Argument. What is it? How do I make a good one?

Similar documents
Fallacies. Definition: The premises of an argument do support a particular conclusion but not the conclusion that the arguer actually draws.

This fallacy gets its name from the Latin phrase "post hoc, ergo propter hoc," which translates as "after this, therefore because of this.

Fallacies in logic. Hasty Generalization. Post Hoc (Faulty cause) Slippery Slope

Arguments. 1. using good premises (ones you have good reason to believe are both true and relevant to the issue at hand),

Fallacies. It is particularly easy to slip up and commit a fallacy when you have strong feelings about your. The Writing Center

Logical Fallacies. Continuing our foray into the world of Argument. Courtesy of:

Fallacies. What this handout is about. Arguments. What are fallacies?

2/21/2014. FOUR WAYS OF KNOWING (Justifiable True Belief) 1. Sensory input; 2. Authoritative knowledge; 3. Logic and reason; 4. Faith and intuition

Logical Fallacies. Continuing our foray into the world of Argument. Courtesy of:

Fallacies Keep in Your Binder

Some Templates for Beginners: Template Option 1 I am analyzing A in order to argue B. An important element of B is C. C is significant because.

How To Recognize and Avoid Them. Joseph M Conlon Technical Advisor, AMCA

FALLACIES. using good premises (ones you have good reason to believe are both true and relevant to the issue at hand),

Bellwork Friday November 18th

Argument and Persuasion. Stating Opinions and Proposals

Questions for Critically Reading an Argument

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 7: Logical Fallacies

Reading Comprehension Fallacies in Reading

Persuasive Argument Relies heavily on appeals to emotion, to the subconscious, even to bias and prejudice. Characterized by figurative language,

Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me?

I. Claim: a concise summary, stated or implied, of an argument s main idea, or point. Many arguments will present multiple claims.

A R G U M E N T S I N A C T I O N

14.6 Speaking Ethically and Avoiding Fallacies L E A R N I N G O B JE C T I V E S

The Argumentative Essay

CRITICAL THINKING. Formal v Informal Fallacies

Common Logical Fallacies

PHI 1700: Global Ethics

FROM INQUIRY TO ACADEMIC WRITING CHAPTER 8 FROM ETHOS TO LOGOS: APPEALING TO YOUR READERS

Relevance. Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true

AICE Thinking Skills Review. How to Master Paper 2

Full file at

MPS 17 The Structure of Persuasion Logos: reasoning, reasons, good reasons not necessarily about formal logic

Lecture 4 Good and Bad Arguments Jim Pryor Some Good and Bad Forms of Arguments

Answers to Practice Problems 7.3

Everyone likes to argue!

LOGICAL FALLACIES. Common Mistakes in Weak Arguments. (these are bad don t use them ) AP English Language & Composition

CHAPTER 13: UNDERSTANDING PERSUASIVE. What is persuasion: process of influencing people s belief, attitude, values or behavior.

Argumentation. 2. What should we consider when making (or testing) an argument?

Chapter Five. Persuasive Writing

All About Arguments. I. What is an Argument? II. Identifying an Author s Argument

Varsity LD: It s All About Clash. 1:15 pm 2:30 pm TUESDAY, June 26

The Field of Logical Reasoning: (& The back 40 of Bad Arguments)

How Thinking Goes Wrong Twenty-five Fallacies That Lead Us to Believe Weird Things

Weaknesses in arguments

LOGICAL FALLACIES/ERRORS OF ARGUMENT

Ethos, Logos, Pathos: Three Ways to Persuade

Logic Chapter 3 Practice Test Matching: Match each of the following concepts to the most accurate definition.

Everything s an Argument Guided Study Notes, Chapters Chapter 16: What Counts in Evidence

PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy

1 Chapter 6 (Part 2): Assessing Truth Claims

Philosophy 12 Study Guide #4 Ch. 2, Sections IV.iii VI

TEACHING ASSISTANTS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM SCHOOL OF SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING Spring 2015

CHAPTER THREE Philosophical Argument

3.2: FAULTY REASONING AND PROPAGANDA. Ms. Hargen

A Note on Straight-Thinking

Language in any type of media meant to persuade or convince Common Examples: speeches, political posters, commercials, ads

ARGUMENTS. Arguments. arguments

PHI 244. Environmental Ethics. Introduction. Argument Worksheet. Argument Worksheet. Welcome to PHI 244, Environmental Ethics. About Stephen.

Lemon Bay High School AP Language and Composition ENC 1102 Mr. Hertz

LOGIC. Inductive Reasoning. Wednesday, April 20, 16

What is an argument? PHIL 110. Is this an argument? Is this an argument? What about this? And what about this?

