College Wri*ng English 101 Chapter 2: Argument as Inquiry

Similar documents
College Wri*ng English 101. Chapter 1: Argument Introduc*on

ARGUMENT AS INQUIRY: QUESTIONING A TEXT

The Declaration of Independence. by Thomas Jefferson

Writing a Strong Thesis Statement (Claim)

Rhetorical Analysis Help:

I would like to summarize and expand upon some of the important material presented on those web pages and in the textbook.

English II Writing Persuasive Prompt

Processes for Accuracy and Accountability in Bible Translation of Divine Familial Terms

Week 8: Midterm Review March 2, 2017

Argumentative Writing

Skill Realized. Skill Developing. Not Shown. Skill Emerging

The Argumentative Essay

PENN STATE UNIVERISTY Engineering Ethics for Graduate Educa<on May th, Eduardo Mendieta Associate Director ROCK ETHICS INSTITUTE

INDUCTIVE VS. DEDUCTIVE WRITING ADAPTED PARTIALLY FROM DR. TAMARA FUDGE, KAPLAN UNIVERSITY

WHAT PRACTICES MAKE A DIFFERENCE IN FAMILY FAITH FORMATION SESSION 2. THE FAMILIES AT THE CENTER APPROACH TO FAITH FORMATION 9/29/16

Writing a Literary Essay

! Prep Writing Persuasive Essay

Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Collections 2015 Grade 8. Indiana Academic Standards English/Language Arts Grade 8

Young Adult Ministry Part 3. Sean Allen, MDiv

Evangelism Resources. USA/Canada Mission/Evangelism Department. Interna onal Church of the Nazarene Evangelism Resources. All Rights Reserved

Practice with Persuasive Thesis Statements

Journaling / meditations. on death and its presence

An Ecological Approach

Organization Thesis Quotation Integration Commentary

Thesis Statements. (and their purposes)

New Testament Exegesis Outline Template by Rev. D. E. Norczyk

HANDBOOK. IV. Argument Construction Determine the Ultimate Conclusion Construct the Chain of Reasoning Communicate the Argument 13

Grade 7. correlated to the. Kentucky Middle School Core Content for Assessment, Reading and Writing Seventh Grade

or did not happen. Some questions of fact are easily answered. These include the many

Less than a third of the pastors in the NAD have a strong posi6ve a7tudes about the exis6ng structure of the Seventh- day Adven6st Church.

by Joshua E. Hummer, Esq. and Dr. Jill A. Hummer, Ph.D. Workbook

Lecture 8: Deontology and Famine. Onora O Neill Kantian Deliberations on Famine Problems Peter Horban Writing a Philosophy Paper

I TAKE ISSUE WITH GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

Louisiana English Language Arts Content Standards BENCHMARKS FOR 5 8

The Toulmin Model in Brief

HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.)

The Writing Centre s Guide to Persuasive Writing

Chapter Seven The Structure of Arguments

CHAPTER 3 THE OLD TESTAMENT IN 15 MINUTES

Write three supporting reasons that would convince the reader to agree with your position (in order of importance).

HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.)

What is Cri9cal Thinking?

Exegetical Paper Guide

Myth for a day. Ancient Greece Speech project. Name: Due: Dear Student,

Overview: Application: What to Avoid:

Plural Subjects III.

Jackson College Introduction to World Religions Philosophy Winter 2016 Syllabus

Informative Essay. Character Traits

Writing the Persuasive Essay

THE ALLYN & BACON GUIDE TO WRITING

Writing a Persuasive Essay

Name Date Period. English 7 Mrs. Foley. Marking Period 2 Quarterly Interactive Review Guide

Argument Writing. Whooohoo!! Argument instruction is necessary * Argument comprehension is required in school assignments, standardized testing, job

Prentice Hall U.S. History Modern America 2013

Teaching Argument. Blanqui Valledor. SURN April 20, 2018

Monday, February 20, 2017

WALKINGTOGETHER Northwest Synod of Wisconsin

Controlling Idea: Claims

Better Angels: Talking Across the Political Divide De Polarizing Civil Discourse: Selected Methods

PERSUASIVE TERMS and WRITING. Notes PowerPoint

Emory Course of Study School COS 321 Bible III: Gospels

CCR Standards Conference Handouts, Part II Mary Ann Corley Devens, Massachusetts November 19-20, 2015

Prentice Hall United States History Survey Edition 2013

Socrates: Are you saying, then, that making it more difficult to get a gun will have no impact on shootings in the U.S?

