A Scientific Model Explains Spirituality and Nonduality

Similar documents
Spirituality Explained Scientifically

A Model of Consciousness and Spirituality

A Materialist Theory of Consciousness That Explains the Origins of Religion

24.09 Minds and Machines Fall 11 HASS-D CI

Department of Philosophy TCD. Great Philosophers. Dennett. Tom Farrell. Department of Surgical Anatomy RCSI Department of Clinical Medicine RCSI

Please remember to sign-in by scanning your badge Department of Psychiatry Grand Rounds

The knowledge argument

What do you think happens to you when you die? The answer always leads somewhere meaningful.

Self-Realisation, Non-Duality and Enlightenment

Conferences. Journals. Job Opening

Examining the nature of mind. Michael Daniels. A review of Understanding Consciousness by Max Velmans (Routledge, 2000).

The Problem of the External World

Metaphysics & Consciousness. A talk by Larry Muhlstein

Important dates. PSY 3360 / CGS 3325 Historical Perspectives on Psychology Minds and Machines since David Hume ( )

Structure and essence: The keys to integrating spirituality and science

On the Conceivability of Zombies

PHENOMENALITY AND INTENTIONALITY WHICH EXPLAINS WHICH?: REPLY TO GERTLER

The British Empiricism

What I am is what I am, Are you what you are, Or what?

Kant s Copernican Revolution

The Leadership of Hindu Gurus: Its Meaning and Implications for Practice

Alignment with our real nature continued: Getting control of our vibrational dial

Rationalism. A. He, like others at the time, was obsessed with questions of truth and doubt

PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 7 : E P I S T E M O L O G Y - K A N T

Is there a definition of stupidity?

Differences between Psychosynthesis and Jungian Psychology 2017 by Catherine Ann Lombard. Conceptual differences

Kant Lecture 4 Review Synthetic a priori knowledge

T hrough the study of intuition the

MY IMPRESSIONS FROM READING PORTIONS OF. William A. Dembski s. "Intelligent Design; The Bridge Between Science & Theology"

Grade 6 correlated to Illinois Learning Standards for Mathematics

Dualism vs. Materialism

Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

24.500/Phil253 topics in philosophy of mind/perceptual experience

RG: Is it this understanding of Ahriman that led you to create Michaelic Yoga?

PHI 1700: Global Ethics

PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 7 : E P I S T E M O L O G Y - K A N T

Project:Yourself Presents

Artificial Intelligence Prof. Deepak Khemani Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

PONDER ON THIS. PURPOSE and DANGERS of GUIDANCE. Who and what is leading us?

In his pithy pamphlet Free Will, Sam Harris. Defining free will away EDDY NAHMIAS ISN T ASKING FOR THE IMPOSSIBLE. reviews/harris

The Self and Other Minds

MISSOURI S FRAMEWORK FOR CURRICULAR DEVELOPMENT IN MATH TOPIC I: PROBLEM SOLVING

Andrew B. Newberg, Principles of Neurotheology (Ashgate science and religions series), Farnham, Surrey, England: Ashgate Publishing, 2010 (276 p.

The sacred is described in terms of ultimate concerns or spiritual ideals such as an

Intro. The need for a philosophical vocabulary

Is the Concept of God Fundamental or Figment of the Mind?

Knowing the Facts about A Course in Miracles

***** [KST : Knowledge Sharing Technology]

What is belief, such that first person authority can exist?

Consciousness Without Awareness

BonJour Against Materialism. Just an intellectual bandwagon?

1/10. The Fourth Paralogism and the Refutation of Idealism

Behavior and Other Minds: A Response to Functionalists

STEP SEVEN-INTUITION. Gut instinct Psychic Ability Pattern Recognition. The only real valuable thing is intuition. Einstein

Mindfulness. Mindful Body Awareness and Stillness

Descartes to Early Psychology. Phil 255

New Aristotelianism, Routledge, 2012), in which he expanded upon

Rationality in Action. By John Searle. Cambridge: MIT Press, pages, ISBN Hardback $35.00.

DIGIT SYNAESTHESIA: A CASE STUDY USING A

Subjective Character and Reflexive Content

Lecture 7.1 Berkeley I

Supplemental Material 2a: The Proto-psychologists. In this presentation, we will have a short review of the Scientific Revolution and the

Indian Philosophy. Prof. Dr. Satya Sundar Sethy. Department of Humanities and Social Sciences. Indian Institute of Technology, Madras. Module No.

