SEARCHING FOR ANSWERS

Similar documents
Episode 15: We the people of the jury 08/09/2015 Speakers: Bob Ruff, Ann Brocklehurst, Becky Ruff EPISODE DESCRIPTION

EXCLUSIVE: PROSECUTOR IN SERIAL 1 CASE GOES ON THE RECORD

Episode 2: Thoughts & Theories After Undisclosed Episode 2 05/10/2015 Speaker: Bob Ruff EPISODE DESCRIPTION

Transcript of Undisclosed Podcast Adnan s PCR Hearing: Day 1 February 3, 2016

Episode 20: Fact Trumps Theory 09/13/2015 Speaker: Bob Ruff EPISODE DESCRIPTION

Everyone likes to argue!

Corporate Team Training Session # 2 June 8 / 10

The State s Case. 1. Why did fire investigators believe the cause of the fire wasn t accidental?

Corporate Team Training Session # 2 May 30 / June 1

Automated voice This is a Global-Tel link prepaid call from Adnan Syed an inmate at a Maryland Correctional facility

Episode 4: Are you scared you should be. 05/24/2015 Speaker: Bob Ruff EPISODE DESCRIPTION

Episode 22: Tactics 09/27/2015 Speaker: Bob Ruff EPISODE DESCRIPTION

Argumentative Writing. 9th Grade - English Language Arts Ms. Weaver - Qrtr 3/4

Annotated Works Consulted

UNDISCLOSED: FIVE LEGAL LESSONS FROM THE CASE OF ADNAN SYED

Episode 17: Suspect-Roy S. Davis III 08/23/2015 Speakers: Bob Ruff and Shaun T EPISODE DESCRIPTION

SO we know will read through the lens of finding the theme in each text. That is our main focus. Since we know that the theme is the lesson the

Explanations. - Provide an explanation of how your evidence supports your point

Grab an Everything s an Argument book off the shelf by the flags. INTRO TO RHETORIC

THE COURT: All right. Call your next witness. MR. JOHNSON: Agent Mullen, Terry Mullen. (BRIEF PAUSE) (MR. MULLEN PRESENT)

Persuasive/ Argumentative writing

Bar Mock Trial Competition 2017/18. Student Role Guide: Barrister England, Wales and Northern Ireland

Condcnsclt! Page 1. 6 Part 9. I don't think I could have anticipated the snow. 7 and your having to be here at 1:30 any better than I did.

Episode 12: What We Know

RHETORICAL ARGUMENTS E T H O S, L O G O S, P A T H O S

Good Day! Ms. Gilluly

Michael Ross: Case Files

Anticipatory Guide. Explanation. Statement. I Agree. Disagree

Can t we just be good enough to please God? Romans 3:10 25 A sermon by Peter Budd Sunday 21 st March 2010, St. Andrew s Cheadle Hulme

THOMPSON KILLER WAS WHITE, NOT BLACK:

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR

Words Never Lie Have We Taught our Children to Lie? BUT PEOPLE DO Secrets of Linguistic Lie Detection. Is It Easy To Lie?

New Testament Exegesis Outline Template by Rev. D. E. Norczyk

Cross-Examination. Peter B. Wold. Wold Morrison Law. Barristers Trust Building. 247 Third Avenue South. Minneapolis, MN

I think the odds of you getting the charming sociopath-- you re just not that lucky.

Inductive Logic. Induction is the process of drawing a general conclusion from incomplete evidence.

higher power. And guess what? He s been sober for ten years? Did the doorknob work for him? Does that make it true? Is putting your faith in the

J. W A R N E R W A L L A C E

Agenda. 1. Revolutionary Songs. 2. Discuss Ch. 6 & Propaganda Practice

ARGUMENT AS INQUIRY: QUESTIONING A TEXT

Persuasive Argument Relies heavily on appeals to emotion, to the subconscious, even to bias and prejudice. Characterized by figurative language,

The Timely Justice Act: Is it Fair Justice. Florida also leads the nation in the number of exonerations from death row, twenty-four to be exact

White Paper: Innocent or Inconclusive? Analyzing Abolitionists Claims About the Death

Center on Wrongful Convictions

Mark Allen Geralds v. State of Florida SC SC07-716

CHAPTER 13: UNDERSTANDING PERSUASIVE. What is persuasion: process of influencing people s belief, attitude, values or behavior.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D

STATE OF MAINE CHRISTIAN NIELSEN. [ 1] Christian Nielsen appeals from a judgment of conviction entered in the

Logical Fallacies RHETORICAL APPEALS

ACTS: FIRST SECTIONAL EXAM REVIEW Acts 1 9

MR. RICHARD C. MOSTY: May it please 25 the Court, ladies and gentlemen of the jury. I think that Sandra M. Halsey, CSR, Official Court Reporter 42

This transcript was exported on Apr 09, view latest version here.

