Charisma gift of grace (Questions and Answers on Miracles, Speaking in Tongues, Filled with the Spirit) What was the gift of Miracles? There were three types of miracles. 1. Healing (including raising the dead) 2. Casting out demons 3. Miracles of nature How was the gift used? By Jesus: The use of miracle pointed to the reality of Jesus constant claims to be God John 2:11 (NASB) This beginning of His signs Jesus did in Cana of Galilee, and manifested His glory, and His disciples believed in Him. John 5:36 (NASB) " the very works that I do, bear witness of Me, that the Father has sent Me. Acts 2:22 (NASB) " Jesus the Nazarene, a man attested to you by God with miracles and wonders and John the Baptist questioned Is He the Messiah? The response pointed to the miracles. Luke 7:20-22 (NASB) And when the men had come to Him, they said, "John the Baptist has sent us to You, saying, 'Are You the Expected One, or do we look for someone else?'" At that very time He cured many people of diseases and afflictions and evil spirits; and He granted sight to many who were blind. And He answered and said to them, "Go and report to John what you have seen and heard: the BLIND RECEIVE SIGHT, the lame walk, the lepers are cleansed, and the deaf hear, the dead are raised up By the Apostles: After Christ s work was finished the apostles were given the task of writing and preaching His claims. To authenticate their work God gave them the ability to do miracles of two types: 1. Healing 2. Casting out demons Today the false miracles include miracles of nature, an ability not even given to the apostles.
Other claims about the gift of miracles. Some claim these gifts are available today so that people might believe. But will everyone believe if we had and used the gift? Jesus did and they crucified Him. Who had the gift of healing? Jesus (set the standard) Apostles Seventy Very few associates (Barnabas, Philip, Stephen) An example of the use of the gift. We never see the gift used at random in the Church. Acts 3 clearly illustrates the gift Acts 3:1-11 (NASB) Now Peter and John were going up to the temple at the ninth hour, the hour of prayer. And a certain man who had been lame from his mother's womb was being carried along, whom they used to set down every day at the gate of the temple which is called Beautiful, in order to beg alms of those who were entering the temple And when he saw Peter and John about to go into the temple, he began asking to receive alms. And Peter, along with John, fixed his gaze upon him and said, "Look at us!" And he began to give them his attention, expecting to receive something from them. But Peter said, "I do not possess silver and gold, but what I do have I give to you: In the name of Jesus Christ the Nazarene-- walk!" And seizing him by the right hand, he raised him up; and immediately his feet and his ankles were strengthened. And with a leap, he stood upright and began to walk; and he entered the temple with them, walking and leaping and praising God. And all the people saw him walking and praising God; and they were taking note of him as being the one who used to sit at the Beautiful Gate of the temple to beg alms, and they were filled with wonder and amazement at what had happened to him And while he was clinging to Peter and John, all the people ran together to them at the so-called portico of Solomon, full of amazement. The salient features: The healed demonstrated no belief in Jesus. The healing immediately attracted a crowd. An opportunity was made to spread the gospel with authenticity. Faith Healing? The issue of faith is usually brought into question when the miracles today fail to produce the desired result. It is often said that a person is not healed because they don t have enough faith. In the example above, the first example of apostles healing, Peter and John healed the beggar without the beggar exhibiting any faith. The purpose of the miracle is immediately demonstrated - it attracted a crowd and authenticated their message. There are examples in the Gospels, for example Mark 5, of a woman who had a hemorrhage for twelve years, and when she was healed Jesus said your faith has made you well, but again that is not always the case. Just as often the recipient demonstrated no faith and in the extreme case, when Jesus, Peter and Paul raised the dead, those dead clearly exhibited no faith. (Jesus raised Lazarus-John 11:43, and widow s son Luke 7:15, Peter raised Tabitha Acts 9:40, Paul raised Eutychus Acts 20:10).
