Answers to Practice Problems 6.5

Similar documents
Philosophy 1100: Ethics

What is an argument? PHIL 110. Is this an argument? Is this an argument? What about this? And what about this?

Philosophical Arguments

1.5. Argument Forms: Proving Invalidity

Lecture 3 Arguments Jim Pryor What is an Argument? Jim Pryor Vocabulary Describing Arguments

There are two common forms of deductively valid conditional argument: modus ponens and modus tollens.

Critical Thinking 5.7 Validity in inductive, conductive, and abductive arguments

Selections from Aristotle s Prior Analytics 41a21 41b5

PHIL2642 CRITICAL THINKING USYD NOTES PART 1: LECTURE NOTES

PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON THIS QUIZ

1.5 Deductive and Inductive Arguments

Relevance. Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true

Logical (formal) fallacies

HOW TO ANALYZE AN ARGUMENT

Session 10 INDUCTIVE REASONONING IN THE SCIENCES & EVERYDAY LIFE( PART 1)

Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics. Critical Thinking Lecture 1. Background Material for the Exercise on Validity

Appendix: The Logic Behind the Inferential Test

The Appeal to Reason. Introductory Logic pt. 1

IS THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD A MYTH? PERSPECTIVES FROM THE HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

PHILOSOPHER S TOOL KIT 1. ARGUMENTS PROFESSOR JULIE YOO 1.1 DEDUCTIVE VS INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS

1. To arrive at the truth we have to reason correctly. 2. Logic is the study of correct reasoning. B. DEDUCTIVE AND INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS

Introduction to Philosophy

Logic: A Brief Introduction. Ronald L. Hall, Stetson University

Artificial Intelligence: Valid Arguments and Proof Systems. Prof. Deepak Khemani. Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Revista Economică 66:3 (2014) THE USE OF INDUCTIVE, DEDUCTIVE OR ABDUCTIVE RESONING IN ECONOMICS

Logic Book Part 1! by Skylar Ruloff!

PHILOSOPHY 102 INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC PRACTICE EXAM 1. W# Section (10 or 11) 4. T F The statements that compose a disjunction are called conjuncts.

Business Research: Principles and Processes MGMT6791 Workshop 1A: The Nature of Research & Scientific Method

Handout 2 Argument Terminology

5.6.1 Formal validity in categorical deductive arguments

A Primer on Logic Part 1: Preliminaries and Vocabulary. Jason Zarri. 1. An Easy $10.00? a 3 c 2. (i) (ii) (iii) (iv)

Experimental Design. Introduction

Inductive Inference, Rationality and Pragmatism: Peirce and Ajdukiewicz

The Problem of Induction and Popper s Deductivism

CHAPTER THREE Philosophical Argument

PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy

Test Item File. Full file at

CLASS #17: CHALLENGES TO POSITIVISM/BEHAVIORAL APPROACH

Argumentation Module: Philosophy Lesson 7 What do we mean by argument? (Two meanings for the word.) A quarrel or a dispute, expressing a difference

LOGICAL FALLACIES/ERRORS OF ARGUMENT

SHORT ANSWER. Write the word or phrase that best completes each statement or answers the question.

Learning from Mistakes Karl Popper and Thomas Kuhn

Mètode Science Studies Journal ISSN: Universitat de València España

Chapter 2 Analyzing Arguments

Tutorial A03: Patterns of Valid Arguments By: Jonathan Chan

Scientific Method and Research Ethics Questions, Answers, and Evidence. Dr. C. D. McCoy

Logic for Computer Science - Week 1 Introduction to Informal Logic

Establishing premises

The Development of Laws of Formal Logic of Aristotle

Directions: For Problems 1-10, determine whether the given statement is either True (A) or False (B).

The Philosopher s World Cup

Courses providing assessment data PHL 202. Semester/Year

Argument and Persuasion. Stating Opinions and Proposals

Argumentation. 2. What should we consider when making (or testing) an argument?

Instructor s Manual 1

The problems of induction in scientific inquiry: Challenges and solutions. Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction Defining induction...

Deductive Forms: Elementary Logic By R.A. Neidorf READ ONLINE

Lecture 4.2 Aquinas Phil Religion TOPIC: Aquinas Cosmological Arguments for the existence of God. Critiques of Aquinas arguments.

