Weaknesses in arguments

Similar documents
2/21/2014. FOUR WAYS OF KNOWING (Justifiable True Belief) 1. Sensory input; 2. Authoritative knowledge; 3. Logic and reason; 4. Faith and intuition

How To Recognize and Avoid Them. Joseph M Conlon Technical Advisor, AMCA

Fallacies. Definition: The premises of an argument do support a particular conclusion but not the conclusion that the arguer actually draws.

Arguments. 1. using good premises (ones you have good reason to believe are both true and relevant to the issue at hand),

Fallacies. What this handout is about. Arguments. What are fallacies?

Fallacies in logic. Hasty Generalization. Post Hoc (Faulty cause) Slippery Slope

Fallacies. It is particularly easy to slip up and commit a fallacy when you have strong feelings about your. The Writing Center

Logical Fallacies. Continuing our foray into the world of Argument. Courtesy of:

Agree or Disagree. An ESL Lesson.

Ethics and Science. Obstacles to search for truth. Ethics: Basic Concepts 1

A R G U M E N T S I N A C T I O N

Bellwork Friday November 18th

How Thinking Goes Wrong Twenty-five Fallacies That Lead Us to Believe Weird Things

This fallacy gets its name from the Latin phrase "post hoc, ergo propter hoc," which translates as "after this, therefore because of this.

Argument. What is it? How do I make a good one?

Logical Fallacies. Continuing our foray into the world of Argument. Courtesy of:

Logic Chapter 3 Practice Test Matching: Match each of the following concepts to the most accurate definition.

3.2: FAULTY REASONING AND PROPAGANDA. Ms. Hargen

Some Templates for Beginners: Template Option 1 I am analyzing A in order to argue B. An important element of B is C. C is significant because.

MPS 17 The Structure of Persuasion Logos: reasoning, reasons, good reasons not necessarily about formal logic

Logic and Nosich s Elements

Fallacies Keep in Your Binder

Critical Thinking Session Three. Fallacies I: Problems to do with the Source

Varsity LD: It s All About Clash. 1:15 pm 2:30 pm TUESDAY, June 26

Practice Test Three Spring True or False True = A, False = B

LOGIC. Inductive Reasoning. Wednesday, April 20, 16

Can t we just be good enough to please God? Romans 3:10 25 A sermon by Peter Budd Sunday 21 st March 2010, St. Andrew s Cheadle Hulme

Reading Comprehension Fallacies in Reading

Full file at

LOGICAL FALLACIES. Common Mistakes in Weak Arguments. (these are bad don t use them ) AP English Language & Composition

Philosophy 12 Study Guide #4 Ch. 2, Sections IV.iii VI

CRITICAL THINKING. Formal v Informal Fallacies

FALLACIES. using good premises (ones you have good reason to believe are both true and relevant to the issue at hand),

Chapter 5: Ways of knowing Reason (p. 111)

A man lives on the twelfth floor of an apartment building. Every morning he takes the elevator down to the lobby and leaves the building.

Debate Vocabulary 203 terms by mdhamilton25

Handout 2 Argument Terminology

Answers to Practice Problems 7.3

Portfolio Project. Phil 251A Logic Fall Due: Friday, December 7

Critical Thinking 5.7 Validity in inductive, conductive, and abductive arguments

14.6 Speaking Ethically and Avoiding Fallacies L E A R N I N G O B JE C T I V E S

I. Subject-verb agreement (393-4), parallelism (402), and mixed construction (418-19).

Argument Writing. Whooohoo!! Argument instruction is necessary * Argument comprehension is required in school assignments, standardized testing, job

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 7: Logical Fallacies

Completed application forms must be returned by: Noon on Monday 24 July 2017

Common Logical Fallacies

2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 1

This document consists of 10 printed pages.

The Need for Law and Justice. Judgement the act of judging people and their actions

Summer Preparation Work

Key Skills for Computer Science Lecture 4: Argument

Today s Tasks. 1. Argument 2. Fallacies: a. Ad Hominem b. Straw Man c. Appeal to ignorance d. Begging the Question

Logical Fallacies. Define the following logical fallacies and provide an example for each.

