Shelly Gruenwald Central Catholic High School

Similar documents
The Scopes Trial: Who Decides What Gets Taught in the Classroom?

SIXTY FOURTH GENERAL ASSEMBLY

Timeline: Remembering the Scopes Monkey Trial.

Textbook A Civic Biology, 1925

Central Historical Question: Why was the Scopes Monkey Trial significant?

Did the Scopes Trial Prove that Evolution is a Fact?

The Basic Information Who is the defendant (the man on trial who is accused of committing a crime)?

Journal of Religion & Society

THE SCOPES MONKEY TRIAL: MONKEY BUSINESS ENCOUNTERS THE BUTLER ACT

Textbook A Civic Biology, 1925

The Scopes Trial, Genesis, and the Nation s Obsession with Monkeys

Textbook A Civic Biology, 1925

Stand or Stunt? The Sensational Trial of John Thomas Scopes

Week Eleven Handout. Christian History in America: Visions, Realities, and Turning Points

Transcript: Monkey Trial (PBS)

Time: ½ to 1 class period. Objectives: Students will understand the emergence of principles of freedom of the press.

One of the defining controversies in American society today is the rift between science

However, this law was quickly challenged by a group called the ACLU, which stands for the American Civil Liberties Union, and was taken to court.

Make sure you are seeing me about make up quizzes and missing work. Warm-Up. Work from Previous Lesson

John T. Scopes ("The Monkey Trial")

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY COMPLAINT

The Trial as a Circus: Inherit the Wind

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Scopes Trial (1925) Michael Hannon

The Scopes Monkey Trial: A look back 85 years later

Strategic Prayer for the Mountain of Education

Who Says? Chapter 12: Authority. Dictionaries are like watches; the worst is better than none, and the best cannot be expected to go quite true.

God and Darwin: The York Daily Record and the Intelligent Design Trial Teaching Note

*1 THIS IS THE TRAP THE COURTS BUILT: DEALING WITH THE ENTANGLEMENT OF RELIGION AND THE ORIGIN OF LIFE IN AMERICAN PUBLIC SCHOOLS

CBS FACE THE NATION WITH BOB SCHIEFFER INTERVIEW WITH ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC HOLDER JULY 11, 2010

MEETING OF THE MINDS. A sermon preached by Galen Guengerich All Souls Unitarian Church, New York City February 3, 2013

Document A: Sparks Letter to the Editor

Different people are going to be testifying. comes into this court is going to know. about this case. No one individual can come in and

Texas JSA LoneStar. Winter Congress Approaching. 2 Career Politicians. 3 The Fight against ISIS. 3 Compromises

Closing Arguments in Punishment

Date: Wednesday, 10 November :00PM. Location: Barnard's Inn Hall

Egor Ivanov Professor Babcock ENGL 137H: Section 24 October 28, 2013 The Paradigm Shift from Creation to Evolution

COLUMBIA'S FIRST BAPTIST FACES LAWSUIT OVER FORMER DEACON'S CONDUCT

THE COURT: All right. Call your next witness. MR. JOHNSON: Agent Mullen, Terry Mullen. (BRIEF PAUSE) (MR. MULLEN PRESENT)

First Amendment Religious Freedom Rights and High School Students

Teaching Guide for Inherit the Wind

>> ALL RISE. SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IS NOW IN SESSION. PLEASE BE SEATED. >> GOOD MORNING TO BOTH OF YOU. THE LAST CASE THIS WEEK IS CALLOWAY V.

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 2 HARRISBURG DIVISION

Protect Science Education! A Toolkit for Students Who Want to Keep Evolution in Schools

APPELLATE COURT NO. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Relating to Electricity, 1885, Vol 33. makes more sense that they married in Utah Territory.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE T. HENLEY GRAVES SUSSEX COUNTY COURTHO USE RESIDENT JUDGE ONE THE CIRCLE, SUITE 2 GEORGETOWN, DE 19947

2007, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Florida State University Libraries

Powell v. Portland School District. Chronology

Transcript of Remarks by U.S. Ambassador-At-Large for War Crimes Issues, Pierre Prosper, March 28, 2002

This transcript was exported on Apr 09, view latest version here.

I m Margo Addler, coming up : The fight over evolution in the public schools : A battle about science or religion, stay with us.

Religion s Role in Education: A Paper discussing the changing And yet enduring role religion plays In America s System of Public Education.