In the vast majority of the healing cases both Jesus and Paul healed everyone there is no indication of any faith on the part of the healed. There is no indication that only the ones with faith were healed. Mat 4:24 (NASB) And the news about Him went out into all Syria; and they brought to Him all who were ill, taken with various diseases and pains, demoniacs, epileptics, paralytics; and He healed them. Mat 8:16 (NASB) And when evening had come, they brought to Him many who were demon-possessed; and He cast out the spirits with a word, and healed all who were ill Mat 12:15 (NASB) But Jesus, aware of this, withdrew from there. And many followed Him, and He healed them all, Mat 14:14 (NASB) And when He went ashore, He saw a great multitude, and felt compassion for them, and healed their sick. Mat 15:30 (NASB) And great multitudes came to Him, bringing with them those who were lame, crippled, blind, dumb, and many others, and they laid them down at His feet; and He healed them, Acts 5:16 (NASB) And also the people from the cities in the vicinity of Jerusalem were coming together, bringing people who were sick or afflicted with unclean spirits; and they were all being healed. The gift of Miracles has ceased. The gift of miracles had ceased before the New Testament period ended. The last recorded miracle was A.D. 58 (Acts 28:7-10). The following three examples show not only that the gift had ceased but that it was never abused. Example 1 Phil 2:25-27 (NASB) But I thought it necessary to send to you Epaphroditus, my brother and fellow worker and fellow soldier, who is also your messenger and minister to my need; because he was longing for you all and was distressed because you had heard that he was sick. For indeed he was sick to the point of death, but God had mercy on him, and not on him only but also on me, lest I should have sorrow upon sorrow. Why didn t Paul just heal Epaphroditus It would have perverted the purpose of the gift. The purpose was not to keep Christians healthy but a sign to unbelievers. Example 2 Once again Paul left Trophimus sick at Miletus rather than heal him. Why didn t he just heal him rather than leave him there sick if the use of the gift was indiscriminate? 2 Tim 4:20 (NASB) Erastus remained at Corinth, but Trophimus I left sick at Miletus. Example 3 Paul had a thorn in the flesh that he prayed three times to have removed. Why didn t he just heal himself? It was not from lack of faith, at the very end of his life he said he had kept the faith, it was to not pervert the use of the gift. 2 Cor 12:7-9 (NASB) And because of the surpassing greatness of the revelations, for this reason, to keep me from exalting myself, there was given me a thorn in the flesh, a messenger of Satan to buffet me-- to keep me from exalting myself! Concerning this I entreated the Lord three times that it might depart from me. And He has said to me, "My
grace is sufficient for you, for power is perfected in weakness." Most gladly, therefore, I will rather boast about my weaknesses, that the power of Christ may dwell in me. The means of getting the gifts in not available. There were only two means of obtaining the gifts neither of which are now available. (1) On the day of Pentecost and at the household of Cornelius are the only two examples in scripture of people receiving the gifts directly from God. These gifts were never promised to others. If this was the method then today when you are slain in the spirit there should also be the tongues of fire and rushing wind noise. (2) By the laying on of the apostles hands. Philip received the gifts but could not transfer them, he had to wait until the apostles came down from Jerusalem. Acts 8:18 (NASB) Now when Simon saw that the Spirit was bestowed through the laying on of the apostles' hands, he offered them money, Tongues (see other handout on 7 reasons why tongues were ordinary languages and 7 reasons why they have ceased) The gift of languages (tongues) are mentioned in 3 books, Mark (16), Acts (2,18,19), 1 Cor (12-14) Tongues means languages 1. glossa human language, normal Greek work for language 2. dialektos also used, normal word for variation of a particular language 3. Same term is used in Acts and 1 Cor 12-14 4. Interpretation 1 Cor 12:10 you interpret languages 5. 