Important to remember:

Similar documents
Notes on Moore and Parker, Chapter 12: Moral, Legal and Aesthetic Reasoning

Chapter 2 Ethical Concepts and Ethical Theories: Establishing and Justifying a Moral System

Chapter 2 Reasoning about Ethics

24.02 Moral Problems and the Good Life

A. The Three Main Branches of the Philosophical Study of Ethics. 2. Normative Ethics

Chapter 3 PHILOSOPHICAL ETHICS AND BUSINESS CHAPTER OBJECTIVES. After exploring this chapter, you will be able to:

-- did you get a message welcoming you to the cours reflector? If not, please correct what s needed.

Philosophy 1100: Ethics

MORAL RELATIVISM. A. What is it for something to be relative to something else? 1. Many things are relative to one thing or another.

MORAL RELATIVISM. A. What is it for something to be relative to something else? 1. Many things are relative to one thing or another.

(i) Morality is a system; and (ii) It is a system comprised of moral rules and principles.

Philosophical Ethics. The nature of ethical analysis. Discussion based on Johnson, Computer Ethics, Chapter 2.

Lecture 6 Workable Ethical Theories I. Based on slides 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley

Making Decisions on Behalf of Others: Who or What Do I Select as a Guide? A Dilemma: - My boss. - The shareholders. - Other stakeholders

Kant. Deontological Ethics

Deontological Ethics. Kant. Rules for Kant. Right Action

Suppose... Kant. The Good Will. Kant Three Propositions

Philosophy 2: Introduction to Philosophy Section 4170 Online Course El Camino College Spring, 2015

Ethical Relativism 1. Ethical Relativism: Ethical Relativism: subjective objective ethical nihilism Ice cream is good subjective

Consider... Ethical Egoism. Rachels. Consider... Theories about Human Motivations

Chapter 12: Areas of knowledge Ethics (p. 363)

SUMMARIES AND TEST QUESTIONS UNIT 6

What is the nature of God? Does God make arbitrary rules just to see if we will obey? Does God make rules that He knows will lead to our happiness?

Lecture 12 Deontology. Onora O Neill A Simplified Account of Kant s Ethics

Moral Theory. What makes things right or wrong?

Evaluating actions The principle of utility Strengths Criticisms Act vs. rule

Philosophical Ethics. Distinctions and Categories

CHAPTER 2 Test Bank MULTIPLE CHOICE

Logic, Truth & Epistemology. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology

The Schizophrenia of Modern Ethical Theories. Michael Stocker, Chapter 17 Introduction to Ethics Phil 118 Professor Douglas Olena

In-Class Kant Review Dialogue 1

MORAL RELATIVISM. By: George Bassilios St Antonius Coptic Orthodox Church, San Francisco Bay Area

Ethics is subjective.

Deontology. Immanuel Kant ( ) Founder of Deontology

KANTIAN ETHICS (Dan Gaskill)

PHIL 202: IV:

Deontology: Duty-Based Ethics IMMANUEL KANT

Basics of Ethics CS 215 Denbigh Starkey

Humanities 4: Lectures Kant s Ethics

Animal Disenhancement

Mill s Utilitarian Theory

CS305 Topic Introduction to Ethics

Quote. Analyzing Ethical Dilemmas. Chapter Two. Determining Moral Behavior. Integrity is doing the right thing--even if nobody is watching

Ethical Dilemmas in Life and Society

Practical Rationality and Ethics. Basic Terms and Positions

Introduction to. Ethics

A Review on What Is This Thing Called Ethics? by Christopher Bennett * ** 1

5. John Akers, former chairman of IBM, argued that ethics are not important to economic competitiveness.

W.D. Ross ( )

Short Answers: Answer the following questions in one paragraph (each is worth 5 points).

Wednesday, March 26, 14. Aristotle s Virtue Ethics

Q2) The test of an ethical argument lies in the fact that others need to be able to follow it and come to the same result.

An Introduction to Ethics / Moral Philosophy

Deontology: Duty-Based Ethics IMMANUEL KANT

AS Religious Studies. RSS02 Religion and Ethics 2 Mark scheme June Version: 1.0 Final

INTRODUCTORY HANDOUT PHILOSOPHY 13 FALL, 2004 INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY---ETHICS Professor: Richard Arneson. TAs: Eric Campbell and Adam Streed.