Chapter 13: Argument Convincing Others

PHI 300: Introduction to Philosophy

Logical Fallacies RHETORICAL APPEALS

USING LOGOS WISELY. AP Language and Composition

Quick Write # 11. Create a narrative for the following image

The Philosopher s World Cup

Position Strategies / Structure Presenting the Issue

Persuasive Essay. Writing Workshop. writer s road map

C. Exam #1 comments on difficult spots; if you have questions about this, please let me know. D. Discussion of extra credit opportunities

Please visit our website for other great titles:

APwk4.notebook. August 23, Opener 8/27. Write a claim of fact, value and policy about capital punishment on the back of your opener

Scientific Arguments

How to Argue Without Being Argumentative

A man lives on the twelfth floor of an apartment building. Every morning he takes the elevator down to the lobby and leaves the building.

stage 2 Logic & Knowledge

Argument Writing. Whooohoo!! Argument instruction is necessary * Argument comprehension is required in school assignments, standardized testing, job

A red herring is a dead fish. Dog trainers used to use red herrings to train their tracking dogs and try to get them off the trail.

I. What is an Argument?

Corporate Team Training Session # 2 June 8 / 10

Purdue OWL Logic in Argumentative Writing

Aquinas Cosmological argument in everyday language

What an argument is not

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking

English I Pre-AP Unit 5

Chapter 6: Relevance Fallacies

Norva Y S Lo Produced by Norva Y S Lo Edited by Andrew Brennan

Hello, AP Scholars! Welcome to AP English Language and Composition.

This online lecture was prepared by Dr. Laura Umphrey in the School of Communication at Northern Arizona University

The Toulmin Model in Brief

In view of the fact that IN CLASS LOGIC EXERCISES

Take Home Exam #1. PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy Prof. Lauren R. Alpert

Propaganda Collection: A Project for Practicing Persuasive Techniques

Some Transition Words and Phrases

HOW TO QUESTION EVERYTHING AND ARGUE WITH EVERYBODY. Amber Bennoui Julian Halbertsma-Black

Philosophical Arguments

Academic argument does not mean conflict or competition; an argument is a set of reasons which support, or lead to, a conclusion.

Portfolio Project. Phil 251A Logic Fall Due: Friday, December 7

APPENDIX A CRITICAL THINKING MISTAKES

Christian Discernment

Transcription:

Argument What is it? How do I make a good one?

Argument Vs Persuasion Everything s an argument, really. Argument: appeals strictly by reason and logic Persuasion: logic and emotion The forum of your argument will dictate your approach. Formal paper= argument. Opinion piece in student newspaper= persuasion.

Intent not Form Argumentation is a term of rhetorical intent, not form. Refers to ANY essay or speech whose aim is to sway or persuade the listener/reader. You can use any number of techniques to achieve this. Define, describe, narrate your tone can be sarcastic or matter-of-fact the subject matter can be infinite.

What sways a reader? Writer s credentials [ethos] (And if you aren t an expert, quote some) Quality of its reasoning is the argument sound? The argument appeals to our self-interests. There has to be something in it for us.

Terms to know Claim- states the argument s main idea or position. Has to be arguable. Claim of fact- asserts something is true or not true The number of suicides and homicides committed by teenagers, most often young men, has exploded in the last three decades -Anna Quindlen

Claim of policy- proposes a change Yet one solution continues to elude us, and that is ending the ignorance about mental health, and moving it from the margins of care and into the mainstream where it belongs. Anna Quindlen

Claim of Value- argues if something is good or bad, right or wrong. There s a plague on all our houses, and since it doesn t announce itself with lumps or spots or protests marches, it has gone unremarked in the quiet suburbs and busy cities where it has been laying waste. -Anna Quindlen

Closed Thesis- states the main idea of the argument but also previews the major points the writer intends to make. It s closed because it limits the number of points the writer intends to make. The three-dimensional characters, exciting plot, and complex themes of the Harry Potter series make them not only legendary children s books but enduring literary classics. This is a great way to start a short essay, esp one written under time constraints!

Open thesis- One that does not list all the points a writer intends to cover. Great for longer essays and ones with many points to be covered. The popularity of the Harry Potter series demonstrates that simplicity trumps complexity when it comes to the taste of readers, both young and old.

Counterargument Thesis Statement- a summary of the counterargument, usually qualified by although or but, precedes the writer s opinion. Advantages: immediately addresses counterargument; makes argument seem stronger; can create seamless transition to more thorough concession and refutation later on. Although the Harry Potter series may have some literary merit, its popularity has less to do with storytelling than with merchandising.