The Cosmological Argument

The Argumentative Essay

Quick Write # 11. Create a narrative for the following image

Lemon Bay High School AP Language and Composition ENC 1102 Mr. Hertz

Take Home Exam #1. PHI 1700: Global Ethics Prof. Lauren R. Alpert

Introduction Paragraph 7 th /8 th grade expectation: 150+ words (includes the thesis)

APPENDIX A CRITICAL THINKING MISTAKES

This online lecture was prepared by Dr. Laura Umphrey in the School of Communication at Northern Arizona University

1 Chapter 6 (Part 2): Assessing Truth Claims

Academic argument does not mean conflict or competition; an argument is a set of reasons which support, or lead to, a conclusion.

Critical Thinking Assumptions

PHI 244. Environmental Ethics. Introduction. Argument Worksheet. Argument Worksheet. Welcome to PHI 244, Environmental Ethics. About Stephen.

Chapter 1. What is Philosophy? Thinking Philosophically About Life

Monday 27 June 2016 Morning

Logical Fallacies RHETORICAL APPEALS

7. Detect bias and fallacies in messages from mass media and other sources.

Lecture 4 Good and Bad Arguments Jim Pryor Some Good and Bad Forms of Arguments

The Field of Logical Reasoning: (& The back 40 of Bad Arguments)

Announcements. No class Monday!! And we have an awesome quiz #3 on Tuesday!!

ARGUMENTS. Arguments. arguments

Remember, remember the fifth of November, Gunpowder, Treason and Plot. By Charlotte Mountford

This handout follows the handout on Hume on causation. You should read that handout first.

FROM INQUIRY TO ACADEMIC WRITING CHAPTER 8 FROM ETHOS TO LOGOS: APPEALING TO YOUR READERS

Practice Test Three Fall True or False True = A, False = B

Argument Mapping. Table of Contents. By James Wallace Gray 2/13/2012

Suppressed premises in real life. Philosophy and Logic Section 4.3 & Some Exercises

TOK FALLACIES Group 1: Clark Godwin, Kaleigh Rudge, David Fitzgerald, Maren Dorne, Thanh Pham

CRITICAL THINKING. Critical thinking is "reasonably and reflectively deciding what to believe or do." (Ennis (1985)

Chapter 2: Reasoning about ethics

Aquinas Cosmological argument in everyday language

3 rd Can you define Corporal Punishment? 4 th Can you define Crime? Give 2 examples of a crime against the state

Questions for Critically Reading an Argument

Everything s an Argument Guided Study Notes, Chapters Chapter 16: What Counts in Evidence

GENERAL ADVICE ABOUT WJEC GCSE RS

GCSE Religious Studies B June 2014 Exemplars with Commentaries

Bell Ringer. find ALL 10 errors.

History. Revision guide

Introducing Our New Faculty

The Roman empire ended, the Mongol empire ended, the Persian empire ended, the British empire ended, all empires end, and none lasts forever.

Reviewfrom Last Class

If Everyone Does It, Then You Can Too Charlie Melman

Do you really know? Is Knowledge Possible? Skepticism and Fideism. Skepticism sounds like

Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me?

Positions 1 and 2 are rarely useful in academic discourse Issues, evidence, underpinning assumptions, context etc. make arguments complex and nuanced

The statistics used in this report have been compiled before the completion of any Post Results Services.

Justification: The Verdict of Salvation Romans 5:1 I. INTRODUCTION-

Conclusion. Critical Thinking

Transcription:

Weaknesses in arguments

Causal arguments post hoc Causal arguments will attempt to reach a conclusion by assuming that a strong cause is proof. Last year s summer was the hottest on record. Travel agents are reporting poor sales of foreign holidays this year. People are assuming that this year will be hot too and are going to holiday at home. Sometimes causes can be very persuasive. The increase in bull bars on jeeps and the increase in deaths of pedestrians in car accidents might be developed into a strong argument but it rests on an assumption.

Exploring Weakness All the great thinkers have one thing in common. They all have beards. Therefore their greatness must be attributable to this fact.