BLESSED ASSURANCE. Bible studies in 1 John. Bathurst Presbyterian Church page 1

What is a good death? Narra1ves, metaphors and professional iden11es in interviews with hospice managers

Synod on Pastoral Care of Marriage and the Family. An Overview of both Synods Parish Public Mee9ng March 23 rd 2015

Listening Guide. Worldview Basics. A Comparison of Major Worldviews. WE102 Lesson 03 of 05

Grab a book! Of Mice and Men. Final Essay. I can follow a process to plan, write, edit, revise, and publish an essay

Persuasive/ Argumentative writing

This resource can be used in mul1ple ways:

Paleo Magazine Radio Eps 115 Mastering Your Mind with Chris Kresser

Arguing A Position: This I Believe Assignment #1

PR 721: Narrative Preaching Hamilton, Fall 2018 Monday 1:15-4:15

that the only way a belief can be justified is if it is based on sufficient evidence. However,

The SAT Essay: An Argument-Centered Strategy

Modern Approaches to Argument

Farm vs. Factory: Citing Evidence

Revisi&ng the war metaphor in the context of end- of- life care

ENGLISH 10. December 12 th

DIOCESE OF PALM BEACH CODE OF PASTORAL CONDUCT FOR CHURCH PERSONNEL

3. Writing. Snider Lecture

Key Skills for Computer Science Lecture 4: Argument

6. Evangelism Practices in Discipleship. 1. Key Elements of a Discipleship Program, Pt Charitable Deeds of Discipleship

Killing Lincoln. Social Studies. Student Ac/vi/es for Grades 8 12: For Use A;er Viewing En/re Film

A Study of Buddhism Through the Art of the Mogao Caves

Understanding and Responding to Islamic Terrorism

Reading and Writing with Sources

2010 AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION FREE-RESPONSE QUESTIONS

Conceptual Levels: Bringing It Home to

CODE OF PASTORAL CONDUCT FOR CHURCH PERSONNEL

Arguments, Thesis Statements & Evidence NOVEMBER 21, 2017

A CHEAT SHEET GUIDE. Religious views on SPORT AND LEISURE

NEW YORK CITY A STANDARDS-BASED SCOPE & SEQUENCE FOR LEARNING READING By the end of the school year, the students should:

the art of hosting & harvesting Conversations that Matter

Today we examine the contribu3ons of classical, ancient Greece to government, both in the championing of democracy and in the development of

A Warning about So-Called Rationalists

A Woman s Reading of Young Goodman Brown : Blaming Faith for Goodman Brown s Loss of Faith and Innocence

A brief review of several meaning theories

Kihyun Lee (Department of Philosophy, Seoul National University)

Transcription:

College Wri*ng English 101 Chapter 2: Argument as Inquiry

Essen*al Ques*ons What is inquiry? (explora*on) Is it possible in America today to convince anyone of anything he doesn t already know? Are there enough places where this mingling of minds occurs to sustain a democracy? sound bites, talking points, talk- show- style shou*ng matches: all reduce truth seeking behavior.

Reflect on yourself Are you both an inquirer and a persuader? Do you engage thoughrully with alterna*ve points of view, truly listening to other perspec*ves, examining your own values & assump*ons? Purpose of inquiry When should you change your mind? How can you responsibly change your mind?

Ac*vity 1: Idea Log Updates Use p. 24-30 to add to your idea log. Use chart on p.25 (iden*fying controversies). Also try www.best- speech- topics.com Use 3C: These prompt you to learn more about an issue & to determine your own stance. Curiosity Confusion Concern Share your list with your classmates. S*mulate conversa*on, engage in conversa*ons, figure out what you think.