Appearing in Issue #57. Order A Copy Today. Consciousness at the Beginning of Life

A Discussion on Kaplan s and Frege s Theories of Demonstratives

Free Won't [This Title Was Predetermined] and philosophy. For religious followers, free will is often considered a paradox. If God is all-seeing and

What is knowledge? How do good beliefs get made?

Crafting the Service Environment

Philosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy. Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2015

Richard Rose s Psychology of the Observer: The Path to Reality Through the Self

Realism and instrumentalism

Living in the Truth of the Present Moment

UUFP September 16, I don t know that I fully believe in reincarnation---but I find the idea wholly

Property Dualism and the Knowledge Argument: Are Qualia Really a Problem for Physicalism? Ronald Planer Rutgers Univerity

Chalmers says Too Hard ; Dennett says Too Easy

Dalai Lama (Tibet - contemporary)

Introduction to Philosophy

Neurophilosophy and free will VI

IN THIS PAPER I will examine and criticize the arguments David

SYSTEMATIC RESEARCH IN PHILOSOPHY. Contents

PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 4 : I M M A T E R I A L I S M, D U A L I S M, & T H E M I N D - B O D Y P R O B L E M

Van Fraassen: Arguments Concerning Scientific Realism

Written by Rupert Sheldrake, Ph.D. Sunday, 01 September :00 - Last Updated Wednesday, 18 March :31

McDougal Littell High School Math Program. correlated to. Oregon Mathematics Grade-Level Standards

9 Knowledge-Based Systems

III Knowledge is true belief based on argument. Plato, Theaetetus, 201 c-d Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Edmund Gettier

Reclaiming Human Spirituality

CONTENTS A SYSTEM OF LOGIC

THE CONCEPT OF OWNERSHIP by Lars Bergström

Epistemology Naturalized

Comments on Saul Kripke s Philosophical Troubles

Introduction to Philosophy

On the hard problem of consciousness: Why is physics not enough?

Guided Imagery as a Technique

Trinda Latherow, Author of Pieces of the Puzzle book Series Interview with Enoch Tan on Wed, 18 Apr 2007

Anne Berube. Online Course Outline. Overview:

Can machines think? Machines, who think. Are we machines? If so, then machines can think too. We compute since 1651.

The readings for the course are separated into the following two categories:

Philosophy of Mind. Introduction to the Mind-Body Problem

Transcription:

A Scientific Model Explains Spirituality and Nonduality Frank Heile, Ph.D. Physics degrees from Stanford and MIT frank@spiritualityexplained.com www.spiritualityexplained.com Science and Nonduality Conference San Jose, California Oct 20, 2017

Blue Annotations On the following slides, blue text like this was added to include some of the ideas that were presented verbally during the presentation. I also took this opportunity to write down a few ideas I would have included if I had extra time during the presentation! 2 2

What is Spirituality? My Equation is: Spirituality = Religion Dogma A book that must be believed is an example of dogma. Spirituality cultivates positive values such as love and forgiveness. Spiritual practices include prayer and meditation. 3 3

When and How Did Spirituality Start? Hypothesis: Spirituality developed around 40K to 100K years ago when human consciousness changed 40K years ago, humans created figurines that could be fertility goddesses. 100K years ago, humans intentionally buried their dead. These may indicate religion/spirituality began around that time. 4 4

Consciousness Change was Facilitated by: 5 Modern Language Which allowed the development of: A Conceptual Model. of the Real World. was an input and output mechanism My model posits that human vocabulary slowly increased from 50-100 words at 6 million years ago, to a few thousand or perhaps ten thousand words at the time religions started. Since that time vocabulary rapidly grew to the modern range of approximately a million words. (Adding words is easy when there are already lots of words.) Individual modern humans have a 10,000 to 50,000 word working vocabulary. 5

Consciousness Change was Facilitated by: Modern Language Which allowed the development of: An Internal Model of a Conceptual World Most of the concepts in this Conceptual World would be abstract concepts that do not correspond to real world objects. 6 6

Who We Are Changed: Ancient humans would have identified with the body Modern humans would identify with the conceptual self = I/Me/My I/Me/My = autobiographical narrative self-model and would include a simple body model. The Conceptual World gave us science & technology and the modern world. However the Conceptual Self-Model led to suffering for individuals and spirituality is the cure for that suffering. 7 7

Agents An Agent is an entity, that Has goals, A way of sensing the world, and A way to make changes to the world to achieve those goals A human being is an agent 8 8