Logical Appeal (Logos)

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE COMPLAINT. Count I. Murder 2nd Degree ( Y )

1 EVALUATING CORROBORATIVE EVIDENCE

Date of last example: Never Today/yesterday Last week Last month Last year Before the last year

Ivan and Zosima: Existential Atheism vs. Existential Theism

Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me?

Test Item File. Full file at

.1E: Right now I am saying things that could really get me in trouble. JE: 1 am saying things that could really get me in trouble.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 98-CF-273. Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (F )

Seek God Ministries Website:

The Case for Christianity

Teach Writing Thinkingly Classroom Ideas that forge forceful arguments

Letter from Birmingham Jail Rhetorical Analysis. Luis Audelio Unzueta. The University of Texas at El Paso

BEFORE THE ALASKA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ON REFERRAL FROM THE ALASKA POLICE STANDARDS COUNCIL DECISION

Argumentative Writing

My name is John Cameron. I am a retired Cold Case Homicide Detective for the Great Falls Police

Creating a Persuasive Speech

To Kill a Mockingbird: The Trial

AP English III LANGUAGE & COMPOSITION Summer Reading Assignment

Case Name: R. v. Singh. Between Regina, and Joga Singh Sahota. [2011] B.C.J. No BCPC W.C.B. (2d) CarswellBC 362

State of Florida v. Rudolph Holton

Rhetoric and Argument. Techniques of and definitions associated with persuasive speaking and writing.

BIBLE RADIO PRODUCTIONS

EVALUATING CORROBORATIVE EVIDENCE. Douglas Walton Department of Philosophy, University of Winnipeg, Canada

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRANDY NICOLE WILLIAMS NO KA-1839-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

DOWNSTATE ILLINOIS INNOCENCE PROJECT. Latent print on Findley Bridge

Jurors, Former Prosecutors and Judges Urge Governor Warner to Grant Clemency to Norfolk Four

Philosophy 2: Introduction to Philosophy Section 2511, Room SOCS 205, 7:45-9:10am El Camino College Fall, 2014

The Kohlberg Dilemmas By Lawrence Kohlberg From Moral Judgment Interviews 1958

All About Writing Standard #1: Standard Progression and Research Base

Affirmative Defense = Confession

Route 66. Lesson Bible Text Lesson Objectives Developmental Activities Life Application. Completing charts Writing descriptions

INVESTIGATIVE REPORT (May 10, 1993) TRIPLE HOMICIDE BYERS/MOORE/BRANCH CASE FILE NUMBER DATE OF REPORT:

I m sure your new roommates are totally normal people, and you have nothing to worry about unlike the fellow in the Tell-tale heart.

CONTEMPORARY MORAL PROBLEMS LECTURE 14 CAPITAL PUNISHMENT PART 2

CSSS/SOC/STAT 321 Case-Based Statistics I. Introduction to Probability

The Murder of Pedro Corzo. January 9, 2004 Dateland, Maricopa County, Arizona

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas

How to Study the Bible, Part 2

Serial: The Presumption of Guilt

Comments on "Lying with Conditionals" by Roy Sorensen

Apologetics Through Uncommon Research

Virtual Academy Honors/AP Summer Reading Requirement VIRTUAL ACADEMY Honors/AP Summer Reading Requirement

INTRODUCTION. The State of Minnesota submits this memorandum of law to address the evidence

Seffner Christian Academy

The Mystery of Sam Smiley

JIM HOOD, ATTORNEY GENERAL

13. What are the various reactions of the guests after hearing the accusations?

Transcription:

MONDAY, APRIL 16

SEARCHING FOR ANSWERS What does Detective Nye do in Las Vegas? What is Capote s purpose? (remember, purpose is not only how he is telling the story, but why he is telling it in this particular way)

AGENDA Discuss In Cold Blood Floyd Wells & Answers DO: Analyze authorial purpose and intent. HW: ICB page 198 (Wed)

OUTCOME D BENCHMARK 1 Lab Day Wednesday (Lab 228) You will need: Your topic 2 articles picked out Use the lab time to write not research (if you still are looking for articles, you will be making more homework for yourself)

PURPOSE OF SECTION TITLES Part 1 The Last to See Them Alive What happened in this section? Why did Capote include this information together? Part 2 Persons Unknown What happened in this section? Why did Capote include this information together?

WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF STARTING THE SECTION CALLED ANSWERS WITH INTRODUCING FLOYD WELLS? Consider the intersection between Capote s section titles, and the overall narrative that section is focusing on. Is Capote foreshadowing what will happen in this section? Why would he do that?

WHO IS FLOYD WELLS? Based on your reading, who is Floyd Wells? Consider how he is described by Capote as well as the other characters. Why is he mentioned now? How does this contrast with his brief, previous mention by Perry?

FLOYD VS. JAY Compare the police s interview of Floyd with Jay s in Serial Why is Floyd talking now? What is his ethos? How do the police treat him?

TUESDAY, APRIL 17

AGENDA Serial Episode 5: Route Talk DO: Analyze and evaluate rhetorical appeals and evidence. HW: Finish Route Talk Have 2 annotated bib sources for lab time tomorrow (Lab 228)

SERIAL SO FAR Using your evidence tracker and notes, consider: What is the case against Adnan? What is the case for Adnan s innocence? Primary physical evidence Primary theories (motive, opportunity, etc.)

KOENIG S PROBLEMS What are some of the issues Koenig faces in her investigation? How is she overcoming them? Are any insurmountable? Is so, what does that mean for her (and us)?

WHAT IS IN THE POWER OF PROOF? What is more valid? A likely story? Or a provable one? Consider the different testimonies (Jenn vs. Jay vs. Adnan)

ROUTE TALK Koenig puts the evidence to the test; as we listen, update your evidence tracker and consider how Koenig focus on logos over pathos in this episode Can she prove the case without having to rely on Adnan or Jay? Why would she need to do that in the first place?

TOMORROW Bring all materials to Lab 228 Make sure you are ready to work! Due date is Tuesday, April 24 at 7:05 AM

WEDNESDAY, APRIL 18 Lab Day in Lab 228

THURSDAY, APRIL 19

AGENDA Closing the Clutter Case an intro Serial Episode 6: The Case Against Adnan Syed DO: Analyze and evaluate rhetorical appeals and evidence. HW: Finish The Case Against Adnan Syed ICB through 217

CAN YOU PUT THEM AWAY? (NEXT WEEK)

TRUE CRIME INVESTIGATIONS Sarah Koenig is meticulously investigating and reinvestigating the murder of Hae Lee, as well as the court case convicting Adnan. Each piece of evidence then becomes suspect until corroborated Can she prove Adnan did it? Can she exonerate him?

IN COLD BLOOD 2HBI While reading, you know Dick and Perry murdered the Clutters, but can you prove it? In teams, you will comb through the book, and find evidence admissible in court. You must prove that Dick and Perry: Had the means to do it (the tools/material) The opportunity to do it (they were there in Holcomb during the murder window)

EVIDENCE Physical evidence Collected at the scene Tied back to Dick and Perry not by Capote, but by the KBI Testimony Puts Dick and Perry in Holcomb Demonstrates they had the opportunity and means to commit the crime

TIE IT TOGETHER! Step 1 Collect evidence Write each piece of evidence on a notecard, with the page number you found it on Step 2 Create a timeline of the murders What happened to the Clutters? How do you know? Step 3 Place Dick & Perry at the scene Demonstrate they had means and opportunity

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE & BAD EXCUSES Why wasn t he worried? Why didn t Adnan call or page her? Hae s letter I m going to kill The Neighbor Boy saw a body

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE & BAD EXCUSES Cathy s testimony how does her story compare to Jay s? Adnan s? The cell phone records? What does Jenn say?

THE SMOKING GUN Why is the Nisha call so problematic?

MONDAY, APRIL 23 Final Lab Day for Annotated Bib