Boxes and envelopes. 1. If the older child is a girl. What is the probability that both children are girls?

Similar documents
Bradley on Chance, Admissibility & the Mind of God

Everettian Confirmation and Sleeping Beauty: Reply to Wilson Darren Bradley

Phil 611: Problem set #1. Please turn in by 22 September Required problems

Degrees of Belief II

The St. Petersburg paradox & the two envelope paradox

Confirmation in a Branching World: The Everett Interpretation and Sleeping Beauty D. J. Bradley

Sleeping Beauty and the Dynamics of De Se Beliefs

Betting With Sleeping Beauty

Monty Hall Saves Dr. Evil: On Elga s Restricted Principle of Indifference

Classroom Voting Questions: Statistics

MATH 1000 PROJECT IDEAS

Reasoning about the future: Doom and Beauty

Discussion Notes for Bayesian Reasoning

Perspective Reasoning and the Solution to the Sleeping Beauty Problem

Defeating Dr. Evil with self-locating belief

Probability Foundations for Electrical Engineers Prof. Krishna Jagannathan Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

arxiv: v1 [stat.ot] 8 May 2017

Phil 413: Problem set #1

2016 CONVENTION RESOLUTIONS

This lesson corresponds to Hamm pages 14 to 16.

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 62 (2011), doi: /bjps/axr026

WBUR Boston Area Poll Survey of 509 Registered Voters Field Dates: April 10-13, 2015

Conditional Probability, Hypothesis Testing, and the Monty Hall Problem

A Puzzle About Ineffable Propositions

Discipleship: Mission, Identity, Lifestyle Matthew 7:24-29

The end of the world & living in a computer simulation

SAVIO SALESIAN COLLEGE

WEDNESDAY. Agenda: August 26th, 2009 ( ) Required Materials: Pen/Pencil. Paper

DOUBTS AND QUESTIONS ON THE CALCULUS OF PROBABILITIES

There are various different versions of Newcomb s problem; but an intuitive presentation of the problem is very easy to give.

Teachings of the Teacher A study in the parables of Jesus

= (value of LEAVE if rain x chance of rain) + (value of LEAVE if dry x chance of dry) = -20 x x.5 = -9

Six Sigma Prof. Dr. T. P. Bagchi Department of Management Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur. Lecture No. # 18 Acceptance Sampling

St. Francis Catholic Primary School

Should We Respond to Evil With Indifference?

St Joseph s Catholic Academy, Hebburn

Matthew 18:21-35 New American Standard Bible July 1, 2018

Pulling Rabbits from Hats (Conditional Probability), Part I

Gettier: Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?

EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: Friday, March 4 at 1:00 p.m.

St Joseph s RC Middle School. Admissions Policy

Mickey S. Morello August 13, 2017 Forgiveness, the Key to the Shackles Ephesians 4:29-5:2

Keywords precise, imprecise, sharp, mushy, credence, subjective, probability, reflection, Bayesian, epistemology

CAN TWO ENVELOPES SHAKE THE FOUNDATIONS OF DECISION- THEORY?

1.6 Validity and Truth

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at

Is it rational to have faith? Looking for new evidence, Good s Theorem, and Risk Aversion. Lara Buchak UC Berkeley

Lesson Plans that Work Year A Fourth Sunday in Lent Lesson Plans for Younger Children

Blaise Pascal

Rules for Decision (Text - Chapter 30 - Section I) Excerpts from the Workshop held at the Foundation for A Course in Miracles Temecula CA

MAJORITY BELIEVE RESURRECTION STORY IS LITERAL ACCOUNT. More than one-third of New Jersey adults also view parting of Red Sea as true word for word

How to solve the hardest logic puzzle ever in two questions

Matthew 18:21-35 King James Version July 1, 2018

Teaching Resource Items for

6.041SC Probabilistic Systems Analysis and Applied Probability, Fall 2013 Transcript Lecture 3