The Good Regulator Theorem: A theorem (1) from control theory says: Every Good Regulator of a System Must Be a Model of That System Good Agents need: A Model of the World So each human has an internal model of the world A Self-Model is required if the agent is present A Self-Model in the World where it makes changes to the World. Because the human body is part of the World, the Human s Self-Model would include the body. (1) Conant & Ashby, Int. J. Systems Sci., 1970, vol. 1, No. 2, 89-97, Every Good Regulator of a System Must Be a Model of That System 9 9

Where Do We Live? Humans living in the World? Human Self-Models living in our Model of the World? A body in the world and a body self-model in the model of the world are equivalent. But the I/Me/My conceptual self only exists in the model of the world, hence the red box. 10 If this is not convincing, consider the following question: 10

Do We Experience the World Directly OR Our Model of the World? Are We Self-Models, Who ONLY Experience Colors can help us decide. 11 11

Do We Experience the World OR Our Model of the World? 12 Blue Light The retina of the eye has 3 kinds of photoreceptors: Green Light Red Light The brain gets the equivalent of 3 B&W images and produces this experience: Colors Exist Only in Our Model of the World 12

What We Experience is NOT What We Perceive because peripheral visual acuity drops rapidly with angle. Peripheral Visual Acuity vs Angle Perception is defined as what the eye sends to the brain. In addition, there is a blind spot which we we don t experience; even with 1 eye closed 13 13

What We Experience is NOT What We Perceive Peripheral vision looks crisp and in focus out to the edge of vision: 14 14

What We Experience is NOT What We Perceive The information the eye sends to the brain looks like this: Blind Spot 15 15

What We Experience is the World Model, NOT What We Perceive The Experiencer knows the World Model is crisp out to the edge of vision and it uses the blurry peripheral vision to estimate what crisp objects are out there. 16 16

Therefore We are a self-model living in and experiencing our model of the world 17 17

Vision, Hearing, & All Body Senses Control all Muscles and Glands Spoken & Written Language Input Spoken & Written Language Output The Three Agent Model of the Human Brain In the Experiencer, Representation is the current state, and Model allows future predictions. Experiencer Modern Human Brain Thoughtful Speech Conceptual Representation and Model of the World,. Body, and Self +WM Slow Interface Thinker Problem Solver Continuous Hierarchy of Categories: Raw Sense Data to Concepts & Symbols Automatic Speech Sensory Representation and Model of the World, Body, and Self Fast Interface Doer. Controls the Body Feelings & Emotions 18 WM = Working Memory 18

Vision, Hearing, & All Body Senses Control all Muscles and Glands Spoken & Written Language Input Spoken & Written Language Output Most of the huge human conceptual model comes through language input. Animals only have the concepts they individually create during their lifetime. This is what makes humans unique. The Three Agent Model of the Human Brain Experiencer Modern Human Brain Inner Voice Thoughtful Speech Conceptual Representation and Model of the World,. Body, and Self +WM Slow Interface Thinker Problem Solver Continuous Hierarchy of Categories: Raw Sense Data to Concepts & Symbols Top Down Attn. Automatic Speech Sensory Representation and Model of the World, Body, and Self Fast Interface Doer. Controls the Body Feelings & Emotions 19 WM = Working Memory Bottom Up Attention Top Down Attention & Motor Plans 19

The Three Agent Model of the Human Brain Unfortunately, this talk is too short to fully explain this model. In particular, I have no time to explain: 1. The agents goals 2. The problem the Thinker causes 3. How spirituality fixes that problem. To understand the full model of spirituality, please visit: www.spiritualityexplained.com. watch the videos and Sign Up Now for updates about significant changes Specifically, I would recommend this video: 14-minute interview for a general overview. For more detailed info see these three videos: Part 5 Goals (12-min) Part 6 Problem (4-min) Part 7 The Fix (10-min) You should be able to click the red underlined text to watch the videos now. 20 20

Thinker & Doer are Consistent With Other Experimentally Derived Cognition Models Both of these are well accepted models of cognition with lots of experimental confirmation. Psychology: Dual Process Theory (1) Thinker Doer System 2: slow, deliberative, explicit, & conscious System 1: fast, intuitive, implicit, & subconscious Action-Outcome is computing what action will produce the desired outcome, i.e. problem solving Neuroscience: Action-Outcome/Stimulus-Response Model (2) Thinker Doer Action-Outcome contingency system / Associative Network Stimulus-Response habit system / Sensorimotor Network 21 (1) Daniel Kahneman popularized Dual Process Theory in his 2011 book, Thinking, Fast and Slow. (2) Yin & Knowlton, (2006) The role of the basal ganglia in habit formation. Nat. rev. Neuro. 7. 464-76 21

