Applying Data Mining to Field Quality Watchdog Task

Similar documents
The performance of the Apriori-DHP algorithm with some alternative measures

A New Parameter for Maintaining Consistency in an Agent's Knowledge Base Using Truth Maintenance System

Sounds of Love. Intuition and Reason

Ms. Shruti Aggarwal Assistant Professor S.G.G.S.W.U. Fatehgarh Sahib

Kripke s skeptical paradox

IN a distributed database system, data is

Punjab University, Chandigarh. Kurukshetra University, Haryana. Assistant Professor. Lecturer

DATAMINING AND ISLAMIC KNOWLEDGE EXCTRACTION: ALHADITH AS A KNOWLEDG RESOURCSE

Identifying Anaphoric and Non- Anaphoric Noun Phrases to Improve Coreference Resolution

QUESTIONING GÖDEL S ONTOLOGICAL PROOF: IS TRUTH POSITIVE?

Automatic Recognition of Tibetan Buddhist Text by Computer. Masami Kojima*1, Yoshiyuki Kawazoe*2 and Masayuki Kimura*3

I. Personal Information

Introduction. Selim Aksoy. Bilkent University

Who wrote the Letter to the Hebrews? Data mining for detection of text authorship

logic is everywhere Logik ist überall Hikmat har Jaga Hai Mantık her yerde la logica è dappertutto lógica está em toda parte

Artificial Intelligence Prof. Deepak Khemani Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Introduction. Selim Aksoy. Bilkent University

Qualitative and quantitative inference to the best theory. reply to iikka Niiniluoto Kuipers, Theodorus


COS 226 Algorithms and Data Structures Fall Midterm

FUZZY EXPERT SYSTEM IN DETERMINING HADITH 1 VALIDITY. 1. Introduction

Basic Algorithms Overview

Visual Analytics Based Authorship Discrimination Using Gaussian Mixture Models and Self Organising Maps: Application on Quran and Hadith

FINALIZED SCHEDULE END-OF-SEMESTER EXAMINATION SEMESTER /2019

Generation and evaluation of different types of arguments in negotiation

Tamer Özsu Speaks Out On journals, conferences, encyclopedias and technology

TENTATIVE SCHEDULE END-OF-SEMESTER EXAMINATION SEMESTER /2019

Phil. 103: Introduction to Logic The Structure of Arguments

An Efficient Indexing Approach to Find Quranic Symbols in Large Texts

1.5 Deductive and Inductive Arguments

STI 2018 Conference Proceedings

MIP Lifting Techniques for Mixed Integer Nonlinear Programs

Analyzing the activities of visitors of the Leiden Ranking website

Artificial Intelligence. Clause Form and The Resolution Rule. Prof. Deepak Khemani. Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Laws are simple in nature. Laws are quantifiable. Formulated laws are valid at all times.

SQL: A Language for Database Applications

Adaptable Recovery Using Dynamic Quorum Assignments *

A Scientific Model Explains Spirituality and Nonduality

Quorums. Christian Plattner, Gustavo Alonso Exercises for Verteilte Systeme WS05/06 Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zürich

THE OFFERING MOMENT 90 SECONDS TO ENGAGE YOUR GIVERS

On the Origins and Normative Status of the Impartial Spectator

Question Answering. CS486 / 686 University of Waterloo Lecture 23: April 1 st, CS486/686 Slides (c) 2014 P. Poupart 1

CHRM 455/MISS 455 Missional Living: Campus, Church, Community, Commerce 3.0 Credit Hours Spring 2012

The Holy Spirit PASTOR FRED GRECO

Network Analysis of the Four Gospels and the Catechism of the Catholic Church

A Model of Decidable Introspective Reasoning with Quantifying-In

Moshe Vardi Speaks Out on the Proof, the Whole Proof, and Nothing But the Proof

Parish of Christ the King

Sociology Exam 1 Answer Key February 18, 2011

Anaphora Resolution in Hindi Language

All They Know: A Study in Multi-Agent Autoepistemic Reasoning

Biometrics Prof. Phalguni Gupta Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur. Lecture No.

