THE SCIENTIFIC PROCESS C H A P T E R 3

Similar documents
Controlled Experiments

From the Greek Oikos = House Ology = study of

Unit. Science and Hypothesis. Downloaded from Downloaded from Why Hypothesis? What is a Hypothesis?

The evolution of the meaning of SCIENCE. SCIENCE came from the latin word SCIENTIA which means knowledge.

Content Area Variations of Academic Language

Critical Thinking - Section 1

Business Research: Principles and Processes MGMT6791 Workshop 1A: The Nature of Research & Scientific Method

I Don't Believe in God I Believe in Science

Philosophy of Science. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology

Message: Faith & Science - Part 3

DNA, Information, and the Signature in the Cell

Did God Use Evolution? Observations From A Scientist Of Faith By Dr. Werner Gitt

Module 1: Science as Culture Demarcation, Autonomy and Cognitive Authority of Science

In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. Genesis 1:1

Appendix: The Logic Behind the Inferential Test

A Layperson s Guide to Hypothesis Testing By Michael Reames and Gabriel Kemeny ProcessGPS

Now you know what a hypothesis is, and you also know that daddy-long-legs are not poisonous.

Prentice Hall Biology 2004 (Miller/Levine) Correlated to: Idaho Department of Education, Course of Study, Biology (Grades 9-12)

THE GOD OF QUARKS & CROSS. bridging the cultural divide between people of faith and people of science

Religion, what is it? and who has it?

Forms of Justification when Reading Scientific Arguments

15-1 The Puzzle of Life's Diversity Slide 1 of 20

SESSION 1. Science and God

Characteristics of Science: Understanding Scientists and their Work (adapted from the work of Prof. Michael Clough)

Rosen, Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications, 6th edition Extra Examples

High School / College Sample Questions Reason for Belief Norman L Geisler. (Updated 14 JUL 2016)

A Quick Review of the Scientific Method Transcript

Biblical Faith is Not "Blind It's Supported by Good Science!

The Qualiafications (or Lack Thereof) of Epiphenomenal Qualia

BIO 221 Invertebrate Zoology I Spring Course Information. Course Website. Lecture 1. Stephen M. Shuster Professor of Invertebrate Zoology

Diagramming and reasoning about causes. Phil 12: Logic and Decision Making Spring 2011 UC San Diego 5/19/2011

Classroom notes for: Radiation and Life Professor: Thomas M. Regan Pinanski 206 ext 3283

Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me?

FINAL EXAM REVIEW SHEET. objectivity intersubjectivity ways the peer review system is supposed to improve objectivity

Copyright: draft proof material

Introduction to Political Science

Book Review Darwin on Trial By Phillip E. Johnson. Submitted by: Brian A. Schulz

Instructor's Manual for Gregg Barak s Integrating Criminologies. Prepared by Paul Leighton (Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1997) * CHAPTER 4

Introduction The Definition of Science

Religious belief, hypothesis and attitudes

P. Weingartner, God s existence. Can it be proven? A logical commentary on the five ways of Thomas Aquinas, Ontos, Frankfurt Pp. 116.

Plantinga, Van Till, and McMullin. 1. What is the conflict Plantinga proposes to address in this essay? ( )

Evolution: The Darwinian Revolutions BIOEE 2070 / HIST 2870 / STS 2871

Causal fallacies; Causation and experiments. Phil 12: Logic and Decision Making Winter 2010 UC San Diego 2/26/2010

Sheldrake's "Hypothesis"

CHRISTIANITY AND THE NATURE OF SCIENCE J.P. MORELAND

Philosophy 1100 Introduction to Ethics. Lecture 3 Survival of Death?

Chapter 2 Science as a Way of Knowing: Critical Thinking about the Environment

Is there a conflict between Faith and Science? October 2018 Faithful Questions Seminar Deacon Ken Crawford

1 Scientific Reasoning

IS THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD A MYTH? PERSPECTIVES FROM THE HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

Quine on the analytic/synthetic distinction

Scientific Arguments

Macmillan/McGraw-Hill SCIENCE: A CLOSER LOOK 2011, Grade 4 Correlated with Common Core State Standards, Grade 4

THE IMPACT OF DARWIN S THEORIES. Darwin s Theories and Human Nature

Religious and non religious beliefs and teachings about the origin of the universe.