Given a Thinker and a Doer The Experiencer is required by the Good Regulator Theorem It would not make sense for the Thinker and Doer to each have their own world model. Instead, the Experiencer is a proposed agent that creates one world model which is shared with both the Thinker and Doer. The Experiencer goals are to: 1. Update the sensory and conceptual world models by understanding the sensory and language inputs, 2. Direct top-down attention as requested by the Thinker and Doer, 3. Generate bottom-up attention for unexpected inputs or when some Thinker or Doer goal target is detected in the environment. 22 I define Intuition as Understanding how the world works without thinking, so Intuition comes from the Experiencer. I define Instinct as Understanding what to do in the world without thinking, so Instincts are in the Doer. 22

Definitions: Body Schema is a model of the body Attention Schema is a model of our current state of attention There are lots of potential targets of attention: the 5 senses, the inner voice, feelings and emotions, memories, and imagined visual objects. There can also be more than one attention target at a given time. The Attention Schema is a model of where and how the attention is being directed the Attention Schema is not the actual attention mechanism itself. 23 23

Attention Schema, World, & World Models The World and World Model always match, even as attention is moved around. World: or World Model: 24 Attention Schema: Peripheral visual attention directed here Eye directed here 24

Attention Schema (AS) and the Current Representation of the World (CRW) Current Representation of the World (CRW): 25 Attention Schema (AS): The spotlight of attention moves around as attention moves, so the CRW changes as AS changes. 25

World Model Equation: Given any two of: WM, AS or CRW, the missing model can be computed. E.g. Given WM and AS, we can use AS to compute where the spotlights of attention will be in the WM to thereby compute the CRW. Or we can get: WM=some_function(AS,CRW): World Model = Attention Schema + Current Representation of the World = + WM = AS + CRW 26 The boxed + sign stands for combined with, not just simple addition. 26

Human and Sub- Agent Self-Models Experiencer isn t in, and doesn t change, the external world, but by directing attention it does change the CRS. Therefore, it does need a self-model in the internal World Model. It s Self-Model is thus the AS since that is the model of how the Experiencer directs attention (which is how the Experiencer changes the CRS). Self-Models Thinker Doer Experiencer Human I/Me/My (autobiographical self + simple body model + goals) The Body (Body Schema + goals) Attention Schema Some combination of the three sub-agent self-models shown above 27 27

Attention Schema Theory (1) : (A) Visual attention is captured by the image of an apple. CRW By neuroscientist Michael Graziano of Princeton. This slide is taken from Fig 1A/B of his paper. I only changed notation This is information, not awareness. (B) Subjective awareness requires additional models, such as: = SM + AS + CRW The visual stimulus [CRW] The self-model [SM], and SM AS CRW Attention Schema [AS], the process that links SM and CRW together. The overall model of awareness is: SM + AS + CRW (1) Graziano & Webb, (2015) The attention schema theory: a mechanistic account of subjective awareness. Front. Psych., 6, 500 28 28

Attention Schema CRW Theory (1) : Consider the Experiencer, Thinker, and Doer as three separate brains. According to AST, ONLY the Experiencer would be conscious, since it is the only agent that has an AS and a world model. In fact, when the Thinker and Doer are separated from the Experiencer, the Thinker and Doer would not be real agents since they would not contain a model of the world. SM AS = SM + AS + CRW CRW For the rest of this presentation, consider the Thinker and Doer to be connected to the Experiencer, so they are full agents and can share the consciousness of the Experiencer. (1) Graziano & Webb, (2015) The attention schema theory: a mechanistic account of subjective awareness. Front. Psych., 6, 500 29 29

Awareness Models for the Agents: Now, let s compute the Awareness Models for the three agents. The Self-Model of Thinker is the I/Me/My conceptual Self-Model, so Awareness Model = SM + AS + CRW Thinker Doer Experiencer SM=Self-Model AS=Attention Schema CRW=Current Representation of the World 30 30

Thinker Awareness Model I/Me/My Attention Schema 31 31

Awareness Models for the Agents: The Thinker would express his awareness in words as shown below The Doer Self-Model is The Body, so Awareness Model = SM + AS + CRW Thinker I/Me/My + am aware + of the Apple (in words) Doer Experiencer SM=Self-Model AS=Attention Schema CRW=Current Representation of the World 32 32

Doer Awareness Model Attention Schema 33 The Body 33

Awareness Models for the Agents: The Doer awareness is the feeling or sensation of being aware of the apple (the qualia). The Experiencer self-model is the AS, so Awareness Model = SM + AS + CRW Thinker Doer I/Me/My + am aware + of the Apple (in words) [The Body]+[aware]+[Apple] (sensory representations) Experiencer SM=Self-Model AS=Attention Schema CRW=Current Representation of the World 34 34

