admire. 2

OK if moved to the left of a vp adjunct. (11) Taroo-wa dare-o i koko-de t i home-mo sina-kat-ta. Taro-Top anyone-acc i here-at t i praise-q 'Taro did not admire anyone here.' Argument that mo is sensitive to LF structure: nominative object Nominative object is outside the scope of mo (12) * Taroo-ni nani-ga uta-e-mo si-na-i. Taro-Dat anything-nom sing-can-q do-neg-pres 'Taro cannot sing anything.' Thus the nominative Case is licensed by T; yet the nominative object is in VP at Spell-Out. (13) a.? [sono-uta-ga uta-e-mo] i Taroo-ni t i si-ta (koto) [that-song-nom sing-can-q] i Taro-Dat t i do-past 'Taroo could also sing that song (can sing that song, Taro did)' b. * [uta-e-mo] i Taroo-ni sono-uta-ga t i si-ta (koto) [sing-can-q] i Taro-Dat that-song-nom t i do-past (lit: could sing, Taro that song did) Arguments that vp-internal arguments (with the exception of nominative object) need to enter the checking domain of the topmost v. Multiple focus construction: sae 'even' Two occurrences of the focus element is allowed only if they occur in different domains. (14) a. subject/v Taroo-sae-ga [kono-hon-o yomi-sae] si-ta. Taro-even-Nom [this-book-acc read-even] do-past 'Even Taro even read this book. b. object/v * Taroo-ga [kono-hon-(o)-sae yomi-sae] si-ta. TaroNom [this-book-acc-even read-even] do-past 'Taro even read even this book. Passive: subject moves to TP-Spec (Kuno 1973, Miyagawa 1989) (15) Kono-kabin-sae-ga kowas-are-sae si-ta. this-vase-even-nom break-pass-even do-past 'Even this vase was even broken.' Scrambling the object takes it out of the vp domain (16)? Kono-kabin-(o)-swae i Taroo-ga t i kowasi-sae si-ta. this-vase-acc-even i Taro-Nom t i break-even do-past 'Even this vase, Taro even broke.' Evidence that multiple-focus construction is sensitive to overt syntactic structure. (17) * Taroo-ni-wa [sono-oto-sae-ga kiko-e-sae] si-ta. Taro-Dat-Top [that-sound-even-nom hear-can-even] do-past 'Taro could even hear even that sound.' 3

Evidence that the Dative phrase ("by" phrase) is higher in structure (18) Taroo-wa Hanako-ni-sae kono-hon-o Taro-Top Hanako-Dat-even this-book-acc?susume-sae s-are-ta /*susume-rare-sae si-ta. recommmend-even do-pass-past /* recommend-pass-even do-past 'Taroo was even recommended this book even by Hanako.' Indeterminate pronoun and the passive and causative constructions: argument that vp-internal argument must move up to the highest v. In passive, vp-internal argument can be construed with mo on the passive morpheme, but not on the main V. Evidence that the internal argument moves up to the checking domain of the passive v. (19) Taroo-wa Hanako-ni nani-o susume-rare-mo si-nakat-ta Taro-Top HanakoDat anything-acc recommend-pass-even do-neg-past *susume-mo s-are-nakat-ta recommend-even do-pass-neg-past 'Taro was not recommended anything by Hanako.' Causative: same result (20) In causatives with an intransitive V, the causee may be marked with Dat or Acc Taroo-ga roozin-ni/-o suwar-ase-ta. Taro-Nom old.man-dat/-acc sit-cause-past 'Taro let/made the old man sit down.' (21) "let" causative: control; "make" causative, not control (Harley 1995, Miyagawa 1999, Morikawa 1993, Terada 1990) a. Taroo-ga roozin-ni-sae?suwari-sae s-ase-nakat-ta. Taro-Nom old.man-dat-even sit-even do-cause-neg-past *suwar-ase-sae si-ta. sit-cause-even do-past 'Taro did not even let even the old man sit down.' b. * Taroo-ga roozin-(o)-sae suwari-sae s-ase-nakat-ta. Taro-Nom old.man-acc-even sit-even do-cause-neg-past *suwar-ase-sae si-ta. sit-cause-even do-past 'Taro did not even make even the old man sit down.' Indeterminate pronoun/mo causee is at the highest v ("cause") (22) Taroo-wa dare-ni/-o suwar-ase-mo si-nakat-ta. Taro-Top anyone-dat/-acc sit-cause-q do-neg-past *suwari-mo s-ase-nakat-ta. site-q do-cause-neg-past 'Taro did not let/make anyone site down.' 4