A DEFINITION OF BELIEVING. R. G. Cronin

The Kohlberg Dilemmas By Lawrence Kohlberg From Moral Judgment Interviews 1958

ST. MARY S CATHOLIC SCHOOL, NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE ADMISSION POLICY

Champions for Social Good Podcast

NICHOLAS BREAKSPEAR CATHOLIC SCHOOL ADMISSION POLICY

Life Of A Leper. Rev. P.A. Bowers

Examples (Textbooks used in Columbus, Nebraska)

ACHAN S SIN AND THE DEFEAT OF AI

Think by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 6b Reasoning

Preschool / toddler lesson

CARMEL COLLEGE CATHOLIC ACADEMY, DARLINGTON ADMISSION POLICY

WBUR Boston Area Poll Survey of 509 Registered Voters Field Dates: April 10-13, 2015

1/17/2018 ECE 313. Probability with Engineering Applications Section B Y. Lu. ECE 313 is quite a bit different from your other engineering courses.

Americano, Outra Vez!

A king has three questions and he is seeking answers to them. What are the questions? Does the king get what he wants?

A Framework for Thinking Ethically

Sermon: Is Being Good Enough? Rick Ezell

EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: Thursday, April 27 at 9:00 p.m.

SALE OF CHURCH REAL PROPERTY FOR DEVELOPMENT In the Episcopal Diocese of Long Island. Policies, Procedures and Practices

Setting Up a Domestic Violence Ministry. An Example Archdiocese of Chicago Domestic Violence Outreach

XVII. READERSHIP ACT (AS AMENDED BY ACT XII 2003, IV 2005, VI 2006, VI 2007, XlV 2012, XII 2014 AND XIII 2018) Edinburgh, 18th May 1992, Session 4.

SECTION 35. Improving and Evaluating Your Preaching

Pastor Views on Tithing. Survey of Protestant Pastors

Academic English Discussions- Prepositions and Determiners Pairwork

YouGov January 31 - February 1, 2017

Pastor Views on Sermons and the IRS

ST ANNE'S CATHOLIC PRIMARY SCHOOL, ORMSKIRK ADMISSION POLICY AND ARRANGEMENTS 2017/2018

Beyond the Doomsday Argument: Reply to Sowers and Further Remarks

Imprint INFINITESIMAL CHANCES. Thomas Hofweber. volume 14, no. 2 february University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

YouGov June 13-14, US Adults

Slots - online casinos A perfect package for enthusiastic players!

Weakness and Hope 2 Corinthians 4:7-15

Pastor Views on Pastor Misconduct. Survey of Protestant Pastors

CHRM 455/MISS 455 Missional Living: Campus, Church, Community, Commerce 3.0 Credit Hours Spring 2012

Teacher s Lesson Flow:

Welcome to the 2009 Citizen s Academy! Volusia County Division of Corrections 1. Volusia County Division of Corrections MISSION STATEMENT

Toolkit 5 Mission Area Role Descriptions

Evidence and Rationalization

FINAL REVIEW - Ch. 11 Probability #1

DISCUSSION GUIDE ADULT & CHILDREN S TRACKS

Cleveland Novel Club November 6, 2018 Submitted by Jill Korbin

Pastor Chad E. Billington. Thanksgiving Sunday, October 13, 2013 AM Service Smythe Street Cathedral Chad E. Billington

ADMISSIONS POLICY. Prospectus. for entry in September 2019

Moral Psychology

On David Chalmers's The Conscious Mind

Transcription:

Boxes and envelopes Please answer all questions in complete sentences. Consider the following set-up. Mr. Jones has two children. For these questions, assume that a child must be either a girl or a boy, that girls and boys exist in equal numbers in the population, and that the gender of a child is independent of the gender of the child s sibling. 1. If the older child is a girl. What is the probability that both children are girls? 2. If at least one of the children is a boy, what is the probability that both children are boys? 1

3. Do your answers to the last two problems make sense? Explain. How is this problem similar to some previous problems we have looked at? 2

Next we have the following set-up. There are three boxes: a box containing two gold coins, a box containing two silver coins, a box containing one gold coin and a silver coin. 4. After choosing a box at random and withdrawing one coin at random, if that happens to be a gold coin, what is the probability that the next coin drawn from the same box is also a gold coin? 5. In which ways is this problem similar to the Monty Hall problem? In which ways is it different? 3