Genres of Argument Pg. 32-34 List: mark with post- it note for future reference In partners or solo, go to BBC iwonder: h`p://www.bbc.co.uk/iwonder Explore a few topics and compare to the list on pages 32-34. What genre is each ar*cle? Goal: to understand the genres of argument as well as the cultural and professional contexts that cause people to write arguments Are any of these people going to be you?

Believers vs. Doubters As a believer, your role is to be wholly sympathe*c to an idea. Listen carefully. Suspend all disbelief. Iden*fy appeals to different audiences. Determine all possible reasons for believing the idea. As a doubter, your role is to be judgmental and cri*cal, finding fault with an idea. Find counterexamples and inconsistencies to undermine the idea. Play devil s advocate.

Ac*vity 2: Belief vs. Doubt Divide into groups based on the color on your desk. I will assign one of the following topics. Make a list of beliefs and a list of doubts for your topic. 1. A student should report someone chea*ng on an exam or plagiarizing. 2. Women should be assigned to combat duty equally with men. 3. Athletes should be allowed steroids and human growth hormones under doctor supervision. 4. Illegal immigrants already living in US should be granted amnesty and placed on fast track to US ci*zenship. 5. Welfare recipients should be subject to random drug tes*ng. 6. Fast- food restaurants should be responsible for refusing service to the obese. 7. Gun owners should be required to register all firearms and pass a skills/ competency test. 8. All students should be required to meet a state- created test or benchmark for gradua*on.

Rhetorical Context Rhetoric: the art of effec*ve or persuasive argument Context: the circumstances, situa*on, or sejng Genre what type of argument is this? Who wrote it? What are their creden*als regarding this topic? Who is the intended audience? What is the author s mo*va*on for wri*ng? What is the author s angle of vision how are they approaching the issue? What are they leaving out? (Imagine a zoom angle versus panoramic in photography.)

Thinking Dialec*cally Compare mul*ple views on an issue. 1. What would each writer say to another s argument? 2. How do your own views change or adjust aler reading each argument? 3. How much do the writers agree and disagree? 4. How much do you agree and disagree? 5. What new ques*ons do you have aler reading? 6. Aler reading all arguments, what is your new or adjusted view?

Ac*vity 3: Terminology Divide into groups of 3-4. I will assign one of the following topics. Discuss the meaning and important parts of each. Type notes to give to the class for your topic. Email notes to teacher: hilary.thompson@ohio.kyschools.us 1. Placing a text in its rhetorical context (p. 31-37) 2. Reading to believe an argument s claims (p. 37-42) 3. Reading to doubt an argument s claims (p. 42-44) 4. Thinking dialec*cally (p. 44-48)

Summary Wri*ng Summary: an abstract, a précis, a synopsis Presents only text s major points & eliminates suppor*ng details Compare your nonfic*on summaries with the defini*on. What can you revise or improve?

Summary Recommenda*ons Page 40- recommenda*ons for an effec*ve summary 1. Read for general meaning 2. Reread slowly, write brief does & says statements for each paragraph Does- iden*fies paragraph s func*on Says- summarizes paragraph s content; main idea

Assignment (p.37) DUE: Monday, August 24 Find two recent arguments on a local or na*onal issue. Your choices should: 1. Represent different genres 2. Represent different kinds of arguers Prac*ce Reading to Believe. Summarize both arguments in one paragraph each (p. 41), prac*cing does & says statements. Include answers to some ques*ons on p. 36-37 in your summary. (Typed, 250 words MAX.) Summarize both arguments in one sentence each. (p. 42) Email/Share both arguments and summaries to: hilary.thompson@ohio.kyschools.us

Assignment (p.42-45) DUE: Using your arguments and summaries from before, prac*ce Reading to Doubt. Raise at least three objec*ons, ques*ons, or doubts about each argument. Think dialec*cally and respond to ques*ons on page 45. Email to: hilary.thompson@ohio.kyschools.us