Christ Church College, Oxford University August 3-4, 2018

Similar documents
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY BALLIOL INTERDISCIPLINARY INSTITUTE, OXFORD OXFORD SOCIETY FOR LAW AND RELIGION. Regent s Park College University of Oxford

BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY BALLIOL INTERDISCIPLINARY INSTITUTE, OXFORD OXFORD SOCIETY FOR LAW AND RELIGION

ST HUGH S COLLEGE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD JUNE 2014

Cosmopolitan Theory and the Daily Pluralism of Life

Religious Impact on the Right to Life in empirical perspective

Understanding Human Rights and How they Get Implemented

Statement by Heiner Bielefeldt SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON FREEDOM OF RELIGION OR BELIEF. 65 th session of the General Assembly Third Committee Item 68 (b)

Nanjing Statement on Interfaith Dialogue

The McDonald Distinguished Christian Scholars Conference. Is Religious Liberty Under Threat? Trans-Atlantic Perspectives

Master of Arts in Health Care Mission

Supplementary Human Dimension Meeting FREEDOM OF RELIGION OR BELIEF, FOSTERING MUTUAL RESPECT AND UNDERSTANDING. 2-3 July 2015 Hofburg, Vienna

University of St Andrews DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY. PY 4652, The Philosophy of Human Rights (2016)

Centre for Law and Religion Cardiff University.

Freedom of Religion as a Distinct. Human Right

LESSON 1: ESTABLISHING CLASSROOM RULES, RIGHTS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES

90 South Cascade Avenue, Suite 1500, Colorado Springs, Colorado Telephone: Fax:

Towards Guidelines on International Standards of Quality in Theological Education A WCC/ETE-Project

LONDON GAC Meeting: ICANN Policy Processes & Public Interest Responsibilities

SOVEREIGN MILITARY ORDER OF MALTA

Let the Light of Christ Shine

The Refugee Crisis and Religious Engagement: Widening Routes to Legal Protection

The Response of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland to the LWF study document The Self-Understanding of the Lutheran Communion

The Freedom of Religion - Religious Harmony Premise in Society

Exploring Concepts of Liberty in Islam

A Policy on How the Church Addresses Social Issues

catholic social teaching

Christians and the Right to Food:

REFORMATION Sunday: Moving beyond the fifth centenary. Holy Trinity Parish October 29, 2017 John Borelli

Ethical Analysis: PRINCIPLISM. Patrick T. Smith, Ph.D.

The Salvation Army Positional Statement PEACEMAKING

What can education learn from recent thinking around the concept of dignity and the intersection between identity and protected groups?

DEBATING the DIVINE #43. Religion in 21st century American Democracy. Edited by Sally Steenland

Peacemaking and the Uniting Church

human rights spiritual rights

FOR CRITICAL ISSUES LAITY. Developments since Vatican II The Vatican Council IL The Extraordinary Synod of 1985 insisted

CURRICULUM VITAE Sarah Moore Oliphant, PhD, MSW

World Religions as a Factor in World Politics

Bowring, B. Review: Malcolm D. Evans Manual on the Wearing of Religious Symbols in Public Areas."

THE SEPARATION OF LAW AND MORALS

Are the core values of the radiological protection system shared across cultures?

JINJU CONFERENCE DECLARATION

THE TANDEM PROJECT

On the Origins and Normative Status of the Impartial Spectator

REQUIRED DOCUMENT FROM HIRING UNIT

Graduate Studies in Theology

Paul Oslington Professor of Economics School of Business and School of Theology Australian Catholic University.

THE PUBLIC WITNESS OF THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN CANADA:

Religious Diversity in Bulgarian Schools: Between Intolerance and Acceptance

We recommend you cite the published version. The publisher s URL is:

Human rights, universalism and conserving human rights practice

Diaconal Ministry as a Proclamation of the Gospel 1

Doing Theology Differently: Seeking a Transformational Theology in Belfast and Beyond. Think peace 8

Mind and Spirit. Reason and Imagination February 23, 2014 Rev. John L. Saxon

HOW THE BAGSAMORO AGREEMENT CAN BECOME AN OCCASION FOR CATHOLIC EDUCATION TO SHARE ITS MISSION OF LOVE IN HARMONY, SOLIDARITY AND PEACE

UNDERSTANDING OF DEMOCRACY AND RELIGION FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE 1. By: Sismudjito Medan, 1 st December 2007

A conference on "Spirituality, Theology, Education"

BAYLOR UNIVERSITY. Appointment of first holder of J. Newton Rayzor Sr. Distinguished Chair in Philosophy