1 Cor 14:21 Sign to unbelieving Israel, as prophesied in the Old Testament 6. 1 Cor 14:27 It was a genuine language to be translated 7. 1 Cor 12:10 Different kinds genos of languages Predicted to Cease 1 Cor 13:8 (NASB) Love never fails; but if there are gifts of prophecy, they will be done away; if there are tongues, they will cease Why tongues have ceased. This was one of the sign/miracle gifts that ended in A.D. 58 (Acts 28:7-10) It is mentioned only in the earliest epistles Ephesians and Romans both discuss gifts of the Spirit at length and never mention tongues. It was a judicial sign for the Jews not for use in the church. 1 Cor 14:21-22 (NASB) In the Law it is written, "BY MEN OF STRANGE TONGUES AND BY THE LIPS OF STRANGERS I WILL SPEAK TO THIS PEOPLE, AND EVEN SO THEY WILL NOT LISTEN TO ME," says the Lord. So then tongues are for a sign, not to those who believe, but to unbelievers
Theoretically, speaking in tongues is a revelation from God. The Revelation is complete (The Bible) and has ceased. Evidence that the gift ceased. Paul wrote at least 12 other epistles in addition to 1 Corinthians and never mentioned tongues. The gift of tongues is never alluded to, hinted at or ever found in any writings of the Post-Apostolic Fathers. It is not mentioned in early church history. The modern movement of speaking in tongues began in Bethel Bible College in Topeka Kansas, around 1900, when Agnes Ozman experienced speaking in tongues and believed she received the baptism of the Holy Spirit. Until 1960 these experiences were contained within the Assemblies of God, Foursquare and United Pentecostal but then spread to the Episcopal and most other denominations. One of our concerns of the whole neo-pentecostal movement with its emphasis on miracles, prophecy, healing, and tongues is the passage from Matthew 7 from Jesus: Mat 7:22 (NASB) "Many will say to Me on that day, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your name, and in Your name cast out demons, and in Your name perform many miracles?' "And then I will declare to them, 'I never knew you; DEPART FROM ME, YOU WHO PRACTICE LAWLESSNESS.' Tongues in Acts 2, 8, and 10 The confusion on the availability of the gift of tongues is due primarily to not understanding the historical transitions found in Acts 2, 8, and 10. Acts 2 Pentecost This is a very unique experience. If this was the norm, then everyone who is baptized and receives the Holy Spirit should experience tongues of fire and rushing wind. Also note that the gift here is clearly defined as the ability to speak singly and be heard in a multiple of languages. Also notice that not everyone heard in their own language some thought the men were drunk. The true gift had more to do with the hearing than the speaking. Acts 2:2-15 (NASB) And suddenly there came from heaven a noise like a violent, rushing wind, and it filled the whole house where they were sitting And there appeared to them tongues as of fire distributing themselves, and they rested on each one of them And they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit was giving them utterance Now there were Jews living in Jerusalem, devout men, from every nation under heaven. And when this sound occurred, the multitude came together, and were bewildered, because they were each one hearing them speak in his own language And they were amazed and marveled, saying, "Why, are not all these who are speaking Galileans? "And how is it that we each hear them in our own language to which we were born? "Parthians and Medes and Elamites, and residents of Mesopotamia, Judea and Cappadocia, Pontus and Asia Phrygia and Pamphylia, Egypt and the districts of Libya around Cyrene, and visitors from Rome, both Jews and proselytes, Cretans and Arabs-- we hear them in our own tongues speaking of the mighty deeds of God." And they all continued in amazement and great perplexity, saying to one another, "What does this mean?" But others were mocking and saying, "They are full of sweet wine."