Martha C. Nussbaum (4) Outline:

From the Greek Oikos = House Ology = study of

Logic Appendix: More detailed instruction in deductive logic

What is a logical argument? What is deductive reasoning? Fundamentals of Academic Writing

As noted, a deductive argument is intended to provide logically conclusive support for its conclusion. We have certainty with deductive arguments in

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking

Inductive Logic. Induction is the process of drawing a general conclusion from incomplete evidence.

Critical Thinking - Section 1

Argumentative Analogy versus Figurative Analogy

A Warning about So-Called Rationalists

Basic Concepts and Skills!

Chapter 2 Human Nature

In a previous lecture, we used Aristotle s syllogisms to emphasize the

Phil. 103: Introduction to Logic Test 1: The Structure of Arguments

Introduction to Deductive and Inductive Thinking 2017

Should it be allowed to win Jeopardy?

CRITICAL THINKING. Formal v Informal Fallacies

What could be some limitations to using fingerprints as evidence? Sep 2 12:58 PM

Logic: The Science that Evaluates Arguments

Class 6 - Scientific Method

In view of the fact that IN CLASS LOGIC EXERCISES

Module 9- Inductive and Deductive Reasoning

Unit. Categorical Syllogism. What is a syllogism? Types of Syllogism

A Brief Introduction to Key Terms

Thinking and Reasoning

1 Scientific Reasoning

T. Parent. I shall explain these steps in turn. Let s consider the following passage to illustrate the process:

L4: Reasoning. Dani Navarro

PHILOSOPHIES OF SCIENTIFIC TESTING

Study Guides. Chapter 1 - Basic Training

SKEPTICISM, ABDUCTIVISM, AND THE EXPLANATORY GAP. Ram Neta University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Chapter 1. What is Philosophy? Thinking Philosophically About Life

INDUCTIVE AND DEDUCTIVE

Richard L. W. Clarke, Notes REASONING

BJ: Chapter 1: The Science of Life and the God of Life pp 2-37

Geometry TEST Review Chapter 2 - Logic

Must we have self-evident knowledge if we know anything?

Explanations and Arguments Based on Practical Reasoning

Other Logics: What Nonclassical Reasoning Is All About Dr. Michael A. Covington Associate Director Artificial Intelligence Center

In his paper Studies of Logical Confirmation, Carl Hempel discusses

Programming Language Research

The Little Logic Book Hardy, Ratzsch, Konyndyk De Young and Mellema The Calvin College Press, 2013

Transcription:

Answers to Practice Problems 6.5 1. This philosopher coined the term abductive reasoning. a. Karl Popper b. Charles Sanders Peirce c. Aristotle d. G. W. F. Hegel 2. Sherlock Holmes is often said to be engaging in this form of reasoning, even though from a logical perspective he wasn t. a. deductive b. inductive c. abductive d. productive 3. In a specific city that happens to be a popular tourist destination, the number of residents going to the emergency rooms for asthma attacks increases in the summer. When the winter comes and tourism decreases, the number of asthma attacks goes down. What is the most probable inference to be drawn in this situation? a. The locals are allergic to tourists. b. Summer is the time that most people generally have asthma attacks. c. The increased tourism leads to higher levels of air pollution due to traffic. d. The tourists pollute the ocean with trash that then causes the locals to get sick. 4. A couple goes to dinner and shares an appetizer, entrée, and dessert. Only one of the two gets sick. She drank a glass of wine, and her husband drank a beer. What is the most probable inference to be drawn in this situation? a. The wine was the cause of the sickness. b. The beer protected the man from the sickness. c. The appetizer affected the woman but not the man. d. The wine was rotten. 5. You are watching a magic performance, and there is a woman who appears to be floating in space. The magician passes a ring over her to give the impression that she is floating. What explanation fits best with Occam s razor? a. The woman is actually floating off the ground. b. The magician is a great magician. c. There is some sort of unseen physical object holding the woman.