Called to Transformative Action

Care of the Soul: Service-Learning and the Value of the Humanities

Beyond Tolerance An Interview on Religious Pluralism with Victor Kazanjian

Principal Acts 29 Oak Hill Academy

The Coming One World Religion - pt 2. The next group that we will examine is the United Alliance of Civilizations. The website for the...

where only traditional Confucian education was predominant at the time. Because there had been no

UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION. Address by Mr Federico Mayor

Consciousness on the Side of the Oppressed. Ofelia Schutte

2015 Melbourne Conference on Jesuit Higher Education July 8 to 10, 2015

JOHN DEWEY STUDIES IN CENTRAL EUROPE: ELI KRAMER INTERVIEWS EMIL VISNOVSKY

Ethical Theory for Catholic Professionals

They said WHAT!? A brief analysis of the Supreme Court of Canada s decision in S.L. v. Commission Scolaire des Chênes (2012 SCC 7)

Michael L. Thompson 2825 Emerson, Denton, TX (813)

PWRDF Partnership Policy Final INTRODUCTION

Pre-Professional. T h e 1 0 t h A n n u a l CO N F E R E N C E. October 13, 2011 Hinckley and Ricks Buildings

Fourth Synod of the Diocese of Bridgeport. Synodal Summary

As Dr. Elman noted, one of the compelling strengths of higher

Guidelines for Parish Pastoral Councils Diocese of Rockford

The Holy See APOSTOLIC JOURNEY TO THE UNITED KINGDOM (SEPTEMBER 16-19, 2010)

Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief

Catholic University of Milan MASTER INTERCULTURAL SKILLS Fourteenth Edition a.y. 2017/18 Cavenaghi Virginia

Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Plan. Department of Theology. Saint Peter s College. Fall Submitted by Maria Calisi, Ph.D.

4.2 Patryk Pawlak International Law, Third Year Czestochowa University of Foreign Languages and Economics Czestochowa, Poland

500 th Reformation Commemoration ELCJHL Bishop Munib A. Younan Responds

Globalization, Secularization and Religion Different States, Same Trajectories?

1 Hans Jonas, The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984), 1-10.

Statement on Inter-Religious Relations in Britain

Fr. Sebastiano D Ambra, PIME

Your signature doesn t mean you endorse the guidelines; your comments, when added to the Annexe, will only enrich and strengthen the document.

RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY. [on the report of the Third Committee (A/49/610/Add.2)]

Curriculum Vitae. Robert M. Tappan. June 2015

GUIDELINES FOR ESTABLISHING AN INTERFAITH STUDIES PROGRAM ON A UNIVERSITY OR COLLEGE CAMPUS

Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie

DIOCESE OF SAN JOSE COUNCIL OF LAY ECCLESIAL MINISTERS APPROVED BY BISHOP MCGRATH JUNE 10, Page 1 of 11

Mormonism as an Ecclesiology and System of Relatedness

German Islam Conference

Philosophical Review.

1/24/2012. Philosophers of the Middle Ages. Psychology 390 Psychology of Learning

Sollicitudo Rei Socialis, The Social Concerns of the Church

Christianity and Pluralism

Brief Curriculum Vitae KEITH A. EREKSON. Director, Church History Library

INCARNATING FORGIVENESS, RECONCILIATION AND HEALING LOOKING ON OUR WORLD WITH THE EYES OF CLAUDINE AND RESPONDING TO ITS MISERIES

Lukas Vischer. A Reflection on the Role of Theological Schools

Transcription:

Human Dignity for Everyone Everywhere: Founding Figures, Foundations, and the Uses of Human Dignity Co-sponsored by: The International Center for Law and Religion Studies, BYU The Oxford Journal of Law and Religion The Religion, Law and International Relations Programme, Oxford Centre for Christianity and Culture, Regents Park, Oxford Programme for the Foundations of Law and Constitutional Government, University of Oxford Faculty of Law Christ Church College, Oxford University August 3-4, 2018 December 2018 marks the 70 th Anniversary of the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The Preamble begins, Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice, and peace in the world and continues in Article 1 to proclaim, All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood. This simple idea human dignity for everyone everywhere is the central idea of human rights. Human Dignity for Everyone Everywhere will explore the ideas that motivated and illuminated the human rights project 70 years ago. Can the idea of human dignity for everyone everywhere help with the implementation of human rights, through progressive measures? Can it enable the vision of human rights to become a common standard of achievement for all people and nations? Can the idea of human dignity help reconcile competing human rights claims, and resolve tensions with other important national and social interests? Can the idea of human dignity provide insight into the nature of dignitary harms and identity politics in the midst of the conscience wars? Answers to such questions may hold the key to finding solutions for building stable and just communities in an inevitably highly pluralistic world. Friday morning s sessions will focus on the founding figures of the UDHR and their views on human dignity, and the afternoon will include presentations on religious and other philosophical views of human dignity. Saturday will include panel discussions of various uses of human dignity in practical contexts, as well as group discussions and reports on draft materials from the planned Declaration on Human Dignity for Everyone Everywhere. 1