But Peter, taking his stand with the eleven, raised his voice and declared to them: "Men of Judea, and all you who live in Jerusalem, let this be known to you, and give heed to my words. "For these men are not drunk, as you suppose, for it is only the third hour of the day; Acts 8 - Samaria Acts 8:14-17 (NASB) Now when the apostles in Jerusalem heard that Samaria had received the word of God, they sent them Peter and John, who came down and prayed for them, that they might receive the Holy Spirit. For He had not yet fallen upon any of them; they had simply been baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. Then they began laying their hands on them, and they were receiving the Holy Spirit. The phrase not yet fallen oudepo (gk) means something that should have happened but did not. The reason was to make sure the Samaritans were under apostolic authority. If God had not restricted the Samaritans and demonstrated their dependence on and authority in the apostles, there would have immediately been two churches. Act 10 - Cornelius (Gentiles) Here the gentiles received the spiritual gifts before they were even baptized. This was not the norm but demonstrated to Peter that these were legitimate Christians. Acts 10:44-47 (NASB) While Peter was still speaking these words, the Holy Spirit fell upon all those who were listening to the message. And all the circumcised believers who had come with Peter were amazed, because the gift of the Holy Spirit had been poured out upon the Gentiles also. For they were hearing them speaking with tongues and exalting God. Then Peter answered, "Surely no one can refuse the water for these to be baptized who have received the Holy Spirit just as we did, can he?" Upon his return to Jerusalem he was almost apologetic to the other Jews that he was forced to accept gentiles. Acts 11:15-18 (NASB) "And as I began to speak, the Holy Spirit fell upon them, just as He did upon us at the beginning. "And I remembered the word of the Lord, how He used to say, 'John baptized with water, but you shall be baptized with the Holy Spirit.' "If God therefore gave to them the same gift as He gave to us also after believing in the Lord Jesus Christ, who was I that I could stand in God's way?" And when they heard this, they quieted down, and glorified God, saying, "Well then, God has granted to the Gentiles also the repentance that leads to life." These events in Acts are not the norm - but a narrative of the unusual events associated with the foundation of Christianity. These were the foundations of the Church not the norm for the Church. Eph 2:19-20 (NASB) So then you are no longer strangers and aliens, but you are fellow citizens with the saints, and are of God's household having been built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus Himself being the corner stone,
Speaking in tongues is not proof of being filled with the Spirit. Speaking in tongues is not evidence of having the Spirit. All Christians are filled with the Spirit. Rom 8:9 (NASB) However, you are not in the flesh but in the Spirit, if indeed the Spirit of God dwells in you. But if anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, he does not belong to Him. 1 Cor 12:13 (NASB) For by one Spirit we were all baptized into one body, whether Jews or Greeks, whether slaves or free, and we were all made to drink of one Spirit. Eph 5:18 (NASB) And do not get drunk with wine, for that is dissipation, but be filled with the Spirit, (The verb be filled actually means keep on being filled with the Spirit not a one time occurrence but a continual action.)
The Gift of Tongues (Languages) Tongues are mentioned in three books of the Bible: Mark (Cpt 16); Acts (2,10,19); and I Cor (12-14). Tongues Means Languages Reasons Why 1. The Greek word "glossa" primarily means human language when used in Scripture, it is the normal for language. In the Greek Old Testament (Septuagint) the word is used 30 times and always meant human language. In Acts 2:6 when the gift is first mentioned, it says, "they were each one hearing them speak in his own language" and goes on to list some 15 different countries and areas whose languages were being spoken (8-11). 2. Also used in Acts 2 is the Greek word "dialektos" from which we get the English word dialect - some of those at Pentecost heard in their own dialect - own language. 3. The same term for language is used later in the book of Acts and in 1 Cor 12-14 - some Pentecostal believe languages are mentioned in Acts 2 but after that it means something else. Glossa always appears in the plural form throughout Acts - multiple of languages. When Paul used the singular in I Cor 14:2,4,13,14 and 19 he was referring to the counterfeit pagan gibberish (unintelligible speech). The King James Version used the work "unknown" with all these singulars to designate a difference between the pagan ecstatic speech and the true gift in plural form, which has no "unknown" in front of it. 4. I Cor 12:10 mentions the same word "glossa" and goes on to talk about interpretation of languages. Take one language and translate into another. You can't translate gibberish. 5. I Cor 14:21 indicates that tongues were a foreign language given as a sign to unbelieving Israel. Paul referred to Isaiah 28:11,12 when he said, "in the Law it is written, "By men of strange tongues and by the lips of strangers I will speak to this people, and even so they will not listen to me, says the Lord". And then Paul went on to say that tongues are for a sign, not for believers, but for unbelievers. 6. I Cor 14:27 indicates a genuine language since it was to be translated. Paul went on to say if no one was there to interpret then keep silent. 7. I Cor 12:10 mentions different "kinds" of languages.. Greek is "genos", family or group. Again the reference means normal human speech.