Types of Arguments A deductive argument is one in which true premises guarantee a true conclusion. In other words, it is impossible for the premises to be true but the conclusion false. Thus, the conclusion follows necessarily from the premises and inferences. Socrates was a man (premise) All men are mortal (premise). Socrates was mortal (conclusion)

An inductive argument, sometimes considered bottom-up logic, is one in which premises offer strong support for a conclusion, but one that is not a certainty. This is an argument in which the premises are supposed to support the conclusion in such a way that if the premises are true, it is improbable that the conclusion would be false. Socrates was Greek (premise). Most Greeks eat fish (premise). Socrates ate fish (conclusion). But what if he was allergic? Or didn t like it?

Inductive arguments are not necessarily weaker. They do allow us to expand our knowledge and offer a more creative outlet.

Logical Fallacies to Know and Love Avoid

Hasty Generalization Making assumptions on a whole group or range of cases based on a sample that is inadequate. Stereotypes are common examples.

Missing the Point The premises of an argument do support a particular conclusion just not the one the rhetor was setting out to prove. The punishment should fit the crime. Drunk driving is serious and can kill many people. It s punishment should be the death penalty. The argument doesn t support why the death penalty, specifically, should be warranted.

Post Hoc Also called false cause. When you assume that because B comes after A, that A caused B. Correlation isn t the same thing as causation. President Jones raised taxes and then the violent crime rate increased. President Jones is responsible for the rise in crime.

Slippery Slope The rhetor claims that a chain reaction, usually ending in some dire consequence, will take place, but there is usually not enough evidence for that assumption. The rhetor assumes that if we put one foot on the slippery slope that we will slide all the way to the bottom; he or she assumes that we can t stop partway down the hill.

Weak Analogy When the rhetor makes an analogy between two things that aren t really the same. Guns are like hammers they are both tools with metal parts that could be used to kill someone. And yet it would be ridiculous to restrict the purchase of hammers so restrictions on guns are equally ridiculous.

Appeal to Authority While referring to respected sources or authorities can strengthen your argument, simply using a famous name or a non-expert is fallacious. I m not a doctor but I play one on TV and I only use Exedrin Migraine.

Ad Populum [bandwagon] To the People. The rhetor takes advantage of the fact that people want to be liked, accepted, and belong to a group. 70% of Pope High School students think we should have a baked potato bar in the cafeteria!

Ad Hominem/Tu Quoque Against the Person / You, too!. These arguments focus on the people rather than the issues at hand. Ad hominem paints the person as bad, tu quoque paints them as hypocrites. You say smoking is bad but you smoked when you were my age so, whatever! Dr. Jones has written several books about how pornography is harmful to women but she s just ugly and bitter so why should we listen to her?

Appeal to Pity When the rhetor tries to get people to accept an conclusion by making them feel sorry for someone. I know the exam is graded on performance but you should give me an A. My dog is sick, my car broke down, and I have a cold so it s been hard to study!

Appeal to Ignorance Using lack of evidence for one conclusion as evidence for another conclusion. People have been trying for centuries to prove that God exists. But no one has yet been able to. Therefore, God does not exist.

Straw Man The rhetor sets up a weak version of the opponent s position and tries to score points by knocking it down [which they can do easily, hence the term straw man ] Gun control proponents want to ban all guns and take away our freedoms. But such a harsh action is inappropriate, so the gun control activists are wrong. Leave gun owners alone.

Red Herring Going off tangent, raising a side issue that distracts from what is really at stake. Grading the exam on a curve would be the most fair thing to do. After all, classes go more smoothly when the students and teacher get along well.

False Dichotomy The rhetor sets up the situation so it looks like there are only two choices. The rhetor then eliminates one of the choices so it seems we are left with only one option: the one they wanted us to choose in the first place. Caldwell Hall is in bad shape. Either we tear it down or we risk student safety. Obviously we don t want to risk student safety so we must tear it down.

Begging the Question This one can be hard to detect. An argument asks the reader to simply accept the conclusion without providing real evidence. It relies on a premise that says the same thing as the conclusion or simply ignores an important but questionable assumption. Active euthanasia is morally acceptable. It is a decent, ethical thing to help another human escape suffering through death.

Equivocation Sliding between two or more different meanings of a word or phrase. Giving money to charities is the right thing to do. Therefore, charities have a right to our money.

Non Sequitur It does not follow. An illogical statement that draws a conclusion not supported by the premises. On the most basic level, ALL fallacies are non sequiturs. My essay will get a good grade because I put a lot of effort into it.

Reductio Ad Absurdum/Indirect Proof Attempts either to disprove a statement by showing it inevitably leads to a ridiculous, absurd, or impractical conclusion, or to prove one by showing that if it were not true, the result would be absurd or impossible The Earth cannot be flat; otherwise, we would find people falling off the edge. There is no smallest positive rational number because, if there were, then it could be divided by two to get a smaller one.

Emotionalism Simply using emotion in place of logic. Paul is unpleasant; he shouldn t be allowed to attend the workshop. I dislike modern poetry; it clearly isn t literature.