Thursday, August 2 9:00 A.M. 1:30 P.M. For those who arrive in time, you are invited to join the following roundtable discussion. Religious Voices and Human Rights, Round Table Organized by Religion, Law and International Relations Programme at the Centre for Christianity and Culture, Regent s Park College, Oxford, at 1 Canterbury Road, Oxford OX2 6LU Friday, August 3 Morning Sessions: Founding Figures of the UDHR: Motivations and Observations These sessions will focus on the thinking about human dignity of several of the key founding figures of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, including Eleanor Roosevelt, Charles Malik, and PC Chang. 9:00 10:30 AM Welcome and Introduction, Ján Figel, Special Envoy for the Promotion of Freedom of Religion or Belief Outside the EU; Former European Commissioner for Education, Training & Culture; Former State Secretary of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Bratislava, Slovakia Eleanor Roosevelt (USA) Presented by Professor Brett Scharffs, Director of the International Center for Law and Religion Studies and Rex E. Lee Chair and Professor of Law, Brigham Young University Law School Charles Malik (Lebanon) Presented by Professor Peter Petkoff, Director of the Religion, Law and International Relations Programme, Regent s Park College, Oxford; Managing Editor of the Oxford Journal of Law and Religion; Senior Law Lecturer, Brunel Law School 10:45 AM 12:15 PM Pen-Chun Chang (China) The Role of Human Dignity in PC Chang s Thought about Human Rights Presented by Professor Pinghua Sun, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing, China PC Chang, Human Dignity and the UDHR Presented by Professor Hans Ingvar Roth, Professor of Human Rights, Stockholm University Institute for Turkish Studies (SUITS), Stockholm University, Sweden 2

12:30 PM Lunch at Christ Church Afternoon Session: Conceptual and Ideological Foundations of Human Dignity: Including Religious Approaches of Jewish, Christian, and Muslim and Non-Religious Approaches 2:00 3:30 PM Human Dignity and Vatican II Presented by Professor Alberto Melloni, Professor of the History of Christianity, University of Modena-Reggio Emilia, and Unesco Chair on Religious Pluralism and Peace Pope Francis on Dignity and Rights Presented by Dr. Joel Harrison, Senior Lecturer, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia; Visiting Fellow, Foundations Programme for the Foundations of Law and Constitutional Government, University of Oxford Human Dignity and Jewish Law Presented by Professor Haim Shapira, Professor of Law, Bar-Ilan University, Israel 3:45 5:30 PM A Common Word: Conceptions of Dignity Presented by Professor Paul Fiddes, Professor of Systematic Theology, University of Oxford; former Principal of Regent s Park College and Chair of the Faculty of Theology, Oxford The Foundations of Human Dignity to Abrahamic Religions: A Comparative View Presented by Professor Joseph David, Visiting Professor (Adjunct) of Law, Yale Law School and Visiting Professor, Program in Judaic Studies, Yale University; Associate Professor of Law, Sapir Academic College, Jerusalem, Israel The Conception of Human Dignity Underlying the Indonesian Concept of Pancasila Presented by Professor Dicky Sofjan, Core Doctoral Faculty in the Indonesian Consortium for Religious Studies (ICRS), Graduate School, Universitas Gadja Mada (UGM), Yogyakarta, Indonesia (read by Professor Jane Wise, Associate Director, International Center for Law and Religion Studies, BYU Law School) Materialistic and Atheistic Foundations of Human Dignity Presented by Dr. Grégor Puppinck, Director General of the European Centre for Law and Justice (ECLJ); Member of the OSCE Panel fo Experts on Freedom of Religion or Belief 7:00 PM Dinner at The Folly, riverside restaurant 3