Philosophy 101: Introduction to Philosophy Section 4152 Online Course El Camino College Spring, 2017

Computer Ethics. Normative Ethics Ethical Theories. Viola Schiaffonati October 4 th 2018

Critical Reasoning and Moral theory day 3

Mitigating Operator-Induced Vehicle Mishaps

FORMING ETHICAL STANDARDS

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 7: Logical Fallacies

WHAT ABOUT HOMOSEXUALITY? I want to try to answer three questions today that often come up when addressing this issue;

Foundations of Bioethics

The Exeter College Summer Programme at Exeter College in the University of Oxford. Good Life or Moral Life?

National Quali cations SPECIMEN ONLY. Date of birth Scottish candidate number

Utilitarianism. But what is meant by intrinsically good and instrumentally good?

Kantian Deontology. A2 Ethics Revision Notes Page 1 of 7. Paul Nicholls 13P Religious Studies

Definitions: Values and Moral Values

SPRING 2014 UNDERGRADUATE COURSE OFFERINGS

Warren. Warren s Strategy. Inherent Value. Strong Animal Rights. Strategy is to argue that Regan s strong animals rights position is not persuasive

Philosophical Ethics. Consequentialism Deontology (Virtue Ethics)

Manuel Velasquez, Claire Andre, Thomas Shanks, S.J., and Michael J. Meyer

Short Answers: Answer the following questions in one paragraph (each is worth 4 points).

ACCAspace ACCA P1. Provided by ACCA Research Institute. Governanace, Risk and Ethics (GRE) 公司治理, 风险管理及职业操守 ACCA Lecturer: Cindy Li

Take Home Exam #2. PHI 1700: Global Ethics Prof. Lauren R. Alpert

Bernard Hoose - Proportionalism

DRAFT VERSION UNPROOFED Understanding Humanism by Brad Sherman

PH 101: Problems of Philosophy. Section 005, Monday & Thursday 11:00 a.m. - 12:20 p.m. Course Description:

ON BEING HUMBLE. Rev. Robert T. Woodyard First Christian Reformed Church, Lynden, WA July 3, 2016, 10:30AM. Text for the Sermon: I Peter 5:5-7

Deontology. Marianne Talbot University of Oxford Department for Continuing Education

AS Religious Studies. 7061/1 Philosophy of Religion and Ethics Mark scheme June Version: 1.0 Final

PHI 1700: Global Ethics

Ethics (ETHC) JHU-CTY Course Syllabus

A primer of major ethical theories

Philosophical approaches to animal ethics

NOT SO PROMISING AFTER ALL: EVALUATOR-RELATIVE TELEOLOGY AND COMMON-SENSE MORALITY

Philosophy 1100: Ethics

Journalists have a tremendous responsibility. Almost every day, we make

Situational Ethics Actions often cannot be evaluated in a vacuum. Suppose someone moves their hand rapidly forward, is that action right or wrong? The

Rashdall, Hastings. Anthony Skelton

Autonomous Machines Are Ethical

Benjamin Visscher Hole IV Phil 100, Intro to Philosophy

Look at this famous painting what s missing? What could YOU deduce about the value of human life from this picture? If there is no God then.

Psychological Egoism, Hedonism and Ethical Egoism

Ethical non-naturalism

Class 23 - April 20 Plato, What is Right Conduct?

Suicide. 1. Rationality vs. Morality: Kagan begins by distinguishing between two questions:

Joseph Forgives His Brothers Genesis 42 45

Let us begin by first locating our fields in relation to other fields that study ethics. Consider the following taxonomy: Kinds of ethical inquiries

Transcription:

Chapter 12: Moral, Legal, and Aesthetic Reasoning Critical Thinking, 10 th edition By Brooke Noel Moore and Richard Parker PowerPoint developed by Sarah Landsdown 2011 By PresenterMedia.com Important to remember: For now, moral means not nonmoral Doesn t mean not immoral 2 2009 McGraw- Education. All rights What s the difference? Placing a knife in a drawer is a NONMORAL act. Placing a knife in your roommate s eye is an IMMORAL act. 3 2009 McGraw- Education. All rights 1