Tongues (Languages) Have Ceased Reasons Why 1. The gift was predicted to cease. I Cor 13:8 Love never fails, but if there are gifts of prophecy, they will be done away; if there are tongues, they will cease; if there is knowledge, it will be done away. 2. Tongues are a miracle gift, and the gift of miracles ended with the apostles. The last recorded miracle occurred around A.D. 58, the healing of Publius' father (Acts 28:7-10). Miracle gifts like tongues and healing are mentioned only in the earliest epistles such as I Cor. When you get to Ephesians and Romans, both of which discuss gifts of the Spirit at length, no mention is made of miracle gifts. 3. The miracle of tongues was a judicial sign to Israel because of Israel's unbelief. I Cor 14:22 clearly states that tongues are for a sign, not for those who believe but to unbelievers. 4. The gift of tongues was inferior to the gift of prophecy (I Cor. 14:1-3). Tongues can't edify the church in a proper way, only a pseudo self-edification is possible 5. Speaking in tongues was rendered useless when the New Testament was complete. Theoretically, the person who spoke in a tongue was receiving revelation from God. When the revelation was complete the gift was no longer needed. If the gift is available today why do people with the gift exist among denomination holding contrary beliefs. Why does it not correct doctrinal errors. 6. Tongues are mentioned only in the earliest books of the New Testament. The only epistle where it is even mentioned is First Corinthians. Paul wrote at least twelve other epistles and never mentioned tongues again. Peter never mentioned tongues. James never mentioned tongues. John nor Jude mentioned tongues. Tongues appear briefly in the early days of the church as the new word of God was being spread and the Church was being established. But once this occurred tongues were gone. 7. History records that tongues did cease. I Cor 13:8 uses the verb "pano" - cease never to start again. Cleion Rogers, scholar-missionary, wrote "It is significant that the gift of tongues is nowhere alluded to, hinted at or even found in any writings of the Post-Apostolic Fathers". What is modern tongue speaking (glossolalia)?-- William Samarin, professor of linguistics at the University of Toronto: " Over a period of five years I have taken part in meetings in Italy, Holland, Jamaica, Canada and the United States. I have observed old-fashioned Pentecostals and neo-pentecostals; I have been in small meetings at private homes as well as in mammoth public meetings; I have seen such different cultural settings as are found among the Puerto Ricans of the Bronx, the snake handlers of the Appalachians [and] Russian Molakans in Los Angeles... Glossolalia is indeed like language in some ways, but this is only because the speaker (unconsciously) wants to be like language. Yet in spite of superficial similarities, glossolalia is fundamentally not language." He is one of many who have made studies of glossolalia. The studies all agree that what we are hearing today is not language, then it is not the biblical gift of tongues.
Miracles Providence is God's supernatural, sovereign control over all natural events so that his plan and purposes are achieved. A miracle is an event in nature, so extraordinary in itself and so coinciding with the prophecy or command of a religious teacher or leader, as fully to warrant the conviction, on the part of those who witness it, that God has wrought it with the design of certifying that this teacher or leader has been commissioned by Him. (Augustus H. Strong, Systematic Theology) Miracles in Scripture are also called "signs and wonders" and happened in three relatively brief periods of Bible history: in the days of Moses and Joshua, during the ministries of Elijah and Elisha, and in the time of Christ and the apostles. Miracles introduced new eras of revelation. Moses wrote the first five books of Scripture. Elijah and Elisha introduced the prophetic age. The apostles wrote nearly all of the New Testament Miracles authenticated the messengers of revelation. All the miracles served an important purpose. They were not simply divine exhibitionism; they substantiated and authenticated the prophets' claim that they spoke for God. Validate of the prophets was the chief purpose of biblical miracles: Heb 2:3 how shall we escape if we neglect so great a salvation? After it was at the first spoken through the Lord, it was confirmed to us by those who heard, Heb 2:4 God also bearing witness with them, both by signs and wonders and by various miracles and by gifts of the Holy Spirit according to His own will. The words "it was confirmed" are in the past tense, an accurate reflection of the Greek text. Miracles were unique to the apostles and those who worked most closely with them. The average Christian had no ability to perform signs and wonders. 2 Cor 12:11 I have become foolish; you yourselves compelled me. Actually I should have been commended by you, for in no respect was I inferior to the most eminent apostles, even though I am a nobody. 2 Cor 12:12 The signs of a true apostle were performed among you with all perseverance, by signs and wonders and miracles.