6. You get a stomachache after eating out at a restaurant. What explanation fits best with Occam s razor? a. You contracted Ebola and are in the beginning phases of symptoms. b. Someone poisoned the food that you ate. c. Something was wrong with the food you ate. 7. In order to determine how a disease was spread in humans, researchers placed two groups of people into two rooms. Both rooms were exactly alike, and no people touched each other while in the rooms. However, researchers placed someone who was infected with the disease in one room. They found that those who were in the room with the infected person got sick, whereas those who were not with an infected person remained well. What explanation fits best with Occam s razor? a. The disease is spread through direct physical contact. b. The disease is spread by airborne transmission. c. The people in the first room were already sick as well. 8. There is a dent in your car door when you come out of the grocery store. What explanation fits best with Occam s razor? a. Some other patron of the store hit your car with their car. b. A child kicked your door when walking into the store. c. Bad things tend to happen only to you in these types of situations. 9. A student submits a paper that has an 80% matching rate when submitted to Turnitin. There are multiple sites that align exactly with the content of the paper. What explanation fits best with Occam s razor? a. The student didn t know it was wrong to copy things word for word without citing. b. The student knowingly took material that he did not write and used it as his own. c. Someone else copied the student s work. 10. You are a man, and you jokingly take a pregnancy test. The test comes up positive. What explanation fits best with Occam s razor? a. You are pregnant. b. The test is correct. c. The test is defective. 11. A bomb goes off in a supermarket in London. A terrorist group takes credit for the bombing. What explanation fits best with Occam s razor? a. The British government is trying to cover up the bombing by blaming a terrorist group. b. The terrorist group is the cause of the bombing. c. The U.S. government actually bombed the market to get the British to help them fight terrorist groups.

12. You have friends and extended family over for Thanksgiving dinner. There are kids running through the house. You check the turkey and find that it is overcooked because the temperature on the oven is too high. What explanation fits best with Occam s razor? a. The oven increased the temperature on its own. b. Someone turned up the heat to sabotage your turkey. c. You bumped the knob when you were putting something into the oven. 13. Researchers recently mapped the genome of a human skeleton that was 45,000 years old. They found long fragments of Neanderthal DNA integrated into this human genome. What explanation fits best with Occam s razor? a. Humans and Neanderthals interbred at some point prior to the life of this human. b. The scientists used a faulty method in establishing the genetic sequence. c. This was actually a Neanderthal skeleton. 14. There is a recent downturn in employment and the economy. A politically far- leaning radio host claims that the downturn in the economy is the direct result of the president s actions. What explanation fits best with Occam s razor? a. The downturn in employment is due to many factors, and more research is in order. b. The downturn in employment is due to the president s actions. c. The downturn in employment is really no one s fault. 15. In order for an explanation to be adequate, one should remember that. a. it should agree with other human knowledge b. it should include the highest level of complexity c. it should assume the thing it is trying to prove d. there are outlying situations that contradict the explanation 16. The fecundity of an explanation refers to its. a. breadth of explanatory power b. inability to provide an understanding of a phenomenon c. lack of connection to what is being examined d. ability to bear children 17. Why might one choose to use an inductive argument rather than a deductive argument? a. One possible explanation must be the correct one. b. The argument relates to something that is probabilistic rather than absolute. c. An inductive argument makes the argument valid. d. One should always use inductive arguments when possible.

18. This is the method by which one can make a valid argument invalid. a. adding false supporting premises b. demonstrating that the argument is valid c. adding true supporting premises d. valid arguments cannot be made invalid 19. This form of inductive argument moves from the general to the specific. a. generalizations b. statistical syllogisms c. hypothetical syllogism d. modus tollens Questions 20 24 relate to the following passage: If I had gone to the theater, then I would have seen the new film about aliens. I didn t go to the theater though, so I didn t see the movie. I think that films about aliens and supernatural events are able to teach people a lot about what the future might hold in the realm of technology. Things like cell phones and space travel were only dreams in old movies, and now they actually exist. Science fiction can also demonstrate new futures in which people are more accepting of those that are different from them. The different species of characters in these films all working together and interacting with one another in harmony displays the unity of different people without explicitly making race or ethnicity an issue, thereby bringing people into these forms of thought without turning those away who do not want to explicitly confront these issues. 20. How many arguments are in this passage? 21. How many deductive arguments are in this passage? 22. How many inductive arguments are in this passage?

23. Which of the following are conclusions in the passage? Select all that apply. a. If I had gone to the theater, then I would have seen the new film about aliens. b. I didn t go to the theater. c. Films about aliens and supernatural events are able to teach people a lot about what the future might hold in the realm of technology. d. The different species of characters in these films all working together and interacting with one another in harmony displays the unity of different people without explicitly making race or ethnicity an issue. 24. Which change to the deductive argument would make it valid? Select all that apply. a. Changing the first sentence to If I would have gone to the theater, I would not have seen the new film about aliens. b. Changing the second sentence to I didn t see the new film about aliens. c. Changing the conclusion to Alien movies are at the theater. d. Changing the second sentence to I didn t see the movie, so I didn t go to the theater.