Awareness Models for the Agents: Awareness Model = SM + AS + CRW Thinker Doer Experiencer I/Me/My + am aware + of the Apple (in words) [The Body]+[aware]+[Apple] (sensory representations) AS + AS + CRW SM=Self-Model AS=Attention Schema CRW=Current Representation of the World 35 35

Experiencer Awareness Model Attention Schema Attention Schema But AS combined with AS is presumably, just the AS, so 36 36

Experiencer Awareness Model Attention Schema Selfless Awareness Thus, there is no self in the Experiencer awareness model! 37 37

Awareness Models for the Agents: But the AS combined with the CRW is World Model (WM), so Awareness Model = SM + AS + CRW Thinker Doer Experiencer I/Me/My + am aware + of the Apple (in words) [The Body]+[aware]+[Apple] (sensory representations) AS + CRW SM=Self-Model AS=Attention Schema CRW=Current Representation of the World 38 38

Awareness Models for the Agents: So, the Experiencer Awareness Model is experienced as if it is just the World Model. How this would be expressed or felt by the Experiencer might be Awareness Model = SM + AS + CRW Thinker Doer Experiencer I/Me/My + am aware + of the Apple (in words) [The Body]+[aware]+[Apple] (sensory representations) [World Model] = AS + CRW SM=Self-Model AS=Attention Schema CRW=Current Representation of the World 39 39

Awareness Models for the Agents: felt as [Aware]+[Apple] or maybe [WM]+[Aware]+[Apple] Since awareness is a fundamental attribute of consciousness, let s rewrite this table as a table for the three kinds of consciousness Awareness Model = SM + AS + CRW Thinker I/Me/My + am aware + of the Apple (in words) Doer Experiencer [The Body]+[aware]+[Apple] (sensory representations) [aware]+[apple] or [World Model] = AS + CRW or [World Model]+[aware]+[Apple] SM=Self-Model AS=Attention Schema CRW=Current Representation of the World 40 40

Three Kinds of Consciousness for 3 Agents Consciousness Models Thinker Consciousness Doer Consciousness (TC) I am aware of X (expressed in words) (DC) [Body]+[aware]+[X] (sensory experience) 41 Experiencer Consciousness (EC) [Aware]+[X] or [World Model] or [World Model]+[Aware]+[X] Now, lets look at what the Human Self-Model might be: In a normal non-spiritual modern human the Thinker would shout We are the I/Me/My. The Doer might feel we are the body. The Experiencer might whisper we are the world. The Experiencer would probably listen to the Thinker and set the Human Self-Model to the Thinker s I/Me/My. (Note, the Experiencer contains all self-models.) 41

Human Self-Model Changes Due Prayer, meditation and other spiritual practices can cause more of the Experiencer self-model to be incorporated in the human self-model. Non-Spiritual Spiritual to Spiritual Practices Partially Spiritually Enlightened Fully Spiritually Enlightened Human self-model: Human self-model: Human self-model: Human self-model: Thinker self-model Thinker self-model Experiencer self-model Experiencer self-model Doer self-model Experiencer self-model TC Feeling of Connection to God Doer self-model Thinker self-model EC This is through Intuition. 42 Animals & Ancient Humans = DC 42

Features of Enlightenment / Nonduality There is no self and no subject in EC (1 st & 2 nd ). Atman=Brahman since the EC awareness model Is the WM (3 rd ). Presence is a non-physical sense of existence. AS is a virtual concept (non-physical) and must exist if the Experiencer has awareness, thus it is reasonable to assume that AS = Presence. CRW is exactly awareness, so Presence Awareness = AS + CRW = EC Awareness Model (4 th ). Tradition Feature TC DC EC Buddhism Hindu Advaita Vedanta No Self No Subject-Object Distinctions Atman = Brahman Atman=soul (SM) Brahman=Reality (WM) Self-Inquiry Who Am I? = Presence Awareness* 43 * Answer from John Wheeler in his book Presence Awareness, Just This and Nothing Else If Presence = AS and Awareness = CRW, then EC gets the 43

Thank You! Thanks for directing your Top Down Attention to my Presentation! I hope that your Experiencer intuitively understood how the three agent model of consciousness explains spirituality. 44 44

The End I welcome feedback! Check out www.spiritualityexplained.com It has links to many YouTube videos and PDFs Click on Sign Up Now to get notification of new content and the publication of the book. Contact me at: frank@spiritualityexplained.com 45 45