The way we convince people is generally to refer to sufficiently many things that they already know are correct.

WHAT IS HUME S FORK? Certainty does not exist in science.

Labs start this week Inquiry 1 proposal due in lab next week Class communication via Blackboard and/or webpage

FAITH & reason. The Pope and Evolution Anthony Andres. Winter 2001 Vol. XXVI, No. 4

Program Guide for How to be a critical thinker (#4 of 6) Sunday

Asking the Right Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking M. Neil Browne and Stuart Keeley

In the Beginning God

Sydenham College of Commerce & Economics. * Dr. Sunil S. Shete. * Associate Professor

Ayer on the criterion of verifiability

Interpreting Scripture #2: Interpreting & Applying the Bible

BJ: Chapter 1: The Science of Life and the God of Life pp 2-37

Lecture 9. A summary of scientific methods Realism and Anti-realism

McDougal Littell High School Math Program. correlated to. Oregon Mathematics Grade-Level Standards

Mètode Science Studies Journal ISSN: Universitat de València España

Hindu Paradigm of Evolution

Naturalism Primer. (often equated with materialism )

Darwinist Arguments Against Intelligent Design Illogical and Misleading

Why Rosenzweig-Style Midrashic Approach Makes Rational Sense: A Logical (Spinoza-like) Explanation of a Seemingly Non-logical Approach

WHY SHOULD ANYONE BELIEVE ANYTHING AT ALL?

Why We Should Trust Scientists (transcript)

THE LIFE KEY POINTS IN THIS LESSON YOU WILL STUDY THESE QUESTIONS:

Implied (Unstated) Main Ideas

BIBLICAL INTEGRATION IN SCIENCE AND MATH. September 29m 2016

Revista Economică 66:3 (2014) THE USE OF INDUCTIVE, DEDUCTIVE OR ABDUCTIVE RESONING IN ECONOMICS

Persuasive Argument Relies heavily on appeals to emotion, to the subconscious, even to bias and prejudice. Characterized by figurative language,

Two Ways of Thinking

Prentice Hall U.S. History Modern America 2013

The problems of induction in scientific inquiry: Challenges and solutions. Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction Defining induction...

Intuitive evidence and formal evidence in proof-formation

Grade 6 correlated to Illinois Learning Standards for Mathematics

Has not Science Debunked Biblical Christianity?

Human Nature & Human Diversity: Sex, Love & Parenting; Morality, Religion & Race. Course Description

Verificationism. PHIL September 27, 2011

Semantic Entailment and Natural Deduction

Ayer and Quine on the a priori

SYSTEMATIC RESEARCH IN PHILOSOPHY. Contents

Physics 496 Introduction to Research. Lecture 2.0: Tools for the Scientific Skeptic (Based on a talk by Lance Cooper)

Science and Christianity. Do you have to choose? In my opinion no

If I were to give an award for the single best idea anyone has ever had, I d give it to... Darwin

Lecture 6. Realism and Anti-realism Kuhn s Philosophy of Science

Prentice Hall United States History Survey Edition 2013

THE INFERENCE TO THE BEST

Truth and Evidence in Validity Theory

MANAGEMENT RESEARCH: A THOUGHT ON VALIDITY OF POSITIVISM

Transcription:

THE SCIENTIFIC PROCESS C H A P T E R 3

OBJECTIVES You will be able to understand: What does learning by inquiry mean? What qualifies as Scientific Evidence? What is a Scientific Theory? What is a Scientific Hypothesis? Why must a hypothesis be testable?

NATURAL LAWS The universe follows a set of rules called Natural Laws. Definition: Rules that describe an action or set of actions in the universe. Everything that happens in the world, obeys the same natural laws

PRIMARY GOAL OF SCIENCE To discover what the natural laws are. The most reliable way to discover these natural laws is through? Scientific Inquiry Process of learning that starts by asking questions and proceeds by seeking the answers to the questions.