Saturday, August 4 Morning Session 9:00 AM 9:15 AM Welcome and Introduction, Ján Figel, Special Envoy for the Promotion of Freedom of Religion or Belief Outside the EU; Former European Commissioner for Education, Training & Culture; Former State Secretary of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Bratislava, Slovakia 9:00 AM 1:00 PM Five Panels of three or four participants organized around various topic groupings (listed below) will have each participant present for five to 10 minutes. Our hope is that presenters will choose one or two of the bullet points below and elaborate or discuss how human dignity can be helpful in one or two of the following ways. In particular, we are hoping to share concrete, specific examples of the ways that human dignity can be a useful concept in actual situations. Panel 1: Foundations, Objectives and Criteria for Facilitating a Deeper Understanding of Human Rights Chair: Brett G. Scharffs, BYU Law School Human dignity for everyone everywhere is the foundational idea of human rights. Human dignity for everyone everywhere is the key objective or goal of human rights. Human dignity for everyone everywhere is the most useful criteria for evaluating laws, policies, and government actions for how well they accord with the goal of human rights. Human dignity for everyone everywhere reminds us that human rights are universal, inalienable, indivisible, interdependent and interrelated. Human dignity for everyone everywhere is an idea that can help depoliticize, or perhaps even more importantly, de-tribalize, human rights. Focusing concretely on human dignity for everyone everywhere can help identify specific content for a right that often seems quite abstract, or even empty. Professor Hans Igvar Roth, Professor of Human Rights, Stockholm University Institute for Turkish Studies, Stockholm University, Sweden Professor Joseph David, Visiting Professor (Adjunct) of Law, Yale Law School and Visiting Professor, Program in Judaic Studies, Yale 4

University; Associate Professor of Law, Sapir Academic College of Law, Jerusalem, Israel Professor Smillen Markov, Visiting Fellow, Oxford; Assistant Professor in Christian Philosophy, Theological Faculty, Univeristy of Veliko Turnovo, Bulgaria Professor Renata Uitz, Chair (Director), Comparative Constitutional Law Program, Department of Legal Studies, Central European University, Budapest, Hungary Professor Paul Fiddes, Professor of Systematic Theology, University of Oxford; former Principal of Regent s Park College and Chair of the Faculty of Theology, Oxford Panel 2: Finding Common Ground among Different Conceptions of Human Rights Chair: Ján Figel, Special Envoy for the Promotion of Freedom of Religion or Belief Outside the EU; Former European Commissioner for Education, Training & Culture; Former State Secretary of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Bratislava, Slovakia Human dignity for everyone everywhere is the most promising point of departure (or entry point) for exploring and understanding the meaning of human rights. Human dignity for everyone everywhere is a mechanism for facilitating discussions between different conceptions of a common concept. Human dignity for everyone everywhere is the most promising basis for finding common ground regarding human rights and achieving an overlapping consensus, or finding incompletely theorized agreements, about the content and meaning of human rights. Human dignity for everyone everywhere can help build bridges between various normative justifications of human rights, including religious and secular theoretical foundations for human rights. Human dignity for everyone everywhere is the best basis for teaching and educating to promote respect for these rights and freedoms. (UDHR, introductory proclamation) Human dignity for everyone everywhere can help overcome hostility towards or suspicion of human rights. Human dignity for everyone everywhere can help reduce the volume and heat that often accompany controversies that involve human rights. 5

Human dignity for everyone everywhere makes it more difficult for advocates and opponents of human rights to be dogmatic and rigid in their understanding of human rights. Human dignity for everyone everywhere helps emphasize the underdeveloped concept in the UDHR that rights include accompanying responsibilities, not just of states, but of right holders, and of all human beings with respect to the rights of others. Dr. Chris Seiple, President Emeritus, Institute for Global Engagement; Advisor, Templeton Religion Trust; Senior Fellow, Jackson School of International Studies, University of Washington Professor Robin Fretwell Wilson, Roger and Stephany Joslin Professor of Law, Illinois College of Law; Director, Program in Family Law and Policy; Director, Epstein Health Law and Policy Program; Professor, Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Champaign, Illinois Professor Pinghua Sun, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing, China Professor Haim Shapira, Professor of Law, Bar-Ilan University, Israel Panel 3: Implementing and Realizing Human Rights Chair: Peter Petkoff, Director of the Religion, Law and International Relations Programme, Regent s Park College, Oxford; Managing Editor of the Oxford Journal of Law and Religion; Senior Law Lecturer, Brunel Law School Human dignity for everyone everywhere is the key to implementing human rights. Protecting the human dignity of everyone within its jurisdiction is the fundamental human rights obligation of states and other divisions of government. Human dignity for everyone everywhere is the best basis for finding progressive measures, national and international, to secure the universal and effective recognition and observance of human rights. (UDHR introductory proclamation) Human dignity for everyone everywhere is the best mechanism for realizing human rights as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations. (UDHR introductory proclamation) Human dignity for everyone everywhere is powerful mechanism for moving beyond narrowly legal solutions to human rights conflicts. 6