Curtis L. Johnston Selman v. Cobb County School District, et al June 30, 2003

Abe Krash. Conducted by Victor Geminiani March 17, 1993 Call number: NEJL-009

A Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life Discussion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D

Pastoral Vacancy Announcement. October 6, 2014

Darwinism on trial in American state (Sun 8 May, 2005)

JENSIE L. ANDERSON. University of Utah S.J. Quinney College of Law

A RETURN TO THE SCOPES MONKEY TRIAL? A LOOK AT THE APPLICATION OF THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE TO THE NEWEST TENNESSEE SCIENCE CURRICULUM LAW

Sample Cross-Examination Questions That the Prosecutor May Ask

Table of Contents. Acknowledgments...3. Preface Galileo: history v. polemic Miracles and rational belief...51

Contents. ix xi. Preface. 1. Introduction: The Cleansing Fire of. Trevor Burrus 1

CNN s Larry King Live Wednesday, February 14, 2007 Interview with Rudy Giuliani

NEW ORLEANS STATES -ITEM

The Privilege of Self-examination Rosh Hashanah, Day Two September 15, Tishrei 5776 Rabbi Van Lanckton Temple B nai Shalom Braintree, Massachus

Evolution and Creation Science in Your School: "The Monkey Business Continues..."

Republicans Challenge Slavery

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE

F I N D I N G K A T A H D I N :

U.S. Senator John Edwards

Chapter II DIALECTIC AND RHETORIC AT DAYTON, TENNESSEE

IN RE: Willie J. Williams, Jr. #A256583

Bong Hits 4 Jesus. If you are on the Supreme Court, how do you rule? You be the judge.

DISCIPLINARY HEARING COMMISSION OF THE 13 DHC 11

The Florida Bar v. Jorge Luis Cueto

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas

C I V I C S S U C C E S S AC A D E M Y. D e p a r t m e n t o f S o c i a l S c i e n c e s STUDENT PACKET WEEK 1

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE

Scholar discusses Joseph Smith's 1844 presidential election campaign

Atheism Is No Longer A Political Taboo

SAMPLE. What Is Intelligent Design, and What Does It Have to Do With Men s. Chapter 3

This book, Lincoln: Through the Lens, is a unique book that follows Lincoln through a time in history when photography was in its infancy and the

1 Government by Investigation, Viking, 1955.

The Blameless Corporation

John Scopes ( )

Beyond the Ballot. Evangelicals in the Political Arena Pre-1970s

Inherit the Wind: The Play's the Thing

Evaluating An Argument Essay

National Association of Muslim American Women PO Box 72032, Columbus Ohio 43207

Receiving, Losing, and Winning Back the Vote: The Story of Utah Women s Suffrage

2. Public Forum Debate seeks to encourage the development of the following skills in the debaters: d. Reasonable demeanor and style of presentation

Case 2:11-cv CW Document 14 Filed 10/17/11 Page 1 of 5

Affirmative Defense = Confession

Dana Williamson v. State of Florida SC SC

Transcript excerpt from : Fox News Network - September 29, 2009 Tuesday - Hannity Show (9PM EST) (Sean Hannity).

Andy Stanley. Note: The following content is a raw transcript and has not been edited for grammar, punctuation, or word usage.

Transcription:

Shelly Gruenwald Central Catholic High School

PUBLIC ACTS OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE PASSED BY THE SIXTY-FOURTH GENERAL ASSEMBLY 1925 CHAPTER NO. 27 House Bill No. 185 (By John Washington Butler) Passed March 13,1925 W.F. Barry, Speaker of the House of Representatives L.D. Hill, Speaker of the Senate Approved March 21, 1925 Austin Peay, Governor. AN ACT prohibiting the teaching of the Evolution theory in all the Universities, Normals and all other public schools of Tennessee, which are supported in whole or in part by the public school funds of the State, and to provide penalties for the violations thereof. Section 1. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Tennessee, That it shall be unlawful for any teacher in any the Universities, Normals and all other public schools of the State which are supported in whole or in part by the public school funds of the State, to teach any theory that denies the story of the Divine Creation of man as taught in the Bible, and to teach instead that man has descended from a lower order of animals. Section 2. Be it further enacted, That any teacher found guilty of the violation of this Act, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction, shall be fined not less than One Hundred Dollars nor more than than Five Hundred Dollars for each offense. Section 3. Be it further enacted, That this Act take effect from and after its passage, the public welfare requiring it. (Normals were teacher training colleges.)

The Act passed through the 80 two houses of the Tennessee legislature with 70 massive majorities. 60 In the House of Representatives it sailed 50 through on a vote of 75 40 'for' and only 5 'against'. The Senate, after a great 30 deal of public discussion and a spirited three hour 20 debate, passed the Act by 10 a majority of 24 votes to 6. 0 For Against House Senate

The ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) were already aware that the Act was likely to become law because it had been passed by the lower house of the Tennessee legislature by a landslide (in January, 1925). After a few false starts, the ACLU sent a press release to several Tennessee newspapers, such as the Chattanooga Daily Times, announcing that they would provide legal assistance, etc. for a school teacher in Tennessee who would be willing to stand trial for having taught evolution in a public school so that a test case could be mounted to challenge the constitutional validity of the Act. From their point of view this was certainly not a lone event. Rather it was part of a wide-ranging campaign to banish the teaching of evolutionist ideas from America's classrooms.