So here, moral just means having to do with morality. MORAL REASONING refers to reasoning that applies a MORAL PRINCIPLE to a specific case. 4 2009 McGraw- Education. All rights A value judgment judges the merit of something. A moral value judgment judges the MORAL merit of something. Eg. She gave him more than he deserved. A nonmoral value judgment judges the merit of something. Eg. June is an effective teacher. 2009 McGraw- Education. All rights Divide into two groups of two: value vs. moral value judgments Jason is the world s best poker player. Susan dresses really well. It s wrong to invade another country. Doug, you should be nicer to your kid brother. 6 2009 McGraw- Education. All rights 2

Moral reasoning mostly consists of applying a general moral principle to a specific case. A moral oa principle cpe is just a general moral statement. Hill Higher Education All 7 Moral Reasoning Principle 1 Similar cases are to be treated in similar ways. Eg. If I let one kid take quizzes with book open We must let everyone take it that way. Hill Higher Education All 8 Moral Reasoning Principle 2 If you seem to be treating similar cases differently, then the burden of proof is on YOU to explain why the cases really are NOT similar. Eg. If I let blue eyed kids take the Quizzes with their books open, then it is up to me to show why blue eyed kids should be treated differently. Hill Higher Education All 9 3

Often the general moral principle is UNSTATED. Eg: He promised he would marry you, so he better not back out now. Unstated general principle: One should keep one s promises. Hill Higher Education All 10 Basic Moral Perspectives 1. Consequentialism 2. Duty Theory/Deontologism 3. Moral Relativism 4. Religious Relativism 5. Religious Absolutism 6. Virtue Ethics 11 Perspective # 1 Consequentialism What makes an act right or wrong is its outcome. Always act so as to maximize happiness! (Known as Utilitarianism. ) 12 4

Problem: It seems some actions are wrong regardless of their outcomes. For example, wouldn t slavery be wrong even if the sum total of happiness in the world would be greater with slavery? 13 Perspective # 2 Deontological Ethics Right/wrong are intrinsic properties of an act. Example: It is wrong for anyone anywhere to break a promise. 14 Problem: How do you KNOW which acts are intrinsically good or right? One answer: Those acts in which you treat others as ends, not as means. 15 5

Perspective # 3 Moral relativism What makes something right or wrong is what one s society thinks. Example: Does your society think extra marital sex is wrong? Then it IS wrong for you to have extra marital sex. 16 Problems! With Moral Relativism 1. What counts as a society??? 2. Even within a society there usually are conflicting views about what is right or wrong. 1. e.g., conflicting views within American society about gay marriage. 3. Suppose your society thinks it is o.k. to kill Americans. 1. Then, as an American, I think it is WRONG for you to kill Americans. But as a Relativist, I think it is RIGHT for you to kill Americans. Then, as an American, I think it is WRONG for you to kill Americans. But as a Relativist, I think it is RIGHT for you to kill Americans. 17 Perspective # 4 Religious Relativism What makes something right or wrong is what one s religion thinks. Example: Does your religion think pre marital sex is wrong? Then it IS wrong for people in your religion. 18 6

Similar problems as with Perspective # 3 1. What counts as a religion? Are Catholics and Protestants one religion or two? Are you still a Christian if you haven t gone to church in umpteen years, etc. 2. Even within a religion there usually are conflicting views about what is right or wrong. 1. e.g., conflicts within the United Church of Christ about gay marriage. 19 Perspective # 5 Religious Absolutism What makes something right or wrong is what the correct religion thinks. Example: Does the correct religion think premarital sex is wrong? Then it IS wrong, period. For everyone. 20 Main problem: Which religion is correct? 21 7

Perspective # 6 Virtue Ethics VE identifies the characteristics of the ethically best tlife. Then it says that one should develop those traits ( virtues ) that best enable one to lead such a life. 22 Problem: What is the ethically best life? We can t say, unless we know what the purpose of life is. But who is to say what that is? And perhaps there is no purpose of life to begin with. 23 Legal Reasoning Justifying Laws Legal Moralism Harm Principle Legal Paternalism Offense Principle Law should make anything illegal that is immoral Outlaw something if it can do harm to others. Outlaw something to protect them from harming themselves. Outlawing an act if it offends others. 8

Aesthetic Reasoning 1. Are valuable if they are meaningful or teach us truths. 2. Capacity to convey beliefs central to traditions or cultures where they originate 3. Can help bring social or political change 4. Give pleasure to those that experience it. 5. Help produce emotions that are valuable. 6. Help produce special non emotional experiences (feeling of belonging, etc.) 7. Posses a special form or property 8. Taste can not be disputed! 9