Dr. Eugenia Relaño Pastor, Max Planck Institute of Social Anthropology, Department of Law and Anthropology, Halle, Germany Dr. Merilin Kiviorg, Senior Research Fellow in Public International Law, University of Tartu, Estonia; President of the European Consortium for Church and State Research; member of the OSCE advisory panel on religious freedom. Professor Paul Yowell, Associate Professor of Law, Oxford University; Fellow and Tutor in Law, Oriel College, Oxford Professor W. Cole Durham, Jr., Susa Young Gates University Professor of Law and Founding Director of the International Center for Law and Religion Studies, Brigham Young University Law School, Provo, Utah Short Break Panel 4: Reconciling and Adjudicating Human Rights Chair: W. Cole Durham, Jr., BYU Law School Human dignity for everyone everywhere is a concept that can help reconcile competing human rights claims, as well as claims between human rights and other important national and societal interests. Human dignity for everyone everywhere is a useful principle for balancing competing rights claims. Human dignity for everyone everywhere can be especially helpful in reconciling and mutually vindicating competing claims between equality (non-discrimination) and freedom (liberty). Human dignity for everyone everywhere is an important constitutional and legal principle for adjudicating rights claims. Human dignity for everyone everywhere is a strategy moving towards balancing and towards an ideal of the mutual vindication of competing rights claims and other important interests. Human dignity for everyone everywhere will help set the boundaries of permissible limitations of human rights and freedoms. Mark Hill QC; Honorary Professor of Law, Cardiff University; formerly Visiting Fellow at Emmanuel College, Cambridge; Extraordinary Professor, The University of Pretoria 7

Professor Catherine Dupré, Associate Professor in Comparative Constitutional Law, Director of Doctoral Studies, University of Exeter Law School, UK Dr. Grégor Puppinck, Director General, European Centre for Law and Justice (ECLJ); Member, OSCE Panel of Experts on Freedom of Religion or Belief Professor Peter Petkoff, Director of the Religion, Law and International Relations Programme, Regent s Park College, Oxford; Managing Editor of the Oxford Journal of Law and Religion; Senior Law Lecturer, Brunel Law School Panel 5: Responding to Distortions, Abuses and Hostility towards Human Rights Chair: Renata Uitz, Chair (Director), Comparative Constitutional Law Program, Department of Legal Studies, Central European University, Budapest, Hungary Human dignity for everyone everywhere helps avoid the distortion and avoidance of human rights by authoritarian governments or others. [OR: Human dignity for everyone everywhere can help states focus on their obligations to all people within their jurisdiction and make it more difficult for authoritarian or oppressive states to avoid their obligations to protect fundamental human rights of all people at all times.] Human dignity for everyone everywhere helps us evaluate claims involving dignitary harm, or the right not to be offended. Human dignity for everyone everywhere is a powerful mechanism for understanding and evaluating identity politics. Human dignity for everyone everywhere helps avoid the instrumentalization of human rights. Professor Nazila Ghanea, Associate Professor in International Human Rights Law, University of Oxford; Associate Director, Oxford Human Rights Hub and Fellow of Kellogg College, Oxford Professor Alberto Melloni, Professor of the Hisotry of Christianity, University of Modena-Reggio Emilia, and Unesco Chair on Religious Pluralism and Peace 8

Professor Brett G. Scharffs, BYU Law School Dr. Joel Harrison, Senior Lecturer, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia; Visiting Fellow, Foundations Programme for the Foundations of Law and Constitutional Government, University of Oxford 1:00 2:00 PM Box Lunches Provided Afternoon Sessions 2:00 3:30 PM Five discussion groups will be formed with five - seven participants each to discuss one of five topic groups (the same as the morning topic groups) with a group representative designated who will present the group s discussion points in the second afternoon session. 1. Foundations, Objectives and Criteria for Facilitating a Deeper Understanding of Human Rights 2. Finding Common Ground among Different Conceptions of Human Rights 3. Implementing and Realizing Human Rights 4. Reconciling and Adjudicating Human Rights 5. Responding to Distortions, Abuses and Hostility towards Human Rights 3:45 5:15 PM Group representatives will report back on discussion points. 5:15-5:30 PM Closing Remarks: Ján Figel, Peter Petkoff, Brett Scharffs Dinner on own 9