Three prisoners, A, B and C, are in separate cells and sentenced to death. The governor has selected one of them at random to be pardoned. The warden knows which one is pardoned, but is not allowed to tell. Prisoner A begs the warden to let him know the identity of one of the others who are going to be executed. If B is to be pardoned, give me C s name. If C is to be pardoned, give me B s name. And if I m to be pardoned, flip a coin to decide whether to name B or C. 6. The warden tells A that B is to be executed. Prisoner A is pleased because he believes that his probability of surviving has gone up from 1/3 to 1/2, as it is now between him and C. Prisoner A secretly tells C the news, who is also pleased, because he reasons that A still has a chance of 1/3 to be the pardoned one, but his chance has gone up to 2/3. What is the correct answer? Explain. (Hint: Compare this problem to the Monty Hall problem.) 4

7. Explain how the previous problem is similar to the Monty Hall problem. Is it exactly the same, or are there differences? 5

You are given two indistinguishable envelopes, each containing a check, one contains twice as much as the other. You may pick one envelope and keep the money it contains. Having chosen an envelope at will, but before inspecting it, you are given the chance to switch envelopes. 8. Should you switch? What is the probability of getting the larger amount of money if you switch? What is the probability of getting the larger amount of money if you stay with your first choice? 9. Suppose now that you are allowed to choose an envelop, open it, and inspect the amount of money inside before making your choice. Design a (random) strategy that makes it more likely you will be able to get the larger sum of money. (Hint: Try introducing another source of randomness.) 6

Sleeping Beauty volunteers to undergo the following experiment and is told all of the following details: On Sunday she will be put to sleep. Once or twice, during the experiment, Beauty will be awakened, interviewed, and put back to sleep with an amnesia-inducing drug that makes her forget that awakening. A fair coin will be tossed to determine which experimental procedure to undertake: If the coin comes up heads, Beauty will be awakened and interviewed on Monday only. If the coin comes up tails, she will be awakened and interviewed on Monday and Tuesday. In either case, she will be awakened on Wednesday without interview and the experiment ends. Any time Sleeping Beauty is awakened and interviewed she will not be able to tell which day it is or whether she has been awakened before. 10. During the interview Beauty is asked: What is your credence now for the proposition that the coin landed heads? How might she answer? 7

11. People have made several strange arguments for this problem. The thirder position argues that the probability of heads is 1/3. Adam Elga argued for this position originally as follows: Suppose Sleeping Beauty is told and she comes to fully believe that the coin landed tails. Her credence that it is Monday should equal her credence that it is Tuesday since being in one situation would be subjectively indistinguishable from the other. Consider now that Sleeping Beauty is told upon awakening and comes to fully believe that it is Monday. Since the coin is fair, either outcome is equally likely. Thus, since there are three total outcomes and all are equally likely, the probability of each is one-third. David Lewis responded to Elga s paper with the position that Sleeping Beauty s credence that the coin landed heads should be 1/2. Sleeping Beauty receives no new non-self-locating information throughout the experiment because she is told the details of the experiment. Others have argued that this is not true because she does obtain new information. She knows that she is now in it, but does not know whether it is Monday or Tuesday. Discuss each of the arguments above in your group. Do you agree with any of these arguments? Why or why not? Choose one of the arguments above and make a case for why it should be false. 8

Two men are each given a necktie by their respective wives as a Christmas present. Over drinks they start arguing over who has the cheaper necktie. They agree to have a wager over it. They will consult their wives and find out which necktie is more expensive. The terms of the bet are that the man with the more expensive necktie has to give it to the other as the prize. The first man reasons as follows: winning and losing are equally likely. If I lose, then I lose the value of my necktie. But if I win, then I win more than the value of my necktie. Therefore, the wager is to my advantage. The second man can consider the wager in exactly the same way; thus, paradoxically, it seems both men have the advantage in the bet. This is obviously not possible (assuming both prefer the more expensive necktie). 12. How can this apparent paradox be resolved? In other words what is wrong with the mens reasoning? 9

13. In what ways is this problem similar to other problems on the worksheet? In what ways does it differ? 10