Causative-passive (23) a. multiple focus * Taroo-ga Hanako-ni gohan-(o)-sae tabe-sase-rare-sae si-ta. Taro-Nom Hanako-Dat rice-acc-even eat-cause-pass-even do-past tabe-sase-sae s-are-ta eat-cause-even do-pass-past tabe-sae s-ase-rare-ta eat-even do-cause-pass-past 'Taro was even made to eat even rice by Hanako.' Adjunct b. indeterminate pronoun/q Taroo-ga Hanako-ni nani-o tabe-sase-rare-mo si-nakat-ta. Taro-Nom Hanako-Dat anything-acc eat-cause-pass-even do-neg-past *tabe-sase-mo s-are-nakat-ta eat-cause-even do-pass-neg-past *tabe-mo s-ase-rare-nakat-tta eat-even do-cause-pass-neg-past 'Taro was not made to anything by Hanako.' vp adjunct (24) a. * Taroo-wa Hanako-o uti-e-sae kaer-ase-sae si-ta. Taro-Top Hanako-Acc home-to-even return-cause-even do-past kaeri-sae s-ase-ta. return-even do-cause-past 'Taro even made Hanako return even to her home.' b. Taroo-wa Hanako-o doko-e kaer-ase-mo si-nakat-ta. Taro-Top Hanako-Acc anywhere-to return-cause-even do-neg-past *kaeri-mo s-ase-nakat-ta. return-even do-cause-neg-past 'Taro did not make Hanako return to anywhere.' TP adjunct (25) a. Taroo-wa sono-toki-ni-sae Hanako-o kaer-ase-sae si-ta. Taro-Top that-time-at-even Hanako-Acc return-cause-even do-past kaeri-sae s-ase-ta. return-even do-cause-past 'Taro even made Hanako return even at that time.' b. *Taroo-wa donna-toki-ni Hanako-o kaer-ase-mo si-nakat-ta. Taro-Top any-time-at Hanako-Acc return-cause-even do-neg-past kaeri-mo s-ase-nakat-ta. return-even do-cause-neg-past 'Taro did not make Hanako return at anytime.' 5

LF Head Incorporation Q on object usually does not license an indirect object indeterminate pronoun (26) * Taroo-wa dare-ni hon-mo watasa-nakat-ta. Taro-Top anyone-dat book-q hand-neg-past 'Taro did not hand a book to anyone.' An exception is with object that occurs with the"dummy" verb su(ru) 'do' -- same behavior as mo on V. (27) Taroo-wa dare-ni soodan-mo si-nakat-ta. Taro-Top anyone-dat consultation-q do-neg-past 'Taro did not consult anyone.' (28) But not a subject indeterminate pronoun * Dare-ga Hanako-ni soodan-mo si-nakat-ta. anyone-nom Hanako-Dat consult-even do-neg-past 'Anyone did not consult Hanako.' Evidence that the process nominal must stand as an independent constituent at Spell-Out: Double-o Constraint (Kuroda 1965, Harada 1973, Shibatani 1977) (29) a.?*taroo-ga suugaku-o benkyoo-o si-ta. Taro-Nom math-acc study-acc do-past 'Taro studied mathematics.' b.?? Taroo-ga suugaku-o benkyoo-mo si-ta. Taro-Nom math-acc study-q do-past c. Taroo-ga suugaku-o benkyoo-si-ta. Taro-Nom math-acc study-do-past LF head incorporation limited to head; not possible with phrasal category (30) * Taroo-wa dare-ni [henna soodan]-mo si-nakat-ta. Taro-Top anyone-dat [strange consultation]-q do-neg-past 'Taro did not make a strange consultation with anyone.' Adverbial incorporation (31) Taroo-wa nani-o gimon-ni-mo omowa-nakat-ta. Taro-Top anything-acc questionably-q think-neg-past 'Taro did not doubt about anything.' 6