APPENDIX D Uses of Dia

TECHNICAL WORKING PARTY ON AUTOMATION AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS. Twenty-Fifth Session Sibiu, Romania, September 3 to 6, 2007

I. Scientific Realism: Introduction

In Part I of the ETHICS, Spinoza presents his central

Cultural Comparisons from Japan. country is. Japan is a high-context culture with low power distance, high individualism, high

Now consider a verb - like is pretty. Does this also stand for something?

NOTES FROM THE ADMISSIONS OFFICE

Gilbert. Margaret. Scientists Are People Too: Comment on Andersen. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 5 (2017):

15 Does God have a Nature?

ON THE ROLE OF METHODOLOGY: ADVICE TO THE ADVISORS

The Theoretical Model of GOD: Proof of the Existence and of the Uniqueness of GOD

Structural Assessment and Rehabilitation Option for YudaganawaDagoba in Buttala

Discussion Following the Remarks of Mr. Cocksedge and Mr. Browning

RISE Scholarship Report

The Responsa Project: Some Promising Future Directions

2017 National Collegiate Landscape Competition Brigham Young University

Circumscribing Inconsistency

Phil. 103: Introduction to Logic The Structure of Arguments

Information Extraction. CS6200 Information Retrieval (and a sort of advertisement for NLP in the spring)

WHERE SHALL WISDOM BE FOUND? Richard Bowman Stanley L. Olsen Chair of Moral Values

The Buddha Said...: Meeting The Challenge Of Life's Difficulties By Osho

Slides by: Ms. Shree Jaswal

Actuaries Institute Podcast Transcript Ethics Beyond Human Behaviour

On An Alleged Non-Equivalence Between Dispositions And Disjunctive Properties

SCIENCE OF BREATH (HINDU-YOGI) BY YOGI RAMACHARAKA

Wendy E. Mackay. INRIA, France

Ethics Primer Elementarz Etyczny by Karol Wojtyła *

P2P Content Distribution BitTorrent and Spotify

Sins of the Epistemic Probabilist Exchanges with Peter Achinstein

Keynote Address by Mr. R. V. Shahi - Former Power Secretary, Government of India

The Trials Of Socrates Six Classic Texts Book Library

Discussion Notes for Bayesian Reasoning

Overview. Is there a priori knowledge? No: Mill, Quine. Is there synthetic a priori knowledge? Yes: faculty of a priori intuition (Rationalism, Kant)

Chapter Two The Telepathic Contact

***** [KST : Knowledge Sharing Technology]

PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS UNDERSTANDING OF PROOF: WHAT IF THE TRUTH SET OF AN OPEN SENTENCE IS BROADER THAN THAT COVERED BY THE PROOF?

Universiti Teknologi MARA. Zakat Calculation System for Academy of Contemporary Islamic Studies (ACIS), UiTM Melaka Campus Jasin

Usui/Holy Fire II Class Outlines

Tutorial on ontological engineering

NATURALISED JURISPRUDENCE

Results of fuzzy verification methods with COSMO over Switzerland and Germany

ON CAUSAL AND CONSTRUCTIVE MODELLING OF BELIEF CHANGE

Allreduce for Parallel Learning. John Langford, Microsoft Resarch, NYC

A Quranic Quote Verification Algorithm for Verses Authentication

Introduction to Philosophy

Semantic Web related Initiatives: Jewish Vocabularies, Community of Knowledge. Dov Winer

Review of Aristotle on Knowledge and Learning: The Posterior Analytics by David Bronstein

Four Asymmetries Between Moral and Epistemic Trustworthiness Susann Wagenknecht, Aarhus University

Transcription:

Applying Data Mining to Field Quality Watchdog Task Satoshi HORI, Member (Institute of Technologists), Hirokazu TAKI, Member (Wakayama University), Takashi WASHIO, Non-member, Motoda Hiroshi, Non-member (Osaka University) This article describes a watchdog program that discovers meaningful repair cases from a field service database. Meaningful cases are those judged worth probing further to prevent an epidemic of quality problems. Our system has employed the Apriori algorithm, a data mining technique which efficiently performs the basket analysis. Our system proves that this data mining technique is not only useful in knowledge discovery but is also capable of performing the database watchdog task. The Apriori algorithm automatically generates frequent itemsets from a large set of records. A frequent itemset is an arbitrary combination of values that appear more often than a threshold minimum support. The algorithm often generates too many itemsets for quality engineers to review carefully in their daily work. Many itemsets don t provide sufficient information to investigate further. Hence, in order not to generate these valueless itemsets, the Apriori algorithm is modified in two ways. One way is Basket analysis on objective and explanatory attributes, and the other is Itemset reduction. The advantage of our method is demonstrated with some experimental results.,,,,, 1. Apriori alogrithm 11 1 (Relational Database) C121 1 13 1