Exploring Weakness Necessary and Sufficient Conditions some relationships. X may have no association with Y may be coincidence (e.g. bearded greats!) X is a necessary condition of Y if X is not present Y cannot occur (e.g. you must be fairly fit to complete a marathon). X is a sufficient condition for Y if X is present Y MUST occur (e.g. the heir to the throne is the eldest son of the reigning monarch).

Exploring Weakness Necessary Conditions if a necessary condition for X is not present, then X will not occur (i.e. false) Sufficient Conditions if a sufficient condition for X is present then X must occur (i.e. true)

Exercises Work out if the relationship between X and Y is; necessary, sufficient, neither necessary nor sufficient, both necessary and sufficient

Exercise necessary, sufficient, neither necessary nor sufficient, both necessary and sufficient X smoking cigarettes Y developing lung cancer

Exercise necessary, sufficient, neither necessary nor sufficient, both necessary and sufficient X driving above the legal alcohol-blood limit Y being convicted of drunken driving

Exercise necessary, sufficient, neither necessary nor sufficient, both necessary and sufficient X having 3 A levels Y getting a place on a degree course at university

Exercise necessary, sufficient, neither necessary nor sufficient, both necessary and sufficient X Labour winning a large majority of seats in the House of Commons Y Labour forming a government

Exercise necessary, sufficient, neither necessary nor sufficient, both necessary and sufficient X having all six numbers in the National Lottery draw on a valid ticket Y being at least one of the winners of the jackpot

Causes and Consequences A study of Leyland town centre showed that when it was raining, a lot of people had umbrellas up. Therefore, people putting umbrellas up causes it to rain.

Causes and Consequences Cigarette advertising on TV was banned 30 years ago. Since then levels of smoking have fallen. If all smoking adverts were banned the level would fall even more. Is the conclusion justified by the evidence? What other explanations exist? What assumptions must be made to draw this conclusion?

X: Having all six number in a National Lottery draw on a valid ticket; Y: being at least one of the winners of a jackpot prize

Ad hominem attacking the arguer People who demonstrate against the live export of animals say that the trade involves great cruelty. This is clearly not true. These people are just intent on stopping a lawful trade, if necessary by acting illegally and sometimes violently. They can t have any regard for the law and their behaviour is just like that of a rabble of yobs. The argument is a criticism of the opposition, not the validity of their point of view.

Straw Men Anti-vivisectionists say that animals should never be used for any type of research. But we need to use animals in developing new and better pet foods: how can we know what foods cats or dogs like best if we re not allowed to use them in experiments on pet nutrition? It s obvious that the anti-vivisectionists case is fundamentally flawed. The argument is weakened and then attacked. The case does not tackle the full strength of the opposition s view.

Slippery Slopes Where an argument becomes more extreme and less logical as it advances We all use these!!

There are too many people begging on the streets, and some of them are making a pretty good living at it. If we don t stop people begging, we ll soon find that most of the unemployed will start doing it to supplement their benefit. Once the unemployed are doing it in such large numbers, people on low wages will wonder why they should carry on working when so many are just sitting about and getting more money than them. And, once the low paid give up work and begging becomes more and more a way of life for so many, young people won t bother about getting qualifications and thinking about their careers. They ll start begging rather than go to school. It won t be long before begging becomes the main option for a whole generation of young people. Our educational and economic systems will collapse, resulting in a catastrophic national decline. To avert this, we must make begging on our streets a criminal offence punishable by very harsh penalties.

Slippery slopes The argument goes too far and too fast so that the conclusion ends up a long way from the initial reasoning. As each point of the argument is developed the case becomes harder to justify. A single weak link in the chain of thinking and the whole argument falls.

Tu quoque you too! (also called two wrong don t make a right) When Charles Black was accused of driving at 105 mph, and with driving without due care and attention (he was using a mobile phone at the time), he told the court that thousands of people broke the speed limit every day and he was sure that many of them were doing things like adjusting the radio, lighting a cigarette or picking their nose at the time. So, he argued, the case against him should be dropped.

Circular Argument/ Begging the Question. Of all the natural healing methods, homeopathy is the one which is best able to provide a wide range of medicines for all types of disorders. These include digestive orders, muscular problems and allergies. Thus, compared to all other natural healing methods, homeopathy offers the most extensive set of options for any medical condition. What was the question?!