SCIENTIFIC METHOD An organized process of answering scientific questions. It is a systemic and logical way to build on evidence. It is based on understanding of our natural world. What does the natural world consists of?

SCIENTIFIC METHOD STEPS State a problem/ Pose a scientific question Observation/Research Formulate a Hypothesis Experiment Collect and Analyze Results Conclusion Communicate results

HOW IS SCIENCE LIKE SOLVING A MYSTERY? Inquiry = Crime investigation with a mystery to solve. Accurately describe who did what, when they did it, and how? How would a detective do this? Detective must deduce (figure out) what happened in the using logical thinking and information collected in the? Past, present

HOW TO SOLVE THE MYSTERY? What are some steps the detective should take to solve the mystery? Search for evidence and clues to help answer questions. Come up with a theory about what happened. Theory A possible explanation Need evidence to back theory up.

STEPS A THEORY MUST PASS TO BE ACCEPTED The theory must be supported by enough real evidence. There cannot be a single piece of evidence that contradict the theory. The theory must be unique. If you have passed all three steps, you have solved your mystery by using the process of inquiry!

SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE What types of evidence qualify as scientific evidence? Do feelings or opinions count? i.e. The potted plant did not grow much because it was an old plant that had been in the pot for many years. Does what other people think qualifies as scientific evidence indeed qualify? No and No. Scientific Evidence may include: Numbers Tables Graphs Words Pictures Sound recordings Other information

WHEN IS EVIDENCE CONSIDERED SCIENTIFIC Scientific evidence must be Objective and Repeatable. What does this mean? Objective: Evidence that documents only what actually happened as exactly as possible. Repeatable: Describes evidence that can be seen independently by others if they repeat the same experiment or observation in the same way. Ex. Gallileo s Sketches

SCIENTIFIC THEORIES A human attempt to describe a natural law i.e. What makes a hot cup of coffee cool down? Was the Theory of Caloric proved or disproved? A scientific explanation supported by a lot of evidence collected over a long period of time. Charles Darwin s theory of evolution by natural selection is the process by which organisms change over time as a result of changes in heritable physical or behavioral traits.

HOW ARE THEORIES TESTED AGAINST EVIDENCE Scientists are always testing theories against new experiments and new evidence. Why? To prove or disprove the theory! One of Two things can happen when new evidence is found The current theory correctly explains the new evidence. The current theory does NOT explain the new evidence. What does this mean?

HYPOTHESIS In Science, Instead of theory scientists use the word Hypothesis to describe a possible explanation for a scientific question. It can be tested by comparison with scientific evidence that supports or rejects it. A scientific hypothesis must be testable! What does this mean? *It must be possible to collect evidence that proves whether the hypothesis is true or false. Not all hypothesis can be considered by science.

EXAMPLE It has been believed that creatures are alive because of an undetectable life force. Is this a scientific hypothesis? No, because there is no way to test it. If the life force is undetectable, that means that no evidence can be collected that would prove whether it exists or not. Science restricts itself only to those ideas which may be Proved or Disproved by actual evidence.

HELPFUL TIP If [I do this], then [this] will happen because of [this] i.e. If I increase the amount of fertilizer on grass plants, then the grass plants will grow taller, because plants will have more nutrients to grow taller provided by the fertilizer increase. In order to write a solid hypothesis, you also need to understand what your variables are for your project. It s ALL connected!

VARIABLES Independent Variable Is changed or manipulated by the researcher. They believe the I.V. might influence another variable. Presumed cause Dependent Variable The variable that is influenced by the independent variable. Responding variable Presumed effect i.e. (Time spent studying) causes a change in (Test Score) and it is not possible that a (Test Score) can cause a change in (Time spent studying).

ACTIVITY Which of the following Possible Scientific Hypotheses qualify as true Scientific Hypotheses? Remember: What qualifies as a Scientific Hypothesis? Get into groups and discuss amongst your groups if your example would be considered a valid Scientific Hypothesis. What are your variables? Rewrite your Possible Scientific Hypothesis as: If [I do this], then [this] will happen because of [this]