1... (epidemic quality problem) Excel SQL(Structured Query Langauge) 12 1 (P i,p j ) SQL (P i,p j ) P i P j SQL 2 (3) 1 minimum support() 2 Apriori algorithm (1) Apriori algorithm (Frequent itemset) Apriori algorithm Apriori algorithm 2. (item) (Record/Transaction) (:Frequent itemset) (association rules) Agrawal Apriori Algorithm (1) (SQL) Apriori Algorithm 21 Apriori Algorithm (Record/Transaction) (item) minimum support( min-sup) minimum confidence( min-conf) 1 min-sup {bread, milk, coffee,...}. 2 2 T.IEE Japan, Vol. 121-C, No.1, 101

A B ( A, B, C A B = φ, A B = C) ) C = {bread, milk, butter} bread milk butter min-conf :{bread} {milk, butter} Apriori algorithm 1 Apriori algorithm Step-1. 1 item frequent 1-itemset Step-2. apriori-gen frequent k-1 itemset k-itemset Step-3. k-itemset t 1 Step-4. min-sup k-itemset frequent k-itemset Srikant item constraint (6) (taxonomy) (5) bread, milk,...) 3. 1 Apriori Algorithm 22 (SQL) X ( ) min-sup Apriori algorithm min-sup=5 1479 759 1 Apriori algorithm 2 C121 1 13 3

31 2 ID / Ex. Model-A C103 X ) ID 2 2 2 STEP-1. N=1. STEP-2. N STEP-3. Step-2 N+1 minsup STEP-4. Step-2 L o STEP-5. lo k L o STEP-5.1. lo k = {o 1,...,o m } lo k k o i STEP-5.2. le,1 k,...,lk e,n STEP-5.3. n l k = lo k. i=1 32 3 4 Step-1. 4 Step-2. Apriori algorithm L o Step-3. Step-2 L o Apriori algorithm L Step-4. L l k e,i 4 T.IEE Japan, Vol. 121-C, No.1, 101

1 2 3 4 4 1479 759 STEP- 5 28 ( 11 6 ) 4 (a) 251 414 492 759 28 7 13 16 4 ) min-sup 3 Freq. 1497 (a) Apriori 759 (b) Apriori 28 4 ID (a) (b) 4 Case-A 11 251 7 Case-B 7 414 13 Case-C 6 492 16 3 Watchdog 4. 33 1479 6 ( ( ) min-sup 5 3 (a) 6 Apriori algorithm (b) Apriori algorithm 3 Apriori algorithm L SQL Apriori C121 1 13 5

SQL min-sup Huber (7) 12 1 31 13 99 99 1 R.Agrawal, R.Srikant, Fast algorithms for mining association rules, Proc. of 20th VLDB Conference, pp.487-499 (1994). 2 Y.Cai, N.Cercone, J.Han, Attribute-oriented induction in relational databases, Knowledge Discovery from Databases (Ed. Piatesky-Shapiro) MIT Press, pp.214-228 (1991). 3 U.M.Fayyad, et. al. Ed., Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining (1996). 4 ed., (),, Vol.12, No.4, pp.496-549 (1997). 5,,,, /, pp.103-108 ( 1997). 6 R.Srikant, Q.Vu, R.Agrawal, Mining association rules with item constraints, Proc. of 3rd Int l Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp.67-73 (1997). 7 P.J.Huber, From Larget to Huge: A Statistician s Reactions to KDD & DM, Proc. of 3rd Int l Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp.304-308 (1997). 1982 3 4 1988 PURDUE 2001 1980 3 1986 1990 1998 4 1988 1990 1996. AAAI 1967. 1975 19771984 19891992, 2001 2000 AAAIIEEE Computer Society 6 T.IEE Japan, Vol. 121-C, No.1, 101

4 C121 1 13 7