It was George Rappelyea who first learned of the ACLU's plan to oppose the Butler Act - offering legal support for any teacher who was prepared to stand trial for teaching evolutionist ideas. Standard Rights Managed (RM) BE043521 Discount available Conspirators of the Scopes Trial at Drugstore The men responsible for instigating the Scopes trial (from left to right): George W. Rappelyea, Professor Walter White, Clay Green, and R.E. Robinson. IMAGE: Underwood & Underwood/CORBIS DATE PHOTOGRAPHED July 06, 1925 LOCATION Dayton, Tennessee, USA PHOTOGRAPHER George Rinhart COLLECTION Bettmann http://www.corbisimages.com/enlargement/be043521.html On May 5th, 1925 he gathered together some of the leading citizens of Dayton and put to them his plan for using a trial, and the attendant media attention, as a means of publicizing Dayton.

Having gained tacit agreement for his plan, Rappelyea then went on to recruit John Scopes as the 'sacrificial lamb'. According to Scopes, Rappelyea arranged a meeting at Robinson's drug store where the conversation went something like this: Rappelyea: John, we've been arguing and I said nobody could teach biology without teaching evolution Scopes: (pulling a textbook from a shelf of books on sale in the store) That's right Rappelyea: You've been teaching 'em this book? Scopes: So has every other teacher. Evolution is explained in Hunter's Civic Biology, and that's our textbook. Rappelyea: Then you've been violating the law. Would you be willing to stand for a test case? Let's take this thing to court and test the legality of it. I will swear out a warrant and have you arrested... That will make a big sensation. Why not bring a lot of doctors and preachers here?

After a certain amount of hesitation Scopes eventually agreed to the plan and Rappelyea sent a telegram to the ACLU to tell them that he'd found their man. Rappelyea also swore out a warrant against Scopes, who was actually arrested two days later, on May 7th, on the charge of having contravened the Butler Act. Scopes was immediately released on bail. A preliminary hearing on May 10th bound Scopes over pending a Grand Jury hearing on May 25th. The Grand Jury, who are well aware of the true purpose of the charge against Scopes, handed down an indictment and the trial date was set for July 10th. Library of Congress Prints and Photographs LC-B2-6377-12 http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/ggb2006013628/

John Scopes did not know if he had taught evolution or not because he was not a biology teacher. He was primarily a coach who taught some algebra, physics, and chemistry. He was subbing for the ill principal who was the actual biology teacher. His degree was actually in law Scopes was charged with having taught evolution on April 24th, 1925. A preliminary hearing on May 9th bound him over pending a specially convened Grand Jury hearing on May 25th. The members of the Grand Jury, who were well aware of the true purpose of the charge against Scopes, handed down an indictment and Scopes was instructed to present himself at the Rhea County court house for trial on the morning of July 10th. At no time was Scopes held in jail on this charge which, by the way, was only classed as a "misdemeanor", not a "felony."

The publicity surrounding the case quickly drew threetimes presidential candidate and arch anti-evolutionist William Jennings Bryan to offer his services to the prosecution team. Bryan was accepted as one of several assistant prosecutors, and not as "the" prosecuting counsel. This in turn induced leading Chicago attorney, and arch atheist Clarence Darrow to offer his services - pro bono as defense counsel, which pleased Scopes, but no the ACLU. Picture: Darrow on the left, Bryan on the right. http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:and9gctllntce9spkbi5pqdbg0hvcwltaet0cpge4gtn edjmgnx5m7b7

Many discussions of the Scopes "Monkey" Trial claim that the judge refused to allow the expert witnesses to present their evidence. Which isn't really true. In fact he allowed one expert - Dr. Maynard Metcalf - to give evidence in person before ruling that such evidence was irrelevant because the indictment related to whether Scopes had taught evolution and not whether evolution clashed with the story of the creation of Adam and Eve in the book of Genesis.

The defense argument was that if the theory of evolution did not clash with Genesis then Scopes had not violated the act. It was an interesting idea, but it really didn't have a leg to stand on given that most if not all of the experts rejected the notion that humans were the result of an act of special creation - and therefore whatever their personal views on evolution might be, they most certainly did contradict the account in Genesis.

The Darwin Club Rea Irvin, artist, March 18, 1915. http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2009616892/ Literary Digest, July 25, 1925. http://ehistory.osu.edu/osu/mmh/clash/scopes/indeximages/images/juryandjudge.jpg

Tennessee s Biology book was Hunter s Civic Biology, published in 1915. The following link goes to a website maintained by University of Missouri Kansas City. http://www.law.umkc.edu/ faculty/projects/ftrials/sco pes/scopes.htm Hunter s Civic Biology, 1915, pages 192-195